So my friend is about to get married and I dont want this shit happening to him. (Pic related)

So my friend is about to get married and I dont want this shit happening to him. (Pic related)

In fact, It's pretty scary to get married.

But in today's society, getting married has some good tax benefits, such as deductions, especially if you have children.

He tells me that "they would do things together", but her fiancee is actually pretty wild.

So in the end, what I would like to discuss is the benefits and I guess cons of getting married.

hes gonna get cheated on; try to talk him out of it before its too late

Don't let him get married. If he still wants to, convince him to get a solid prenup drawn up. She will show her true colours once ink begins to hit paper, and you can use this as a "told you so" moment. If she doesn't, then he has a good prenup protecting him.

That webm is probably fake, but your friend sounds like hes marrying a women just for the fuck of it instead of starting a family which is the root of the problem. Tell him to grow the fuck up and get his priorities straight before marrying some random whore. Polite sage.

Most women wont sign a prenup because they'll say the man has "trust issues"

Webm is real. Check Girlsdop0rn E154.
She does porn behind her fiance's back, then comes back for a threesome.

wew lad

Exactly. And when she does not sign - despite it being very reasonable (lawyers generally pre-balance prenups including provision for kids etc to prevent them being challenged) - it will be a gigantic red flag.

A good prenup is a sign of strong trust, not the lack thereof. If she trusted him, she would not mind signing because the document will never be used. Right, babe?

I'd tell her it's not about being unable to trust her. It's all about not being able to trust the family court system.

Too bad we live in an age where romanticism is dead and adulterers serve no punishment. She should be tossed aside by society and let to rot in a whorehouse but that won't happen.

i proposed to my girlfriend. she loves me, she is redpilled, and she knows if she ever cheated on me i'd kill them both. it's pretty easy when they understand the rules of the game.

omg I love your blog subscribed

We've known each other for 7 years, married for 6.

it would appear your friend sucks shit at selecting mates. don't convince him out of it. let him learn from his own mistake

Red flag right there. If she's not rich too, then she's looking to "marry up".

Good advice. If he's your friend, ask him if he's really sure; but don't interfere. It'll make you look jealous or trite. He'll have to learn for himself.

I hate how this is true 99% of the time. I live in an uber liberal area though, I should find a church but it will still probably be hard.

If you framed the relationship the right way and didn't pick a bad one, yes, I think so.

I would personally explain it as I take care of those I care about and those that are faithful. Infidelity, "no fault", or disloyalty get you nothing. I would hint at that from the start of the relationship. And I've seen too many horror stories of divorce rape on good men.

Especially if you live in Canada, don't even think about going into a marriage raw, it's bad in the US, but Canada is insane with alimony and child support.

That's why I'm interested in setting up an ironclad prenup.

first, check those Hitler dubs

Marriage is a sacred institution, and the best way to raise, good, successful children. However there are societal (((influences))) that will corrupt even the best of partners, and destroy marriages.

A prenup sounds like a good ideal but for a number of reasons, it's not. First, merely suggesting a prenup will often poison the relationship. That should be a red flag all by itself that the relationship is destined to fail. Prenups get thrown out all the time. All a woman has to do is cry on the stand and that will get about half of them thrown out.

If you want protection for your assets, get a family trust. Establish it before the marriage. Make the home the sole and separate property of the husband. Make the wife pay RENT to live in the house with her husband. If she's a stay at home wife, her contributions are in lieu of rent. Don't make the wife an executor of the trust (leave 2ndary executor to your father, and tertiary to the 2nd born son). This way there are no cash and prizes for the wife should she succumb to (((factors))) and get a divorce.

OYYYY VEEEEY

Prenuptial Agreement: How not to get BTFO by marriage laws, a primer

First of all, do not consider this guide to be an exhaustive list of everything you need to know as there is always more to consider based on the localities you live at. Liberal judges tend to favor women in divorces and visa versa.

Alright, so you're thinking about hitching yourself to a 3DPD. There are a few things you need to know if you want to write a prenuptial agreement that doesn't get immediately thrown out by the courts.

1.) Time for consideration: This is the big one where people fail at. Some people think that signing a prenuptial agreement on the eve of a marriage will be enforceable, but courts have made it very clear that the amount of time a boob animal is allowed to have to consider such agreements are very important for the enforceability. The more time the better, and if you don't think you can have this conversation with your wife then the red flags are already up my friend. Have this conversation half a year to a year beforehand and you'll be golden. This way she will have enough time to consider the agreement before signing and then entering the marriage contract with you.

2.) Duress: Duress is when your boobanimal thinks she was pressured into making the agreement. Giving her time to consider the agreement is a good thing to prevent this, but another way to prevent a claim of duress is to hire her her own lawyer to explain the implications of the prenuptial agreement. Take note, you can't share a lawyer if you want this to be viewed as a good thing. Get her her own lawyer that is acting as her agent and have him read through the contract with her and explain the contract. This is to prove to the court that she had every opportunity to back out of the agreement but still chose to do sign her John Hancock on your prenup.

3.) Disclose everything: This is the scary one. Only by disclosing assets will you be able to use the prenup to shield them. Basically, if it's not on the list of assets both parties knew about before the prenup was signed, then it doesn't have cover from the prenup. This is the double edged sword where if something does go wrong, now the boobanimal knows about your shit. It's essential for having full legal protection of your premarital assets however. It's helpful to include your own balance sheet and tax returns if you want to keep this valid. Then again, if you make a dead drop of a bunch of gold in the middle of your farm, that's probably the safest of all. You've been warned.

4.) Severance Clause: This is a VERY important thing to include in your prenuptial agreement. A severance clause basically makes your prenuptial agreement a modular agreement. What this means is that if one provision of your prenuptial agreement is deemed unenforceable based on the pozzedness of your locality, then only that once provision is struck down instead of the entire thing. Remember judges can be kikes so don't let them fuck you by throwing out the entire prenup for one minor detail you overlooked.

5.) Spousal Support: Here's where the pozz comes in. Sadly, there are not many places where you can include a alimony waiver. Florida is one of them, though you will be on the hook for alimony during the divorce proceedings but that's not that bad all things considered. Again, you can try to include a clause anyway as long as your severance clause is also in your agreement.

Remember that a lawyer is expensive but having your boobanimal take half your premarital assets is even more expensive. It's well worth the cost which is why we haven't lynched all lawyer kikes yet. Consult with a good attorney. Also, if you want to be a huge asshole and your wife is trying to push your prenup to get thrown out, make a point of calling all the local family lawyers in the area and have them be your legal counsel. Then, by law, she is unable to hire them. Then she'll have to settle for some shitty public defender or a literally who who got his legal degree from poo in loo university who doesn't know how to speak english anyway.

At this point you're just setting your marriage up for failure by taking so many precautionary steps. It's like you're already preparing for your marriage to inevitably fall through. Fuck that dude, if you really need to talk all these steps just don't marry the bitch and find a woman worthwhile.

Now, I'm not saying setting up a prenup will be always be easy, but how is making your wife paying rent a better alternative?

The modern west and feminism, where women can do everything that men can do, and just as well too, but men are still expected to pay child support and alimony after divorce

The guy's going to get cucked with a bitch like this.

Prevent it.

Unless he's an absolutely Alpha Master (Which judging by your description, he isn't), then he shouldn't even consider it.

Removing the financial incentive for divorce regularly makes marriages happier. She doesn't have those lingering feelings about maybe a divorced her would be happier post divorce. If you can't have these conversations with your wife then you are either a pussy or you want to get divorce raped. If she can't have a serious financial conversation then toss that hoe right into the bin.

I'm not saying to not have a srs financial conversation about the whole thing, but the mentality you've assumed is "Fuck her over before she fucks you over, and she will fuck you over." Just stay away from modern females and city dwellers and you'll be ok.

Those first two points are important. Hire her a separate lawyer. Take note: Any decent lawyer's advice to her will be

If it comes to shove, get the lawyers to work it out between them. They know the game.

Keeping your own pre-marital assets isn't fucking anyone over. You're still on the hook for any assets you earn while you are together. Prenups just protect things you have before the marriage and maybe reduces or eliminates alimony. Do you have a coin? Flip it. If its heads, take half of your money and flush it down the toilet. Again, if you're too much of a cuck to let her know that you're going to ghost a bitch if she tries to fuck you over then you should probably just not breed.

Forgot pic

The mentality is not "fuck her before she fucks you". Or maybe it is in America, you guys seem to do your contracts pretty visciously. A prenup determines what will happen in a divorce ahead of time. A divorce is a terrible time to make any decisions. A marriage is a contract between people, and like any contract, thorough and clear is better.

nice cuckchan thread

A prenup is not you fucking her over, it's making sure courts don't fuck you over.

Fuck off with these bad Fraser memes, he's a good dude hurting right now thanks to feminism and shitty courts

If your wife works, I'm sure that she expects to contribute to the relationship.
If she doesn't then her household contributions are in lieu of rent.
The key is framing that contribution as rent. Because what you don't want is for her to be able to go to the judge when she divorces and say that she is owed x percentage of the house. That's why the house is owned by the family trust, and not the husband+wife directly.

This is actually what my dad did for my sister before she got married. She already owned a home and was paying the mortgage. When husband moved in, he started paying rent. She never even had to ask for a prenup because her house, her pension, etc were all owned by the family trust that she created before the marriage.

underrated post kek

true concerns from OP but still worth the highlight

I notice you didn't include a section about provision for future children of the relationship. If a prenup doesn't have provision for children in it, it is more likely to be heard in court, which puts the rest of the agreement at risk. I understand that a good prenup will adjust the final settlement amount to provide for children. Some involve family trusts set aside and activated, but this can be a lot of mucking about and sometimes viewed as a bad-faith evasion by courts.

What are your thoughts on this?

I'm not too versed on the child aspects of it. You're on the hook for your spawn usually.

This is a really good thing to highlight. Prenups and trust arrangements protect women too. If you have a female relative, sister, cousin, whatever, urge her to protect herself. Divorce courts do favour women tremendously, but it is still in everyone's favour (especially if the dude goes bad) to have a quick and uncomplicated disengagement with few opportunities for lawfare.

The original purpose of prenups was to protect wealthy women widows who lost their husbands from con men.

Your points here are spot on. But the disclosure part is a huge thing. By having your assets in your direct ownership, you have to disclose everything in the prenup. It's way easier if you have no assets directly, and they are all tied up in family trusts, and corporations with the trust holding the shares.

Point being, is that by isolating all the wealth in the trust, then both the husband and wife can be on equal footing in the marriage. Of course get a prenup too if you think that will help, it probably can't hurt if you can get the 'boobanimal' to sign it

Also, let her have some sole and separate property too. Maybe she has a house or something, cars, whatever. You can use that prenup to have her be protected too.

Kinda weird, but interesting. Trusts seem to be a helpful way to avoid many legal complications.

Also semi related, if you ever decide to buy a legal suppressor for your gun, put it in a trust, not your own name. Gives you a lot more leniency with possession and potential lending it to friends that way, and you don't have to provide fingerprints or a photo.

If the kids are in care of ex-wife, child support still goes right to her. I've heard of cases demanding child support to the give them at least the exact same financial life they had before divorce.

So if you had a stellar job before, and lose it post divorce, you're still expected to pay according to your old salary.

Oh I forgot one more question, it would kinda apply to both prenups and family trusts, but how would an inheritance be counted? I assume it would bet kinda difficult to account and log something you don't own yet. It would be shitty to protect most of your stuff, but lose your inherited family house or something post-divorce because it was never included.

He's rich and he's NOT getting prenup?
Your friend is retarded. Tell him to get one, tell him to get one so he doesn't end up like Brendan Fraser or Dave Foley.

a trust has an executor
The executor directs how the trust spends it's money, etc.
So you have a succession of executors. You being the primary, someone you trust as 2ndary (usually the father), and any number of executors, down to one of the sons.

The executor has complete control of the trust, so it's imperative that you appoint reasonable and responsible people. If your son's or father are not suitable, a close friend, or an attorney may be the best choice. For some people this might be an issue if they don't have trustworthy people in their lives. At any rate, you probably don't make your wife a successive executor unless you want to end up having a fatal 'accident'. Children can't be executors until they are at least 18… but many trusts won't give them control until they are well into their 30's so that they are more mature and responsible.

I meant an inheritance of something you don't own yet. Like you inheriting your parent's house during divorce and that goes to her because it wasn't accounted in prenup or family trust yet

This, I feel, is what the "but why have contracts don't you trust your wife bro" brigade misses. A marriage is stronger when incentives for divorce are a) lessened and b) fixed and certain rather than imaginary. It means you can put all the numbers away in a piece of paper stored in your (and her) lawyers' safes. If she is a decent woman, she will have a sense of fairness and agree that she isn't entitled to your pre-marital assets. Mine did and we've been together nearly a decade. She quibbled over some of the future children provisions at the advice of her lawyer and I agreed because it was something that had been overlooked. Great woman.

Don't let romanticism and insecurity blind you, guys. Marriage is a contract. Treat it with the kind of serious diligence you'd treat any contract. Her conduct in doing so will tell you a lot about the quality of mate you have selected.

I did not know this. It makes sense. I've heard of multiple occasions where a woman (often sick) will have a male friend move in with them for circumstances. No domestic relationship. The woman then dies (sooner than anticipated) and the man claims they'd been boning all along and he's her common-law husband, thus the sole inheritor and/or entitled to challenge her (often outdated) will.

People never seem to make sure their affairs are in order. It's fucking infuriating. While we're on the subject: Write a will. Yes, you. Soon. Don't scrawl it down on a piece of paper or use one of those DIY shitkits. Go see a lawyer (wills are so stock standard that most will do it for a fixed fee) and get it drawn up proper, then you can just adjust it as your assets and wishes change. Keep it in their safe and make it known they're your reference. And pick your executor well. Faithless executors suck.

My understanding is that it's pretty difficult to account for imaginary future assets. Once you start playing imagination games in nuptial contracts they begin leaking very fast. Trusts and so forth make this a bit easier because inheritances can be transferred into the control of the trust, but as already discussed trusts have their own complications and risks. They're not a silver bullet. Contracts can only control risk, not remove it.

Your parents will bequeath (and anything else) the house to your trust.
You setup as much income as possible to go to the trust, things like stock dividends, 401k, IRA, etc.

You're going to have to have a lawyer setup a trust, and give you the skinny on how to notify people that you want any gifts/willed items/whatever to go to the trust.

Yeah. The thing is that as long as the couple stay together, the woman is going to indirectly benefit from those trust resources. But she's going to lose them if she leaves.

I hate to be the one to break this to you user, but the woman in your video is not actually engaged.
She's a prostitute. She makes her money doing whatever depraved thing a person tells her to do, usually sexual in nature.

And right now, business is good for prostitutes, because we've got this (((wonderful))) thing called the pornography industry, which is basically just indirect prostitution.

Now, if you go onto any of the major pornography aggregate sites at present, you'll find three conceptual areas which are being hit particularly hard at present: 1. Indirect Incest, 2. Indicrect Cuckoldry, 3. Interracial.
All three rely upon leveraging a type of taboo sexual practice in order to stimulate the pornography viewers, most of whom have been conditioned to seek greater and greater taboos in order to satisfy their perverse sexual interests.

#3 is obvious, we've been over it before many times.
#1 and 2 are relatively new phenomenon, however.
#1, which I've termed "Indirect Incest", is a type of pornography which preys upon the taboo of incestual relations. Now, the normal individual, even those heavily exposed to pornography, generally find genuine incest to be rather disgusting under most contexts – hence the introduction of 'indirect incest', in the form of, for example, step-siblings having sex, or step-parents having sex with their step-children. In most cases, the focus is upon the female, presenting a slutty step-sister, step-mother, step-daughter as the focus of interest.
#2 functions in a similar vein: The average heterosexual male has no interest in cuckoldry and finds it a turn-off, thus "indirect cuckoldry" is employed, which refers to pornographic storylines which focus upon, for example, a girlfriend cheating on her boyfriend, often in the most perverse and demeaning manner which can be concieved.

The video you placed in the OP is exemplary of #2.
Its not real.
Its a fantasy, made by perverted Jews and employing soulless, shameless, and oft brainless, prostitutes, designed to subtley prey upon the taboo of cuckoldry in an indirect fashion – the intent is to portray cuckoldry entirely from the side of the adulterous female and the male with whom she is cheating, without ACTUALLY going full cuck-porn retarded by having the man in question there and observing the events.

That's not to say adultery doesn't happen, but the case you're presenting is a depraved fantasy concocted by a Jewish mind, with the express purpose of preying upon the taboo of the concept, of planting the interest in such taboo-focused sexuality in your mind, and of making you distrust (beyond reason) potential mates.

Thing is, I suspect you know as much already.

It kinda seems like all these roadblocks put in place against us is making us colder, more logical and careful, more protective of ourselves and the ones we care about. They're unintentionally making us stronger in many ways.

These things have been around a long time.

They are the things that 'rich people' have been doing to preserve their family wealth. I'm the user who is working on the "Generational Wealth" post (still not finished, haven't work on it much lately). Anyway, these things are what smart rich people do to protect themselves. It's why guys like Ted Kennedy didn't lose all their money because of Jary Jo Kopechne Chappaquiddick.

Yeah, it's a pain to set these things up, but losing all your wealth would suck more.

Your post reminds me how they ruined bonds between men by implying that any affection a man shows another man is homosexual in nature.

Wow.

Crazy redpill right here out of nowhere.
Thank you.

Many of us in the chans are of "marrying age".
Thats why this topic so important.

Guess I need a good lawyer too.

Rough :/
He's a physician too.

You b8ing us m8? This thread is starting to feel like a slow retelling of that one MSPaint comic.

True, it is a very important topic.
When I said roadblocks, I meant more then just marriage security. Our governments are actively trying to harm and displace us, while simultaneously keeping us weak and dependent on them. Those of us who are aware and becoming active or standing up are becoming stronger. It is a form of evolution, we are adapting to our new environment.

Sage for somewhat offtopic though

is there no way to protect yourself or assets you earn while together in the marriage?

As degenerate as it is, I used Tinder to find the girl I am currently dating. We have been dating for about 5 months now and haven't slept together, deleted Tinder after about a month with her. Most of the other women I met on it were mostly just sex seeking (which is nothing new to anybody) but it was so depressing, that even the woman didn't really want more than that.

With that said, we've now been "mutually exclusive" for about 4 months now I would say, I'm not good at keeping time with school and what not.

Like another user said, if you look for a 10/10 hottie with an awesome body, you'll find one, but you sure as hell won't keep her attention, especially if that's all you care about. She's about a 6-7/10 with blue eyes and long legs and a huge pair of tits, though I'm usually into ass myself. And she actually wants a couple kids (and her family is super conservative, and love guns) and told me no sex until we're "officially a couple" (which we pretty much are now at this point).

Though I suppose my point is that I actually like her, and not only that the last time she dated somebody was about 3 years ago and she's conservative and voted for Trump, and was vocal about it.

Nigga wut?

Either you got a NAWALT or you are getting cucked.

And based on the fact that you found her on Tinder, I'm leaning strongly for cucked.

Nope. You can have your pensions, and some other things… but you gotta check with a lawyer.

I don't think so, in all seriousness. I've met her best friend (and her now fiancée) and the fact that she still lives at home and her parents do keep tabs on her, not in a crazy way, but through texts like "where are you?" and "when will you be home?".

I've looked for any and all signs that she may be seeing somebody else but I haven't seen any, and I'm a bit paranoid. She's from the country area of Virgina, a solidly non-degenerate non-liberal area.

Honestly, a 6-7 is probably ideal for most, because she will likely have just a bit of insecurity. Chances are she'll end up more attached to you, and less likely to cheat.

user…
That's good though, you want milk for the wee ones. Not too big hopefully though, they usually don't age well.

She already told me bluntly "I'm pretty sure I'm way more into you than you are into me", wasn't expecting that at all.

Pls no bully user, I'm sorry, though only "normal ass" nothing that looks comical if it helps at all.

The pictures (related) are what her body type looks like (that I can quickly find), the most I have seen of her is no shirt and bra and in panties.

Is the resolution to the paradox above what I think it is? In that case why even say you're dating for 5 months? I quite dislike the notion that dating itself isn't, inherently, mutually exclusive (at least in or monogamous society).
So, in under half a year you can fuck her? Not to play "no true conservative", but if that's super conservative I dare not see what's liberal.
At least it seems they aren't someone who gets carried away doing dumb shit, i.e. the relationships have purpose.

There is no reason to think one should have sex in under 5 months, if even that. That's how you wind up with a bunch of used up trash. However, your point about the Tinder thing is valid. Honestly, that 3 years gambit doesn't fly by me considering they were found on Tinder.

Why are men becoming such pussies?

I use the word "dating" in the way most people refer to it, not to be exclusive, though she seems like she was way before I thought about it. "Super conservative" in relation to what I have been living around, Washington, D.C. and Maryland, disgusting areas.

I scoured her entire facebook when I first found her and I also did a "public records check" that I can get for free from a legal search database to check and see if anything I should know about, nothing there either.

Only way to know is to see where it goes, honestly that's all anybody can do I think, until you know a great deal about somebody.

Look, sorry to burst your bubble here…. but:
Is she a virgin or is she just making _you_ wait?
Also, how would you know if shes lying - about being a virgin, or if she's out fucking chads when you aren't around.

LOL. All chicks are insecure, especially 10's. They all thrive on attention. The 6-7's who finally get some from a 'nice guy' are the ones who go off the deep dick end because you've boosted their ego for the first time ever.

Maybe… if she's verifiable as a virgin and of marriage material… but since I presume that she isn't, this is just a power play to make sure that he's forever her servant, and she's the master in the relationship.

Frankly, he needs to dump her. He'll never be alpha enough for her, and she's probably going to end up taking his wealth once she squirts out some kids.

You retard

It's like the old space race. When they put a chimp in a rocket, the chimp has no idea that the rocked could explode and he could die a painful death.

A man who is aware of these things has to be brave enough to face them, knowing full well that there are risks.

The difference is that the current marraige situation is like the space race, except the chimps are the engineers who designed the rocket. Would you get in one of those chimp made rockets?

They are practically impossible to find anymore, especially in my age group, 25-29 and she recently turned 24. And the whole church-going meme is exactly that, a meme. I know a girl who married a buddy and she only did anal before getting married, and sucking cock, but no vagina sex since that wouldn't make her a virgin anymore and she was a pastor's daughter for God's sake (that meme seems to be onto something).

I would also add to my post at, that I don't even have a job, and won't for about 9 months, I'm still in school while she has 3 jobs, if anything she would be supporting me for a bit.

That's the only way to win at the marraige game.

My best friend is the son of 2 doctors, and an only child. While he's good looking, everyone knew that he is 'rich'. He went and got married (against has fathers suggestion) and knocked out a couple kids. Fast forward about 15 years and they are on the rocks. But, he's never had a job, and she's pulling well into 6 figures. LOL she can't afford to divorce him. He even said that he'd settle for like $50-100k lump sum from her to divorce. LOL but she's so bad with money and has so much debt that she can't even afford that.

Learn to cook. I mean really cook. You will never, ever have to get a job. It's a bit of a reversal of the "50s housewife", but it's amazing how much a modern girl will put up with if she has a live-in chef.

Damn, what the hell was he thinking?

So my friend is about to redditspace and I dont want this shit happening to him. (Pic related)

In fact, It's pretty scary to redditspace.

But in today's OP, redditspacing has some good benefits, especially if you're a faggot.

He tells me that "redditspacing makes what I write clearer", but all he's writing is "don't get married, goy" agitprop.

So in the end, what I would like to discuss is the benefits and I guess cons of redditspacing.

with his dick. I;m sure she was pressuring him, and she thought she'd be the one on easy street. now she works like 10 hour days, travels a lot, etc, and he's even got audio evidence of her fucking a coworker in their prius.

fuck off faggit everything doesn't have to be a run on sentence or one paragraph to not be 'reddit spacing'

Structuring your post like that is inviting abuse.

This meme needs to die, kill yourself

King Nigger and his ATF changed this recently. The new rules fuck over trusts and give a bit more leniency to individuals.

Trusts now require fingerprints and background checks from all members, and they have to be updated on a regular basis.

Individuals no longer need to ask permission from their local sheriff, but must simply inform him.

I forget all of the details, but the IraqVeteran guy on youtube did a good job breaking it down. You'll have to search through his videos from a few months ago. Youtube isn't currently loading correctly for me right now, so I can't give you a link.

redditspacing
get the fuck out tbh fampai