Huh

Huh

...

You're a faggot, Harry.

I don't get it.

Once you've fucked a horse, doing faggot Sir Patrick Stewart isn't all that surprising.

I don't think they actually fucked a horse in the play

You dun it now arry

Are you certain?

'ARRY
N'RMIND CARRY ON

The only sane member of the Harry Potter trio

EBIN meme my friend

go back to where you came from

...

Can't make this Sir Patrick Stewart up, conservitards actually have nigger level IQs

anyone have a huge gay crush on this boy?

yep that's degenerate

How to spot a degenerate.

...

Does watching a movie turn you gay? Does a movie have to adhere to your trigger warnings? Serious question, serious statement: film is not the medium for you.

LEAVE HER ALONE YOU FUCKING GINGER, EMMA IS MINE

It's okay user they are just very good friends

That's the moment when you back away slowly.

Have you ever kissed someone before? You look them in the eyes and close your eyes as you kiss. BTW

Sounds like you're the one who got triggered.

You certainly haven't.
Women always look at the lips and the eyes quickly before they kiss you.

Well she did look down a couple times, this is a different circumstance of kissing someone you don't want to necessarily so all thats showing is nerves. Also that was before they started filming.

I wouldn't know, they're always blindfolded.

Emma thread? Emma thread.

Cucked beta from behind.

shoop a doop

Rupert is the only one who didn't go into homosexual entertainment or screeching incessantly about gender and politics.
He bought his ice cream truck and was happy with that.

Every thread is an Emma thread, it just needs to be pointed out

Thanks for the predictable fucking blogpost faggot, hes the one that didn't want to be in more kino

Bling Ring is hottest Emma.

I'm not sure where you're going with this or why Rupert makes you angry tbh

Rupert doesn't make me angry…I'm saying to stop memeing..Rupert is chill and so are all three because they are friends and a good judge of character therefore. Dan is just a jew but it isn't his fault. Rupert and Emma are very good friends and Rupert is a bro…Emma supported Dan with his alcoholism in private. Save the gay Sir Patrick Stewart Dan is cool. They are all fine compared to many others.

...

But what does that have to do with Daniel participating in homo propaganda and Emma crying about political Sir Patrick Stewart?
All I said was Rupert doesn't do that Sir Patrick Stewart, I have no idea why you have a problem with a simple observation.

Fucking wordfilter

stay mad faggot.

...

The former is for a movie and doesnt affect you and the latter is overblown by you asshats and wrongly criticized. Rupert doesn't do anything thats not an argument and not a reason for you to act like a sjw yourself. Emma is the only actor or actress who has addressed mens mental health and suicide and even has championed her father and his importance and the lack of it placed lately on fatherhood. She has been the same since she was little you either know her or you're memeing an internet meme.

...

there's no way they didn't bang.

t. internet midget

Why are you even here suppressing your homosexuality?

i don't keep up with celebrity bullSir Patrick Stewart.
because, why?

...

i'll unleash my state enforced homosexuality on that little fistula you call an asshole you degenerate ingrate.
faggots are truly insufferable losers who can't get women

Is this kino?

I want the salt-left to leave.

wizlets BTFO

...

who would have known he would go from this to this

Emma comforts him about his height here lol

he always comes out as a bit of a beta cuck tbh

I think its the British in him, he's a little bit of a self deprecator when it comes to humor

If I don't like spiders, does that mean I'm secretly a spider?

i bet he was also a literal cuck irl who could only watch and stroke as emma was mounted by the strong scottish ginger bull

She's really a pusher tomboy with his manletism

>Getting your Sir Patrick Stewart shown from a woman on camera and staying submissive
Found the swede

kys sodomite

She seemed like she consoled him there, she whispered stop yes you 'ave

The people of Sodom did nothing wrong.

That's just not cricket, man

Emma is in every right to bully whoever she wants

I think I see your problem, you probably got into an argument with some Holla Forums faggot, he made you angry, and now you're taking it out on me because I like Rupert more than the other two.
I never even said I disliked Dan and Emma, I just don't agree with some of the things they do.
You are right that they're nowhere near as bad as a lot of celebrities, which is why I don't hate them.

Harry Pozzer and the Philosopher's Bone
Harry Pozzer and the Locker Room of Secrets
Harry Pozzer and the Prisoner of Ass-kaban
Harry Pozzer and the Goblet of Spunk
Harry Pozzer and the Hoarder of the Penis
Harry Pozzer and the AIDS Blood Prince
Harry Pozzer and the Deathly Loads

Are you saying you know for sure you aren't a spider Sir Patrick Stewartlord?

She only grinned when he made a joke and was laughing along with all of them

Oscar worthy.

Imagine being a Harry Potter fan, just imagine.

B-but Harry Potter is kino, user!

Yea imagine being a fan of the best franchise ever

The Bible tells you to kill witches…
Wasn't there some cases of Christians even burning the books?

Funny, because I remember a lot of drama about the books being satanist propaganda created to brainwash children.

bc they are

Yea that's what's ironic about it, you see people overreact

Jesus Christ you are a fucking asshat

...

Wait, are you implying wrestling is a part of, if not the gay community?
'cuz I can't think of something mainstream that is gayer than wrestling tbh.

...

...

WE

WUZ

WITCHES

BLACKWASHED

I'd be homosexual for that car

hit a nerve there

except mass raping newcomers for kicks…

No I can't believe that people as dumb as you actually exist and fucking breathe

your satanic trash is going straight where it belongs, heretic

It isn't satanic, lord of the rings has witchcraft

WITCHCRAFT ISNT FUCKING REAL

Well it is progressive propaganda so "satanic" isn't entirely inaccurate.

t. wizardo

Not today magical faggot.
Someone get a torch.

somebody burn this fucking sorcerer

...

We don't take kindly to black magic in this school

Das raycis!

SEE WHAT HAPPENS HARRY, THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS HARRY!
Where did denouncing White Nationalism get you, Potter?

that sounds like something a witch would say

Use that green screen video to drop in a mob of niggerians rushing the couple as they look lovingly deep into each others' eyes knowing Ron is about to be bashed and lit on fire while she is raped as she watches him squeal in flames.

That's the stuff porn is made of.

Yes, because "witch" means "we suspect you are a murderer but cannot prove it". That's the same reason pagan franks burned witches long before christianization. All cultures do it and it is right and proper to kill those who are fucking up society.

No, that is actually a myth. Funny story, even the ebil Nazis didn't destroy literature they merely destroyed copies but the Allies at the end of WW2 completely eliminated all extant copies of 43,000 volumes because they were "evil propaganda".

Isn't that the same thing? The idea behind book burning is to destroy their accessibility to those ideas. Destroying copies might not be erasing that literature but it made it harder to find. And even then, there were some pieces of literature lost forever because of the Nazi book burning.

What exactly did the Nazis burn that were so important, anyway?
the jews don't count

No its not the same thing, the Nazis banned commie shit from popular circulation and encouraged the public to burn all their copies which most did, but the books were merely banned from being imported, printed, or available in libraries to the general public. Copies remained in the restricted sections of libraries, in the hands of any private individual who didn't destroy them himself, and in government archives. The allies on the other hand systematically destroyed all copies of the Nazi literature(despite the holohoax being fake and commies killing way more even if it wasn't) and made it illegal to hold that literature. In fact outside of the US it was illegal(fine equivalent to several thousand USD) to own fucking Mein Kampf for years though they ultimately gave up on destroying that book in the 60s.

Not to my knowledge and I intentionally tried to find an example years ago when this subject came up years ago.

Now much of the destroyed Nazi literature was fairly short and had small publication runs in the first place, I don't pretend that the loss of political literature is some huge blow to human thought. Hell I've read Das Capital and if I could destroy every copy of every commie text along with every mudslime text(and all the commies and mudslimes themselves) I certainly would do so. Those things have no value. They are no "deep" philosophical or theological works, the Koran in particular is such shit that it doesn't even contain a coherent narrative due to the poor job they did assembling it from its component texts. It's not like the Epic of Gilgamesh or the Bible in which one even follows another it jumps around so much that you can't tell what is happening half the time.

Mudslime shit is for shitskins only and commie literature is just plain old lies without an iota of truth. Their only use is as a source of ridicule for muds and commies.

I just get pissed off at the hypocrisy of the left and other faggots who act like destroying literature is this huge sin against mankind when they are the only ones who actually do it.

I try not to include things by Jews, however they also burned Sigmund Freud's works including his thesis' on sexuality and the understand of it.
Now, I don't see the Allied burning of Nazi books are anymore just as the Nazi's burning but you can't bitch about one side committing an atrocity while trying to shill for the other. As both sides claim their book burnings were just because of "evil propaganda."

If the Nazis truly wanted to silence dissent voiced through those books then they did a very poor job. The Mein Kampf on the other hand…

Communist propaganda and the degenerate works of Weimar Germany.
The rest were basically pacifist works.

Hemingway fought for dirty commies in the Spain Civil war, and the fascists in that country legitimately did nothing wrong even if you by the liberal narrative. Franco had almost zero character flaws and was a very temperate man. Also Hemingway was a big kike sympathizer, so fuck him.

But Freud is 100% bullshit and is based on zero data. Even psychologists and psychiatrists totally dismiss him today. It was always bullshit.
I don't know anything about Jack London.

Ernst Haekcel's hypotheses were all wrong, but I don't know if that was their critique of them or if it was just because he supported commie bullshit.

I was pretty sure you'd do this. I'm debating rather or not this is a waste of my time however, I might as well go with.
Freud's works are cherry picked, even on here, whenever people try to justify their belief. Freud thought homosexuality was a disease that he could cure and that's something that's been echo'd on here. His analysis are dismissed by psychologists and the like, I assume, are more political than the legitimacy of his thesis. Which help give an understand of human sexuality and mental illness related to sexual desire.
On Ernst Hemingway, I didn't say anything about the Spaniard fascists or rather they did anything that was right or wrong, I brought up his works because they seemed to have been more anti-war than anti-fascist/pro-commie. I didn't finish A Farewell to Arms in high school.
Ernst Haeckel's works were essentially just expansions on Darwin's theory of evolution.

They wanted to keep as much of it out of Germany under their rule, and if they had their way, none of it would exist. I say both sides because there is no difference between what both have done and Mein Kampf is still widely distributed, I bought one of my English copies from Barnes and Noble.

No man everybody of every political stripe dismisses Freud because his models are non-predictive shit, he based them on zero data. Its just the musing of some academic, he's making shit up. The only reason he ever got popular was because other jews in the media pushed him as a kind of intellectual fad. This has happened before and since even without the jews being involved.

Except his models were junk, he supported a kind of psuedo-Lamarkian theory that didn't bear out. But it seems that wasn't why he was banned after looking him up was just his political diatribes and his unusual level of political activity which got 5 other professors at his university to denounce him. He was a racialist, believed in the superiority of europeans in general and germans in particular and espoused strong social darwinism. It seems to have been a case of personal politics and political favors that got his work banned. I frankly don't know why he was banned other than pissing off somebody with influence, I have an MS in geology and only remember him being brought up in passing during an evolutionary biology course.

I don't actually approve of destroying all literature that is shit, just the really bad shit like marxist theory and the Koran(on the condition that we also exterminate muds themselves). If Marxism only created liberal faggots who refuse to breed that would be fine as I want them exterminated and letting them off themselves is a great solution which is in a way more thorough than a violent purge, everybody with undesirable predispositions dies. But marxist has caused so much shit that frankly I don't think even killing all liberals and justify it existing for a second longer.

Piss off you underage faggot

With Freud, I've never seen that. I've seen many people on here and in real life who discusses him and his theories.
I wasn't arguing for the significance of Ernst's works but the destruction of them was due to the fact that he pissed off someone. Even something that supported European supremacy and the German Aryan was banned because someone thought he was an ass.
I don't believe that literature should be destroyed. The censorship of ideas you don't like is no better than that of the left. Who'd banned right leaning books as in the Soviet Union. Ideas deserve to exist. Right or Left leaning, they should in order to be analyzed and discussed. I don't think you can condemn book burnings of one ideology but encourage the destruction of the other. It's hypocritical, either all of it should be destroyed or none of it, as I could see say, Hitler's Mein Kampf fracturing from his ideology to support a sort of heretical belief that's routed in his ideas say. One fused with the personal, left leaning, ideas of the person who read it. Like what happened to Roman Catholicism when the Bible was leaked to the public for all to see. Then what? Will Mein Kampf be censored and burned too?

kill yourself, friendo

top fucking kek m8. it's okay if you like to fap to her, but stop trying to defend her actions.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

you included this in the list to hint that the Nazis were evolution deniers. however, they were more willing to practice eugenics than any first world nation that exists today, so it seems to me that they had a great understanding of evolution.

Are you a mind reader, or are you just setting up a nice strawman for you to attack?

shit
test

What's next for his career?