web.archive.org
Why are leftists so pro-kike again?
web.archive.org
Why are leftists so pro-kike again?
Other urls found in this thread:
ifamericansknew.org
natsummit.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
gtr5.com
webcache.googleusercontent.com
twitter.com
Underchecked triples.
rats fleeing a sinking ship
Leftists pro-kike? They hate Israel, it's modern day colonialism to them.
based rabbi
Modern leftists hate Israel, though. They are overwhelmingly pro-Palestine. Many leftist, self hating Jews amongst them too.
Libbies are. Depends on how left.
LGBT is a terrorist organization
Even if kikes fight one another, they will never fight for us.
If you saw two kikes fighting and put on some magic reality glasses then you'd see both standing on the mangled, backstabbed corpse of a white man.
Yeah. Kikes are neurotic and will even fight one another. As they say amongst themselves - two kikes, three opinions.
The super pro-kike types tend to be right-wing evangelicals.
Its weird how in ANY FUCKING SITUATION leftists will always jump to defend Islam.
...
they only hate israel because they view it as "whites being mean to brown people"
They hate Israel because Israel is right wing.
It's been over 2,000 years, guys. I think it's time to we made Judaism great again.
Kike's pay their bills and feed their egos.
They fell for the lolocaust meme because it was real in their mind, goys
No, they usually hate Israel because of this:
ifamericansknew.org
or maybe this:
natsummit.org
sometimes this:
youtube.com
or even this:
youtube.com
gtr5.com
>>>/oven/
Mark my words, jews are going to get chased out of the left. By muslims and this trash. They will then be easy pickings for us
Because LGBT is a religion of peace
Good stuff.
Retard, kill yourself.
(checked)
I've been saying this on Holla Forums for a while now, religiously observant orthodox jews are based. The problematic jews are ALWAYS non religious.
wtf i love israel now
...
The kind of stuff the "Epstein VI Foundation" is funding.
This trap plague is planned, faggots:
RESEARCH PROGRAM 2016-2017 Robert Trivers
Evolutionary Theory applied to Social World
1—Species selection. What factors are associated with differential reproduction and survival of species over time, in particular genetic vs investment? To what degree does biased investment in some ant species, termites, many birds (via male parental investment) improve species survival? What other non-random factors besides major niche inventions (multi-cellularity) or occupations (dinosaur-vacated world) have been involved? Work done with Koos Boomsma.
2—Evolution of heterogamety. Why are some species (birds, moths) female heterogametic (XY) and some (mammals, flies) male? I believe the key intervening variable is sex differences in recombination. A large detailed literature has grown up which with intriguing exceptions appears to support the general argument first made by Trivers 1988 (Sex differences in rates of recombination and sexual selection. In R. Michod and D. Levin (eds.) The Evolution of Sex: An Examination of Current Ideas.)
3—Natural selection of honor killings. Inbreeding is commonly imagined to favor sociality as degrees of relatedness climb toward 1 within the group. It aint necessarily so. Indeed increased relatedness to other clan members , e.g. via cousin marriage, decreases the relative value of one’s own offspring, making sacrifice on the (patrilineal) alter more likely.
4—Evolutionary dynamics of homosexuality. Repeated work has shown that human male homosexuality has a genetic component on the X and 8th chromosomes. Other positive correlates, e.g. with number of older brothers, and reproduction of maternal (female) relatives, suggest the possible importance of sex antagonistic genes, harmful when found in males but beneficial when found in females. Female homosexuality is more often associated with bisexuality and has low genetic penetrance.
5—Transexuality is a brand new phenomenon made possible by advances in controlling phenotypic expression, so that some children are already receiving hormone therapy to adjust their external phenotype to their inferred internal one. Three separate areas are worth pursuing: 1) How do we manipulate a phenotype so as to produce the opposite of the one usually programmed by that genotype (homology and sex hormones, i.e. estrogens and testosterones)? 2) Why do some individuals wish to change their phenotype? 3) How does the changed phenotype affect others. This is particularly important—the erogenous power of transsexuals.
6—Human evolutionary genetics. A series of findings in the last ten years demonstrate that cultural evolution did not decrease the power of natural selection but tended to have the opposite effect, greatly heightening the power of selection, coincident with orders of magnitude increases in density associated especially with agriculture but beginning well before. Especially important were parasite-resistant genes in a world with heightened transmission. Likewise, interbreeding with Neanderthals and Denovisians introduced important genes selected earlier in the environments the latest wave of humans were moving into.
Dr Robert Trivers
Biosocial Research Foundation
131 George St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1414
The golem is turning against its master.
based jews