Zestiest anti reactionary memes?

"muh flood detected"

more

This poem is a fav of mine

stuff

more stuff

etc

comments

...

more etc

Regarding the third pic, Holla Forums these days essentially admits that their views toward Israel are nonsensical and settle for a neo-con "nuke their ass and take their gas" view of the Middle East to pretend to be neutral and cover it up, but also worship Trump and believe him when he says that the war on terror was a mistake.

post it

Yep.

some such

et al.

even more

keep em coming

and this

just posting

One comes from a drawfriend on /k/

examples

and such as this

...

and even more and such

We really do need to get friendlier with the /k/verse, though operatorchan will probably kick us out. In particular we need to stress that Holla Forums would absolutely take their guns to keep the shitskins from having them

I saw you post the "muh tolerance" version of the third pic before delete. Neutral funposter?

nah, just accidentally posted the original I had saved in order to make the edit in the first place.

Guess so.

more n such

...

Holla Forumss blondie boyfriend is kinda cute, is it a set?

I think so too, but I don't have any more pics of him, sorry famrade. I do distinctly recall seeing more of him somewhere though.

eee

eeee

sss

www

vvvv

aaa

ere

qqq

Does someone have that first image but with a tankie and a libertarian added?

kjj

There should be an OC thread/art thread where people can request things

I hope Holla Forums likes comics!

part 2

weeee

rtttt

geggrgrgh

gets me every time

nnmmththt

bfbnfhhhh

ngngngjhh

...

bnnnnnn

bbfhfbfbf

vfggb

sfffvsv

csacsdf

hm

bfbfbfn

I remember when this and the 'hey guys I made a poll' polandball strip came out. They were always faves of mine. Do you have more?

...

How about the Soviet Union?

Unrelated, but regarding the fourth pic: how can any of you say that Soviet design wasn't aesthetically beautiful? Minus the weathering and poor maintenance these would have looked great. The simplicity and repetition is incredibly pleasing and I love how reserved the style is.

Compare this shit to porky buildings which are usually just gaudy lightshows designed to attract as much attention as possible, or fascist art which is too focused on appealing to some nebulous "tradition" to produce anything of modern merit or attempts to be ludicrously stylish and overt.

We really should make inroads into /k/ tbh, by and large they seem to be less dogmatic and could be brought over to the red side, at least as libsocs.

It does have a nice functional aesthetic. Restore it, maybe give it a coat of paint so it isn't bare concrete (and differentiate the buildings a little), and it'd actually look kinda good.

Meant for

If you want some good ol retrofuturism the SU is a goldmine.

Afraid not. Sorry famrade.

those all have merit on their own, to attempt to belittle them is rash. There are many metrics to good art and architecture.

just a ripoff of the merchant
not funny or spreadable
just a butthurt wordfilter

Step it up its been like 2 years and you still can't make a meme of your own

OC

we have posadism, and cat girls

also hibernian conspiracy

not to mention all the Stirner shit

Porky predates merchant by about 70 years.

But I agree, bunkers is unfunny and has no repost value beyond the larpers here.

Ok. Go tell the gost of Mayakofsky he ripped off pol.

Well… If Nazis can mutate commie words, why can't we?

Also, ye, we have Posadas. What do you have? Your happenings? DO YOU EVEN UFO?

Holla Forums hasn't made a decent maymay since Doom Paul, and that was /new/.

Shit like muh kangs and cucks only spread because it's in with edgy teenagers to pretend to be neo-Nazis online.

Holla Forums meming Stirner is like watching a normie post Pepe on Facebook.

Stirner is a /lit/ meme, btw.

Here's what you don't seem to get about memes: trying to ascribe them to an author is stupid, because the nature of memes is that they replicate and constantly evolve into something else. They are beyond the control of any one person, so any attempt to claim ownership of one is just embarrassing

just got this, you can't make this shit up. Holla Forums has turned into such a fucking torture chamber

his one in particular [first attached bothers me for a number of reasons.

Marx's Law of Value asserts that value is the sum of labour and material. I mean, he lists about 30-odd exceptions, such as fractional reserve banking, fluctuation of supply and demand, taxation, uneven exchange, monopolies, countertrade, grey and black markets, bubble economies, and so and and so forth ad absurdum; and if my theory of value had so many exceptions, I'd wonder if it was really a rule, but whatever. Let's humour the pinkos and assume that Marx's Law of Value and the Labour Theory of Value are accurate descriptions of the economy. Okay.

So, let's imagine that you and I are the bourgeoisie, and we want to make some money. We have about $10,000,000.00 to blow on frivolous bullshit, because, just like most of the wealthy, we've inherited our wealth. We're also going to assume, for the purposes of this exercise, that we're not the Monopoly Man, or Ebeneezer Scrooge, and that we run our company sensibly, in a way that is far closer to late 20th/21st-Century models of capitalist production.

After a long and fruitful debate, you've convinced me that the way of the future is manufacturing gizmos. We want to be in the black within 10 years, which means we'll need to earn $1,000,000.00 a year. The market rate for gizmos is $100.00, and has never dropped below $85.00, so for every 10,000 - 12,000 units sold, we'll bring in about $1,000,000. In this scenario, there is no retailer or middle-man, and we're selling directly to the consumer. Let's assume a flat rate of $100.00, with no changes in supply or demand, no increased or decreased taxes, no sales, no bulk-purchase-incentives, no competition, and no inflation. We need to sell 10,000 units to reach a million, and 100,000 to reach $10,000,000.00.

However, we live on Planet Earth, and must pay taxes. Here in Canada, we can take advantage of the SBD, which means our corporate tax-rate is 11%. And we, of course, are patriotic, and want the best quality. People are less likely to buy gizmos from Indonesia, even if they're cheaper, and when it comes to child-labour, you get what you pay for. Hey, I don't mind giving Trudeau a buck or two if it means "free" healthcare and school for the rugrats.

Okay, that's great, but we still need to pay for the raw-materials to make the gizmos. The parts of each gizmo cost, let's imagine, $75.00. Let's continue.

Except, we still need to pay the wages of the employees who run the machines that make the gizmos. Market research shows us, on average, that, while rates vary, a single worker at a single machine can make one gizmo every 30 minutes. When Notely gets her way, we'll be paying a minimum of $15.00 an hour, but a Canadian isn't going to risk their limbs working at a dangerous gizmometer for minimum wage, so we'll have to give them benefits and a wage hike. Workers at our plant will earn $22.00 starting salary. We'll figure out the cost of our insurance plan as a bulk-cost once we've figured out exactly how many employees we need to hire. So we'll be earning $33.00 per gizmo made. Hey, that's still 3X more than our employees make, if we can ensure that we only keep workers on for a year or two, so that we don't have to give them pay-raises. We're on our way to being robber-barons.

But wait, we still need to have an HR department. We need about 1 supervisor for every 10 workers. We need maintenance staff, janitorial staff, drivers, accountants, lawyers, IT guys, and other employees. We can afford to give the janitors minimum wage, and we won't have to pay maintenance, IT, or HR much more than the factory stiffs, but the lawyers, accountants, supervisors, and so on aren't going to work pro bono.

If one worker plus one machine makes 2 gizmos an hour, and we have our workers on for full time, no overtime, for 80 gizmos a week, two weeks vacation and two weeks sick-time, for 48 weeks per year, that means that in a 10-year period, a single labourer at a single machine can produce 38,400 gizmos, which means each worker will earn us $1,267,000.00 over those 10 years, which means we'll need at least 8 machines, plus 8 workers. However, machines can break down; workers can quit or die or get fired or catch a terminal disease; and we still have plenty of overhead. We'll round up to 10 machines, which means we're earning our $10,000,000.00, plus 2.672M. We'll need a supervisor. Our manufacturers make a yearly wage of $42,240.00, and supervisors are requesting $52,000. We'll also need an HR-lady, who needs a salary of $40,000.00 a year. We need an accountant on staff, who, according to GoC estimates, will cost us $67,000.00 a year. Rather than hiring a lawyer on staff, we can save money by acquiring the services of a private practice, who request $25,000.00 yearly to remain on-call. A single truck can transport 400 gizmos every trip, so we'll need to send out two trucks every week, at the very least. Additionally, we'll need to account for the exact same number of ingoing shipments. The trip is 4 hours round, and we require 1 hour to load the truck, so we only need the driver part time, 20 hours a week, and can afford to pay minimum wage: we're spending $15,600 yearly for our driver. $60,000 yearly for our maintenance guy, $45,000 yearly for our IT guy, and for the janitors we have come in for three-hours before we open our doors ever day, we're looking $23,400 yearly (assuming minimum wage, two employees, 3 hours a day, five days a week, no off-time).

So, this is what we're looking at, in terms of staff expenses:

10 x $42,240.00 = $422,400.00
$ 52,000.00
$ 40,000.00
$ 67,000.00
$ 25,000.00
$ 15,600.00
$ 60,000.00
$ 45,000.00
2 x $11,700.00 = $ 23,400.00
———————————————-
$749,800.00

That's a yearly expense, though. Across 10 years, with no bonuses, no raises, not taking into account pension plans, benefits, or anything of that sort, we're looking at $7,498,000.00, all spent on employee wages.

Taking statistics for a 14-foot U-Haul getting 16.09 kilometers per litre, and assuming an average speed for our driver of 40km/hr, with 8 hours spent driving every week (2 trips, 4-hour round trip), our driver will put 320 kilometers behind him every week, using 19.89L of gasoline. Let's pretend that the price of gas falls significantly and stays at 80 cents/L forever. That brings us to $15.91 for gas every week, $8273.46 for the decade. It's not ridiculous for a four-member household to use 1000kWhrs per month, so we'll estimate that one machine is using half of that, and the plant (lighting, heating and so on) is using 3X that (a very low-estimate). Across a period of 12 months, we're using 96,000 kilowatt hours, 960,000 for the decade. Using a conservative rate from the AUC, we're looking at 5 cents per kilowatt hour, or $48,000 for the electricity utility. We're in Canada, so our gas bill should be about equal to that. (I'm getting too lazy to do the research), and our water bill should be about a quarter. We are not taking into consideration phone lines or internet. Our IT guy is basically banging rocks together and sending smoke signals.

So, our utilities expenses are:

$8,273.46
$48,000.00
$48,000.00
+$12,000.00
——————
$116,273.46

We'll also assume a conservative maintenance cost of $10,000.00/yearly material, and assume that one machine in ten every ten years breaks down completely. If each machine is $150,000.00, (resaleable at $75,000.00, being as generous as possible) the cost of machines is $1,650,000.00. Of course, we'll consider the machines as a depreciated asset once we've calculated everything. For this exercise, we'll assume that our employees are top-notch, as are our suppliers, and that the material to make gizmos is not wasted at all. With 10 employees working 40/hrs a week 52 weeks a year (we need to bring in guys to pick up the slack when vacation days come along), we're spending $27,040,000.00 on the raw materials alone. We'll assume that the land is $1,000,000.00, and that the cost of hiring the contractors to build the factory was twice that: so that our property costs us $3,000,000.00

So, that means that our cost of materials is:

$100,000.00
$1,650,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$2,000,000.00
+$27,040,000.00
————————–
$35,950,000.00

Then there's taxes insurance. We're working with heavy machinery here, so our premiums will be high. However, we're an industrial operation, so our rates will be low. Looking at some government rates, by taking advantage of some loopholes, we can drive our property tax down to just over $22,000, and just because we're evil capitalists in this scenario, I'll round down to the nearest thousand, and we can pretend we cheated on the form. Insurance rates are actually kind of difficult to look up if you're no so sure about specifics and don't actually want to spend five hours on the phone talking to someone, so, guess what, we're doing this without insurance. Our employees are uncovered. If the factory burns down, we eat it. If we get robbed, we eat it. If our guys slip and fall or lose their arms to the machine, we get sued. Who doesn't love a risk (this is solely because I'm lazy, no sane business would ever do this).

So, we'll just break it down to $22,000 in property taxes, we'll calculate corporate taxes later.

Now, finally, we can add up all our expenses and find our cost of operations:

$7,498,000.00
$116,273.46
$27,040,000.00
+ $22,000.00
————————
$34,678,073.46

Okay, and, with us bringing in 41,600,000.00 over those ten years, we can claim to have made a profit of $6,921,926.00. After we pay our 11% corporate tax rate, we have $6,160,514.62 left, rounded to the nearest penny. Adding in our $3M property value and the depreciated value of our equipment of $750,000.00 gross, we can claim our combined net-worth to be $9,910,514.62, which is lower than our initial investment of $10,000,000.00, but still respectable. We lost less than $85,000.00. Meanwhile, each of 19 employees collected a liveable wage for ten years. But keep in mind, to make this work, we had to forgo our own salaries, never pay insurance, never give bonuses or pay-raises, forgo phones and internet (a disaster for a company in 2016), abandon all non-essential equipment and a great-deal of essential equipment, and employ other severe and borderline illegal austerity measures.

But hey, we've made roughly -$3,840,000 off the backs of the proletariat, let's at least go out and spend our 3M each, in celebration!

We can't do that.

The money that the company makes belongs to the company, not to us. If we make any cash directly off of this investment, it has to be paid as a salary. Avoiding this predicament is called fraud, and it's the sort of fraud that actually does get investigated and prosecuted and met with serious fines and jail-time. When you see somebody like Buffet or Gates or Bloomberg having a net worth in the tens of billions, almost all of that is held as equity, usually in their own company. Now, yes, that wealth is marketable, but they can't sell it all at once at the snap of their fingers. If you sell all your shares in your own company, it looks bad. Investors start to back out, the price of the shares plummets, you look like a fool and a fraud, and both you and your company get investigated for fraud and insider trading.

The money that we make as profit is a holding of the corporation, not of the person who own it. Most profits either go into growing the company (ie, hiring more employees, buying more machines, expanding into new areas) or get invested in other companies (like what Buffet did with Berkshire Hathaway; only a teeny tiny fraction of BH is actually BH). The little bit that doesn't gets placed in cash-reserves which are held in case the company goes into the red and needs to cover additional expenses not outlined in the budget.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

All of this is essentially just restating what the original original said. The OP on Holla Forums, it seems, didn't even read the robber-baron's blurb. The edit of the edit essentially responds to the argument with an insult.

can you tldr; what you think this wall of text has proved? I can't follow other than to say it's a bunch of arbitrary numbers which add up to another arbitrary number and somehow this means alienation isn't happening?

TLDR: Labour theory of value is bullshit, the rich just can't empty the company vaults and run off with the money. People like Bill Gates or Bloomberg's who have billions, that money is almost all held as equity, they just can't sell it at the snap of their fingers. Fraud and insider trading do get prosecuted.

TLDR: Leftists have a cartoonish view of reality.

wut

Read all of my texts.

If a group called a government, which is actually a mafia, prints itself some money…
And this group claims borders and all within belongs to it.
And if this group then kills those who choose not to use that money this group prints.
And this group decides you need permits and permissions to do anything on the land the group claims as its own.
And this group decides that a small select few in this group are the masters.
And this group pays lip service to the masses while using every tool available to tell the masses they are in control while robbing them of all control.
And this group makes convoluted laws to expand the legal professions.
And this group starts and perpetuates foreign wars for its gain.
And this group blames any and all other groups for any mistakes this group actually makes itself.
And if this group also creates false flag events to blame on both real and imaginary groups because no other groups actually do these types of things.
This group has not made the money it printed legitimate.

TLDR capitalists have brain cancer and statists are the capitalists greatest useful idiots

this just goes back to this post
but somehow its ignored and restated again even though it was refuted

...