So my thread about fake moon landings was destroyed. Why?

Fuck off.

Here's a pity reply to your bad thread: kill yourself, you stupid faggot. Find a hostel, go there and take a fucking overdose of barbiturates.

Also, that's definitely not kubrick.

I hate it when you've made an effort and gave your time to give actual facts and then "suddenly" someone just erases it.

Are you sure? He seems pretty damn knowing and sensire.

mfw
also stop bumping your own thread nigger

Facts are pretty much shit at this timeline. And yes, I'll bump this.

Completely fucking retarded.

Denying the moon landing makes less sense than being a flat earther at this point.

You can literally see the tracks left by the lunar rovers.
space.com/12835-nasa-apollo-moon-landing-sites-photos-lro.html

refute this, (((OP)))

No, you can literally find "rocks from moon" eveywhere. You can send a mirror into moon without humans. Russia has never told about moon.

sage

ALL OF THE MOON PHOTOS HAVE MULTIPLE LIGHT SOURCES

I thought you're "it's impossible to go to the moon" statement applied to unmanned missions as well. If it is possible to send unmanned missions to put the retro reflectors there then it must also be possible to send people there. You are retarded either willfully or genuinely retarded.

No you can't, knuckledragger. The moon has a completely different geological composition. That's how we can tell where meteorites come from, because every body in the solar system is made of different concentrations of material. The rocks they brought back couldn't have come from anywhere but the moon.

You're either a low energy troll or deeply ignorant.

MOON IS FAKE
NOTHING IS REAL
WE ARE LIVING IN A DREAM!

Of course there were multiple light sources you fucking lunatic.

You've got the Sun, the Earth's reflected light, light reflecting off the lunar module, the spacesuits, and also the lunar surface itself.

NUKSE ARE A HOAX

No, only the fact that any human ever went to the surface of the moon is fake. And actually ever left our athmospehere.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt

This keeps us in our home planet Earth.

YOU WONT RUSE ME CIA! I KNOW THE MOON IS FAKE< YOU WILL NOT SILENCE ME!

Now you're just being a nigger. You can buy a $50 telescope and look at the ISS.

No, you kike wont ruse me. I know you busllshit us with you scifi and shit.

No, they have a single light source. The shadows go in different directions because the ground isn't flat.

Please don't act like a retard. Of course you an be on our orbit and we've been for decades.

clavius.org/index.html

Because it's actually fucking possible, and it's white man's greatest triumph over nature. Fuck off, nihilist schizo kike.

The stars will be ours, whether you take your meds or no.

Confirmed for low energy troll. You had it for awhile but now it's too obvious. Proper trolling requires subtlety, user.

And how many astronauts have died of cancer? It's not a fucking death ray it's a layer of radiation, a thin one at that. At escape velocity you would get roughly the same dosage as eating an entire bunch of bananas in half an hour.

Yeah, Sun is just across the angle. Thank you for the information!

Claimed by the same people who are the perpetrators or are invested in the scam.
Again claims about results of experiments by the same people. Also laser was reportedly bounced from the moon few years (or some) before the 'moon landing'.
You can? You're bullshitting.
The US and the Soviet Union, two sides of the same coin. Look up the technology transfers from the US to the Soviet Union going on while they were playing Cold War externally.

Because earth protects it with it's gravity.

What? I hate to engage because it only results in you bumbing this thread but fucking what?

What did he mean by this?

WHY DO YOU THINK SATELLITES AND ISS GOES AROUND THE EQUATOR AND NOT AROUND THE NAVELS? BECAUSE IF THEY WOULD THEY'D BE DESTRYED

I was gonna ask for better proof, considering your video is retarded. But now I see that you're also retarded. KYS

Fos the truth that there has never been people on moon and even in space.

I replied to the wrong fucking thing

Are you having a stroke?

Are you having a fucking brain aneurysm?

Nigga I think you just revolutionized quantum physics

No. I'm telling the truth. There has been no chance of people surviving the elements of space.

Wow, really instigates pondering….

You can believe what ever you want.

Based on what? The van allen belt? Surely people survive getting x-rays all the fucking time, why exactly would getting an even smaller dosage or radiation kill people and thus prevent space travel at all?

If I didn't know better I would guess you were a clever son of a bitch that was deliberately trying to prevent any legitimate questions regarding space travel.

...

In fact, the moons geochemical composition is identical to the composition of Earth billions of years ago. So the rocks gathered from the moon are indeed just a chunk of ancient earth, which is why it is studied, because billion year old rocks on earth have almost entirely been recycled by plate tectonics. Actually, what has taken place is that the rocks have been "cooked" so many times that they "cant go back the way they used to be." The way the used to be being the current state of the moon. The moon is also covered in basalt, the blood of the mid-ocean ridge. The moon is too small on its own to sustain its own unique rock cycle, thus we find our own rock cycle all over the moon.
The surface composition can be measured by anyone with access to hyperspectral image data of the moon (is free and online.) All objects will reflect light in a unique way. The quantification of this amount of light is called spectroscopy. Do you dispute spectroscopy also?

also,
one of the major parts of the moon that makes it unique is is iron fucking core. Note, that the moon is only moon in the solar system with an iron core. Guess who else has an iron core? All terrestrial planets, including Earth. Which is constant with the theory the moon spawned from earth.

got any proof better than repeatable tests on lunar specimens that have been examined empirically by thousands of independent scientist around the world, for decades? Yea tell me about the shadows bro.

Van Allen belt is actually the sole "wall" to escape our "space". And it is yet to be overcome.

What the fuck are you talking about?

About people taking off to space for real.

But it has been. Just go really fast and avoid the more dense areas.

Density is most in the earth of planets.

This is alphabet soup pseudo-argumentation D&C bullshit. It makes use of the fact that anti-establishment types are naturally extremely suspicious. Too bad Holla Forums is not composed of 100 and lower IQ retards.

ok, we've been troled fellers. Was kinda hoping you'd be a shill

Eat shit kike and take your D&C with you.

...

...

OP, I honestly can't tell if you are just shitposting, are currently having a stroke, a troll or genuinely retarded.

Being suspicious is good, being delusional is bad.

It's a troll.

WAKE UP. I SAW A LIGHT THROUGH THE MOON SO SUCK MY COCK AND SO HAS THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY MULTIPLE TIMES SO GO SUCK THEIR DICK TOO.

PEONS. TV IS YOUR GOD. I COULD TELL YOU WHATEVER STUPID GOYIM. HAHAHAHAHA. YOU WILL NEVER, EVER LISTEN TO YOURSELF. HAHAHAHA

but seriously though. i know the world is flat and that we never went to the moon and you are really the retards here. all you do is parrot the mainstream like the good little goy you are and wont even look at a subject that youve been conditioned to think is ridiculous since your birth you dumb dupe.

If you dont know that the moonlanding was fake then ur a little baby. Stop coming here. We dont need you normies. Pol started out as crazy people not aligning with mainstream views and should continue like it BECAUSE IT IS POLITICALLY INCORRECT NOT YOUR FUCKING NATSOC/TRUMP BOARD YOU DUMB ANTIINTELLECTUAL CUNTMUFFIN.

Now then. Enjoy this video. Reparte!

media.8ch.net/file_store/96d4150ea13a3c7fadf9fc07ce7226f072b1ac71d46713776f39bcfcc4e813f4.webm

No one gives a shit what you think. Stop hurting Wojak. He's not hillary and never was. Now go suck trump cocks you homo.

Your thread was removed because murdering a perfectly good thread for this bullshit is a capital felony.

You have to go back.

I agree with OP: fake moon landings are actually impossible.

because it happened you moron

Shut your whore mouth. I was one of the few anons meming feminism hate on the 4chan pol in the early days of the counter culture movement. If it hadnt been for the likes of me antifeminism would never have become mainstream. Now we are trying to awaken you normies to an even bigger lie and just like last time you stand on your backbones and act like little toddlers who have been taken away their toy. Respect your betters hound.

Kill yourself.

...

There's photos of sets in a warehouse. A fucking giant moon and a track in front that a camera would go around. There's cranes holding up landers and all sorts of shit. Just damning as fuck but Americucks hold that bullshit dear.

sage

Kill your self you autistic same fagging spammer. Go spam on cuckchan with your cuckchan memes.

HURR DURR. THAT THE MOONLANDINGS WERE FAKE HAS BEEN DISPROVEN ON KIKEPEDIA. IT IS JUST A COINCIDENCE THAT THEY ARE ALL MASONS. HURR. ALL THE 400 ARGUMENTS AND 200 CIRCUMSTANTIAL ONES ARE JUST BS. HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

MASONRY DOESNT EXIST, THE RUSSIANS WOULD HAVE EXPOSED IT HURRRRRRR

sage

Lunar landing faking was a theory chiefly spread by soviets in order to discredit US capabilities and lessen the damage to the Socialist Republics. Do you side with the pinkos OP?

8ch.net/pol/res/8917755.html#8941406

HURRRRR SINEAD. EBIL RUSSIANS!

white people landed on the moon.

alright OP I'll bite, just exactly why do you say it's impossibru?
Give me facts here OP not just muh feelings

Thanks for outing yourself. Seriously; I could never have done it as well as you. You’ve PROVEN it. Global report for off-site raid.

He’ll respond with “HURR VAN ALLEN BELTS HURR”. Sage the thread and report it.

The best indicator of a jew is that he likes to report everyone like a little jew.

sage

The entire "moon landing never happened" nonsense was manufactured as a controlled op to astroturf the label "conspiracy theory" which could then be applied to real conspiracies to discredit them.

LOOK AT ME! IM SO HAPPY I WAS ON THE MOON

You niggers need to wisen the fuck up because OBVIOUSLY the moon landings didn't happen.

First of all, think about what you thought before you learned of the holohoax. You had learned about it in school, you've seen the movies, etc… But then start tugging at some logical threads and lo and behold, the holocaust story falls apart.

Well it's the same fucking thing with the moon landing. If the moon landings happened, then we would expect there would be a scientific record and falsifiable data. Instead, we're left with anomaly after anomaly.

Nothing suspicious there. No reason to keep the mathematical proof of mankind's greatest achievement.

The astronauts used a regular Hasselblad camera. No lead shielding. No special film. There's plenty of pictures with the sun shining right down on the camera - no atmosphere or magnetosphere in the way - but not a single blemish on the film.

The spacesuit was made of nylon, dacron and other mesh polymers. Useless against cosmic rays, X-rays and similar ionizing radiation. They'd be dead if a solar flare hit 'em.

Aside from the Van Allen belts, there's still all the deadly, deadly radiation outside Earth's magnetosphere. Aluminum isn't good enough for all deadly ionizing radiation.

Each astronaut allegedly wore a radiometer on the moon to make sure they didn't get radiation poisoning. When they got back on Earth, the radiometers were reported to be within calculated range. Which is odd, as 30 years later scientists discover the moon is 20-40% more radioactive than previously thought. Why wasn't this reflected in the radiometer?

An astronaut + spacesuit weighs about 350lbs. We've all seen the footage of an astronaut jumping and barely making it two feet. A fat guy on Earth can jump two feet. We'd expect about 5-6 feet.

There's no atmosphere and lower gravity. This means there is less resistance when moving on the moon, not more. (If you speed up the footage by about 50% the astronauts will appear to move normally.)

The Soviet Union was kicking ass at the space race, until the US unexpectedly beat them by (allegedly) going to the moon. But in the intervening 40+ years, Russia has never gone to the moon. We're s'posed to believe that Russia just gave up?

Technological progress goes like this: do a thing, do a thing again, get better at the thing, doing the thing becomes everyday. Except when it comes to the (alleged) greatest feat of engineering of all time. We were able to do this 40 years ago, but haven't been able to do it since.

First of all, look REAL hard at that spaceship. Do you think that could withstand the vacuum of space? That it's airtight?
Next, look how small the Earth is. This picture is OBVIOUSLY fake.

No. The lunar reflectors don't prove we went. We could bounce lasers off the moon before 1969. (See Natl. Geo. Dec 1966)

No. The Soviets wouldn't have talked. It's the height of the cold war. If Russia starts claiming that the US didn't go to the moon, the US would just say that's cold war propaganda, the Ruskies are jealous, etc… Plus, doing it that way, the Russians don't get anything in return. Much better from a govt standpoint to hold your secret for blackmail.

No. Just because 10,000 people worked on it (or whatever) doesn't mean that someone would've talked by now. Do you work in an office? What's everyone on a different floor up to? Or the guy in the cubicle next to you, even? It's super easy to keep things comparmentalized. Tell someone they're building a moon rocket by pressing this button all day, they'll believe you.

No. Just because astronomers (allegedly) tracked the spaceship there doesn't mean they went. It's not like the observatories were in radio communiction. They were bascially pinging the (alleged) spaceship. This can be replicated by unmanned satellite.

No. Just because he dropped a hammer and feather at the same time doesn't prove they went. It can be faked using rubber materials.

There's more. I could go on and on and on.

sage

I've found the following graphic explains it quite nicely.

Lurk more faggot

aulis.com/saturn_v.htm - Russian PhD disputes the Saturn V power.

aulis.com/apollo17_ascent.htm - PhD in control systems shows that the Apollo 17 liftoff was on rails.

aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm - PhD candidate who shows using the parallax effect that the moon photos use a backdrop.

youtu.be/NlXG0REiVzE - NASA engineer who states that they haven't solved the radiation shielding problem to pass through the Van Allen belts.

flickr.com/people/pixeltricks?rb=1 - This guy who admitted to faking the moon landing photos (see also apollofake.atspace.co.uk)

Yep, please sage.

AND ME! I HAVE PROBLEMS STRINGING COHERENT SENTENCES TOGETHER BUT I WAS TOTALLY ON MARS

Suck my balls cuck

Russian PhDs amounted to nothing in comparison to German scientists. Why else would they have had to kidnap so many in '45.

...

These are modern scientists, dipshit.

he's a shill

Moon landing conspiracy is a code for anti-white

Now you guys are just exposing yourself

Maybe you'd like to debate the substance of my argument rather than calling me a shill.

The moon landing conspiracy was probably created by the C.I.A. to discredit real conspiracy theories like mil industry complex, jews, 9/11, et. al. Anyone who believes that we never landed on the moon is either stupid or getting paid by the (((CIA))), in both cases they should be banned.

I have crawled this thread with an open mind, the supposed evidence is nonsensical. Theres no building 7 or jew demographics to prove without a doubt it is true like 9/11 theories or holocaust denial. It is just another kike lie to divide the bad goyim.

you really don't understand the different types of radiation do you
alpha
beta
gamma
cosmic rays
and how dosage is determined by strength of the radiation and exposure time.
and gravity and inertia seem to be outside your grasp
and materials science seems to be a stretch as well… hmmm

OP is def a pop-sci retard with delusions of knowledge

...

do you deny that orbital space travel occurs?
Y > good luck in life
N > when was the first time man spacewalked?
when was the first time man left Earths magnetosphere?

No explanation for no radiation damage on the photos then?

No explanation for the incorrect radiometer readings?

Anyone who still believes in the moon landing and the mars landing after having seen the videos posted need to leave asap because you can't into thinking whatsoever. And anyone who gets called out 400 time ++ for whatever reason you need to be deeply sceptical of. Unless you are not an antisemite because it seems that when one calls out nasa for their bs, there's always an (((explanation))) but when you call out the jew of course it's true. See the problem here?

We went to the moon in a tweakers shelter.

Gemini program. early 60's

Apollo 8. Which leads me to another point. The ludicrous engineering standards.

For orbital tests, NASA used dogs, monkeys, etc.. to test the viability of mammalian cells in orbit. But for outside Earth's magnetosphere, the first test subjects were humans. That's outrageous!

So you're all telling me that you can easily believe the holohoax, and you'll happily look into every tedious detail about crematoria. But when it comes to the moon landing you're all ready to just believe whatever NASA (military intelligence) tells you?

Kek wept. Develop some fucking skepticism.

'Merican pride.

What is there to be gained or lost in posting lunar landing theories on this board of peace other than forum sliding?

It's certainly politically incorrect to believe in the fake moon landing, isn't it nigger?

It has to do with everything. Understanding NASA is full of crap is super important especially if that guy to the right increases their funding.

do you understand film speeds? do you know how much radiation and of what types it takes to fog films of different types?
The one thing that is perfectly clear is that you really have no clue as to how much radiation is in space other that a whole lot
well… two things pop into mind you mentioned a supposed slight increase of 20% or so… if the levels were 10 times or 100 times greater than expected then I'd say your argument had merit but since it's only a quarter or a fifth increase and not even a doubling…
plus do you realize the detection parameters on a film badge dosimeter?

I think haste led to the human extramagnetospheric travel. The astronauts all were gung ho about some aspects of space travel, especially at that point in the race. But you do accept that those to thing occurred, I take it? Then radiation mitigation becomes plausible. The next big step is landing and take off in a small vessel with no atmospheric pressure. What are your arguments against thrust in a zero pressure environment?

If I can hold 350psi inside a 0.2mm thick plastic pop bottle why do you think 1.5mm of aluminum can't hold 5psi?

...

ANOTHER TRUSTWORTHY INTERVIEW FROM A MAN THAT CLEARLY WAS IN SPACE. (that is sarcasm you niggers)

At this point it's being left up for Holla Forums to bat around like a cat with dead mouse.

So, this means Soviet Union won space race?

sage

These moon hoax fags always remind me of the great usenet spam of yesteryear.

this topic interests me but not 3 and a half hours worth. condense the main points into a couple paragraphs and I'll hear you out.

There are a LOT more square inches in a spacecraft vessel than a soda bottle.

"Space" is just a lie my little gurl. why do you think stars disappear when youre flying high up in an airliner? Why do you think crepuscular rays are (((explained))) in bs way that doesnt make sense unless youre retarded, what do you think of media.8ch.net/file_store/96d4150ea13a3c7fadf9fc07ce7226f072b1ac71d46713776f39bcfcc4e813f4.webm, what do you think about objects being seen through the moon? Does that sound like a solid object to you??

But you're totally sure that the astronauts could withstand whatever is out there. Including solar flares. I'm not a physicist, but this guy is: ocii.com/~dpwozney/apollo5.htm - Double check his math, would you?

No. Man has never travelled outside Earth's magnetosphere.

You must be new. Leave.

That video, like the moon landing, is fake.

Quit being such a fag and at least post something credible.

ooh. the faggot musters up some cojones. well, you failed. you leave.

Multiple light sources create multiple shadows

who gives a shit you schizo fucking sperg

No they dont. That depends on the light.

Okay, faggot, I'll bite. Why I think that we landed on the moon:
1) At the time, it would have been more expensive to fake it. That was the state of Hollywood special effects in those days.
2) The Russians didn't contest it. No, the US and SU weren't a cartel trying to control people.
3) The sheer number of people who would have to be lying: no conspiracy is that cohesive.
4) The US marched soldiers into mushroom clouds, and many of them are still alive today to talk about it: radiation isn't as bad as you would like to believe.

You win the most normie award - congratulations. Now go back to The_Donald or whatever the sub is called.

I'm pretty damn sure a direct hit from a CME would fry the ISS or any astronut. But even regular solar flares are deadly but there weren't any. And so far the ISS has been lucky even though it's inside the Van Allen belts it's still very vulernable and will most likely die quickly if we get another Carrington Event
You've conflated my counter points OP.

The only reason you'd be trying to make a shitty half-assed shill thread about the moon landing being fake, when time and time again you morons have been disproved makes me think the kikes are planning something and thus feel the need to start bringing you morons here ten fold.

I understand that the concept of landing on the moon, and making it back, and all the science involved is very complex, to the point it sounds like magic to someone of your stature, cause let's be honest here OP, you're not just underage based on you going

Getting all bent out of shape like a fucking slack-jawed, mouth breathing twink who actually believes a sage is so damned destructive, to the point you literally made it obvious you view it as a downvote, thus are clearly not from around these parts.

Plus the whole bumping your own thread like a typical mouth-breather, not posting any webms, just embedding cluck-tier goober videos, to talking like a literal third world child with phrases that make no fucking sense, "I guess the fake life is more important than the truth so you must suppress it." Where you learned English, I sincerely want to know so I can lynch them alongside your obvious ethnically non-European family cause we don't need idiotic mouth-breathing nigger-nosed, flat footed shitskins like you running amok botching the English language and thus making a horrible smudge upon society alongside all other shitskins who think they're apart of this 'society' that none of you contribute to, due to the fact you have no society of your own, just merely leeching off European society, the SOLE society contrary to shitskins misusing the phrase 'society' to refer to whatever shithole they live in.

The fact you have yet to provide any proof of the moon landing being fake, outside of muttering to yourself, "There's TONZ of EBIVDENCIE HOMBRE!!!!", you're not fucking fooling anyone with you bumping your own thread which proves your doing something underhanded.

What is your ethnicity?

Merican pride, it's important for some people to believe that America went to the moon and no one else touched it.
I understand, it's fucking awesome, but I'd rather know the truth

They remind me of CTR.

1) Do you even hear yourself??? More expensive to fake it??? You are not redpilled. You are still in eceleb lala land. I guess kubricks film 2001 a space oddessey produced before the apollo missions were more expensive too, huh.
2) masonry is an old power bloq that is international in scope. all of the astronauts are masons. peope dont know enough about masonry here. it is the most powerful organisation in the world.
3)everything is military structure at nasa. everything is compartmentalised. need to know basis. only a couple on the top puts everything together. only a couple need to know. you could go as far as sending fake data to the terminals and the viewers would be none the wiser… not that this is neccessary because hiring police at nasa is very mason friendly.

Really!? You're retarded. That's SG Collins' asinine argument. No, it would not have been harder to fake it in a studio that travel 240,000km through the harshest environment ever known to man (but which somehow doesn't short out the computer) and then land using a rocket powered craft, then take off again, meet up with the command module going 2400m/s using less computing power than a pocket calculator and travel another 240,000 km and survive the heat of reentry in a 1960's craft (which is still a problem today though).

SG Collins imposes artificial limitations on the film that could've been used, then repeats these as fact as to why the moon landings weren't possible.

What light source doesn't create a shadow?

Stop pretending to be stupid. People can read you know.