Above, you can see Clint Eastwood and his son, Scott Eastwood

No shit, sage for slide thread

...

Clint Eastwood cloned himself, while Robert De Niro debased himself.

What drugs you on, son?

You cannot exist without a bio-chemical environment which is indistinguishable from "drugs." Cuckstian puritanism is just another example of Semitic trash in need of being discarded.

The other poster is a faggot but holy shit you're degenerate.

You think the reality of biological function is degenerate?

Call her out in the comments section.

That really is one of the greatest paintings of all time, it's so close to almost not being shit.

Drink piss and smoke coke while fucking a goat why don't you, it's all engaging biological functions right?

The entire point is that "drug" is a nonsense term which does nothing to describe degeneracy. Everything you eat is a drug, it impacts your bio-chemistry.

Biology does not provide morality. The rest of your argument reduces to "my actions have no consequences", which is trivially false. Either overcome your nihilism or commit suicide already, and stop making these shitposts.

So what? If you're so autistic you can't understand what someone is referring to when they talk about drugs then you probably have very little value to offer society.

No, my entire argument is that the consequences of actions are the only determinant of degeneracy and simply labeling "drugs" as degeneracy is the most infantile sort of puritanism imaginable.

Do you berate people who want to clean their houses without using chemicals by pointing out that water is a chemical? Do you excuse your behavior by appealing to the fact that you are correct and the retarded plebs are just wrong?

If you don't understand my point it's because you're autistic.

Now you're creating a Universal strawman of the opposite position and using the necessarily extant exception to win in your mind. Such a mindset and argument tools are in fact infantile, and the tragedy of this conversation and your life is that you are too egoistic to see it.

As for labeling drugs degenerate, it does not have to be all usage of drugs, it does not even have to be most usage of drugs that is degenerate- it only has to be a rate deemed significant. If you were intellectually honest, your task would then be to identify the reasons that the rate is significant, and directly refute these. Instead you play logic games so basic that 4 year olds reinvent them on the playground daily.

You do realize "drug" is a distinct biological term, right? And that it does not constitute the entirety of ones bio-chemical environment?

You have to be a Jew semantic shill or just retarded. Food = three basic building blocks of life (carbohydrates, lipids, protein) and Vitamins, it is necessary to survive. Drugs = substance unnecessary for survival with the purpose of altering mental state away from the norm.

If they want to claim moral superiority for using water to clean their houses as if it wasn't simply a chemical, sure. And beyond that, where the fuck do you think you are using autistic as if it were an insult?

No one who says that taking drugs are degenerate ever mentions distinctions such as this. Maybe if the puritans were intellectually honest they would try to define such things instead of saying, "drugs are degenerate." Propose such a specific thing and I will debate the merits of such a rate for each substance, anything less is puritanism rooted in the Semitic tradition of Cuckstianity.

This is how dumb puritans are.

Trying to redefine nomenclature is classic Marxian methodology of weaseling out of responsibility for being a dumbass. DRUG refers to an external (often manufactured) chemical substance your body absorbs by any number of ways for a certain desired effect, usually used to treat a pathology.

If getting thirsty and needing to breathe air is a drug addiction to you then you belong on Tumblr or Holla Forums. I'm sure they will waste further time entertaining your faggotry.

Autism: confirmed.

k

Oh wow yeh it's pretty clear you're not from around here lad.

This is the new degenerate buzzword around these parts. Hedonists have recently picked this up and ran with it trying to paint anyone who isn't as big of a hedonist as something to be ashamed of.

No, because they probably indulge your sophistry, which was summarized in a single sentence. The judgement that no drugs should be used because they are degenerate at a significant rate is not puritanism, it amounts to strict liability. You can drown your sophist brain in thousands of pages of philosophical foundation which justify that position rather than continuing to use an information sharing platform to feign dialectic.

Beyond the fact that altering your mental state has no inherent moral quality if you aren't a Christcuck.

I'm not the one who thinks "Yer autistic!" amounts to respectable posting or that puritanism hasn't been used for cucks since they have first tried to push puritanism here.

...

Ahh, moral relativism. The hedonists guide to an inconsistent worldview. Me shooting your grandmother in the face has no inherent moral quality either, would that be right? If you try to stop me killing your family you're just a fuckin puritan!

But you're demonstrably autistic lad. Where do you think you are? Autists have been shamed here since time immemorial.
It has not. You and your ilk picked it up in the recent weed push to try and pull a Motte-and-Bailey on the board, but nobody bought it.

That man in the middle is holding a half caste baby. Genetics ruined.

And to think I was accused a creating a strawman. Well, that's Christcucks for ya, argue like a kike while accusing your betters of arguing like a kike instead.

You have no reply and continue addressing low hanging fruit. You are keeping yourself inferior.

Why don't you point out the strawman I used bud. I don't quite think you understand what that means.

There has been a push recently by shills and degenerates to try and normalize hedonism on Holla Forums. They use the classic Libertarian tactics of "well nobody can tell ME what to do!" while injecting their new buzzword into it: Puritanism. They will almost always try to justify their hedonism by misinterpreting the Joseph Geobbels speech about "moralists", twisting the intention and circumstance of that speech to make it sound as if it justifies drug use and consumption of things like pornography. Geobells spoke against those who tried to ban leisure as a pursuit in general, not those who sought to prevent degenerate avenues of leisure.
Long story short he's autistic and is upset other people aren't supporting his degeneracy. Be big and he will see how small he is.

This is your mind on Judaism, kids. Let's reach your logical conclusion and reduce all words created to specify and organize things back into a generalized jumbled mass with multiple objects under one blanket term.

But of course a Jew would claim there's no such thing as degeneracy, hide by arguing semantics, use a buzzword as if it's a shaming tactic (Puritan, Christcuck etc) and then claim superiority without actually engaging in any form of counter rhetoric

Eastwood is a man's man that found a proper woman to give him a proper child. The seed is strong in him.

De niro's seed is so weak, his child looks nothing like him. First becouse of his mental weakness and second for his really shit genetics, which should have been prominent at least a little bit.
The only thing similar are the cheeks.

None of you seek to prevent anything, you never define degeneracy nor "drugs" or whatever else your rabbi tells you to crusade against. Goebbels' speech applies specifically to puritans who label everything as degeneracy without a single justification.

Oh, user.

Degeneracy is that which causes society's structure to regress, to "degenerate". This means that individuals intentionally harming themselves for pure leisure gain is degenerate, that which weakens the family unit is degenerate and that which harms the volk is degenerate. This is why self-harm is degenerate, why homosexuality is degenerate, and why race-mixing is degenerate.
Perhaps that's because "drugs" is already a well known term. Regardless, drugs are substances which do not provide nutrition, that when taken induce a physiological change in the body. Caffeine is a drug, and its use is largely degenerate unless moderated. Alcohol is a degenerate drug when used outside of moderation. Nobody is denying a man in the death throes of an allergic reaction his insulin shot, and you know this, because English is a context-based language and you're well aware of the distinction that's been made between drugs and "drugs".
Perhaps the fact that I provided justification as to what degeneracy is and could make a solid case for how drugs weaken both the individuals health and by extension his family unit for pure leisure gain.

That isn't a strawman buddy. That's not something I'm saying you stated. It's something I'm stating, and want to try and refute without invalidating your own premise.
Go ahead give it a whirl.

user you're very special to me and I believe you can do great things if you put your mind to it.

Well at least you are close to escaping from stupidity. You might make it in this incarnation.

De Niro's son has autism?

...

yeah, he worked on "vaxxed", then they threatened to cut off his balls so he backed down.

...

Yeah De Niro is a nigger fucker, always has been. He fucked one monkey as an old man and got a retard out of it.

I did coke with him like 15 years ago now at a party. Or rather, he did a lot of mine. Was no real intro, no talk about anything that he does. He was cool during but after, a real asshole. Actually he did buy some from me the next day. But like a year later I ran into him and he totally avoided me after acting like he had no idea who I was, but he remembered. Was pretty degen night. Real asshole.

Any other celebs you partied with?