lobste.rs
Videos, like photos, will no longer be able to be trusted very soon.
This will change things
Aaron Gonzalez
Other urls found in this thread:
web.archive.org
pornhub.com
pornhub.com
gfycat.com
gfycat.com
gfycat.com
gfycat.com
archive.fo
archive.fo
web.archive.org
twitter.com
Angel Morales
Archive it.
Jaxson Reed
Oh, technology is so cool! Definitely it won't be misused, right?
Juan Wilson
t. slowpoke
Robert Bennett
Think of the effect this will have on video evidence in court.
Jayden Wilson
ai_assisted_fake_porn_is_here
literally where?
Bentley Myers
archive that shit
Bentley Moore
I'm guessing all this means is there's gonna be a really high demand of "video footage experts" in the future in order to prove anything by video.
Carter Hernandez
it will be trivial to tell the porn is fake and failing that (assuming the tech becomes better at some point) it will be trivial to forensically prove it's fake. of course the top comment is some faggot operating under the premise that this isn't true
Jose Taylor
The keyword here is "trivially". Also, why the fuck is everyone saging?
web.archive.org
Can't use archive.fo for some reason. Do it yourselves next time
Alexander Smith
I tried doing it with archive.is, but it didn't work for whatever reason
Mason Torres
Maybe a camera could use something like steganography to put information in the video proving that it was that camera that made it?
Oliver Torres
...
Adam Jackson
And this couldn't be faked? Please.
This is not only a threat because you can fabricate info, but also because it diminishes the trustworthiness of real evidence.
Camden Smith
Vice was so butt devasted goobers were archiving their shit that they made all their sites archive-proof. They are literally memory holing themselves and thinking they are giving the middle finger
Jeremiah Nelson
that's a nice looking blender
Logan Young
...
Ayden Stewart
Where is the porn eggman
You said there would be porn
Mason Moore
here's the video
pornhub.com
anyone have the unshooped version?
David Turner
...
Aiden Watson
The article is fucking gay, doesn't even link to the video. Some redditard (/u/deepfakes) used TensorFlow and a bunch of other libraries to make some shitty fake nudes in video form. You gotta realize though, fantasy porn is always easier in image form. In video, artifacts are too hard to hide unless it's potato quality. Also faking voice and mannerisms is a whole other can of worms, this one only swaps faces so it's like watching a whore with a decent face mask on and non-existent acting.
Because Vice are cucks here's the goods (I'd post an image but >tor):
pornhub.com
gfycat.com
gfycat.com
gfycat.com
He keeps putting these on SendVid (which Vice thought was "sendvids" lol), and they get taken down, I'm not sure why he doesn't use another site. The gfycat uploads that I found in plebbit comments have the sound removed... How hard can it be to upload a video in this day and age? I guess that's reddit for you. Anyway, generally the quality is very bad. Lots of artifacts, and the replacement is apparently done as a low-res rectangle, meaning there's a discontinuity around the forehead, neck and cheeks where you can see a sudden change from new face to original face. It also doesn't seem to get the hue/tone/lighting right. All the videos are very low quality, because it probably looks even worse on watchable bitrates. tl;dr: Just like the fake celeb nudes we've had for years, but a million times worse, AND he seems to have godawful taste.
The commenter on lobste.rs makes a nice point, though: When this becomes more advanced, it will take a gigantic shit on ubiquitous video surveillance thanks to the "but a hacker could have faked it!" defense.
Incidentally, can any of you shoot a lobste.rs invite to [email protected]?
Ian Hernandez
let me fix that for you
in 200 years
the government can get you for any reason they want, and they know what their cameras saw. they don't need to prove it to someone else. they don't believe their off the shelf smart cameras could be hacked unless there's some strong indication. besides if this was true nobody could be arrested for CP because it's extremely easy to plant CP on anyone's computer.
Nathaniel Watson
The clip I saw from the Maisie Williams one did not look half bad at parts. Next step: Easy to use Open source voice synthesis. Then the waifu age will truly be upon us.
Ryan Powell
...
Brandon Robinson
Unfortunately for them archive.org still works.
Do you suppose an artist could make a second pass over the output of the program, tweaking specific elements to make it more believable?
Kevin Barnes
Haha nice
Robert Reed
If an artifact is easy to spot, it's easy to fix by hand. It would just take a lot of tedious work. But there were, usually very short, video fakes before there were automated tools to make them. This tech will make it easier to produce good or long fakes for people who really, really care, and short good enough ones for everybody else.
Joseph Anderson
these are still impressive. these problems will be ironed out. in 20 years you'll have your VR headset and be banging emma watson / your robo-wifu and japan's birth rate will finally hit zero.
Brayden Reyes
imagine the possibilities 100 years from now
Owen Hall
Stone age, and lots of unoccupied but also useless land.
Henry Lewis
I am not so sure about that. Digital still fakes have not really improve over the last twenty years. They are at a higher resolution and some of the tools are easier to use, but they still have the same problems they always had. There might be less really terrible fakes now, but there are not more good ones. There are probably less really good ones because the culture of autist that produced them was eaten by social media, the mainstreaming of the internet and an overall decline of care and discipline in young men.
Evan Martinez
digital still fakes are easier to nitpick apart, your brain is going to realize it's off. if shit's off in the a video the brain is going to put the pieces together anyway.
Liam Evans
I can't wait until the SJWs get a hold of this and use it to rewrite history
I laughed harder than I should have.
Fucking scrrencap it then.
Landon Smith
THE STAR TREK FUTURE WE WERE ALL PROMISED, RIGHT GUYS?
Tyler Davis
One person can simple screencap and pass the image around. There's lots of ways to dodge clicks.
Tyler Bell
jews beat them to it already
Ethan Johnson
Canon cameras already do this.
Bentley Sanchez
...
Ian Wood
What difference does one standing man do? Those on the bunks already look pitiful.
Hudson Brown
There's workarounds to use archive.is. They're delusional if they think they can stop it.
archive.fo
archive.fo
Leo Morgan
Archives can't be tampered like a screenshot can. A bunch of sites were caught deleting and editing stuff too like adding disclosures to their pieces retroactively to avoid being fucked by the FCC
Yes but unfortunately most people don't know they can do that, which gives Vice more opportunities to get away with stealth editing shit and claim innocence when all people have is a blocky jpeg screenshot
Landon Myers
nearly made another thread on this
whatever happened to putting keywords in subject or image_related.pngs in the op?
Bentley White
The artifacts and discontinuities don't look too bad and should be addressable with a trivial amount of time and additional work. As a proof of concept it's quite impressive.
Benjamin Thomas
Yeah, it does look really promising. So far, it actually looks a lot better than most manual efforts I've seen thus far, and none of those flaws seem like the can't be ironed out.
William Walker
kek
Nathaniel Thompson
you can identify which camera a video is from using distortions caused by small imperfections in the glass.
Justin Miller
The place between her legs is a plaza.
Julian White
>gfycat.com
That looked like piss
Hudson Foster
Hahaha-
HAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Nathaniel Smith
6000000 KIKES
Easton Diaz
i feel like this would be better if i knew who galdot wuz
Adam Torres
Oh, great.
People are already retarded enough to believe in all sorts of bullshit without any evidence and now we have the means to fabricate "evidence" on the fly. I can already see the numerous injustices this technology will bring.
Adrian Price
It's amazing how goyim will convince themselves of this instantly if this tech was made. If the tech exists it's because it was inevitable, it's not like some unique genius method that some guy stumbled upon by some massive luck. The tech will be made and remade independently by multiple entities and even the one or two products with some watermark will be easily modified to remove it. It will eventually be impossible to tell by forensic methods whether something is fake. That said, we still don't even have something that looks real to a _human_ eye.
Did you actually watch the video? It proves the article's title is literally false. The video is full of shit and obviously fake. These news stories are retarded and the people reacting to them look the same as idiots reacting to the end of reality back when photoshopping became a thing.
Connor Turner
your life was better for not knowing. she's the 98 lb. jewess who plays the Amazon, Wonder Woman, in modern capeshit films
Gabriel Mitchell
Evan Flores
hmm
Nathaniel Johnson
People will just use it to brag on facebook. "Look who I banged last night. Here let me show you how I nut on Emma Roberts."
Elijah King
WHY
Jayden Phillips
Maybe its an epiphany she could have correlated pre-retirement.
Hunter Lopez
I support this effort.
Joseph Wood
checked
Hunter Wilson
Lmao. That was one of the first DS9 episodes I ever saw. Nana Visitor is so fucking hot holy shit