I found a benchmark of popular *nix shells.
Here's the resluts:
unix.stackexchange.com
Here's links to the shells:
gnu.org
zsh.org
busybox.net
github.com
gondor.apana.org.au
mirbsd.org
I found a benchmark of popular *nix shells.
Here's the resluts:
unix.stackexchange.com
Here's links to the shells:
gnu.org
zsh.org
busybox.net
github.com
gondor.apana.org.au
mirbsd.org
Other urls found in this thread:
deftly.net
oilshell.org
twitter.com
If your shell's performance matters you've probably fucked up and shouldn't be using a shell in the first place.
It matters because autism
>>>/facebook/
I've been playing around with using ksh as an interactive shell. its tab completion is really comfy, with it putting the options in a pretty little numbered list, and you can type the numbers and press tab again to have it autocomplete that option.
Never write shellscript.
Said no one ever
You realize that is not ksh doing that but an argument of `ls` that ksh's default conf file probably aliases `ls` to, right?
Actually it is ksh because I re-aliased it to ls --color=auto and it still does this.
So ksh fucks with the default output of programs? You know what I call that? (((BLOAT)))