...
Muh crime is caused by socio-economic status
Robert Carter
Mason Sanchez
correct.
incorrect.
"race" is arbitrary folk terminology and is unsientific categorization. there is ancestry, and it proves that physiological phenomena like skin color are not necessarily the strongest implications for distinctions as a "race" hence is therefore a social construct.
that said, there have been very little experiments conducted to solve the everlasting question of "nature vs. nurture" but indicators like the fact that the historical discrepancy between the civilisations and cultures is merely 5000 years old suggest that IQ as a measurable institution (even ignoring that it is shoddy and itself subject to many things) might be indeed influenced by ancestry but in a very, very marginal way so that nurture pretty much supplants ancestry in this matter.
now please bother doing actual research instead of taking jpegs at face value without any kind of methodology for an explanation that isn't 'the facts speak for themselves' or, when it fails when you realize it isn't the case, shout 'da joos.
ethical sage.
Gavin Moore
Crime is caused by the superstructure, which while determined by historical socio-economic status, is not the same thing as socio-economic status
Liam Russell
We never said that though
Ryan Nelson
kek
Michael Reed
Blacks live in worse places, it's not that hard to figure out
Cameron Miller
Men commit 95% of all the crime in the world yet you are blinkered by race.
Lincoln Taylor
this, compulsory estrogen shots NOW.
Austin Roberts
It's not just individual socio-economic status that you'd expect to be relevant to crime rates, but also the overall socio-economic status of the neighborhood a person comes and the schools they go to (keep in mind that the US has a fucked up system where local property taxes fund school systems so poorer people get much lower-funded schools) since that's where most socialization happens. And because of the history of housing discrimination, if you pick a low-income black person and a low-income white person who make the same amount individually, the black person is far more likely to live in a neighborhood with "concentrated poverty". For example if you define the cutoff between "poor" and "nonpoor" exactly the same, only about 7.5% of poor whites live in neighborhoods of concentrated poverty while 25.2% of poor blacks do, see the second chart at theatlantic.com
Also see the paper at scholar.harvard.edu
Kayden Lopez
Except it isn't just skin color; it's skull features, brain size, age of maturity, etc along WITH ancestry. Race is therefor a perfectly valid scientific categorization for these features.
Hunter Brown
Oh no it's not like men are behind 95% of inventions.
David Cox
Are Holla Forums really that far from the niggers they love to sperg about?
Luis Robinson
only Holla Forumsacks could come up with this logic.
Nathaniel Bell
Correction, borderline autistic beta males are behind most inventions and science throughout history, the alpha tough guy heroes so beloved by you nazis (and some tankies too) have contributed very little of lasting value, and of course they're the ones who commit most of the crime.
Austin Turner
except if 'race' as a term in practice refers to you is
by ignoring the basis upon which
is built, you are still left with an unscientific, idealistic conception of particularity you base your entire 'scientific' categorization on.
it should also, particularity when it comes to skull features and brain size which you mentioned, be known that anthropology and evolutionary biology have fully discarded as invalid the ultimately unscientific 'sciences' of phrenology, racialism and race 'realism'. this isn't even an appeal to authority (in case you decide to put on your metaphorical fedora and put on your best interpretation of internet pseudointellectualism): it's actual science that has yet to stand up to scrutiny.
Aiden Jones
Or rather it would be if anyone could decide empirically on what a "race" is. Every individual is different, and while some are more similar to others everyone is on a gradient. It's like trying to say when blue becomes green. Even if you choose an exact wavelength that divides blue from green, it will still be arbitrary. Every stormfag I talk to has a different opinion on what races are which. It's easy to say africans and europeans are different, but if you line up people of ancestry from northern africa to germany everyone would give me a different answer on where one "race" began and another ended, or even how many "races" were present in the group.
I really don't get why this is so fucking hard to understand. I almost think you guys actually do get it, but just want to ignore it. Even stormfront has a sticky saying they don't know and to stop asking what "white" is, yet for some reason they have a whole site dedicated to preserving it.
Ryan Bell
Race is a spook
Cameron Butler
...
Colton Lopez
remember, they believe if hitler won ww2 they would've been space kangz who would be colonizing the stars and terra forming planets
Logan Sanders
It's not were, men ARE inventors. And if you want men to commit less crimes, then look at black men, who's increased crimes are because of higher testosterone levels along with lower intelligence.
What basis?
Eli Cooper
if you think the theory of evolution and biology as a science is a spook too then sure.
Lucas Turner
...
Jose Mitchell
I think you need to go back to biology if you think races are real solid categorisations.
They are pseudo-groups based on 19th century pseudo science. Real biology uses ethnic and genetic groups, not "race"
Gabriel Richardson
...
Ryan Adams
"evolution and biology" does not predict a species distributed over a wide area will generally form cleanly distinct "races", rather there will tend to be more or less continuous variation in the statistical variation of different genes present in the species.
Jeremiah Rodriguez
this one's better