IRA-Style Insurgency for Eurocucks

Destroying Europe is the whole point though lol

Eurocucks are going to just let themselves erupt in a conflict where all Christcucks and probably white people are dead.

This is the result of being pro-Jew and anti-white/anti-self. Europe is gone. They died with their Christian morality which said 'lel races are not a thingz jebus saves :DDD"

Its ok goys just keep faping to chinese pictures, posting frogs in imageboards and cheering every time white people are killed in a terrorist attack i am sure that it will save the white race, also don't even think of organizing with racially aware white people to do political activism, not even in a million years that of 1000 racially aware whites one may pick a rifle and be a pain in the ass to the kikes.

What kind of drugs are you on? That's literally the exact opposite of what you would expect the FBI to do.

I do believe that the FBI is like a bogeyman, they want to make us think they are everywhere, but they couldn't even set up something useful to take on donald trump or protect hillary's servers.
They try to make themselves bigger than they actually are.

Wasn't the only reason the IRA had as much power as it did for as long as it did, that it got funded by US politicians, as evidenced by the fact it's funding mysteriously dried up after 9/11?

I'm pretty sure if whatever resistant movement played their cards right, they could get funding as well.

You know, the fbi isn't as much of a direct concern as when the fbi turns turds to try to incite otherwise great men into doing compromising acts. Informants, snitches, whatever you call them… I doubt the feds really have to do a whole lot of direct monitoring on waifu origami message boards insomuch as they have direct dirt on some other dude who desperately needs to stir up some shit to avoid his own indictment. Is that you, user?

I am not even american or european, i am brazilian, why the hell does everyone is that paranoid that they think that anyone who believes that shitposting wont save the white race and that they need to do something useful, it is like saying that shitposting will end the nigger problem in the favelas, no it wont, a bullet will.
If that is such a big controversy i wonder what kind of people do browse this imageboard.

American here. YOU ARE WRONG.

Your nation's pride on display in the Euros when you went around fighting for your country inspired many of us here.

It was no joke. You have it within you to fight the hoards. You may not have guns, but you will find yourself with them quickly should shit hit the fan.

If you're dumb enough to talk about this kind of stuff online then I'd monitor you, stalk you, then put you down myself. You're the kind of fuckhead who can't be trusted to keep his mouth shut, i.e. your ingenious thread. That would be assuming it's a honeypot, which it is. These threads are fucking cringey, only the stupid or OP bumps this kind of stuff. How about you not respond, and wait for the retards to bump it? Then you'll look less culpable. Then again you could just switch IPs.

Oh look another internet tought guy that will talk shit of people that actually sugest that white people do useful stuff instead of just eating, masturbating, whining about their racial demise on the internet and then going to sleep, which to be fair is what i am doing, but i actually realize that this shit isn't getting us anywhere.
Europe is like a powderkeg and any shit hard enough can make it explode.
It is like the sole fact of talking about real life violence which can happen is a taboo in a Taiwanese Painting Club that loves to mentally jerk off about mass murdering the muds in europe or rounding up the mexicans, point them with bayonets and force them to march into mexico.
There is some serious mindscrew there to me.

You've given a lot of thought to this user… We'll be watching you.

we need a new way of thinking about this. It's true we have to be paranoid of provocateurs, its also true that if we do nothing we will be destroyed.

maybe brainstorm ways of advancing despite fed infiltration? building intentional communities, parallel societies and institutions?

take it from the ground up. what are all requisites we would need to inflict violence on our enemies? of those requisites, which ones can be gathered peacefully, quietly, legally?

I've been nazi saluting white people in public for solidarity and propaganda, and generally memeing right wing death squads into existence– seeding fear among shitskins and kikes.

Kek willing, he will manifest this in real life.

t. Astroturfer
Asymmetrical warfare is key, it's how the American Revolution was won for example. The thing is that such a topic is moot if exposed to millions of eyes, like discussing it on an imageboard. You really did have a good hook for the bread though, OP. The Irish Civil War is a great topic to research for specifics.

No, just funded by Irish Americans in general.

Potato here.
The IRA were fucking crazy and had no long-term goals other than "kill Protestants"

wut
The IRA died down in the late 90's, around the same time the troubles ended.

yeah, you think that but its not true. they broke into my house, stole my cell phone, vandalized my car, poisoned/drugged me and a number of other things. they'll get super-pissed if they really think you're a "bad guy" but they can't get the good on you – they'll then just do whatever themselves

All the Irish Burgers stopped funding them in fears of being caught.

You're an idiot. One of the major buzzwords in military, LE, and intel thought for the last ten years is adaptation and learning. If you read the literature on all this one of the offensive tools that they have come up with is making sure that rival groups don't learn from their mistakes, don't adapt, and don't do anything that would make them more wily for them to crack down on. Cracking down on threads like these – that aren't even talking about specific violence that the FBI would investigate – would be more of a case of screaming, "FBI!" when someone posts general strategic/tactical thinking threads. By scaring off people from generic threads about strategy and tactics (that have nothing to do with operational details involving locations and targets. You know, what actual terrorists do) you make sure that information and learning never happens. You'll make sure that information and knowledge about military logistics, war economics, military organization, military geography, military administration, tactics, weapons, strategy, leadership, etc. in a future war for European survival never becomes common knowledge. That sounds exactly like what the equivalent of FBI would do.

So op, you want to go camping in Sweden? It`s lovely over there. Lot`s of outdoor activity. Woods to go camping in, small towns and some larger ones. Lovely Swedish ladies, be carefull tho, it might be kebaks on Tinder trying to lure you into the woods to murder you and bury you where they`ll never find you, unless they track your phone that is.

I don't whetver to laugh or cry. Fucking Sweden man, they either burn everything down or get their heads straight again.

Well i suppose it's no surprise really, taig niggers share a lot in common with their muslim brethren. A love of bombs and underage children being the most salient.

The fire rises, brothers.

We need prison gangs. If and when our freedom fighters are caught they need to be safe in prison and be able to stamp out the kebab problem in there.

Bloody Sunday happened only a few decades ago, Ireland had already had a full scale war of independence followed by a civil war over if they should accept 26/32 counties or keep fighting for the entire Island… the original IRA started in 1917.

Other examples of IRA

The Irish Republican Army (1917–22) (in later years, known as the "Old" IRA), recognised by the First Dáil as the legitimate army of the Irish Republic in April 1921, split into pro-Treaty forces (the National Army, also known as the Government forces or the Regulars) and anti-Treaty forces (the Republicans, Irregulars or Executive forces) after the Treaty.
The Irish Republican Army (1922–69) – the anti-treaty IRA which fought and lost the civil war and which thereafter refused to recognise either the Irish Free State or Northern Ireland, deeming them both to be creations of British imperialism. It existed in one form or another for over 40 years before splitting in 1969.
The Official IRA (OIRA), the remainder of the IRA after the 1969 split with the Provisionals; was primarily Marxist in its political orientation. It is now inactive in the military sense, while its political wing, Official Sinn Féin, became the Workers' Party of Ireland.
The Provisional IRA (PIRA) broke from the OIRA in 1969 over how to deal with the increasing violence in Northern Ireland. Although opposed to the OIRA's Marxism, it came to develop a left-wing orientation and increasing political activity.
The Continuity IRA (CIRA), broke from the PIRA in 1986, because the latter ended its policy on abstentionism (thus recognising the authority of the Republic of Ireland).
The Real IRA (RIRA), a 1997 breakaway from the PIRA consisting of members opposed to the Northern Ireland peace process. They have grown into the largest Dissident republican organization fighting the Dissident Irish Republican campaign. They merged with a large Vigilante group in 2012 known as Republican Action Against Drugs and released a statement that they have officially changed their name from the Real IRA to just the IRA. Despite this they are usually referred to by the media as the "New" IRA.
In April 2011, former members of the Provisional IRA announced a resumption of hostilities, and that "they had now taken on the mantle of the mainstream IRA." They further claimed "We continue to do so under the name of the Irish Republican Army. We are the IRA." and insisted that they "were entirely separate from the Real IRA, Óglaigh na hÉireann (ONH), and the Continuity IRA." They claimed responsibility for the April killing of PSNI constable Ronan Kerr as well as responsibility for other attacks that had previously been claimed by the Real IRA and ONH.[3]

These also dont include groups like the INLA - Irish National Liberation Army - Or the modern 32csm - 32 county sovereignty movement, and their military wing, which IIRC is simply Republican Sinn Feinn - a violent group not associated with "political" Sinn Feinn. Óglaigh na hÉireann (Soldiers of Ireland), etc etc.

Bloody Sunday was in 1972, the Provisionals - the main group associated with the term IRA in the 60s 70s 80s etc - started 3 years before that. The people were protesting the concept of Internment, which is being arrested and put in prison without a trial, or proof etc… simply locking people up on a pen stroke, which they STILL do today. They were unarmed women and children, shot dead by the army. It made a big recruitment boost, and embittered the public even further.. but really they were fighting against over 800 years of oppression and genocide, not just a few people shot in the streets in 72.

youtube.com/watch?v=VLunqfi8-KM

This is a 50 minute documentary about a man named Dan Breen, the initiation of the Irish War of Independence is attributed to this man, and a couple other people.

Irish people had a long history of violent resistance and a struggle to retain their land - and even they, today, are mostly cowards. Its like in Palestine, where children are raised to hate the enemy, to know what they look like on the street, the children are raised knowing other people want them dead, and those other people want to take control of their land.

That breeds a lot of hatred, Sweden doesnt have that, Canada doesnt have that, Ireland doesnt even have it - anymore. The marxist we are all one propaganda is having a huge effect, they are a tiny island, easy for a country of 70 million run by jews to propagandize them.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with taking an interest in the troubled history of Ireland, friend.

The IRA were financed and run by the USA from day one.
Their purpose was to weaken and distract the UK.

This is why they always had huge stockpiles of US made weapons and imported narcotics from the USA.
When you'd expect their stockpiles to contain continental weapons and drugs.
They were the only ones to ever widely use the AR-18. Despite it never being sold commercially in large numbers. The US government literally bought most of the weapons limited production run and gave it to the IRA.

Weren't the IRA a bunch of gommies?

They had brothers in the USA but they werent run from the USA. They sent people to the US when they needed to hide, or had done something perceived as shameful. They actually tried to send Dan Breen away, after the move that eventually was recognized to have initiated the Irish War of Independence.

Again, Irish people in America and Canada are - and were - very sympathetic to the Irish struggle and the suffering of their people. Many of them ended up in NA because they were forced out, or couldnt survive with all the food being taken by the British army except for the rotting potato crops.

Whitey Bulger was an American Irish gangster - his brother in government protecting his ass. He used to send massive weapons shipments to Ireland, but it wasn't just America either. Everyone knows Gaddafi was funding them, giving them money, weapons, semtex explosives for their bombing campaigns. I believe they tried to attain weapons in places like Lithuania at one point, but IIRC that particular story was them being busted in a sting.

I have never heard of the Irish leadership being outside of Ireland, that doesn't make sense to me at all, it would be a communications and planning nightmare.

The IRA's leadership was Irish and in Ireland yes.
But they took their general instruction from the US government.
Said general instructions being "Raise hell. Distract Britain. Continue to do so and we will give you money and weapons. We will also continue to ignore your efforts to get these things yourselves"

They were puppets. Used to weaken Britain. Just another case of the yanks going "LOL REGIME CHANGE!"

You could call the "Official IRA" gommies as they were marxists in the 70s, but this is mostly a misunderstanding. When the Irish Nationalist movement started, decades before the rise of the National Socialists - the term National Socialism and the concept didnt exist. Without going into an extremely detailed response, National Socialism draws some concepts from Marxist socialism too, they only hard Marx, no Nazis to look up to and "identify" with.

Their version of "socialism" was for self defense, it wasnt about wealth redistribution and class warfare, it was about Ireland for the Irish! Brits out! It was about securing their racial inheritance and setting up an IRISH socialist state.

They were national socialists before the term existed.

James Connolly

Shan Van Vocht (socialist newspaper) January, 1897. Reprinted in P. Beresford Ellis (ed.), "James Connolly - Selected Writings", p. 124.

James Connolly lead the Irish Citizens Army and was a crucial part of the 1916 Easter Rising. He is regarded as a marxist, in reality, he was an Irish Ethnic Nationalist Socialist.

Aye, but the OP is a brain dead plastic paddy.

Thats quite the insulting way to belittle and marginalize a mass grassroots movement of people taking to the streets and risking their lives to stop a thousand years of oppression and genocide on their own land, one they formerly ruled over with a system if 4 under kings and 1 high king.

You also provided zero evidence to back that up. The history of the IRB and IRA have nothing to do with America, it was sparked because of the proposition of "home rule" - Britain giving Ireland nearly Canada tier status, a free state, owned by Britain paying taxes to the Queen - but having illusory independence. A half measure, to calm down the angry people.

In response, the PROTESTANT SIDE INITIATED VIOLENCE - in the form of going through Irish areas and firebombing their homes, attacking and killing random Irish people etc.

The Irish violent resistance mainly started as a response to that, with DEFENSIVE PATROLS through their neighborhoods, to protect their people. That had absolutely nothing to do with America, it was also near the start of the century, and WW1.

Oh the irony.

Yeah start of the century?
The USA had just benefited from the overthrow of Hawaiis government and gotten their first taste of "regime change"
Course they'd turn their attention to Britain, the nation they hate most.

And the protestants knew they had to get the first strikes. Because papists always kill protestants.

So, if you wanted to start a movement where Swedish people resist, Soliders of Odin is your best bet, Id say.

Marxist, get out.

60%

That's from 2011, they're 50% at best.

The evidence was in every IRA weapons dump.
The vast piles of weaponry and ammunition stamped with MADE IN THE USA
Their seemingly inexhaustible supply of US made equipment and weapons. Including things that weren't easily available.

Underrated post

When the English first invaded the North I might add, they were Catholic themselves. England was invaded by Protestants and Northern Ireland was the last refuge of the former King when William of Orange defeated him.

The Irish were tricked by an English pope, originally, who gave his papal bull suggesting the English invasion was sanctioned by god himself, confusing the Irish into not resisting. It was originally a deposed Irish king who invited them in.

The Irish had gone through 3 genocides under the English and were justified in killing every single Brit on the Island for what they had done. Norman invasions, Cromwells fury and the removal of all food sources with the army, a naval blockade etc intentionally creating a mass starvation.

Youve provided zero evidence for anything, even if America was part of it as a government, which they werent - they merely supported an Irish struggle that was already going on. They didnt initiate it, they merely sent weapons.

Gaddafi sent more than America ever did. You might as well say Libya was overthrowing a British colony.

This is troll tier garbage.

Thats the level of argument you just made.

If Gaddafi provided more than we'd have seen them using large amounts of warsaw pact weaponry.
But we didn't.
It was all US made.

Good to know you have absolutely no clue what youre talking about.

Every bomb that went off was Gaddafi.

/thread

Which means?

What a role model.

I'm not talking about the bombs.
I'm talking about the rest of their gear.

But by all means be a good goy. Focus on the bombs. Ignore all the guns and other equipment.
Ignore the fact that the yanks made sure the conflict was as violent and bloody as possible to service their own agenda.

The founders of the irish republic wouldn't had tolerated such invasion, the irish republicanism has been hijacked cucked and today isn't worth shit, but it as a national liberation front, europeans need national liberation from kikes and shitskins.

Back to Reddit. You lost the argument.

Just because the Red Army was made up of patriotic Russians doesn't mean they were fighting for a nationalist cause. They were useful idiots, and so are you.

You literally have nothing.
No way to counter the large quantities of US made weaponry the IRA always seemed to manage to get huge consistent piles of.

Face it.
The IRA took a somewhat decent cause and ran it into the ground by slurping globalist cock.
Now what do we have? An Irish republic that wants to see the Irish exterminated and replaced with niggers. To see the Irish republic conquered by the EU one treaty at a time.
An Irish government who will obey when the EU says "You got the wrong result in this referendum. Run it again and get the right answer this time."

Yes the IRA suffered a motive decay and now they are useless fools with little to no chances of actually achieving anything but back in the day they even tried to help Hitler in ireland and britain.

It was never communist you idiot, did you not listen to the motivation for using socialism? Read the fucking quotes you dunce, thats why I included them.

What matters to him?

Then on top of it all -

Irish Nationalist Socialism was about BLOOD ENTITLEMENT to the land, for Ireland to be Irish, and to assert Irish control over it. Marxism is about feeding people, not about protecting your race and asserting control over your own land.

research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/haken32.htm

Why Are We Nationalists?

We are nationalists because we see the nation as the only way to bring all the forces of the nation together to preserve and improve our existence and the conditions under which we live.

The nation is the organic union of a people to protect its life. To be national is to affirm this union in word and deed. To be national has nothing to do with a form of government or a symbol. It is an affirmation of things, not forms. Forms can change, their content remains. If form and content agree, then the nationalist affirms both. If they conflict, the nationalist fights for the content and against the form. One may not put the symbol above the content. If that happens, the battle is on the wrong field and one’s strength is lost in formalism. The real aim of nationalism, the nation, is lost.

That is how things are today in Germany. Nationalism has turned into bourgeois patriotism and its defenders are battling windmills. One says Germany and means the monarchy. Another proclaims freedom and means Black-White-Red [the colors of the German flag]. Would our situation today be any different if we replaced the republic with a monarchy and flew the black-white-red flag? The colony would have different wallpaper, but its nature, its content, would stay the same. Indeed, things would be even worse, for a facade that conceals the facts dissipates the forces today fighting against slavery.

Bourgeois patriotism is the privilege of a class. It is the real reason for its decline. When 30 million are for something and 30 million are against it, things balance out and nothing happens. That is how things are with us. We are the world’s Pariah not because we do not have the courage to resist, but rather because out entire national energy is wasted in eternal and unproductive squabbling between the right and the left. Our way only goes downward, and today one can already predict when we will fall into the abyss.

Nationalism is more wide-reaching than internationalism. It sees things as they are. Only he who respects himself can respect others. If as a German nationalist I affirm Germany, how can I hold it against a French nationalist who affirms France? Only when these affirmations conflict in vital ways will there be a power-political struggle. Internationalism cannot undo this reality. Its attempts at proof fail completely. And even when the facts seem to have some validity, nature, blood, the will to life, and the struggle for existence on this hard earth prove the falsity of fine theories.

The sin of bourgeois patriotism was to confound a certain economic form with the national. It connected two things that are entirely different. Forms of the economy, however firm they may seem, are changeable. The national is eternal. If I mix the eternal and the temporal, the eternal will necessarily collapse when the temporal collapses. This was the real cause for the collapse of liberal society. It was rooted not in the eternal, but in the temporal, and when the temporal declined it took the eternal down with it. Today it is only an excuse for a system that brings growing economic misery. That is the only reason why international Jewry organizes the battle of the proletarian forces against both powers, the economy and the nation, and defeat them.

From this understanding, the young nationalism draws its absolute demand. The faith in the nation is a matter for everyone, never a group, a class or an economic clique. The eternal must be distinguished from the temporal. Maintaining a rotten economic system has nothing to do with nationalism, which is an affirmation of the Fatherland. I can love Germany and hate capitalism. Not only can I, I must. Only the annihilation of a system of exploitation carries with it the core of the rebirth of our people.

We are nationalists because as Germans, we love Germany. Because we love Germany, we want to preserve it and fight against those who would destroy it. If a Communist shouts “Down with nationalism!”, he means the hypocritical bourgeois patriotism that sees the economy only as a system of slavery. If we make clear to the man of the left that nationalism and capitalism, that is the affirmation of the Fatherland and the misuse of its resources, have nothing to do with each other, indeed that they go together like fire and water, then even as a socialist he will come to affirm the nation, which he will want to conquer.

That is our real task as National Socialists. We were the first to recognize the connections, and the first to begin the struggle. Because we are socialists we have felt the deepest blessings of the nation, and because we are nationalists we want to promote socialist justice in a new Germany.

A young fatherland will rise when the socialist front is firm.

Socialism will become reality when the Fatherland is free.

Why Are We Socialists?

We are socialists because we see in socialism, that is the union of all citizens, the only chance to maintain our racial inheritance and to regain our political freedom and renew our German state.

Socialism is the doctrine of liberation for the working class. It promotes the rise of the fourth class and its incorporation in the political organism of our Fatherland, and is inextricably bound to breaking the present slavery and regaining German freedom. Socialism, therefore, is not merely a matter of the oppressed class, but a matter for everyone, for freeing the German people from slavery is the goal of contemporary policy. Socialism gains its true form only through a total fighting brotherhood with the forward-striving energies of a newly awakened nationalism. Without nationalism it is nothing, a phantom, a mere theory, a castle in the sky, a book. With it it is everything, the future, freedom, the fatherland!

The sin of liberal thinking was to overlook socialism’s nation-building strengths, thereby allowing its energies to go in anti-national directions. The sin of Marxism was to degrade socialism into a question of wages and the stomach, putting it in conflict with the state and its national existence. An understanding of both these facts leads us to a new sense of socialism, which sees its nature as nationalistic, state-building, liberating and constructive.

The bourgeois is about to leave the historical stage. In its place will come the class of productive workers, the working class, that has been up until today oppressed. It is beginning to fulfill its political mission. It is involved in a hard and bitter struggle for political power as it seeks to become part of the national organism. The battle began in the economic realm; it will finish in the political. It is not merely a matter of wages, not only a matter of the number of hours worked in a day — though we may never forget that these are an essential, perhaps even the most significant part of the socialist platform — but it is much more a matter of incorporating a powerful and responsible class in the state, perhaps even to make it the dominant force in the future politics of the fatherland. The bourgeoisie does not want to recognize the strength of the working class. Marxism has forced it into a straitjacket that will ruin it. While the working class gradually disintegrates in the Marxist front, bleeding itself dry, the bourgeoisie and Marxism have agreed on the general lines of capitalism, and see their task now to protect and defend it in various ways, often concealed.

We are socialists because we see the social question as a matter of necessity and justice for the very existence of a state for our people, not a question of cheap pity or insulting sentimentality. The worker has a claim to a living standard that corresponds to what he produces. We have no intention of begging for that right. Incorporating him in the state organism is not only a critical matter for him, but for the whole nation. The question is larger than the eight-hour day. It is a matter of forming a new state consciousness that includes every productive citizen. Since the political powers of the day are neither willing nor able to create such a situation, socialism must be fought for. It is a fighting slogan both inwardly and outwardly. It is aimed domestically at the bourgeois parties and Marxism at the same time, because both are sworn enemies of the coming workers’ state. It is directed abroad at all powers that threaten our national existence and thereby the possibility of the coming socialist national state.

Socialism is possible only in a state that is united domestically and free internationally. The bourgeoisie and Marxism are responsible for failing to reach both goals, domestic unity and international freedom. No matter how national and social these two forces present themselves, they are the sworn enemies of a socialist national state.

We must therefore break both groups politically. The lines of German socialism are sharp, and our path is clear.

We are against the political bourgeoisie, and for genuine nationalism!

We are against Marxism, but for true socialism!

We are for the first German national state of a socialist nature!

We are for the National Socialist German Workers’ Party!

The same reasons Germany used Nationalism and Socialism are the same reasons Ireland used them. Irish Socialism has nothing to do with questions of the stomach, despite the "famine".

Half the shit I listed happened just after they were founded you fuck.

I am proud of having irish blood, they are the bravest bunch and more rebelious group of western white people.
Of course they have decayed but the british did too, they used to have a empire and now they are a overcrowded island full of pakis, same can be said for any group of whites.

Ah, here we go, here is the subversive load of shit you wanted to dump as soon as your false premise was supposed to be accepted.

Oh, even better, more divide and conquer blaming jews actions on the Irish.

Ban this fucking kike. Every EU country and Canada too is the same fucking thing, this isnt a real Holla Forumsack, this is a white genocide promoting subvert. He has no argument, Ive laid out endless amounts of factual Irish history that can easily be sourced if I didnt already include it. This is the enemy, these people hate us, they are here to undermine conversation.

Britain only works when the British peoples are united.
Since the paddies decided they wanted to be continental rather than human, the whole thing has fallen apart.

The matter is that the british never considered the irish as part of a british country, they where considered a colony in europe but still not a full member of the british nation if such thing exists.
They ended up invading the island, confiscating their land, importing forgeiners and eventually trying to kill them from hunger, something that later stalin did with the ukranians. And then they have nerve to say complain about irish rebellions and drunken paddies runing around with assault rifles and killing british soldiers.
Im not anti-british, i believe in ireland for the irish and britain for the british, the same i can say for any white people.

...

True enough the Irish got a shit deal.
Primarily due to being papists and thus not capable of managing their own affairs.
If they hadn't been papists or had ceased to be papists then there wouldn't have been any problem.

Or if Mosley had managed to get the tories to stop being retarded.
But then Mosley is one big "if only"

Juden. Ireland for the Irish, Scotland for the Scottish, Wales for the Welsh. England for the muslims.

No, thats you. Ireland is for white genocide because of jews, not because of Irish people. Your whole message is that white genocide is white peoples fault, dont blame that sneaky semite in the corner rubbing his hands and cackling.

This was the reason behind the Act of Union 1801

Can we just get rid of the muzzies and confine the English to the south east of England?
You know the old saxon territories.
Then the rest of Britain can be returned to the Britons and whats left of the Picts.
Though the latter will need a lot of purging to get them to stop being so absurdly globalist.

I would say begone saxons entirely. But the English are so delightfully useful when they're not busy being moody angsty idiots.

Britain has always been at its best when for one reason or another we're united.
Ok we had to drag Ireland kicking and screaming along for the ride but together we conquered half the planet and terrified the rest.
Since the Irish left the English went full emo and have been cutting themselves using migrants ever since.

Come on protestanfuck the religious wars ended 4 centuries ago, the catholic church was based then by modern standards.
This isn't about religion it is about you british being on a territory that doesn't belong to you.
Fuck off, i am sure that you will defend the Boer genocide and will say that boers where racist with the british therefore you and your kikey friend where entitled to steal their lands and let them starve in concentration camps.

You "conquered" niggers, abbos and pajeets. Any European maritime nation was capable of that much. You were just a lot better at jewing.
That's why Germany started two world wars against you among others, and that's why the French challenged you all the time during the 19th century, right?

The papists have always been globalist. It is the nature of their religion.
They all wish for all of humanity to grovel before the pope.

And the Irish are British.
British covers multiple groups. Since the British islands are home to multiple native ethnic and cultural groups.
Though it is debatable if anglo-saxons are sufficiently native to count as native. Or if they're just Germans who don't want to be German.

Any european maritime nation could? Yet they did not.
France and Spain were ultimately destroyed by their Empires.
Though the French made a solid comeback they were never able to build an empire as impressive or stable as ours.

And don't go speaking like the Irish weren't involved. It was your empire too.

You do realise it was the Boers who declared war on the British Empire? How else are you going to fight a guerrilla army without using scorched earth tactics?

Those tactics would have also been required were Britain that bothered to keep ahold of Southern Ireland.

...

You cunts cut the Irish population in half, its not a me, it was white genocide 3 times.

You sent swaths of Normans in to not only wipe the Irish population out with mixing, but it was violent, they raped and pillaged and slaughtered all across the island. Then you sent that jew lover cromwell in - and he went around town to town slaughtering everyone in sight, simply because they were Irish. Thats what he did, thats his contribution to Ireland. He went town to town, killing every single Irish person, cleansing the land. Ethnic cleansing.

Damn those Irish resisting the extermination of their race, what was their problem?

Then, on top of all that, and the other things I left out like the language being made illegal, resulting in the loss of their own fucking language and culture… or how they were denied even housing, or right to vote - what a luxury that would have been, power to control their own political destiny.. but on top of all that, you fucking cunts come up with your "final solution" and during a potato famine, send in regiments to all the Irish areas that resisted the local constabularies attempts too fiercely - to remove every single last source of food in the country, except that rotting potato crop.

You put up a naval blockade and stopped other countries from sending aid. You intentionally starved the entire Island of Ireland.

Kicking and screaming. Id like to kick you in the teeth until you stop screaming.

The English are too sentimental to use those kind of tactics on their own.
Perfectly acceptable on the boers since they were foreign.
But on other Brits? Simply not done.

I think you're too stupid to see the contradiction in your own post. The true battle of dominance was against the French, German, Spanish, Dutch etc. Empires who also vied for worldwide superpower status.

You think anyone over here likes Cromwell?
Agreement on Cromwell is unanimous. A terrible idea and the best argument against Britain ever being a republic of any sort.

Yes, look at South America. Brazil is fucking big compared to Portugal, and the Portuguese also had other holdings across the globe. They alone could have had something bigger if not for the competition. Then you all the other players. Yes, you win in that game, but it was a game between European powers, not some serious war of conquest.
France was also a land power in Europe, and Spain and Portugal were hit quite heavily by the Moors. So out of all the maritime European nations you were in the best position, that's all.
I'm sure as hell that it wasn't an Eastern European empire, therefore it has nothing to do with me.

Anyway this is funny and enlightening

I presumed you were a paddy.
But you are in fact a gommie.
Now it all makes sense.

Also south america its important to remember that all the Portugese and the Spanish had to do was establish ports and they had effectively conquered the region.
The locals were too stupid, underdeveloped and disorganised to put up anything remotely resembling a fight.
Even in Africa you could count on the niggers not murdering each other for just long enough to try and murder whitey.

Blame bongposters and heavy TRS shilling atm. Hell they may be one in the same.

The portuguese and the spanish fucked it up by not importing their own ethnicities on big quantities, racemixing with the natives and not genociding them.
I will give you that for the british they where the best at creating other white countries by emigration.
Thanks for creating america, canada and ANZAC, still you should gtfo of ireland.

In India you just had to play the locals against each other and the subcontinent was yours. It's the same thing.

Were the Dutch and the French not doing exactly the same thing? You're not very smart, are you?

No, you start a thread praising a bunch of shitskin loving marxists that have done nothing but kill their closest relatives and tell us we should emulate them. Gas yourself you fucking plastic paddy, probably have more injun than Irish in you ffs.

No, you are the baka here. All I say is that you weren't the best conquerors but the smartest pseudo-kikes, and that is how and why you took control so much land. Land filled with lesser people.

Bringing up the IRA is always going to trigger us brits.
Because the IRA are cunts and Ireland is essentially the member of the family who left home, moved in with a cult and never calls but sometimes sends us parcels full of feces and pictures of them having sex with black men while eating feces.

Well.
The Empire did a number of things depending on the situation. That flexibility made it great.

When the locals were organised we'd subvert them heavily and retain a lot of their ruling class, take their children hostage and provide them a British education. Then send the kids home to succeed their parents and assist the British governor in running the territory.

When the locals were no more than stone age tribals. We just moved in en masse.
And tried to leave the locals alone for the most part except in what became the USA because their upper class were essentially kikes.

They tried but weren't very good at it.
The Dutch were just not very good at anything really while the French have massively inflated egos.
Seriously you ever spend twenty minutes around a Frenchman? No you probably haven't, otherwise you'd understand why everyone hates them.

I'm not even going to bother reading this thread because I already know the kind of replies that are in it.

Your women and children are being raped and murdered by the thousands and here you are afraid of the bad optics of violence. A few thousand people willing to do what's necessary and martyr themselves could bring this whole system down in flames. History remembers heroes and a traitors are condemned for eternity.

The men of Greece went and sacrificed their lives at Thermopylae. No other Greek would fight the Persians and were content to let themselves be conquered. They're still remembered as heroes 2500 years later.

We are now facing the greatest threat our people have ever faced. We're not going to live forever and there's no better hill to die on.

French and Dutch holdings in India were ceded to Britain largely in Treaties following direct wars between the powers. Britain only gained complete suzerainty over the Indian Subcontinent after directly defeating the French and Dutch armies in the Napoleonic wars, for example. Another obvious example - the reason why New York is no longer New Amsterdam.

When you invade another country's colony, who do you think your biggest obstacle is? The third-world natives with sticks or the well-armed professional European soldiers garrissoned?

Again, i don't think you posess the requisite intellect to discuss this matter.

Im not sure that they where marxists to begin with, i am talking about the fact that they did wage a sucessful war agaisnt a kosher approved goverment, i am not praising them but the fact that they did something that no european nationalist group has managed to do, quit using words and use guns.
The got something right and that is worth researching.

You can't really use Ireland as a case study for other nationalist groups.
It was a situation where England was not prepared to nor could do what was needed to win.
The English were never going to turn their full armoury and book of tricks on a part of Britain.

Yeah, I remember how the British Army just landed in Normandy and marched to Paris.
Again, you don't want to face that a war of conquest is not the same as this:
A war of conquest was when the Mongolians slaughtered their way to the Chinese capital and became the new rulers. You instead sold opium to the Chinks and forced them to open their ports. You could do it because they were so backward that they couldn't put up any meaningful resistance. Meanwhile the Mongols were technologically on the same level, maybe even inferior. Therefore this is why I hate how you go on about "conquering" so much of this world. It wasn't a conquest, it was fucking over apes and retarded chinks. Hardly a challenge compared to the bloodshed that was going on in Europe during all those centuries.

The Mongols had the benefit of China having degraded considerably by the time they were able to take over.
But China didn't become Mongol as a result. The Mongols became Chinese.
Chinese culture and practices won out over Mongol ones in the end.

I really can't get to see the story from a point of view that is good for the british, you literally acted like kikes in ireland.

Yes because papists.
Fucks sake it's like you don't pay attention. What do I need to be Italian with a silly hat for you to pay attention?

I see, so Britain's conquest of New France and incorporation into British North America should fit your arbitrary definitions perfectly. Can't wait to see how you'll move the goalposts this time.

And you still talk about muh papists, people like you speak more about catholicism than catholics, yes i am one, and no i don't give a fuck about what a pope thinks of politics, and yes francis deserves the oven.
You are so obsessed about religion like the paganfags.

What goalposts? Yes, those could be called wars of conquest. And what are those lands compared to the rest of your holdings? The jewel of the crown wasn't Canuckistan, but India.

son are you stupid
Wellingtons campaign was even more impressive given the level of technology it was carried out with
and the english were very smart in not occupying france for which they lackedthe manpower but rather but their semi puppet aristocrats on the throne

this too is incorrect
i assume when you say mongolian you refer to the famous version of them in short genghis and ogedei khan
whereas in reality the yuan dynasty replaced the jin dynasty which were the descendants of an earlier wave of mongolian tribesman invaders
this may shock you, but historically china was rarely ruled by chinese, it was always some foreign warrior society that conquered them largely intact and then due to sheer numbers of the chinese this foreign people inbreed and culturally became chinese
after which they stagnated and left the place open to invasion for the next set of tribes
if anything european intervention in china destroyed the greatest source of decandance and stagnation by destroying the position of emperor

Also forgot the pic to trigger butthurt religion-obsessed brit

Ah i see, so that's how. Those goalposts are almost on top of each other now. You're a blubbering moron.

...

You should also realise that Britain largely took places to colonise so as to make themselves more prosperous; not simply to lord it over other people.

South Africa, Canada and the 13 colonies were all rich and prosperous lands of bounty. The British had their hands in the fertile areas on Palestine, the oil-rich lands of Persia, the 'breadbaskets of the world' Rhodesia and South Africa.

Britain made homes for their people and took places that could increase quality of life immensely. They could feed masses of people, allowed for many jobs, instituted common law and advanced the fields of science and technology by huge leaps and bounds. There were kikes scheming away with their precious metals and blood diamonds, their pointless wars and their myriad other out-of-sight crimes- and there were likely too Brits who were traitors themselves, though every time I bother to research despicable individuals they turn out to be kikes.

The British Empire was a great thing, too great perhaps. The success of Imperialism emphasised the weaknesses of democracy, and coupled with mass-dislike from defeated competitors and jealous cousins there was no shortage of enemies without, whilst kikes had rooted their way within long ago. The kikes were unable to undo Britain from within without exposing themselves, and thus needed outside forces to take over.

Two dictators were used to destroy Britain (and consequently all the free world). First Napoleon, and secondly Hitler. I'm not going to say that either these men had bad ideas, but without them Britain would not have been undone. They were both exploited by Kikes to maximum benefit; and now the world is rotten.

… I also find it hilarious that Potato-papists still insist that 'proddies started it' when you dense fuckers still murder Protestants to this day on account of nothing but their religion. I had an ex whose family was Protestant and they have been harassed in the street several times (though her mother took it as a source of pride). Cromwell (for all his crimes) only invaded you people after you started murdering protestants (again), and I also doubt he did half the things you accuse him of as history indicates that (again for all his crimes) he was obsessed with doing the right thing, to such an extent that he often did nothing at all for fear he would do the wrong thing.

Also how the hell did you failures become so reliant on potatoes? You'd only had them for a couple of centuries- they are not native to Ireland or Europe. Maybe try growing some other crops?

No britbong, YOU fucked up europe by being a good goyim.
You boicotted rhodesians.
You fucked up genocided the boers.
You shot at irish people.
You created versailles.
Now i realize that the eternal anglo is true, i am sure that you will defend the kike-cock-sucker Churchill and will say that the Dresden bombing was justified.
What are you doing here?

south africa was a prosperous dutch colony
then the british came, fucked fellow europeans and imported pajeets
when the dutch boers removed the brits from power south africa was prosperous again
then the eternal anglo embargoed them in favor of their pet niggers
just like in ireland they attempted to genocide the native white population at multiple occasions

The problem with the papist is he willingly subjugates himself to god.
He slaps the chains upon himself and proudly declares himself a slave.
The Anglican on the other hand adopts the old royal motto "By god and my right"
That yes god is important for them, but they have their rights.
They refuse slavery to god.

This is why papists oppose freedom. Their whole mindset is pro-slavery.

To be fair on the potato front.
They're very easy to grow and a lot of their land is good for little else.

You are drunk Anglican, you have a nigger Bishop of York and the Canterburry is literally a kike.

That's a view that hasn't been widely held here for around 20 years.

The Dutch made a port town, the British made a marvel of the entire World. The Dutch were pretty great in general though, can't fault 'em.

Napoleon is the reason why kikes got control of most of British business. From that point on the kikes slowly get more and more power, and pushed more and more ridiculous shit like anti-imperialism, suffragettes and all manner of other degeneracy.
Boers started it, although they co-existed for a long time until Jewish powers undermined the whole nation which they were only able to do because of Britain's infestation of liberalism/jewry- a result of the consequences of the actions of Napoleon and Hitler.
Irish shoot at us; we shoot back. Those potato niggers had it pretty good; thankfully we also know they caused shit in the US, so you cannot just blame the Brits because it is obvious that they are a nigger-tier people wherever they go.
The French created he draconian measures in the Versailles with the British telling them it was going too far.
Churchill is known for saying that were it not for the jews, WW2 would never have happened.

Hitler forced Britain's hand; do you let your Empire die (an inevitable consequence of Hitler's brand of nationalism which had already infected Ghandi in India) or do you fight to defend it? Britain was in a shit position, and whilst Churchill was a scumbag alcoholic; he didn't have much choice. The Brits too were struggling with kikes, and just as with the haavara agreement the kikes said they'd all fuck off to Palestine if the Brits gave it to them. … But we all know how jews are with honouring their agreements.

And war is war. Dresden was horrific, but so was the Blitz. Fact is these were all jew manufactured wars, which were brought about because of two dictators. In hindsight yes, Hitler winning would have been better than what we have today; but it is also true that the kikes only got ANYWHERE because the wars allowed the jews to gain ever more power (as well as generally liberalise the West by annihiliating generations and creating a 'hippie/pacifist' movement).

Those who hate the British Empire are fools and scoundrels.

fuck off leftycuck.

Reminder that the Brits are the reason Israel currently exists

No, it's all because of Hitler. If not for him they'd still rule over so many millions of shitskins, and everything would be great. See:

I would put it in another context.
Does standing up to that sound lefty to you?
Irish Nationalism used to be implictly pro-white because the irish are white.

That would be the American President, Roosevelt.

Hitler had a lot of good ideas. One thing he was doing was creating Israel; either through moving jews to palestine with all their wealth in tact, or his previous dream of putting them all in New Israel AKA Madagascar.

I never said everything would be great, I said the destruction of the British Empire at the hands of the Jew was only possible because of Napoleon and Hitler.

I don't complain about the british having a empire and submiting shitskins, i do hate the fact that you treated the boers and irish as shit, also if you had joined the axis you would had kept your empire, but the anglo is nothing but a slave to the international jewry, then they ordered your politicians to get rid of the empire and open the floodgates and you complied like good goys.

The empire started dying when the brits decided to give a fuck about what happened in europe, that was the end of the Pax Britanica, the empire only existed because you stayed out of continental warfare that drained your wealth and willpower to keep such a giant empire existing.

What the fuck OP.

Part of my IRA folder.

And Britain likely would have were it not for previous Jewish intervention which was possible due to Napoleon, as well as going further back with general anti-monarchist sentiment.

The Monarchy was, if anything, pro-Axis. The problem is after Waterloo most of the 'money' was owned by kikes who used their influence to get what they wanted. True patriotic Brits were increasingly on their own (just as true American patriots are increasingly on their own today - jews are seemingly everywhere).

There's also the problem who how Imperialism could work alongside the overt-nationalism of Hitler's Germany. I do admire Mosley and enjoy a great many of his speeches; but he wanted to get rid of the Empire for those same nationalist reasons. To me that does not feel the right option, and regardless of whether it is or not; that's a very big choice to make as a leader of a nation. Do I throw away my country's Empire in the hopes that Uncle Adolf will take care of us? Or do we try to maintain our image as the invincible Empire?

As already said; the Boers started it, and a lot of the shit that went down against them was at the behest of jews, not Brits. The Irish had it coming. This is not just Anglo-Irish rivalry; the Irish are literally a shit-tier people. Go live in Ireland for a bit, I did. They commit crime like niggers. They even exported their criminal ways to the US. … And before you tell me 'not all Irish' - realise that you're sounding awfully like an SJW crying not all niggers. Yes there are many, many good Irish out there; but relative to other peoples they have a lot of shit-tier people, and they regularly commit crime INCLUDING murdering protestants.

Pretty much. Once we had our Empire we should have just consolidated the Anglosphere and let the Frogs and Krauts and Rus murder the shit out of each-other. So long as we made sure ol' Blighty was safe 'n' sound with a huge navy docked just outside, perhaps all would have been well.

Listen here you muggafuga!!
If you're lazy, fat, a welfare leech living in the basement of your parents with no rope to breed, get a lady or even leave your parents home any day, so, you have absolutely nothing to lose.
What's the so big concern in get caught after killing Angela Merkel or the pozzed mayor of your city?
If the prison of your nation isn't a 5 star hostel like the Scandinavians, if is a common prison where you can get you shatter shattered by a Muhammad, just kill yourself before the police caught you.

Unfortunately we had a very nasty, vindictive continental neighbour who always saw fit to involve themselves and stir trouble in our affairs.

Easy thing, nationalism for white people.
Imperialism for shitskins.

As nice as that is for the future Empire (and it is bloody good and simple, and fits in with the ol' white man's burden ideology), we must remember that Hitler advocated nationalism for all peoples. He was not quite the white supremacist that our (((history teachers))) make him out to be. Ghandi was inspired by Hitler, as were others who wanted to (and later did) destroy the Empire.

A matter at hand regardless is define if Holla Forums is a nationalism for everyone, white separatist or imperialist board.

You stupid fucking Ameri-kike.

You do realise that the IRA are anti-white Marxist scum who engaged in a campaign of ethnic cleansing AGAINST OTHER WHITES?

Plastic paddies will be the first ones to be gassed to be honest.

t. half taig/half prod based ulsterbro.

IRA are marxist scum who hated white brits but hare happy to have unlimited nigerians flooding into dublin and belfast. Gerry adams marches in fag pride parades and has photo ops with trannies.
The BASED LOYALIST paramilitaries are where its at (UVF, UDA, UR, LDF etc) and are a far better model to emulate in this regards.

NO SURRENDER

Found the Fed.

(checked)
Really difficult to say. Soldiers of Odin is a good start. Best case scenario is something like the SD coming to power and taking over the media. If something on the scale of Rotherham happened in Sweden, and the media amplified the fuck out of it, you could see a serious push to remove kebab. Of course the best long term solution involves removing (((subversives))) from the education system as well to eliminate the cultural rot, but that's not effective on the timescale we need.

The brits made ethnic cleansing of the irish first.

De-programming whites on mass scale would take decades and we aren't in power in any nation.

Gas yourself retard this is about successful insurgencies, not ideology.

At last someone gets it.

im sure they made you sail to their country and invade them. You are a nation of faggot fucking cunts and I laugh every time I see the pathetic state of your shithole island

I know, that's why it's the long-term solution. Short-term, best we can hope for is more Happenings to further radicalize the populace and foster mistrust against existing institutions.

Pot calls the kettle black?

And does that fucking excuse the fact that the (((Irish))) go about intimidating Prods out of their homes on the Falls Road only to replace them with fucking niggers?

At least when Prods intimidate the Taigs out of their homes, they are replaced with more Prods, or in the worst case scenario, a bunch of Eastern Europeans.

But sure, you fucking Kike, keep siding with the (((Irish))).

I love Holla Forums, but the resident plastic paddies on this board need to be thrown out of helicopters.

Top kek.

Basically what i am saying that will happen, Holla Forums should pour gas on the fire, so we finally end up seeing germans puting on a balaclava, smuggling guns from serbia and entering into a rapefugee center and shoahding all of them.

Again, what right do the prods have to rule over the paddies and what right do they have to live, if prods live in ireland it should be as guest of the irish not as the rulers.
Tell me how is that different from how the pakis have overrun london and other parts of britain?

They were successful in forming cells, acquiring supplies, and carrying out missions. Aka the groundwork that any successful white insurgency will need to have. That's the stage we're at right now.

The conquered have no right to tell the conquerors how to rule.

You want Northern Ireland?

Come and take it :^)

But then again, if you were to do that, that'd mean that whites would be fighting against fellow whites… but you'd like that, wouldn't you (((Seamus)))?

Meanwhile, in reality, most people in Northern Ireland don't give a shit about the constitutional question and the vast, vast majority are happy with the status quo. The goal is, was, and will forever be, removing the non-whites from our beloved island.

By that right do the jews have a right to rule the anglos and import shitskins to england?

Peter King raised money for the IRA, but the Good Friday agreement was before 9/11.

The three cops who think they are spying on me on my FB all have drug incomes.

Youre arguing with reddit.

Things Holla Forumsacks never do.

Aye, only to be infiltrated by the security forces pretty much instantly.

Having unlimited (((American))) money and access to shit-skin weapons from Libya isn't a model we should emulate

Sure, if you want to kill innocent children (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrington_bomb_attacks#Second_attack) and massacre innocent workers (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingsmill_massacre).

Now kindly fuck off, you are clearly an FBI shill.

Raaaaaaaaycissssssss

youtube.com/watch?v=1yJ87y7BR80

Jews are one thing, the (((Irish))) are another thing entirely.

DeVallera took in Nazis. He knew the score.

Gerry Adams is a fucking cuck, nobody likes Sinn Féin.

Those where soviet-made, unless you count the slavs as shitskins.

Why do taigs have those BIG PINK LIPS?

I'm from Northern Ireland and this is a very silly idea. The IRA and the rest of our paramilitary groups are all completely irrelevant now, have been since the Troubles ended in 1998, and only get brought up as the butt of sectarian jokes and satire anymore.

Are you American, by any chance?

I was thinking the same thing really. The history of these paramilitary groups are worth studying because they show how a small number of dedicated people can really fight the system and cause them a lot of damage. Much more than a bunch of lukewarm deplorable faggots or whatever.

The vast majority are perfectly happy with that status quo as well. You can't judge something based on what normies want because normies are dumb.

Federal agents encourage violence on the internet, and only retards like you indulge him. Assuming he's not just switching IPs.

I really don't get this shit, anyone who believes that physical force is useful to achieve a political objective is a fed, a shill or a retard, so the smart move is just vote and then go back to doing nothing.
US federal agents don't achieve nothing encouraging violence in the internet because nobody takes it seriously, if a group of people decided or make violence they wouldn't be talking about their plans on the internet.
Holla Forums is just a analysis site and a trolling site, no violent actions will be organized from this site because it is unorganized by nature.

I don't want to kill british soldiers i'm not a marxist faggot like the IRA

This. IRA degenerates should be saught and executed.

Of course not, that is not the point of it, but i don't object killing law enforcement and army if they protect the enemies of the natives, kikes, faggots, muds and cucks.
They should be our allies fighting them, they should be giving nationalists the rifles to shoot the traitors but a lot of them are cucks with guns, see the swedish army
The point of it that their tactics and the experience in northern ireland could happen again in some europeans countries because of the racial strife.
Again i do support the idea of ireland for the irish, and commies get free helicopter rides.
you tube.com/watch?v=QBhOzRvkERc

HYPOTHETICAL

DO NOT ATTEMPT

OP completely failed to create the discussion he wanted. Examining the tactics and structure of The Troubles as a hypothetical potentiality for a racial/religious conflict. The immediate parallels being that action would probably come from non-state actors with a state being nominally neutral clearly taking a side though. The IRA was incredible in how they married political and military goals. A political wing and an armed violent wing under the command of a war council. Having clear political objectives while pursuing a concomitant military strategy was effective. Secrecy being paramount.

As for their fieldwork the first thing to note was their indoctrination. The Green Book clearly lays out the political objectives of the struggle so all the fighters knew the goal. It also gave practical tips on resisting interrogation. They also had centuries of rebel music and poetry as their esoteric inspiration.

The second thing to note was their weaponry. They found a state that was antagonistic to the UK for other reasons, Libya, and used it to acquire arms and conduct training. They also worked with ETA in Spain for a similar cause. Their combat was very often urban.

Third their international financing scheme was pioneered by the Fenian Brotherhood in the 1800s. They used a large diaspora in a wealthier country and appealed to them. Much of this fundraising was done under the guise of concerts.

Fourth they operated under heavy surveillance. In Belfast the British knew the color of the wallpaper inside every room and they had listening devices hidden in the forests of Northern Ireland. Informants were everywhere. Secrecy and harsh reprisal to turncoats was needed to overcome this.

Finally the IRA was willing to negotiate to end the war. They were willing to take a solution that wouldn't bear fruit for a generation, knowing that demographics were on their side.

Observations, but not recommendations:

These are all hypothetical points and should be read as satire. Any and all violence is highly dangerous and illegal. Consult a lawyer before reading.

...

Good analysis.
Also
The irish rebel music is beautiful, i don't know any better political music, it beats 100 times the garbage that is Rock Agaisn't Communism.

I honestly prefer English folk revival. Irish rebel music is certainly beautiful. I'm glad you enjoyed my analysis.

I was under the understanding that they imported it all off of the international arms market: Armalites were cheap AF because by the 70's they'd spent a decade or so trying to sell them and hadn't pulled a single large western contract, and they were the cheap, high tolerance, stamped sheet, AR variant that nobody wanted.

yeah but they had tonnes and tonnes of soviet arms confiscated at the border, I guess the libyan gommies either couldn't keep their mouthes shut or they were just under heavy surveilance for gommunism that yank black market traders didn't have to deal with.

focusing on armaments is like wondering whether /k/ommandos are commies for using Mosins?

What's next? "Hitler was a socialist"?

This kills the islamo. It's all clear now, Sweden's tactics are 42Dchess/3.14! Swedes will overload them all with such levels of liberalism even ((they)) can't tolerate, forcing muslims and kikes to commit suicide out of unbearable shame for their unforgivable deviation of their own shitty values.

Just imagine the day when a furry muslim refugee with a fox tail puttblug appears on swedish tv sucking a trans-platipus-jewish man's half-circumcised cock on mandatory cocksucking tolerance day and suddenly all the other muslims and kikes all throughout the civilized world burst out vomiting and shitting involuntarily so afraid and ashamed that they'll run back to the middle east shivering out of pure mental trauma, repeatedly mumbling to themselves "I-I can't ….t-take it any more…the whites have beaten us in our own game" and "make it stop….please make it stop…" and "allah/yaweh please don't look at me…i-i'm so dirty, please, no mercy.".

And then, the Swedes finally rejoice. Not because they no longer need do delve in degeneracy, but because they can finally send Eirný Jökulsdóttir, who was in charge of the CGI department of OPERATION FÖRRUTTNELSE, back to Iceland. As no more fake disgusting content was need to be produced, and no longer did the Swedes need to watch tv through a secret mesh network they themselves developed in secrecy. (Not that they watch tv that much anyway).

This day will forever be remembered as Puke-shit All Gay Arabjews National Suicide Day, or PAGANS Day.

Sure, as long as the motives are pure the method is sound.
Of course, you don't think that the explicitly Marxist IRA created with the stated goal of forming a Socialist Republic were good or correct, do you OP?
You're not that stupid I assume.

lol son, Irish Republicanism was always cucked.
It's been bokshevism from Day 0

I have heard claims and counter-claims about wether the Provisionals where or not marxists, one claim is that the marxists where the INLA and that the Provisionals where just nationalists and other claims that the Provisionals where a mixed bag of people of many ideologies.
Don't know who is right about it.

...

They weren't financed by the US government. They were financed by Irish Americans. Probably mostly from Boston.

Read a book, nigga.

Holla Forums is basically "if you j
kill your enemies they win": The board

There's no point asking this question here. These people that were born into institutionalised leftist violence and have internalized their commands; that is to be domesticated. Every elaborate explanation you fags can come with for why we shouldn't be violent comes from this fact and this fact alone.

No one is revealing blueprints on how, when, where to do shit idiot. We are just talking about violence as a viable pathway towards progress. Literally no other people on earth are this afraid to talk but this except right-wingers on the internet. There are commies posting pics of themselves with guns and vague threats and they don't give a fuck, niggers talk about revolutions and killing whites on TWITTER and they're not afraid of it. It's only right-wing pussies that are afraid of "muh FBI CIA looking at muh anonymous posts on Holla Forums". No one talks as much shit and does nothing than internet right-wingers.

its not about being persecuted for whyt you say/write.
its about them documenting your activity and pilling up evidence to use against you if they need to.
they wont give a fuck if you talk some "hate speech" or "violence" on here.
but if you for example try to hold a public office or be someone when the shit hits the fan, they can just bring you in for what you said/posted

the best tactic you can employ from the IRA playbook is the single shot sniper. Carbombs arent great, because of the heat you'll draw and of course muh pr. But pop a few weasel politicians with very little chance of getting caught and you can make some real progress.

Sure, but the death of funding kept the peace from breaking down in the longer term.

passing the hat on saint patty's

This. Also, it doesn't matter how low the target either. Even if the politician was a nobody pawn, it puts fear into their leaders. Also, it's easier, so f you're inexperienced, you'll have better odds.

...

...

Is it against us law for a us citizen to organize armed resistance in Europe?

yes. youd be sentenced for joining, sponsoring and conducting terrorism in foregein friendly states.

any armed resistance in the west against the establishment is branded terrorism, as use of violence to pursue political/ideological goals by non-state actors is the definition of terrorism.

thats why the EU is launching the new police infrastructure in 2017 according to the Lisbon treaty where member states can send police forces to supress opposition and resistance in other member states, to avoid the inconvinience of brothers killing brothers in one country. like the romans, soviets and the US did in the past.

Well, if you want Kek on your side it probably should be….