(((Leftists who dont oppose this)))

Isreal is a racist apartheid state with racial Jewish only settlements in the west bank. Its border walls wrap around the racial settlements in an obvious land grab.
This is why rockets are falling on their heads and why the rest of the west suffers terrorism for supporting Israel.

Leftist in the US are the only ones who do not oppose this imperialism. Why is this so?

If you support what isreal is doing to the Palestinians you are not a leftist. End of story.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=iPVKSiTmU8s
chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/591965/jewish/Is-Chabad-Ashkenazic-or-Sephardic.htm
ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4640044,00.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>>>Holla Forums

Anti-semites belong to ovens.

This is a state that actively bulldozes homes of indigenous people and replaces them with racial settlements

Saying you cant hate isreal for being anti semetic is like saying you can hate Nazis because its deeply triggering and problematic
Go catch a rocket

This is B████ ██████ freaking out on a liberal girl for questioning the racist apartheid state of Isreal and its settlements
youtube.com/watch?v=iPVKSiTmU8s

Why is the left so backwards in the US?

A mandatory reading by Carter

Because Leftism in America is basically infected with idpol and America sucks the Israel's dick hard. Despite the Palestinians who were forced out of their homes are the racists ones.

Why should you care which (­(­("leftists")­)­) do or do not oppose a particular state? Won't also a rightist, particularly an "alternating" one, advocate for walls around the acquisition of national identity, ethico-religious categories, capital, resources, labour power, and whose functional process involves a lawful expulsion from the land towards alien dwellers? If so, then who is the left's biggest enemey? Itself, or its counter?

I like knocking people off the moral horses. Its how i get my kicks.
Those that work counter to its general global consensus. American liberals do not compare to their European counterparts.
Europeans die protesting them. I have never met an American in person who even knows about the topic. It is NEVER on the media either.

These are small though. They are easily set aside as fringe group by the mainstream

I've never supported Israel in the form of an aggressive apartheid state in the first place.

I know some other faggots are quick to shit on anyone who mentions jews, probably their paranoia complex from Holla Forums ("LOOK AT ME VIRTUAL SIGNALING! I LOVE JEWISH PEOPLE! LOOK AT HOW ACCEPTING I AM! ANYTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT JEWS MAKES YOU A NAZI!") but I'm willing to give you a chance and suspend you have any affiliation with Holla Forums (for the time being).

I am against the state of Israel, but I am not against jewish people, ethnic or religious otherwise.

Being anti-zionist is being against jewish nationalism, as nationalism is inherently idpol, a spook, and all around cancer. Zionism is jewish nationalism. Being anti-zionist is not the same as being anti-semitic.

🍀🍀🍀me giving a rat's ass about faggot polyp threads and maymays🍀🍀🍀

Didn't know that was filtered, lol nice.

...

>It's only okay when 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀we🍀🍀🍀()@()@*(#I_@()[email protected]/* */ do it ecks deeeeeee

...

Zionism is absolutely a racialist ideology.

You know what other ideology is inherently racialist in practice?: anti-Zionism.

Every Palestinian I know equates "Zionism" with "Ashkenazi" and sees their colonization as a result of European Jewish ideology. They have no issue with Mizrachi Jews from Morocco, Iraq, or Yemen because they assume 1. those Jews were duped into coming to Israel/Palestine and never wanted to leave Morroco/Iraq/Yemen in the first place, and 2. they can be re-Arabized after a one democratic state is established.

Now, if the Palestinians are smart (which they most certainly are) the first thing they're going to demand after a ODS and a full Right of Return for refugees is a land reform; there's zero use in the former two if all the people who benefited from apartheid would still be benefiting from it. And you can bet they'll demand that land reform solely on a racial basis with farms, kibbutzim, and houses/flats owned by Ashkenazim being handed over to Palestinians. In principle I have no issue with land reform given that I'm a communist, but to think this isn't going to be a giant clusterfuck in-practice is laughable.

nothing wrong with driving out ashkenazis. they are invaders who have nothing to do with the original jews.

KULAK GO

So how else do you propose a decolonization plan?

Liberals pls go.

I would expect an anarchist, of all people, to recognize that states, whether white, black, or brown-dominated, are tyrannical by their very nature. The user in question was specifically referring to the potential outcome of a one-state of Palestine whereby the Palestinians get a Mugabe-style leader.

The American right wing is unusual for its view of Jews. They constantly whine about liberals playing the race card but will call you an antisemite if you so much as imply Israel isn't perfect and shouldn't colonize Palestine.

Many of the far right in the US also consider Jews to be part of the white master race and the left entirely to be against them. Yes, I am serious. They frequently argue about it too.

What did you expect? The Hamas snackbars are the only group pretending to care about Palestinians. It's no different from how Islamic fundamentalists came to power in nations the US imperialized.

Even without Hamas, the Palestinians will no doubt base their gameplan on sheer biological essentialism (not much different from Zionism really); the fact that so many of them like to invoke the now-debunked "Khazar hypothesis" is proof of this.

What makes this scenario even more of a mess is the fact that anywhere between 25-35% of marriages in Israel are mixed Ashkenazi-Mizrachi. Pretty soon Jewish ethnic distinctions in Israel will start drying up with a whole generation of mixed-ethnic Jewish children. One of my friends from university was Israeli who had a Moroccan father and Romanian mother; when I asked her which side she identifies with more she said "both". So, if you're a Palestinian nationalist or Ba'athist and are looking for a way to cleanse out the eevul Ashkenazi white devils from Falasteen, what becomes of the mixed-breeds?

Is this a rhetorical question?

Hi Holla Forums!

I don't really know which "leftists" you are referring to, but the leftists in my country surely don't support Israel, but the definitive liberation of Palestine and such instead.

How about we deport all Muslims from the west and deport all whites from the middle east then everyone will be happy and stop killing each other.

See:

This is actually an interesting post. Perhaps the solution is to encourage that dissolution of ethnic distinctions.

Either that or invade the region with overwhelming non-lethal force and turn it into a technocratic utopia ruled by a neutral AI.

Again, Ashkenazi vs. Mizrachi is on its way out given the high rates of marriage and breeding between the two groups. There are probably more Israeli youth today who are mixed European and Arab Jew than there are youth who are pure-blooded Ashkenazi or Mizrachi.

Even Jewish traditions are becoming mixed.
chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/591965/jewish/Is-Chabad-Ashkenazic-or-Sephardic.htm

Sauce of claim of interbreeding between Jews?

I recall reading that anywhere between a fourth to a third of Israeli marriages are mixed but I don't remember from where.

Why?

ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4640044,00.html

Isreal problem cant exist under global communism

The point is, most of the bigger demands from hardcore Palestinian nationalists aren't feasible. They essentially envision Mizrachi Jews, who have been the victims of Ashkenazi racism for decades, to give up on the Zionist project and take up pan-Arabism and anti-Zionism. The problem is, very few Mizrachim in Israel with the exception of hipster leftists think like this.

There's also the issue of land ownership. For a communist regime, this is no big deal since the abolition of private property is our top priority. However, the Palestinian leadership isn't close to communist or socialist-leaning, so even if they were to carry out a land reform it would be entirely on a racial - not class - basis, which could very well turn into lands owned by Jewish elites merely transferring over to Palestinian elites (as was the case with Zimbabwe).

Also, Jews aren't going to just give up their holy cities (Jerusalem, Safed) willy-nilly. If a Palestinian president were to demand the eviction of large numbers of Ashkenazi Jews from those cities there is zero question in my mind that they'd fight back.

TL;DR - one-democratic state without communism = giant mess

They complain that slavery happened 400 years ago, yet urge you to never forget the Holocaust.

This is true. Anglophiles believe that the Royal Family is a Jewish bloodline.


No leftist has a soapbox until he sells out. Haven't you noticed?

At this point I would be more than OK with the West leaving Israel entirely to their own devices if it weren't for the fact that they have nukes.

This warrants some OC.

Nice assumption. You fag.