Glorious get for full communism
Revolutionary get
Other urls found in this thread:
marxists.org
archive.is
twitter.com
...
/Thread
Delete this board.
meh Tryhard
wew
stop oppressing us
wew
...
Nice get comrade.
If he didn't do it, /sp/ would have done it
PURGE THIS
So /sp/ actually did do it.
Typical.
And you're stealing GETs, just like real capitalists.
Can't wait.
Are you /sp/ or Holla Forums?
t. everything stolen ever
95% of us are white,male and heterosexual.
Wew how will i ever recover
We only have loyalty towards our socio-economic class.
...
We don`t feel love or hatred towards any ethnicity or religion. Only towards class.
This never happened, these are clearly edits.
lol
Can't even handle someone getting digits.
Same goes for you, snownigger
:^)
everyday i wonder to myself
who made that image
/leftyu/
OH NO CORRUPT MODS DESTORY CORRUPT MODS #LEFTYPOLGATE
Nice pixels famo
Delet this racist post.
kek
finally the purge gets real
good job
You have to leave.
WE NKVD NOW
This, actually. It'd be nice if this was a vison of the future.
B-but I don't want NKVD.. I only want Checka to Check…
First se size the memes of production
B████ ██████ is the only true revolutionary in united states. Political revolution now! Feel the bern!
I was referring to board moderation, mr soon to be gulaged.
kek don't delete this mods
Comrade, were you just talking to that counter-revolutionary?
B████ ██████
despite me having told you guys from the beginning how much of a faggot he is
is still a socialist
even if a fucking retarded one, like anarchists to give another example
wanting is counter-revolutionary
...
9/10 people that quote 1984 have not read 1984
MODS = GODS ESTEEMED COMRADES
U wot m8
Too bad for you I have read it.
Moldy cardboard box sex scene best part
>>>/suicide/
MODS MODS MODS
Alright other Stalinists. I dare you to defend this guy.
Is this why you're a state capitalist?
Socdems were alright until in 60-70`s their political line moved away form building socialism&Marxism to upholding the status quo.
yet again
no arguments
no definitions
just butthurt and denial
and again you will end up accusing me of being in favor of social democracy
because that's the level of retarded faggots you are
Holla Forumsack levels of inability to discuss
Social democracy sucks.
He was responding to a poster saying that Bern man wasn't a socialist.
their definition of socialism has developed to shit
see SYRIZA, S█████, Corbyn etc.
i do not agree with them
going on whining about "not socialism not socialism" instead of talking about substance is the faggotry that is driving Holla Forums into shit
you'd probably have to purge off the anarchist shits first to have any chance of having a discussion going that isn't just shitposting and whining
...
How the fuck is it socialist?
give the definition of socialism, we then continue.
What is Stalin's face concealing?
Holy shit, what's your definition of it?
i'm not asking for your personal one or mine
just say it so i don't write it and you start nitpicking over it to distract from the point
i wont have this shit
so go along and answer or you're a disingenuous little shit who's not interested in discussion
...
type it out, no image and graph posting here, it's really not that hard
Collective ownership of the means of production, then
acknowledged, preparing further answer
IDENTIFYING SOCIALISM
Do the workers own the means of production?
Yes -> Socialism
No -> Not socialism
Do you still think it's socialism?
No -> Not socialism
Yes -> Kill yourself
Workers =/= collective
Trying to be as un vague as possible.
bump
a spee get
this is the argument as been put forward by social democrats, not by me
this does not reflect my views on social democracy and their fraudulent "socialism"
acknowledge this in replies or i wont take those serious and worth of any further attention
how do they want to organize the (collective) workers ownership over the means of production?
social democrats claim that their (bourgeois) socialism will guarantee collective control over the MoP through parliamentarism and political rights for workers.
there are very varying degrees on how far socdems/demsocs claim they would go with this. workplace democracy and shit like that.
their "class war" only goes as far as to "defend workers rights" and stay on an "even playing field". all of this is fraud and lie, yet it's still the socialist undertone of this faggotry.
which i do not argue and is not the point to determine if they are socialist or not.
anarchism leads inevitably to the restauration of capitalism as well, yet they're still socialists and i'd still gulag them alongside socdems/demsocs for reeducative purposes.
this often goes hand in hand with the ridiculous claims that reformism will eventually turn society into a classless society when division of labour becomes obsolete.
it's mixed economy faggotry that does not work, the difference with "worker control through market socialism" is marginal as the market does not allow any control, but rather controls the workers and dictates the economy.
if you go around whine "socdems are not socialists" it's essencially shitposting "anarchists/market socialists/X is not socialism".
difference to "natsocs" as this will be brought up:
those claim socialism to be nothing but an ethnic community, economically they do not seek any workers control/ownership/participation which has obviously jack shit to do with the given basic definition, therefore a false equivalence.
fug
forgot link
archive.is
kek
i lik criket
me 2 budy
...
NICE
What was the picture and how did reddit end up capturing the get?
Because people didn't care about gets.
You're asking too many questions comrade
...
the main point of the book was that the soviet union betrayed socialism for power and that marx would have hated it
Look, I can manipulate quotes too.
Wow what a cunt you seem.
Social Democracy is Marxist Leninism with a human face so this doesnt suprise me at all.
tbh fam it is mostly due to the fact that I was socdem before becoming a Marxist
wade does not approve of this.