Does Holla Forums know about Holochain?

this \/

For off topic topics like cryptocurrencies the OP needs to be structured in a way where it's about the technical implementation of it.
Just saying "XYZ. Discuss" doesn't make XYZ tech related.

Name: Holochain (not Holocaust (Lo-NRG))
Use: Holographic storage for distributed applications
License: GPLv3 only *1* *2*
Written in: Go
Developement platform: GitHub *3* (github.com/Holochain/holochain-proto)
Source availability: github.com/Holochain/holochain-proto.git
Developement started: 2016-12-23 (according to initial commit)
Releases: None (source provided by git clone)


*1* If GPLv4 is ever release they can't upgrade
*2* Read librecmc.org/github.html for things wrong about GitHub
*3*:

Sorry, footnotes are in wrong order:
10,11c10< *2* Read librecmc.org/github.html for things wrong about GitHub< *3*:---> *2*:13a13> *3* Read librecmc.org/github.html for things wrong about GitHub

At least PIVX has the purple panther theme to capitalize on Black Panther and all the black hustlers.

Attached: accepted_here_port-200.png (200x316, 15.82K)

holo.host/ico/


ehh...
I've had my identity stolen by enough exchanges already. Might buy some if it gets on Binance.

Why not and is this a problem?

Attached: 16dff549b7360c9b0e0fbcdc1797c747a84af5a785e080f79238fc8634a18eea.jpg (1600x1132, 1021.34K)

How difficult would it be to host a chan with similar features to 8ch?

https:/gitgud.io/
Do it

Holo a cute desu.

Any organization is prone to infiltration and corruption into oblivion. What happens if someday Stallman, or his successor decides to release a harmful GPLv4? What happens if that particular person writes GPLv4 as to make any GPL licensed software his intellectual property and subsequently employs a team of trolls to relicense all software of interest?

On a side note, I would appreciate a copyleft license that is not authorian, that doesn't include phrases such as:


Authority is cancer and so are (((You))).

...But a copyleft license is authoritarian, perhaps in a good way but still... it's basically saying you can edit the program however you want but then you MUST release it to the public for free so they can do the same if they wish.

This kind of nullifies the license, because a latter version could basically say ALL RIGHTS RESERVED*

Attached: 51f1ceebd4f63db4755017f3bfcb555841155388155a47ce274de4777e41c1e5.jpg (7016x4961, 9.64M)