Hillary Vote Lead

It doesn't matter op. Hillary won't request a recount because it gives us another chance to uncover the fraud that she was, going by her past, likely complicit in. I would be very surprised if she actually (legally) won the popular vote.

polite sage *this should probably be in the "questions that don't deserve their own thread" thread.*

She has til friday to challenge

pls explain.

No, the game is to win the EC, and that's how everyone campaigned. Trump could've easily won the popular vote if he changed his strategy and only campaigned around huge urban centers. You can't just change the goal of the game afterwards.

Tell the world about the movie "Hacking democracy", and point out that all voting machine owner companies were Clinton donors.
Or point out that Clinton only had lead in states with no ID laws.

Or just say: To quote someone famous - what difference, at this point, does it make?

No she doesn't. Do you even know what the word "concede" means?
con·cede[kənˈsēd]VERB admit that something is true or valid after first denying or resisting it: "I had to concede that I'd overreacted" · [more] synonyms: admit · acknowledge · accept · allow · grant · recognize · [more] surrender or yield (something that one possesses): "to concede all the territory he'd won"
She's done. She "surrendered or yielded" to Donald J. Trump. There is much evidence. Had she not conceded perhaps she would have until Friday to challenge the outcome. Too bad so sad I'm glad.

It doesnt matter. The electoral college has been in place since 1789 and its working as intended. Bunch of asshurt liberals are trying to convince themselves that it matters. In reality they got the dead, illegals, and multiple time voters to try to shove that hag over the finish line. In California they gave IDs to illegals you bet your ass some of them voted for her, counties that had been red turned blue. What really needs to be done is an audit of the voter rolls along with tough voter ID laws.

Them talking about winning the popular vote is about as relevant as saying the losing team of a world series should have won because they scored the most total runs.

Or winning in chess because you have the most pieces at the end.

...

I posted this in another thread and got shot down, but I think it's at least worth mentioning again. This is pure conjecture, mind you.
The guys who gave the roman salute at that alt-right conference thing were jews. The media picked up on it so quick that I saw it on NBC nightly news, which leads me to believe it was staged. It could be part of a narrative to equate white Trump voters with alt-right and alt-right with neo-nazis.
Then you have the Soros funded "revolutionaries" who are still angry and just waiting for a chance to riot in the streets. They have been relatively quiet for a while, which is outnof character.
Finally, we still have this "hillary contesting the election" meme, with the rumors that they are leveraging electoral college voters.

I know it's very thin, but the possibility is there for a three pronged strategy at seizing power from the right. Make white conservatives out to be nazis, stoke the fires of "protest" in the streets, then jew us out of the election with the electoral college. It may be unlikeley, but I don't thinl we should let victory make us complacent.

Muh popular vote has always been a crutch for fucking losers.
It's always been the electoral and never the popular, boohoo you got more for something completely inconsequential and irrelevant to the actual conclusion of the election.
It'll be even funnier when its revealed that the majority of that popular vote is illegal and invalid.
I'm sure the press is already aware of that but is just so pooper pained that they have to cry about the popular vote.

Alright well thanks for the input. That helps a lot especially with arguing the case. So I am seeing that she could have 50 million votes extra and it still wouldnt matter due to her conceding.

Absolutely, this confirms Spencer is controlled op.

...

Dubs also confirm, praise kek.

All it does it make regressives feel better about being losers.

(checked)
Completely. Only a saboteur or complete autist would do what he did.

(checked)
kek confirms

Even better question: how many electoral votes came from illegals? IIRC California's 55 EVs are calculated based on the population including illegals. So around 5 EV are effectively illegal votes. That's enough to erase the votes of entire states like West Virginia and New Mexico.

No, of course it doesn't matter. Stop letting the kike media get under your skin for fuck's sake.

Give me a fucking break.

We should play up this angle.. give the libs some hope so they can suffer another defeat in Dec.

They're doing it themselves.

Did you respond to the right person? Your pic has nothing to do with the post you responded to.

Wrong. Get your head unfucked.

Nigger are you retarded? You have the reading comprehension of an autistic monkey. My only argument in that regard was that the msm could use that to paint all white Trump supporters as ebil nadzis

So fucking what? It's laughable. The media trying to paint Trump as a Nazi because 300 Nazis had a rally in DC is a fucking joke. The people recognize it as a fucking joke. It is irrelevant. Why even bring it up, unless you're fucking stupid?

Considering the "massive voter turnout" I still find it funny that the popular vote for Hillary kept rising and rising long after the end of the election.

It smells like kikery all the way over the Atlantic.

Who cares? It's PR faggotry designed to get you attacking yourselves. Ignore it and attack the media.

The moderators have been compromised.

,,,

If someone ever brings it up, just shout at them in your best Hillary impression
"WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT, DOES IT MAKE?"
and then start chanting USA USA USA USA while making pelvic thrusting actions because lets face it they do not care about discussion and will probably report you for rape regardless of the outcome anyway. Might as well trigger them as badly as possible in the meantime.

Actually, it technically has not been called and won't be called until the Electors vote on 12/19. I've been saying this for months, literally months, but Holla Forums refuses to acknowledge that the people do not elect the President or Vice President. If they did, then Al Gore would have been our President in 2000.

Now, do I think the Electors will go faithless and not elect Trump? No. I do not think they will. A few might, yes, but not enough to make a difference. But the question is whether or not they can. Yes, they can do it and yes it will affect the outcome of the election if they do.

tl;dr
Can they? YES
Will they? NO

The moderators have been compromised.

jjj

The system is in place to stop high density cities that out vote other counties from just winning every election. The people did vote dumbass; and the electorate will honor that. It's just not enough votes for the left from certain areas which is a good thing.

The people don't elect the president is a shitty meme. The current system today stops the east and west coast from controlling everything in politics, if we didn't have it trump would have lost.

I've seen some news articles pushing the idea that muh russia hacked the machines and there should be a paper recount. Only in swing states hillary lost mind you, because obviously that's where all the rigging was taking place.

Yes
But they don't have to. (re: Election 2000)

It's not a meme. They literally don't. Maybe you should read the Constitution some time. The Electors do most often go the way of the people's vote; but on 4 occasions (5 if they elect Trump) the winner of the popular vote has lost the Electoral vote.

It is the Electoral vote that determines the President and Vice President, not the popular vote. We have a thing in this country called "civil disobedience" and it's what makes America great.

bush had the absolute minimum of ev required
still didn't happen

THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE IS STILL VALID AND RELEVANT: IT PREVENTS RIGGING! THINK ABOUT IT!

What I expect he's trying to explain is that the people aren't supposed to elect the president with a popular vote. If you want a pure democracy put your prettiest dress on and emigrate to sweden. The whole point of the electoral college is avoiding a situation where the government caters perfectly to the will of exactly 51% of the population.

So she's trailing by 1 million

Confirmation bias is not truth. George Bush lost the popular vote, yet still won the election because of the Electors. It is one of 4 examples of such a thing happening. If Trump is elected on 12/19, then that will be the 5th time.

However, you have to pay attention to the most important part: Can they? YES. Will they? NO.

I'm expecting 2 or maybe 3 Electors to go faithless, but not the ~40 required to shift the election.

There is that one elector in Washington state who said he'd be faithless and vote for Trump. So we've got that going for us, which is nice.

I wonder how many faithless electors wind up in a ditch.

that's what I meant you fucking retard
what are you even arguing?

No they can't do shit. Hillary already conceded publicly and privately. They could recount and find 90% hillary and still won't matter because she already forfeited her bid.

Also I don't get why people keep bitching about muh popular vote. Do they seriously think that just because they won the popular in a campaign where everybody focuses on electoral votes, they would still win if the system was changed? Because everybody would campaign and vote exactly the same even after the system changes, right?

Fucking liberals, don't they ever get tired of whining?

True. I expect a couple more of those as well. It'll all balance out and Trump will take the oath of office on 1/20.

That's not legally binding, you know.

xDilla!

saved. probably worth remaking with slicker formatting, but this is effective messaging.

The Bitch's dead. They lost hard and now we are going to pick them apart. I can't wait for February.

...

Should have upgraded to speedier ballot printers, jew.

based on the law they can't do anything but technically they could if they had the balls and the right backing

i guarantee you that right now if hillary somehow came into control of small batallion of loyalist troops and performed a coup, killing trump and key repubs, the dems would rally behind her along with the rest of the media and cucked world

they would overlook all their oaths and constitutional principles and claim that is was for the best, for the good of the world

yea, it might spark civil unrest but what could civil disobedience accomplish especially if it meant sacrificing every modern comfort

(((SCIENTISTS)) NOW CLAIMING 'EVIDENCE' OF VOTE RIGGING

zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-22/scientists-find-persuasive-evidence-vote-hacking-demand-clinton-recount-3-states

...

Kek, her and what army? The one that's overwhelmingly pro-Trump because he's the one who isn't trying to gut their funding?

Obviously if you're willing to resort to a coup, people will accept your rule. The point of a coup is that you'll kill them if they don't. But you first need support from people capable of performing the coup, and suppressing resistance after. Liberals are as far from this as could be, having spent the last three decades castrating the small contingent of true revolutionaries in their ranks because muh toxic masculinity and muh brocialism.

No, you fucking idiot. Trump is locked in for the nomination. If you understand how the electoral college works, you will understand nothing will happen.

The only thing this will cause is more liberal asshurt. Fuck the popular vote, it would just have NYC and LA decide every election.

They are not scientists. Where is the scientific method in their garbage ?

MOST of the lead comes from 2 counties in CAL

a place were trump never went.

if they want a recount I'm willing to bet a lot of the votes are fraudulent

also Hilary conceded

the news seems to forget that. if even if she got the votes, she is out of the race.

what fucking votes?
trump popular vote victory confirmed in 29 states

...

the 2 million that she is over. most of it is from LA county there 10 million people that live there, only 10% percent of the people voted and most voted Hillary .

in comparison 8 million people live in NYC.

if anything this election shows that CAL should be split into at least 3 different states.

The less the left accepts Trump as their president, the better. We tried compromise and they refused to give an inch, they just took and took and took more of our rights.

Fuck compromise. Let them refuse to acknowledge Trump's authority and let us smash them apart when they stand in his way.

WELCEOM to shitpost. Please enjoy your stay, sir.

They're trying two things:
1. Passing a constituitional amendment removing the electoral college or obliging them to vote the same way as the popular vote.
2. Passing state laws obliging their electors to vote for the candidate who won the popular vote.

Both will fail because Republicans control the most state legislatures. In effect the lefties will burn untold time and energy on yet another lost cause of theirs.

No, user, don't you get? They have PhDs so it means they're really smart! You should listen to them because they clearly know better.

Ugh, I can't even, you're such a fucking uneducated white male. I mean, it's 2016 guys, for fsm's sake!

nation wide popular vote doesn't matter

Those will also fail because they fly in the face of the separation of states and the balance of power between the states.
Hell, the entire point of the EC was to make sure that whoever got elected president actually gave a shit about most of the states instead of endlessly pandering to only Califags and Jew Yorkers.