Are there any good modern books that explain how corporations work from a Marxist perspective?

Oh! The capitalists don't get profit from surplus value, the bank don't create money out of thin air and automation doesn't lower surplus value anymore?

Tell me more…

Sorry, I always forget that capitalism is only those three things and nothing more.

...

Physics developed a lot more since Einstein. It's like asking what is our current understanding of physics and recommending reading Einstein because it's still true.

You realise that every single person who has an understanding of today's physics has started by learning, not even Einstein's, but Newton's laws, right?

Das kapital is still almost entirely relevant. The basic structure of capitalism has not changed, it just moved onto new commodities.

Not sure if it was in there, but keep in mind that copy right and patents exist as a way to turn an information good (infinite once created) into a commodity (scarce and the supply is controlled by those who make them). Copyrights and patents are required in capitalism in order to enable the existance of the information good industry (software, inventions, medicine) within a system that is profit driven. Keep this in mind and these commodified information goods act like any regular old commodity where a company has a monopoly.

Isn't Capital about the whole economy instead of just a single corporation, though?

A corporation is run in accordance to how society is.

If you want to know the inner workings of corporations, learn marxism and then read regular stuff on how corporations work, try to break it down internally.

Not that I've found. Corporations are only one type of business, there's a lot of others that are legally different, let alone how they're actually structured and administered internally. It'd take a lot of time to go through them all just in the US, let alone globally.

hijacking: are there any good book with practical examples on how corporations would work vs how they would on marxism?

Marxism isn't a type of society. I assume you're talking about communism: there won't be any corporation.

Look up co-operatives and workers' councils for the latter. If you want a general overview behind the logic of businesses and the Marxian response, read this book.

...

i was thinking of something like how would corporations deal with production and creative work or price control etc in both models. one of the biggest turn off i was with full marxism is that it looks like very stagnant.
like the unabomber dude: stop developing new things and lets go back to the 1800
is that book about that?

im currently reading a book about liberalism, it goes with a current example of some scenario then it show how would that play out on full blown liberalism. like how price control and minimum wages work today and comparing them to the liberal theory.

you know what i meant you nigger, by corporations i meant "production facilities" , better?

...

And I meant "independent production facilities". Didn't you?

hurr durr edgy post-left retard

The means of production changed a lot, as did the way Capital circulates and is accumulated with central banking, reserve capital and state economic policies possessing a far smaller role than they did in the 19th and mid 20th century.

Nowadays it's all a big ponzi scheme for venture capitalists and bankers and wild west investments. But Capitalism at it's core hasn't changed as it still has the exploitative nature it always possessed.

capital production, proletariat, marxism
socialist marxism, economics, reserve capital, banking
means of production, marxism, proletariat
co-operatives
capital moves

That's a cute butt. Would eat.

...

kaname hi

in marxism there is no independence

yo ma nigga this has a lot of maths, can i still understand the point of the book if i skim trough it?

That's a result of anarchists being incapable of presenting any decent anti-Marxist arguments other than endlessly repeating "Marxism is a religion." What exactly about your theory has changed since Kropotkin again? The only thing I've noticed is that you guys have degenerated into a noticeably more reformist stance since then. It's not uncommon here to see anarchists apologize for wage systems and pro-market programs, something that of course used to be vehemently opposed.