Why does leftypol never talk about people like the rothschilds or similar families?

Why does leftypol never talk about people like the rothschilds or similar families?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_capital
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Business_families_of_the_United_States
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Why should we?

Don't hate the player, hate the game.

...

Because the faces and names of the upper class change but the aggregate effect of their existence does not.

Now Holla Forums on the other hand likes to point to rich Jews in order to give some semblance of legitimacy to their anti-semitism, because they don't give a shit about oppression, they just want to be the ones doing it.

...

>I happen to like capitalism, so I want people to only hate the top bourgies and blame everything on them and the jews not the system that created them.

Same reason (((Marx))) based his entire criticism of capitalism around white English factory owners actually producing stuff and non of it around (((financiers))) who just shift money around. Pure coincidence goyim!

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_capital

Even if you somehow got rid of all the jews, other people would come in and take their places. Holla Forums wants to deal the people doing most of the exploitation. Holla Forums wants to deal with the system that makes it possible in the first place.

Are you new to socialism?

Rothschild
Roth schild
Rot=red=communism
Schild=shield=protection

They are our Jewish puppet-masters so, we protect them. Don't tell Holla Forums

If that were actually the case then capitalism would be fine.

You know your ideology is just the pro-white version of "social justice," right?

That gives me an idea.

Guys. Guys. What if… what if we start calling the alt-right "vanilla sjws"? Like, sjws, but for white people, maybe vsjw for short.

Wouldn't that just piss them off?

I mean think about it.


The parodies write themselves.

isn't that just Holla Forums?

or white justice warriors?

>>>/idpol/

The point was that if true mobility existed then capitalism would be good enough. Instead it's the same cast of families in power for generations.

Periodically bootleggers, pirates, drug dealers, and war profiteers work their way up through the ranks with blood money. The faces and names DO change, but it's slow, and not the principle problem.

...

we don't need to personify problems that are systemic

who are you quoting?

No, because the issue with capitalism isn't in mobility, but in the fact that there is going to be a hierarchy where a few exploit the majority of the population. Socialism is good enough because under it my material condition, and pretty much anyone who isn't a bourg, will improve dramatically.

I was paraphrasing


But rich people are miserable though.

right idea but its to long to really stick

hate both tbh

Socialism has yet to deliver on that particular promise. Honestly, socdems are the only ones making any real headway in that regard.

...

America is controlled by certain rich business families whether it be the Rothschilds or the DuPonts or the warburgs or the Kennedys.

Wiki has a list of a bunch of them

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Business_families_of_the_United_States


For some reason tin foil tards love to latch onto the Rothschilds.

Realistically they are probably just rich globalists, the Rothschild own the magazine the economist which is basically just a globalist rag

No, WJW is too distinct.