Fuck titles

Off yourself

Actually all you niggers and your stupid flags should eat the curb, flags are fucking cancer right up there with trips and 80% of bants on this board are because of fags and their flags

If you flagpost regularly without a specific reason you are a goddamned faggot and should be helo-d into volcano tbqh

That's the thing, a lot of people on here they seem to act like letting them talk is the same as letting them talk without consequences. Sure, let them speak but then after or during their nonsense, you beat them up.

You are literally so retarded it hurts.

You inhibit free expression and you directly halt the empirical progression of ideology.

If they can't talk, you can't reply, so they go to PLACES LIKE Holla Forums where they CAN talk, and fester.

Hence, the whole of the internet is a reactionary shithole.

You realize being able to act like victims is one of the main reasons the whole oppressed white man narrative can flourish.

If you need to ban or beat somebody up to win your debate, you loose.

Aside from that, thinking you are so correct and infallible to be the arbiter of who says what is just the height of arrogance.

We all have opinions, why should yours have some kind of special protection?

We don't need to beat nazis to win any debate. We need to beat them to keep them from normalizing themselves and swarmfronting in like they did to imageboards.

Because fascists will die. Simple. You can't prevent it anarcho-pacifist baby.

Yup, we've still not been brainwashed into your porky-supporting bullshit.

Fuck off.

Right

Yea fighting free speech, the thing the communists and anarchists of the past gave their life for, is totally going to help us when our own """comrades""" call us white neo nazis just for refusing to call ourselves feminist or caring about ebil MRA's.

Yes. Because when you don't, bad things happen to people. Letting nazis have their rallies is just stupid.

No, not censorship. Violence against violence. You can't protect nazis with "muh free speech", let them talk, sure, but don't let them get away with being nazis.

I mean christ, free speech is wonderful but you're using it as an excuse to let fascists run wild in the streets.

Except you'll likely find that if policing speech becomes acceptable it won't be long before somebody uses it against you. People who argue for speech restrictions seem to do so under he belief that those given the power to restrict speech somehow won't do it entirely out of self interest. Power corrupts.

Go away you are not welcome here unless you are a troll in which case stop being such a shitty troll but you can stay.

yes

You are a disgrace kill yourself.

You are an idiot. Nazis attending a rally is exactly what we want. How else are you going to get them to declare their views and let you take their picture?

Please go away.

Fascists are not welcome here.

Except you'll find fighting back against fascists isn't policing speech and free speech is a pathetic excuse to let them do whatever they want.

Nazi sympathizers.

...

Firstly, why should I care about feelings of feminists or SJW`s?

Secondly, why do you think that class reductionism is a bad thing?

...

Just look at these horrible fascists taking away the precious rights of those innocent fascists! Horrible! Never again!

If Nazis start rounding up jews and shooting them in the back of the head then by all means kill them but if they are just in their little retarded circle jerk not hurting anyone and you decide to off them anyways or prevent them from speaking because you find their ideas ==TRIGGERING== or ==PROBLEMATIC== then you are the fascist.

This is the kind of attitude that allowed the blacklisting and rounding up of communists that I am sure that you decry.

You have no idea how incredibly easy it is for the balance of power to flip in an instant. Enjoy your gaschamber.

When the fascists break down your door and rape your wife then you can kill them and piss on their stuff.

At least post the full comic lad

But not when they're planning it, right? We have to wait for them to act first, let innocent people get hurt (again) before we do anything. Because, unprevented, nazis just never, ever, commit acts of violence against innocent people. Doesn't happen.

Not an argument

you know literally nobody thinks you should stop nazis from voicing their opinions, right?
anti-fascism is about stopping what they actually fucking do politically
it's not like when nazis get together they just sit around having serious discussions, they actually go out and attack people themselves because that's the ideology they're having their free discussions about

S T A L I N
T
A
L
I
N

If you have actual proof that particular individuals are planning a specific act of violence then you can take preemptive action.

Are you not aware that your ideology also promises explicit acts of violence and the destruction of society as we know it?

There are Republicans using the exact same logic to round up all the god damn lefties.

OP is

it's a reference to the fact that alt-rightists are always talking about their free speech, it's not against or mocking the actual concept of free speech

It absolutely is what the fuck are you talking about.

Your double speak is double plus un-good.

And reasonably so, I mean, we do want a revolution right? Locking us all up would prevent that.

Nobody is. I don't think it should be an excuse to protect fascists at every angle because it's their "right to free speech" to group up and kill innocent people.

oh wow a 1984 reference this must be internet neckbeard bingo

Oh boy more internet bingo :^)

bingo

And you would prefer that not happen right?

So maybe don't start rounding people up as enemies of the state and make ourselves massive hypocrites.

What do you think the average non political person will think when he remembers that under the old regime people with controversial opinions spoke their piece they didn't get disappeared but now that the "liberators" have rolled into power everyone who doesn't like them gets labeled an enemy of the state and becomes an un-person.

They probably will see the blatant hypocrisy.

by this logic anyone who isn't a pacifist is a hypocrite

...

No anyone who arrests people for though crime is a hypocrite.

thought

Right, well when the revolution comes I'll give you a rose and point you to the nearest pig or fascist.

Fuck off. Bullshit lies and excuses to protect the fascists from action.

you've mentioned in other threads that you have autism so I don't blame you for not picking up on these subtle distinctions
but there's a difference between being against free speech, and making fun of alt-rightists using free speech as an excuse to avoid criticism

likewise, 1984 is not a reactionary book but it is frequently referenced by reactionaries because since they read it for school it is one of the only books they know

Unless you honestly think anti-fa are actually just police, and they go around arresting people for the anarchist state they live in currently.

Ok cool. Ill probably hook them up with a new productive job in our socialist utopia and reform them into functioning members of society or something.

Fuck off. Bullshit lies and excuses to protect the fascists from action.

MUH STATISM

Mobs can still arrest people. Councils are a form of state power, its just collective state power, arguing over semantics is retarded and anarchists doing the whole "If we create a state and call it not a state it makes it TRUE!" is the oldest and most tired song and dance in the book.

NEWFAG DETECTED!!!

Everyone with a red flag is not the same person.

...

You should just leave, your posts are cringey as fuck

Pure hippie fantasy. Won't happen.

You officially have no idea what words even mean.

If they believed in free speech then they would welcome the criticism because criticism of their ideas falls under freedom of speech.

Jesus fucking Christ on a sitck.

This is a picture of Mao hanging out with the former emperor of China you are retarded.

If someone shot the redflagfag and OP I wouldn't lose any sleep.

What did I do?

but I have a right to freedom of speech :^)

exactly, so the point is that they don't really believe in free speech, they just believe they should be able to say what they like and have people listen

You're an autistic faggot whose heart defect should kill him as soon as possible.

...

Glad to know that you are a mind reader and can figure out everyone's secret unstated motives.

You seem to be confusing me for someone else.

I am neither autistic nor do I have a heart condition.

rights are inalienable

remember these are the people who made a petition to ban gender studies courses

...

Hey guys remember when Hitler and the Nazis we're defeated in rational, public discourse and Socialists reformed them all carrying roses?

liberal scum please go

This tbh. Rights aren't even real.

but I have a right to free speech :^0

We are not Sargon of Akkad.

Why are you even bringing this up?

Where do you think you are

Everyone! Come join our revolutionary movement where we will throw off the shackles of the old regime and bring freedom to liberty to all under our LIBERTARIAN socialist policies.

Unless you have the wrong opinions in which case we reserve the right to take away all of your rights and you cease to be treated as a human being.

because I was talking about the alt-right

in a shit thread filled with people who can't understand sarcasm

Socialists, arguing against freedom.

I have no mouth and I must scream.

Sargon is a liberal what the fuck are you talking about.

you sure rused us bucko

...

You are literally autistic.

Here's an idea, bear with me.
How about… everyone has the same rights.

...

Doesn't work in a system of exploitation.

Which is why everyone in this conversation is a socialist, you moron.

I'm not sure what you mean, please elaborate

I even used the designated irony smiley :^(

We all agree that real equality cannot exist in a society where capitalism exists, therefore we are socialists.

Everyone should have equal rights which is why your comment about the fact that it doesn't work in a system of exploitation is redundant and stupid because we all already know that and no one is arguing that point.

Yes? Hello? Why would we work with nazis? Our goals are absolutely opposed to each other.

Well I'm talking about beating up or killing nazis, and you're talking about how that's literally 1984 and we need to protect them or we're hypocrites.

I'm not sure what your critique is. I am arguing that going on and on about free speech in our current society is moronic, I never said I was opposed to it in a socialist society.

Your goals are opposed to the goals of literally every single other ideological movement that exists on the planet.

Are you just going to kill everyone who disagrees with you Pol Pot?

You realize that there are other ways to cripple your ideological opponents that don't involve shooting everyone who hurts your fee fees in the back of the head, right?

What you are suggesting would make you look bad to the masses and cripple your movement and hinder you achieving your objectives.

Yes you did.

You have suggested we kill fascists in a socialist society multiple times in this thread for having the wrong ideas.

If you haven't then its the boards fault that I am confused because we dont have thread ID's and there are multiple people posting in the latter half of this thread with no flag.

Give your self a flag so you are more easily distinguished.

The whole point of anonymity is that you take each individual post on its merit, you are the one trying to conflate a bunch of different posts into a single individual ideological opponent. Let it go dude.

If someone says "I never said that in this thead" and there is no way for me to see which posts were there's then there is no way i can adequately assess that claim.

their's

The post I quoted, was presumably you, quoting another of my posts. In neither post did I make such a claim. You must quote specific posts and address said posts, not flail around the thread.
You really are new to image boards tbh.

I've been on image boards for like 8 years. And sorry I got you confused with anarcho communist guy who was just saying we should kill anyone he disagrees with.

You literally cannot distinguish between speech and mass murder. Amazing.

I can, but free speech isn't an excuse to be a nazi. You don't just get away with being a nazi because "lol free speech I'm immune to fucking everything"

Remember muh 18 million gorrillion

fuck wrong trolling flag

Of course you do. It's simple, just don't break any laws.

Then just do nothing, eh? Can't stop the bourgeois since they'll use it as an excuse to fuck with us.

Laws are irrelevant. Laws aren't my friends. Laws let nazis be nazis.

Those same laws are the ones preventing the state from peeling you alive for your beliefs.

Im pointing out your blatant hypocrisy.

Not to mention prevent random sociopaths from peeling him alive because they decided he's a nazi.

This. Holla Forums is shit tbqh

Everything is shit.

Also this tho

A durr somehow we can only truly give the workers a hold of the means of production if we make them all suck each other's dicks and dye their fuckin hair blue durrrrr

Ay fuck off retard