Non-Degenerate Fetishes

What fetishes are not degenerate? Here are my choices and my justifications of them:

Cuckqueaning: This is a fetish where a woman gets off on seeing or knowing that her man is fucking other women. She can either enjoy it because she wants him to have pleasure and give pleasure, or sometimes it can have more to do with the self-denial and humiliation element or not feeling good enough for him.

Justification: It fits with evolution, where men try to have sex with as many women as possible to spread their genes, so it's natural. Cuckqueaning encourages men to be the best that they can be, and stay fit, attractive, and wealthy so that they can continue to attract more women. It encourages women to get satisfaction from their man's pleasure. For those of you who are Christian, it fits with Christianity (polygamy is allowed in the Bible). It doesn't necessarily involve humiliation of the female cuck (although it can) and doesn't necessarily involve lesbianism (although it can). It doesn't conflict with a happy, loving marriage and having children. It promotes male dominance.

DDLG: This is a fetish where women enjoy being treated like children. Some people find this disturbing because it reminds them of pedophilia. However what people find sexy about it is not that the girls are actually like children, it has more to do with the submissiveness and helplessness that comes with playing that role.

Justification:
Women are naturally submissive and a relationship where the male is the dominant partner is usually more successful. The problem with most fetishes that promote female submissiveness, such as most forms of BDSM, is that they go overboard emphasizing violence to the point where there is not enough love. DDLG is different because the man acts like a caretaker, so there is more affection. Ironically the amount of control and deference given to the male in a DDLG relationship is roughly equivalent to what men used to have in 'normal' relationships so it may actually end up being more healthy and natural than trying to date a woman without this fetish.

Monstergirls: Monstergirls are sexualized female versions of monsters.

Justification:
Unlike the others this is not really something you can enact with another human (apart from cosplay), which is a downside. However as a fantasy it tends to promote positive values. This is for a number of reasons. In fictitious portrayals of monstergirls they usually are madly in love with the human and aroused by him. The fictional portrayals also promote romantic love, things like cuddling and headpats are often as much a part of the fantasy as sex is. Sometimes having a child with the girl is even a (non-sexual) part of the fantasy. Unlike furries monstergirls look mostly human, they don't have snouts and rarely have fur. Knowing about monstergirls also promotes knowing about European mythology and culture as well as some other cultures because that is where most of these monsters originated. Ideally as a fetish this will encourage guys to want a loving relationship with a real woman, not wallow in 2D waifu fantasies forever.

Not a Holla Forums thread

What the fuck? That's absolutely degenerate.

You could argue that those into it for the humiliation element are being degenerate. But that seems to be a minority of those with this fetish anyway.

Normal sex (like the missionary position). Fetishes in general are degenerate.

ayy lmao

All of them? Don't you find completely vanilla sex gets boring eventually?

No.
You should be ashamed of your fetishes and never parade them to the public.
People can have scat fetish, be faggots or whatever else they fucking want but the bottom point is that you do not expect other people to accept it.
You do it in private where nobody is looking and without hurting anyone.

The very act of masturbation is something that should be a taboo, if you do it don't fucking tell us, we don't care about what you watch when you unload one.
Fuck off.

Okay I'm falling for the bait here but only so passer-bys don't listen and take this dumb shit into consideration.
Look up r/K selection theory. pair-bonding and strict monogamy is an important evolutionary mechanic.

Promiscuous "r" species like frogs, turtles, rabbits, and insects all tend to be less intelligent while monogamous "K" species tend to form societies and have more complex brains and communication skills(Wolfs, lions, owls, eagles, elephants, some primates, ect.)

In other words, no, it's not okay when a man does it. Stop having frivolous sex and find a life partner you love, respect and share a deep emotional connection to.

pol is not here to approve of your degeneracy.
Thanks for sliding a thread retard.

Fair enough but I would argue there are some fetishes that are mentally unhealthy and maladaptive and lead to unsustainable relationships or psychological and/or physical danger. Stuff like scat would fall into that, I don't think that should be practiced even behind closed doors although I'm not gonna hunt people down for it. It makes sense to discuss what fetishes people should feel free to practice in private and what fetishes are inherently harmful.

Artificial intelligence and more importantly said artificial intelligence in big hulking, yet still somehow fuckable machines.

all fetishes are degenerate

This
Sage sage

...

So do you really not have any fetishes? I don't think I've ever met anyone who didn't have any fetishes, at least not anyone who I've known long enough that they'd honestly answer that question. Or do you have them and just suppress them?

This ONE scientific concept on sexual activity, reproduction, and child rearing explains perfectly why (((they))) push miscegenation and modern slut culture so fucking hard. Thanks user for your severely underrated post.

My only fetish is saging shit threads

Any fetish which doesn't normally result in procreation is inherently degenerate.
Consider: hedonism is the surest tell-tale sign of degeneracy. Pleasuring one-self is hedonism; sex with partners outside of a marriage/long-term is implicitly for pleasure. Hence, hedonism.
Hedonism is Degeneracy. Fetishes are Hedonistic. Fetishes are degenerate.

handholding and headpats

...

Beating jews to death with two pounds of frozen bacon duct-taped to an axe handle.

Is there a raid going on, or did the election just bring us more cuckchan trash than I thought?

We should not be further encouraging fetishes of any sort; only sex for the sake of procreation. For any other purpose is degenerate.

I'm pretty sure it's the latter, but then again industrious anons have uncovered some good shit in the past few months and like clockwork the slides hit like an avalanche of shit.

Nice trips, faggot.

/abdl/ please go.
Though if you made a thread about this just to ruin your hitler dubs, then 5/10 decently played

KEK VULT

Theres nothing wrong with fucking your wife for fun. Nice trips, wizzie

Sage for wrong board.

Non-degenerate fetishes would be any kind of monogamous sexual activity with your wife or husband, which deviate from missionary vaginal sex, but nothing anal (major disease risk, and pegging is immasculating).

The most degenerate fetish is posting shitty threads on Holla Forums. Back to reddit you go.

There's nothing wrong with felating a barrel.

>>>/cuckquean/5825
Interdasting :DDDD

You are a faggot. Bending your girl over the dinner table and pounding her is the way to go.

It's a THEORY, goy.
Monogamy is for pussies.

What about a fetish for impregnating women in general?
A fetish for European women?
A fetish for National Socialism, i.e. Nazi girls?

I don't think OP is completely off base on the first one as the norm used to be that the most genetically fit human males win out over their competition for breeding rights with a harem of a many women as possible. How is competing and only allowing genes the led to success degenerate?

How is encouraging women to be submissive and listen to their men degenerate? Women are virtually children anyway mentally, this just encourages people to accept and embrace reality.

Okay.