Memeing liberals into self awareness

We all know lefties love social psychology. well here's a bit of social psychology even you guys might be interested in:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naïve_realism_(psychology)
Sound familiar?
Disregarding the irony of attributing this particular bias to those you disagree with, I think this might be a good tool to get liberals to question their ideology. Obviously we aren't going to break the conditioning by slapping a definition up somewhere. They're just going to attribute it to whoever they disagree with (us) and then never think about it again. But can we meme this into the public consciousness somehow? Can we get our political opponents to see that maybe they aren't the bastions of objective reasoning that they clearly think they are?
Have some shit OC along the lines of what im talking about.

Labelling and arguing has no effect. A person's mind can only be changed with their consent. If these people reject the logic contained within redpills, then they must be ignored until truths such as kultural marxism, synagogue of satan, holokaust, etc become maistream. Redpill the minority of logical people, then wait.

I'm not talking about actively engaging them. I'm talking about using their pseudo-intellectualism as a tool.
At the core of liberal elitism is the notion that they are the objective ones who see things from both sides and think critically about the issues they take a stance on. Many lefties honestly think that the source of all disagreement with them is due to a lack of understanding or willingness to understand. They believe their worldview is so airtight that the only possible way you could not find their cookie cuter "arguments" compelling is if you either haven't heard them repeated enough or you have no desire to understand objective reality.
What I want to capitalize on is the fact that they will justify to themselves that they don't have this bias. In the middle of an argument, they will just reject the idea and their views will only become more solidified. But if the idea becomes one that's on people's minds outside of debate, They might actually take some time on their own to evaluate where they demonstrate this bias and begin to consciously try to avoid it. They want to convince themselves that they are taking new information into account, it's the source of their ego.

Ben Shapiro put it best I think
"Right wing see the left wing as people who think with their hearts, they have good intentions just not good solutions to issues. They see inequality as an atrocity not simply a rational outcome of how much effort is put in.

Left wing see Right Wing as demon nazis that want to kill everyone and eat babies."

Is it even possible?

Only as possible as you meme it to be.

come on now, it's 2017, they have mind control rays n shit

...

How does this have anything to do with my philosophy? I simply believe that everything and everyone should be equal, on the same playing field, and that everyone should have the same rights. I also believe that united we are strong, and that excluding groups just leads to in-fighting and revolutions.

Please don't call SJWism (AKA, Female / Black supremacy) Liberalism. It is not Liberalism. SJWism fights for the rights of minority, not the equality of the majority and the minority.

...

why?

Everything is not equal, so whining about it won't do anything, you cocksucking faggot.

If everyone is equal, what is the point of trying to excel? You will always be rewarded the same as the lowest person. There's no point in trying or improving yourself in a system that rewards everyone equally.

Which is exactly why our education system is such a mess. There's no reason for kids to try to get ahead, because everyone gets an award and talented kids are told they're equal to the kids who are in remedial courses.

If I can do absolutely nothing, not give a shit about improving myself, and not try hard in anything, people will still think I'm great and just as good as everyone else. So why bother doing anything or trying to improve? Why bother getting in shape if some morbidly obese cow is considered beautiful? Why bother excelling in studies when everyone is smart?

Liberalism is a disease on society which causes the average citizen to not live up to their potential.

While in areas like government these principles are used, in other areas they are ignored. Liberals will date the most attractive person that will have them, for example, not choose someone at random because "they're all equally attractive." Or for liberal parents, do they equally distribute the household income across all members of the household, regardless of age? Does a 5 year old child get as much money in his allowance as the parent does?

United we are strong. If we all have the same rights, and have the same opportunities, we're stronger. When everyone has freedom, there is no need to have hatred for a particular group.

When people are divided, the people as a whole are weaker.


Obviously not everything is equal. What can be made equal is the opportunities and freedoms of the society around us.


Some people do better than others, you're absolutely correct. My point is that everyone should have the opportunity to excel in their fields. Everyone should have the ability to excel in their fields of study. If you did better than person X, you should get award Z instead of award Y. Person X did not apply themselves well enough to succeed.


Because people will see those improvements. You will too. Obviously, if you're better than a homeless person, people are going to see that. Homeless people are generally looked down upon, but do the homeless have the option to get on their feet, and contribute to society? Yes!


Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If SJWNancy is given fame by Tumblr, so be it. But realistically, American Society is going to look at here like a cow. She has every opportunity to either:

1) Get healthy, and live longer
or 2) Stay fat, and die sooner.

So you're not arguing that people are equal, but they should have equal opportunities. And I assume the next step is that people you feel are disadvantaged are given advantages to make up for your perceived unfairness and lack of equality.

However, you make the assumption that people who don't excel only fail because they aren't given the opportunities to excel and not that they're incapable of excelling. So what happens when you take an opportunity and give it to someone whom you feel is more deserving, and that person isn't actually capable of using that advantage? All you do is deny someone who would have earned that opportunity to make way for someone who didn't deserve it and isn't cut out for it.

This is exactly what is happening with Common Core and why we've slid so far down in rankings in things like mathematics. If you give an opportunity to someone, you have to take it away from someone. Opportunities are a finite resource (think of things like college admissions).

how?

true, so why do you advocate inclusiveness?

If people arent equal than there is no way to "fix nature" the problem lies in your perception. You cant give a midget the opportunity to play basketball.

Sure you can. You cannot, however, guarantee that the midget will excel at playing niggerball, despite the fact that you gave him the opportunity.
What leftists really want is equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity.

but they hate the concept of objectivity

So women are responsible for being feminists, not Jewish propaganda.
Thanks for admitting that.

You're conflating postmodern liberals with liberal elitists.
Postmodern liberals are the hyper relativist types that think beginning every sentence with "from the perspective of X" justifies their blatant disregard for facts.
Elitists are your Bill Maher types. The ones that brush off right wing victories as the result of a lack of education. They believe that anyone who took the time to honestly evaluate their positions would necessarily end up agreeing with them.

...

Both types of leftist employ objectivism or relativism as it suits them, the Jewish creators of the ideology naturally included this technique because it is one they are familiar with in their daily lives.
A Jew calls himself White one moment and Jewish the next, as it suits his current argument.
Leftists (of all shades) do the same with objectivity and relativism. You can easily notice this when they talk about IQ.
Any leftist will deny the validity of IQ as a metric when it is applied to Blacks, but will rigorously support it when referring to "low IQ religious right."

...

No they don't. They say it's because of the racist system (also, many of them don't say most individuals are racists. They often redefine racism as the system itself and don't believe this necessitates that most individuals within it hold racist tendencies).

...

Yes some do that but you're just pushing the phenomenon down one level, because they won't excuse low IQ Whites that way.
i.e they chop and change their "beliefs" one way or another.
I believe the term you are looking for is institutional racism.

I'd like one with a moderate saying "The right say the sky is blue and the left says it's green, can't we all just compromise and say it's turquoise. I'm a moderate! i'm so smart."
^^
Could somebody make this happen please.

Why not meme them into suicide? I mean, when you start to say there's a stygma against mortal diseases it can't be that hard.

...

They think the distribution between high and low IQ's would be the same between races if racism were taken out of the picture. They don't think all low IQ is because of oppression.
Because they aren't a monolith. There are several subgroups in the left and this does sometimes result in cognitive dissonance in people who choose not to renounce one group in favor of their own.

Not entirely. Institutional racism refers to a specific institution. Systemic racism refers to the system as a whole but many hold this as, and I quote: "the academic definition of racism."

Congratulations on totally ruining your memes.

pretty gud, captures his ugly fucking face well

I never claimed they're monolithic but they do, on aggregate express this stereotypical malleability of beliefs which I described.
There may be individuals who would make that argument, but again their beliefs are not consistent and demonstrate the flip-flopping I described. In this case they never make fun of or criticize low IQ Blacks as stupid or somehow worthy of derision, yet they blame stupid Whites for being stupid, imply that their low intelligence is a result of their political beliefs, or at least consider them as valid target for ridicule.

I believe that the terms are synonymous, institutional racism can apply to any system depending on the context in which it is used. Anyway, It's a tool which allows the leftist to accuse anyone of racist behavior, without evidence and in a way that can never be disproved by the individual.
Well I have read about this topic in books of the enemy. It's worse than you might think, a lot worse and goes beyond what any reasonable person would call "racism."
I'll give you an example: any policy which results in a negative outcome for "minorities" or women is institutionally racist/sexist by definition.
Now, this is where it gets really crazy. The "negative outcome" can include things like low exam scores or failing a physical during fire fighter recruitment.
If the failure rate for the minority or women is greater than it is for White men, then it is both racist and sexist.
This is as insane as it sounds and is the ideological basis for the lowering of physical requirements in military and fire service.

What the fuck is this shit?

Because low IQ whites disagree with them.
Like i said, the liberals I'm talking about targeting are those subject to naive realism. Low IQ blacks aren't seen as worthy of ridicule because of the way they vote. Also note that naive realism often applies to the in group as well, eg:
>in a study conducted by Robinson et al. in 1996, pro-life and pro-choice partisans greatly overestimated the extremity of the views of the opposite side, and also overestimated the influence of ideology on others in their own group.

Yes, but they don't see it that way. They honestly think think the influence of racism is so damn obvious that it would be trivial to even try to prove it. When you question whether or not a system is racist, they think of it the same way as if you showed them a red bucket and asked them to prove it was red.

Yes. I couldn't have said it better myself.
Which is the natural result of thinking all races and genders are the same.

Can we meme them into the ground instead?

"My disagreement with communists is agrarian in nature: they want to put me into the earth and I do not want them to walk upon it." - Mikhail Drozdovsky, White Army officer, 1915

u wot? CY-90

Propaganda ? Public Opinion?

Stopped there.


NO GOOD JEWS

Indeed. The left would have us believe that rejection of "progressivism" by the lower classes is caused by aforementioned low IQ. In reality it is because stupid people gravitate to the lower classes on account of their low income potential and are the first affected by mass-immigration by virtue of relying on low-skilled jobs, often accessible to illiterate immigrants. Their communities, being less affluent and having lower rents and property prices, are similarly first affected by the immigrants. The "stupid working-class" is acting in entirely rational self-interest by resisting the destruction of its wages and community. They are the canary in the coal mine.

That makes sense. I believe that guilt and social pressure also act to keep the Black immune from criticism, but (in my belief) the main factor is as follows:
Leftists are immensely "racist" themselves. They do not expect much from Blacks because, subconsciously, they view them as hapless, primitive and incapable of self-improvement. Whites on the other hand, being fully capable, are held to a higher standard, the Black has an excuse for being stupid - the leftist expects him to be - but the White has (the leftist imagines) had all of the privileged opportunities afforded himself since birth and thus, if he still fails to secure a highly paid job, it can only be due to a flaw of the character.
True, I've seen this myself and in fact examples abound in the memes.
"You're a fucking White male".
"Well, duh!"
"I can't even."
Perhaps the quick turn to frustration is precisely caused by the attitude you described. They become frustrated because, to them, it's all so obvious and they can't understand why others don't see it.
There is a beautiful kind of internal consistency in the beliefs of the left. No matter what evidence is presented, their ideology has an answer. The leftist is shielded from all dangers of hurtful contradictory evidence.

I see them as lazy retards

Exactly, but this does not in any way necessitate that those with low IQ MUST reject progressivism in their eyes. Hell, like i said, they even tend to assume those who DO agree with them are under the influence of bias.
And they see this as a bad thing. Lefties think white people are inherently advantaged in society and any attempt to work in their own interest is essentially a fight to preserve their privileged status, even if the white people themselves are unaware of it.

This is not a new idea. Hell, even Bush spoke of this in terms of affirmative action when he coined the term "soft bigotry of low expectations."
But the thing is, lefties think nigs are "hapless, primitive and incapable of self-improvement" because of the oppression they're subject to.

Yes, that's why they hold their ideology. People much more well read than either of us thought long and hard to create many of the ideologies that survive today.

Remember: virtually everyone thinks they are enlightened on these issues. This naive realism can be attributed to many of us (including myself). But if we can get this bias into the public mind, we might begin to see more honest discussion about the merits of our ideas rather than brushing off opposition in a manner similar to this guy

Hmm, after personal experience I see the left wing as pathological liars. The "good hearted" people are used and the smart ones clue in pretty fucking quickly.

t. former NDP activist

Anyone who signs their memes should be executed.

I disagree there and here's why. The entire foreign-aid porn cycle that had its mainstream debut in the 80s (BandAid) can only be based on the same sort of thinking. Ethiopian Blacks don't live under the tyranny of White institutional racism, so that can't be the reason for their failure (in his mind), but the leftist's expectations don't change a jot. It is the "White man's burden" redux, the concept that Blacks are stuck in a perpetual state of mental childhood and that a responsible White adult should oversee their lives. The obvious difference is that today, taking over the country and imposing White rule is not viewed as a solution, but pumping in billions of dollars to fuel a breeding boom-bust and perpetual starvation is the perfect recipe of the leftist "belly tingles" which they all secretly feel when watching an infomercial about how much of a positive difference "your donation" makes.
Now one might say "but they ARE perpetual children and they DO need guidance". Perhaps but rather the childishness is spiritual, Blacks are perfectly capable of sustaining themselves but we should not expect them to develop any kind of advanced civilization, it just isn't in their genes.

Now I think I've gone off on a wild tangent.

They have tons of explainers for that. The two big ones are "environmental determinism" (which holds that the nature of a society is fundamentally based on geography) and a more social argument which asserts that scientific advancements weren't spread to them the same way most cultures got their advancements so they were at a huge disadvantage when the white colonizers came and left Africa in the state of ruin it's in today.

Ah, of course.
The good old "Guns, germs and steel."

You read Guns, Germs and Steel, huh?

Relate these with any white country, asian country, arabic country or even native american country under the same circumstances

"BUT THERE WERE NONE'

Korea. Tibet. thailand. Vanuatu. Every fucking 'Stan'. Estonia. Georgia. etc etc etc

Libs don't think those people were/are under the same level of exploitation as Africans.

come on now

Agree 100%, the faggot who made these should repent before Kek curses them.

Work WITH their biases, not against them.
This is like propaganda 101 right here.

And it's not about using leftist rhetoric, it's about using leftist tendencies to invoke some self awareness into them.

(checked)

none of those even remotely correlate to what im saying you fucking retard,

Oh boy. Do me a favor and give me an example of how any group of people is disadvantaged under the law in the United States? Just one fucking example.

That's right you can't. And this is why progressives and their ilk have to come up with magical excuses as to why some groups of people do better than others.

On the surface it sounds like you want a meritocracy. But I know that's not what you really want because you would be horrified by the results. The smartest and most productive would pool to the top. The least productive and socially un-able would rot at the bottom. You are too soft-hearted to accept such a natural order.

I'm convinced if true meritocracy existed in America it wouldn't look too different than it does now. Huge wastelands of blacks and browns choking in their own shit. Asians and whites at the top. You can't handle that. It's obvious that you can't handle that because you still honestly believe there is some dark hidden system that oppresses certain groups of people regardless of the facts.

No such oppressive system exists. And no affirmative action or protected class clauses or pouring money into ghetto schools will ever be enough to make fix such deep inequality. Genetics isn't something that can be wished away son.

What do you mean by this? You mean, the feeling of superiority?

You're an idiot.

You're wrong straight off the starting blocks. Leftists do not love anything. Leftists only hate themselves and "society", whose exemplars are straight White men. Leftists only pretend to love things in order to use them as a sledge hammer against "society" in the deranged hope that it will make them hate themselves less. Never ever get this wrong. The Leftist always lies.

They dont even understand that mspaint memes are meant to be crudely drawn and simple. Fucking normalfags cant into memetics.