Which one? Only people who actually know what they are talking about answer...

...

Immediate family is middle class, extended family is more well off, they have 3 4K's one curved, two not, that's how I can say with certainty, that curved looks absolutely shitty when compared to a normal one.

As for poorfag, I mean relatively, like I can't drop 2K on a luxury right now, I encourage myself to spend most of my cash on gym stuff, food, investments, hobbies instead of stuff that will encourage me to stagnate like movies and video games (don't always have the willpower but there you go). Ideally I will get to the point where I can have a really great kino setup and still have a life but atm if I did that as I am now I would probably never leave and just watch films all day.

P.T.A you smug magnificent bastard, probably planned that all out

The lotr films CGI was done in 2K
The Star Wars prequels were filmed on digital 1080p

besides that anything filmed on film is naturally 4k 6k 8k etc

So only shit things will be lost

The issue is that a lot of things won't make the transition every time there is a new resolution. For example, the reason Star Trek Deep Space Nine and Voyager are not on blue-ray or 4k is that all the effects were done for standard definition television resolutions. The shows themselves were shot on film but they would have to go back and redo all the effects work for every single episode. Too expensive. Now imagine all the television produced in the last 10-15 years that uses a lot of digital stuff. Will it be worth the cost to go back and redo effects? No. Unless there is something I am missing I think the SJW era might be lost to history because of low resolution special effects.

Does it matter when the images arent in 4k and you arent watching them on a 4k monitor? It isn't showing the quality of the projector just what the hell it is for retarded people. The projectors work perfectly.

Yea they could ideally remaster the LOTR graphics if they wanted because there is a payout for newer versions and I believe they were filmed on 4k or 6k just the graphics werent done in it.
WB has already updated the Harry Potter prints and they are all coming out this year, the first two might be remastered completely.
Star Wars surely will get treatments but they will be crappy. The prequels would look horribly upscaled. The OT would actually look fine if they did it despecialized and not special edition style. Unfortunately the newer star wars were shot on film and the graphics which arent good would still look as presentable as they did in theaters when released.

But besides that yes all the capeshit movies are going to look like ass, besides Nolans which had little CG in them, if you dont count TDKR and its huge flying batmodbile which was a horrible film.

4k resolution would be great for a PC monitor or gaming but there's so little 4k movie/tv content out there it won't be useful as a TV resolution for a long time. Consoles still struggle to reach 1080p and can only manage fake 4k most of the time.

bump