Yea we should just give up and stop trying. Embracing the cuck state because surely our corporate overlords will be good masters. I hate this defeatist outlook.
Defend BSD licenses
You certainly shouldn't wage war on battlefield chosen by your enemies.
Write good code and teach everyone why closed code is bad. This is where corps have nothing to offer. This is how you win.
What if I am using a library that is released under a non-GPL compatible license?
That's exactly why FSF and EFF etc exist.
But yeah, in some cases it's certainly true, I can't imagine anyone suing chinks.
Where does it say not for corporate use? Do any of these fag licenses say anything about not allowing certain companies/states to use the code?
Yeah thought so.
GPL requires you to share the source of changes you made.
Companies/states can ignore this and keep changes to themselves, because they have army of lawyers/pay judge's wages.
So, in practice, when it comes to big guys, GPL is the same as BSD, only spread over more pages.
t. cuck
Wrong. You only have to share the source to people who you distribute it to.
Don't want to share the source? Don't share the binary.
Any piece of software.
That post was vague enough to still be correct, just ambiguous.
I've made changes to KeePassXC to improve performance/security of my system and yet I don't have to share those improvements with anyone.