I just watched Hidden Niggers. Ask me anything

It's based on the "untold true story", which remains untold because this movie is bullshit.

Besides the three black women, all of the main characters are fabricated. All of the dramatic events are fabricated.

I'm 95% certain there is an homage to Saul Alinsky. The first person to really be nice to any of the black ladies is an old jewish man they call "Salinsky" or "Zalinsky". The fabricated character's official name in the script is Karl Zalienski. He serves as a sort of a wise grandfatherly figure in the background of the plot.

The movie starts off with "Based on a true story". It ends the movie with historical pictures of the black ladies, but in black & white so you can't discern the actual skin tone. It really leaves the impression that the movie is an accurate depiction of historical events.

In the movie, the only reason astronaut John Glenn is able to make it back to Earth alive is because of the main black lady's calculations and expertise. The only way NASA can figure out how to use their new IBM mainframe is because another black lady figures it out after visiting the library. She teaches a team of white IBM engineers how their own cutting-edge new mainframe computer works. Throughout the film, a white engineer (a fabricated character) tries to steal credit for the black lady's calculations and is jealous of her brilliancy. Pretty much all the white people are hateful and racist for most of the film, except for the head NASA guy (also a fabricated character). They 'redeem' all the white people in the end by having them all learn to respect the black ladies because of how brilliant they are.

When the film ended, all the white people in the theater seemed compelled to assert how good of a movie it was, but I could tell in the back of their minds they knew something wasn't right. All of the black people were giddy as fuck and seemed a little cocky afterward. There was a black couple sitting behind me – the man sounded like an alcoholic with a 3rd grade education. Afterward, the upperclass older white couple sitting near them felt the need to tell the black folks how good of a movie it was, and dare I say they sounded slightly obsequious in doing so.

Here are the historical black ladies:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine_Johnson
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Jackson_(engineer)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Vaughan

The movie:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden_Figures

Interesting article:
vdare.com/articles/why-not-a-movie-about-jack-crenshaw-the-white-man-who-actually-did-what-hidden-figures-credits-to-black-women?content=treat with reverence.

This movie needs to be exposed far and wide. It instills guilt complexes in whites, instills victim complexes in blacks (and to a lesser degree, women), and it gives a false sense of pride to blacks for having been responsible for the success of the 1960s space program. It's an attempt rewrite history and reassign credit for an accomplishment. It is a disgrace. Barron, I hope you're reading this.

Other urls found in this thread:

ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/trs/_techrep/CR188427.pdf
nbcnews.com/id/34470642/ns/technology_and_science-space/t/moon-poses-radiation-risk-future-travelers/#.WIVa3VjQeUk
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constellation_program)
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

What the fuck are they even paying you for anymore? I miss when shills were good.

sage

Not a shill. I was going to make an autistic shitpost, but the words flowed from the heart as I got all of that off of my chest.

Unsaged

I heard there were no niggers on the moon when we got there?

Is that why we haven't bombed the moon?

Why do they call them moon crickets?

I was promised "death camps" by Takei. I thought the camps would be here by now. Is this the beginning of the end for "death camps"?

Did they have a scene where Wernher Von Braun sees these worthless niggers shuffling around an office, realizes they're not janitors and then in a furious rage, complete with death camp flashbacks, drives them out of the building with a whip?

A good example of "He who controls the past controls the future". It's like how they rewrite Ada Lovelace as the first computer programmer, whereas contemporary accounts detail how she was little more than a copy-writer for Charles Babbage, who did all the hard thinking for her.

On the other hand, do people still watch what Hollywood shits out? I haven't been to a cinema in years, and I seem to remember reading there are a lot more flops than successes because they are losing to the "new" media.

Is the earth flat in the movie?

Why did you waste time and or money on this?

Hearty kek

I was invited to go with a group of normies. I decided to go to stay current on the latest propaganda and as an opportunity to possibly redpill some folks.

he took his broad to go see a movie.

they had a scene where one of the girls stole a book so she could take a class
there was also a scene where another crime was committed by one of the girls, not the same one, but i forgot by now what it was
i didnt pay for the ticket

They actually did have a scene where they begrudgingly promote the black lady despite their racism (because they desperately need her genius level skillz). As soon as she walks into the new office, someone hands her a trash can because they think she's the janitor.

How'd you get in? Also, was it busy?

oh, and lest you forget OP
at least two of those women were at least half-white
and even someone who worked on making the movie claimed that the movie was embellished or something like that; i wont tell you how I know that though

it wasn't busy since i only saw it last week or so
someone else bought the ticket for me

Is this real?

Nice. It's fucking busy at my theater, it brings in at least a hundred each set. I work at a movie theater.

earth is flat you retarded globecuck and nasa is full of kike loving mason homosexuals

Exactly.

The theater was actually packed. This propaganda is getting slick. Hordes of people are walking away from this thinking it's a historical telling of events.

(((Coincidentally))) NASA just happened to recently rename a building after this lady.

popsci.com/today-nasa-renames-building-after-human-computer-katherine-johnson

...

...

Wi wuz da reel astronats n shieet. Yu wait bois be jelos of hao smat wi iz!

It was a recon mission. I went behind enemy lines so you don't have to.

Yup. And of course they showed the preview for the new WE WUZ KANGZ & WHITE GIRLS WANNA FUCK US movie.

We all know exactly what was in this movie without even watching a 30 second trailer. Hollywood is a gigantic, kike run behemoth that produces anti-White, anti-Western propaganda 24/7. We've been watching them churn out piles of shit like this for decades.

AMA is fucking cancer lad.

Hang in there, OP. Board's being shilled to Hell.

List a few reasons as to why tackling the propaganda machine head on to debunk its fallacious poison is a bad thing. OP also stated that he didn't extravagantly pay a single shekel to view the loaded blue-pill-on-a-screen.

Holy shit that poster is terrible. You really couldn't be assed to take more than one photo of your two leads? Or use any background other than some shit you got from the first page of Google?

...

I FUCKING HATE JEWS

be honest op, are you from 4chan?

Not sure he's made it that far yet.

well feck, no sage…

cool your autism, bro.

it's cool you got to see how people react but I'm not sure it was worth the shekels.

that reminds me, I need to fix up my old military computer
also kill yourself

How many obviously made up instances are there of ebul white men taking credit for the inventions, ideas or advances of the stronk black wymyn?

is not reddit spacing, it's proper formatting
reddit spacing is a double return after each sentence
OP is readable
fuck you

What exactly did the "black" women do? Is it literally just a couple of Negresses doing arithmetic in a back room somewhere for a couple of hours?

Did you watch this for school?

He will, and HE can

I haven't seen the movie but I imagine it involved them mentoring stiff old whitey to get the creative juices flowing. Diversity is strength goy.

OK. Question: who is this?

did you get aids watching this?

it's bizarre how narratives in the media are a direct inversion of reality. I don't understand how normalfags don't eventually catch on

Hidden Niggers sounds like a blacked rape porn film

I hate this fat obnoxious sheboon. This is the negress that's always on Jew Maher.

hurrr

Stop the ride I want to get off

Yeah, I'm a fullchan newfag. On 4chan, screencaps from here are regarded like The Protocols of the Wise Elders of Chans.

We all are on our own path. I have a degree in hivemind engineering with a specialization in the reddit field. Don't be a cliquey faggot just so you can get a dopamine spike to your cucked ego.

He's literally a shit eating cuck user. It was in another thread.
And I do mean that literally.

Niggerw believe every single thing they see in a movie even if it contradicts an even tha happened right in front of their wide noses. This movie wasn't for cucks, it was for the Left's monkey shock troops to repeat for all of future recorded history

I always thought it was weird that the characters in Breaking Bad were named Jesse 'Pinkman' and Walter 'White'. That Walter got screwed a super wealthy jew and they fought Neo Nazis in the end.

Two days ago in a statistics class, my professor made a reference to it in his slides. It was an appropriate reference, because he was taking about how human "calculators" preceded electronic computation, but I immediately saw the films angle from its poster, and I could tell the professor kind of felt something wasn't right.


Before electronic computation there would be rooms full of people employed as calculators for any in depth applied math or statistical work, working in assembly lines, doing computations on slide rules, looking up numbers from books of tables.

Thank you for watching it so I didn't have to.

> How was Wernher von Braun portrayed in the film, or was he just a hidden figure?

Ah shit, I just read the part you wrote about the IBM scene… jesus, that's about as bad as I could imagine.

And now my phone can do 10 times the work of those people and more. I love white man's technology. It's also very interesting that these magical devices work because they have metallic runes inside them that conduct electricity.

We still have that today, you can hire pajeets with the Amazon Mechanical Turk program.

sam hyde

How many Oscars will this win? And how many of its Oscar speeches will be about Trump?

None
All

dysonomia. get out

the Jew only turned out wealthy because Walter Chose to cuck himself….. ironic huh?

Typical Hollywood. They are absolutely hopeless when it comes to reality.

Not bad, good write up, if you had filtered 'black' with 'nigger' I wouldn't have thought twice.

reddit spacing is a trs meme, kike

Fun fact: the moderators are "reddit spacers", so maybe you're in the wrong place.

Is there any romantic angle? Like one of the black wymyn in love with some white boi but his parents don't approve? Also, any kind of physical confrontation?

Yes, but imagine needing to hire six pajeets to work six hours everyone you wanted to invert a matrix, which now takes seconds on wolfram.

Oh I know, it's absolutely amazing what we can do these days, and we even take it for granted.
Wolfram Mathematica is the greatest, I'll let that kike hang last.

Isn't there a building named after her?

I too think the whole thing is bullshit, but I did read that they named some shit after her years ago

oy vey

>a gang initiation
>a game of knockout

so lemme get this shit straight fellow goyim, this fucking show creates a plot point that revolves around a game that was invented BY NIGGERS in the ghetto, and perpetrated BY NIGGERS on white people, usually in gangs of NIGGERS. So they took something that was inherently nigger and just swapped the races around.

There's no fucking way you could be a writer for this show and not see exactly what you're doing. "Well if we show this like it happens in real life it will make black people look bad, so letter makes white teenagers do it and have a nigger be the victim instead. I can't imagine why anyone would be so racist."

TL;DR, the movie is basically
WE WUZ NASA

did you really believe in the intellectual honesty of these people? that they are just misguided liberals that are just tweaking things a bit to fit their views of the world?

good thing is that the further you stray from truth, the more your work will be devoid of artistic merit, and i think that it's something that most people can see. even if they don't consciously recognize it.

WE WUZ KANGZ

Shit cracks, without you cum skin honkies, blacks would be ruling the earth. We wuz the creataz of civilization, our empires were the best. We were on our way to space, but then y'all Neanderthals destroyed us, enslaved us and took our knowledge. Now you claim it as your own.

Without blacks you bitch made vampire ass mother fuckers wouldn't be shit. You owe us. And deep down you jelly of us because we're superior and blessed with melanin intelligence. Each grown black person is worth millions. We walking millionaires, and that's why white bitches want da dick. They want the superior BBC. We gon breed y'all out of existence.

Bow down, honky. We rising up, and soon we'll have taken over.

This really is like one of the best redpills.
It is like learning history in pubic school (for me) and being told how germany was all evil n shit for the supposed holohoax, but stalin was really the victim when he enforced mass starvation.

Image related.

Nigga, da fuq DAT

U weak, bitch ass playa hating ass punk ass faggot ass junkie ass coward ass pussy ass how ass twisted ass ass ass

Bullshit.

AHS is a guilty pleasure show of mine and I literally decided right at this point (keep in mind that this clip is like two minutes into the first episode of the season) to skip the season entirely. Pisses me off that they havee Lily Rabe cuck out… always thought that was oddly sexy.

Of course the eternal anglo would marry a kangz.

...

The main chick marries a black dude. That's the only romance. No interracial romances.

There weren't any physical confrontations, except for one of the black chicks has a husband that always watches racial violence on the news and keeps getting more and more pissed about it in a way that was portrayed as righteous.

All.
All.

Made me think of something actually. I listen to Adam Carolla's podcast, and they play a game sometimes called "The Rotten Tomatoes Game". It's very simple: you try to guess the score that the professional critics have given a movie on the RT site. So for instance, if a movie scores a 50% from the critics, and you guessed that it would have a 64%, you'd end up racking up 14 points. The goal of the game, life golf is to have the lowest score possible after going through the five or so movies you'll do per game. So when trying to figure out how you'll rate something, you can use little tells to see what the critics may have given it… is the movie about racism or sexism? Okay, well that's good for about 20% at least. Is it pro-America? Uh oh, that's good for about a -5% for whatever it's worth. Is it about gay rights? Awesome, tack on 10% for that. You get the point and there are many things to consider.

So when I first saw this movie, I played the game in my head. I knew it would immediately be high (I figured low-90% range), and I did this math:


Total score: 96% score. Obviously a super high score but not unseen (I believe Toy Story is one that has a perfect 100% score for instance). Just looked up this movie and it's at 92%. Not a dead on guess, but it's damn close.

There go their awards.

Wernher von Braun should have been the head of NASA during the events of this movie. They must have forgot about him ;^)

Hey, this is good tactics.

sounds like the ada lovelace bullshit

Retard, they're not supposed to be true. The pictures only purpose is to make niggers not want to race mix.

You would have to involve white men in a respectable setting since it revolves around black women.
So of course it would have no interracial romances - they are too clever to fall for the white mans lies :^) .

Is the one good sympathetic white person obviously jewish?

didn't this movie flop extremely hard

No. The opposite

sounds like it.

from the OP:

kek approves

She even has Blue/Grey eyes.

Ah, so if anything, white people got in the way of progress and innovation even back then. What a wonderful life lesson. Whitey really needs to learn to step aside and let Hershel and his army of groids hold all the reins of power.

lurk more, faggot.
or literally kill yourself.

You niggers don't still believe in the moon landing, do you?

-No radiation damage on any pictures
-No pictures of any stars (yes there's the albedo of the moon claim, but to not take ANY pictures of the stars in man's first voyage outside the magnetosphere is asinine)
-Batteries wouldn't work on the moon
-Rover fit in the LM without any redesign
-Astronauts can't jump higher than 2 feet, doesn't agree with 1/6th gravity
-You can see the fucking wires in some videos
-Russia wouldn't blab because doing so gains them nothing, better to hold back for blackmail
-USGS is in on it. NASA is military intelligence.

Prove me wrong niggers.

NASA left mirrors on the moon for research purposes. With a laser you can ping it.

Hi user,

What is the highest level of mathematics have you learned?

Moon landing denial is an attack on one of Western culture's greatest achievements.
On top of that, very few people spout moon landing conspiracy theories without kvetching about all the German scientists who made it possible.

I'm a janitor and I wish somebody would hand me a trashcan for once instead of just kicking it on the floor.

...

Calculus III

...

Moonlanding was real. You can prove this yourself together with your local observatory. Just check "Lunar Laser Ranging experiment". I do however believe that some maybe all footage of the first trip was fake. Let's not forget, it was first and foremost a propaganda mission. There is btw good evidence that Gagarin wasn't the 1st guy in space. He was replaced with another dude before the start and this guy died of radiation.

Shindlers list is fiction. That's all I say to people about it.

we wuz kangz: The Movie

Keep going to school, kid

Classic, first year engineering dropout, eh young buck?

??

...

honestly, I haven't taken much math.
i just weighed in to ridicule this off-topic dick-measuring contest.

That's complete bullshit. The shit eating slave has been dead for years, you retarded cunt.

I don't follow. Are you being a faggot and claiming he ISN'T a shit-eating cuck, contrary to photo evidence?

Or are you playing a Jewish semantic game where "IS" should be "WAS" because he's figuratively dead?

Either way, gas yourself.

and fuck me for Reddit spacing

1. It's not the same guy
2. The shit eating guy is literally dead
>>>/g/
>>>/e/
>>>/t/

>>>/t/
>>>/h/
>>>/e/

>>>/f/
>>>/u/
>>>/c/
>>>/k/

>>>/o/
>>>/u/
>>>/t/

You could bounce lasers off the moon before the reflectors. See natl. geo. Dec 1966.


Phd in pure math bud.


Dig deeper. German scientists created the breakaway civilization. See Sonora airship mysteries of mid 1800s and onwards. Also electrogravitics research spearheaded by the Germans in 1940's goes dark in 1950s.


Another reason why the moon landing is fake is that technological progress REGRESSED after the moon landings. We were allegedly able to go using 1960s/1970s technology. Then, after rockets, computing, engineering, all got better, we lose the ability to go back. In terms of technological progress, we (allegedly) landed on the moon before the space shuttle, space station, etc… This means from a technological standpoint, before Russia built the MIR, they should've been able to land on the moon as it was easier.

See my original post. Explain the lack of radiation damage on the photos for a start. See attached picture - first of all, that's now how the sun appears on film. Second, there's no protective atmosphere or magnetosphere between the camera film and the sun. You're telling me the only radiation picked up on the film is from the visible spectrum?

Also consider the engineering standards for Apollo 8. This was the first manned circumlunar flight. But coincidentally, this was the first flight containing mammalian tissue to go past the van allen belts and return safely. Unlike prior tests, NASA didn't send up monkeys, dogs, rats, etc… to test the viability of passing through the Van Allen belts and beyond the magnetosphere. That's utter horseshit engineering if true. Just fucking hope the radiation doesn't kill us? Bullshit.

And on and on it goes.

If Apollo happened, then it would be a scientific endeavor with repeatable, falsifiable data. Instead, we see anomaly after anomaly which suggests it didn't happen.

Proof?
You made the claim, I'm not searching through the thread.

Forgot to mention that no observatory possesses the resolving power to conclusively prove Apollo. (Well, that's what they tell us.)

Isn't it weird that advertising dollars are being spent to promote this film here? Do they think we will hate watch it?

i dont know anything about him being dead, but I know he isn't the same guy.

If you watch spencer get punched you can see the dude has meaty fingers and a somewhat stocky build. Shit eating cuck has neither.

MOON CRICKETS "THEYED DANCE AND SANNG AROUND THE PLANTATION AFTER A HARD DAYS WORK
SABER TOOTHED CROTCH CRICKETS "SOMETHING YOU'LL CATCH IF YOU FUCK ONE OF THEM

no way the ride never stops

Rockets didn't get better. The problem is nothing was done with the propulsion knowledge from the apollo teams, so it died out when the white guys who did it all did.

The Space Shuttle was a giant waste of time.

Given that you had a choice to NOT watch this movie, I need to ask if you're really rich or just insane?

This is kind of true but it's a good alternative to spam and shills on a slow day

also nice trips

What if he watched it for free?

No, faggot. I'm a Biochemist, and I took an extra maths course at that. You only need Calculus II to be a scientist (chemistry, biochemistry, biology, neurobiology, etc.)

They are fucking half caste though? Fucking niggers.

ACTUAL NASA SCIENTIST JACK CRENSHAW RESPONDS

http:// jack crenshaw .com/politics/

bump

Typical whitesplaining.

WE WUZ AZTROWNOTS

(((true story)))

turn off that pesky adblock

Sheboonsplaining

So these women did calculations for the NASA like hundreds of men and women at that time? Just because they where black they get famous?! wew

...

Any movie that starts with "based on a true story" is going to immediately be nothing but embellished retarded bullshit.

Because real life is boring as fuck for the most part.

Doesn't stop idiots from thinking the events happened as filmed though.

Oscar Bait. Nothing more, nothing less.

fucking pleb

...

Sure there was. And when I point you to a paper about this, you're just going to dismiss it as "NASA lies" or whatever: ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/trs/_techrep/CR188427.pdf

The best evidence that you're full of shit will always be the fact that nothing you say is really falsifiable. You'll constantly say, "show me X" and when I show you X you'll say, "it's fake" - thus, there's no evidence you'll ever accept.

Lies. Apollo 16 took an instrument called the Far Ultraviolet Camera and captured pic-related. Of course, I know you're going to say that's fake, so why bother?

As far as the regular apollo photos, of-fucking-course there are no stars! This is how cameras work. When there's a bright object in the foreground, you can't see dim shit in the background. Same thing happens on Earth. See pic-related.

Bullshit. Three other countries have landed robotic rovers on the moon (most recently the Chinese Yutu in 2013) and all of them use batteries.

There's extensive documentation about how it folded up and was deployed, and how much it weighed. More importantly, if you were going to create a hoax, why would you pull a rover out of your ass?? It just means you have to fake more shit! And if you're creating a hoax, and you think people are dumb enough to not notice an unexplainable rover, why not fake a little jet plain too?

Do you know how much their gear weighed? That'll answer this question for you.

You can see the radio antennas. That's all.

This is as dumb as pointing out that there are no rigid airships the size of zepelins that can cross the atlantic ocean and then claiming, "we've lost the ability"

Or pointing out that there are no supersonic aircraft the size of the concorde and claiming, "we've lost the ability."

Here's the thing about Apollo - if NASA had told congress that they needed a solid gold rocket that burned $100 bills for fuel, congress would have gladly written that check. You can do literally anything if you have enough money. If you had the money right now today, and you wanted to, you could build a ship with similar capabilities to a Zeppelin, or you could build an aircraft with similar capabilities to the Concorde, or you could build a rocket with similar capabilities to the Saturn V.

The fact that nobody does any of those things doesn't mean that any of those things was faked. It means that nobody with the money has the will.

Reported.

Witnessed.
Shiny and chrome.

Niggers aren't smart enough to follow the reasoning there. You need to indulge their delusions of grandeur. They already believe "we wuz kangs", so go with "we needz tuh keep our royal bloodlines pure".

That wording is perfect.

>Sure there was. And when I point you to a paper about this, you're just going to dismiss it as "NASA lies" or whatever: ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/trs/_techrep/CR188427.pdf

Link doesn't work. But of the total number of photos taken, what percentage had radiation damage?


Bring it. One other thing I forgot to mention: during the trip, when the Apollo astronauts came back, the radiometers were within calculated ranger. However, years later, we learn that the radiation on the moon is 20% greater than previously thought. How come this wasn't reflected in the radiometer?

Link: nbcnews.com/id/34470642/ns/technology_and_science-space/t/moon-poses-radiation-risk-future-travelers/#.WIVa3VjQeUk


This certainly could be real, but there's no evidence this particular picture was taken on the surface of the moon. (Unless those stars which have been identified in the picture can be identified, and subsequently the position of the photo can be triangulated. But if the error would be less than the distance between the earth and the moon I dunno.)


The Earth has an atmosphere. The moon does not. The typical explanation for not seeing stars in any photos is that the albedo of the moon is great enough so that the reflected sunlight outshines the stars. However, the albedo of the moon is around the same as asphalt, so this explanation doesn't really hold water.


Let me clarify. The batteries on the rover which were exposed to both sunlight and dark should've froze. Modern battery technology is different from Apollo batteries.


The astronauts + gear equals approx 300lbs. A 300lb man can easily jump a foot in Earth's gravity. One would expect a much greater jump by peak-athlete astronauts.

Debatable. See attached vid.


This is spurious reasoning. Why didn't the Soviets ever go to the moon? The Soviets were kicking the asses of the US space program. But then suddenly, the US manages to accomplish the greatest feat of human engineering out of nowhere? And this feat of engineering has never been equaled. So the space program peaked in the 1970's?

Horseshit. We can't do it. See Bush's (now cancelled) plans to go to the moon. (Link: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constellation_program) It would've taken approx 20 years of r&d to do something we did 40 years ago.Is that how technology works? It should be easier to go to the moon again if we did it once.


Prove me wrong, nigger.

What about the reflectors that were placed on the moon, how did they get there ?

see

you'll need to link to a NASA source showing the dosage expected vs. received. What I suspect is that (since they're not retarded) they had at least 20% room for error. In other words, (since they're not retarded) they didn't plan a mission such that if the radiation were 1% higher than expected, everyone would drop dead.

Right, of course. As I predicted. You say "show me X" and when I show you X you say that X is fake.

Obviously, you could take a modern astronomy program and reproduce the photo, but why bother? You'll just say the astronomy program has been made by people who are in on the conspiracy.

your claims are not falsifiable

Irrelevant to the question of photographic exposure. A bright object in the foreground prevents dim stars from showing up. I literally just showed you a reproducible example of this happening. Predictably, you dismiss it. Your claims are not falsifiable.

…and asphalt in bright sunlight is plenty bright enough to prevent stars from being visible in most photos.

citation needed. (hint: the suit alone is 200lbs)

citation needed (note: after correcting the figure above - you're actually looking for about a 400lb man)

We "can't" do it in the same sense that we "can't" take a trip in a zepelin across the atlantic. We have the technology, but not the will and money.

You're right to point to the cancellation of Constellation, but you don't even know the half of it. The follow-on to Saturn V was called Nova. It would have been capable of trips to Mars. In fact, the Apollo command capsule was designed to accommodate the greater delta-V from a reentry from a craft that comes straight in from mars. Anyway, Nova was canceled.

After that there was the shuttle, and the shuttle is actually a great idea if you intend to build a space station. The shuttle has a unique capability that no other vehicle has - it can bring large payloads back from space. If you used it to service a large, modular space station, it's be awesome. But the space station (at the time called, Freedom) was canceled.

After that there was venture star. Canceled. Mars-direct. Canceled. I'm probably forgetting a few as well.

We have the technology. We've had it since the '60s. But we don't have the political will to invest the money in it. No space program has ever survived a transition from Republican to Democrat. They always get canceled.

Apollo would likely have been canceled too if Kenedy hadn't been shot.

You still gave up two hours of your life to it.

Holy shit. Did not catch that.

Parody when?

Conclusive proof Moonhoaxers are retards. I ate after I drove, despite the fact that driving is much harder to do. Driving is therefore a hoax, right?

Sage because you're derailing the thread with irrelevant bullshit. >>>/fringe/


Yep. No US scientists at the forefront of rocket technology. No US missions on-par with the Soviets. The US went from having nothing to landing on the Moon. We shouldn't even call it the Space "Race" and instead call it "The Comfortable Soviet Jog."

It's simple photography, you dolt. If you calibrate for the brightest parts of the image, you don't capture the dimmest parts. Hint: Standing in direct, unfiltered sunlight makes you a lot brighter than the stars. This is why technology like HDR is invented.

This video is only possible in a total vacuum with a stable point of gravity.

How long was it before you fell asleep?

The moon looks pretty shiny from where I'm standing (earth). Is there a reason the moon would be darker the closer you are to it?

FTFY

It sounds strange, but lunar regolith is approximately the same shade as asphalt. The reason it looks lighter in apollo photos is that the sun is entirely because of camera exposure settings under a really bright sun. And it shines brightly in the sky for a similar reason: the sun is fucking glaring, and at night your irises are wide open.

You really can't trust your perception usually. There are so many things that fuck with it. I mean think about, you've seen how gigantic the moon looks when it's near the horizon, right? Well, that too is just a trick of perception.