I propose new term: (((free))) - free as in "you are the product" we already have Free as in gratis, free as in freedom. this would be third one. free as in you are the product and we will write it as (((free))) some examples of (((free))) products: -facebook -google -windows 10 -google chrome -skype you can post more
It would be useful if we had picture/meme to spread this term more. We could also put there logos of products considered to be (((free)))
Connor Gray
an attempt was made
Logan Stewart
Free as in "free beer" already works (you're getting poisoned in exchange for it).
Grayson Phillips
too easy to confuse with normal free, thus diverting FSF. I suggest "unpaid" or " disservice" or maybe "use after free"
Lucas Rodriguez
Windows 10 is both paid and (((free))), you have to pay for it and you are also the product. Microshaft really nailed it in how to screw consumers more than jewgle
Ian Long
Free as in "you make money for them, for free".
Jacob Richardson
Indistinguishable from FSF initiatives.
Nathaniel King
Fuck off Holla Forumstard.
Easton Thomas
I like that one. Facebook's services are free in the same way that the cow gets its food for free from the farmer before it gets shipped off to the slaughterhouse.
Sebastian Lee
If this is supposed to be accepted by normies, forget about it. Just say that those things exploit them and that's it.
Landon Lewis
beer is gud you pussy lipped faggot
Leo Mitchell
only if it's a real beer and not some shit from supermarket
Parker Johnson
come up with something that doesn't just look like you're blaming jews and maybe it'll get used correctly
Jackson Ortiz
literally who literally who literally who literally who literally who
Matthew Wilson
Yes, the kind that only true Scotsmen drink
Lucas Collins
What about “free as in some company uses open source developers as free slave labor and then sells the product”
Examples: Chromium, Red Hat
Noah Davis
Did you know that Red Hat is the largest single contributor to Linux in terms of code submissions? Did you know that Google is the developer of Chromium?
Anthony Williams
enjoy posting on this (((free))) service, courtesy of Jim Watkins
Nathan Reed
Red Hat and Google are paying millions to developers to write free software which you use without givng a penny or a single line of code back.
Kevin Hernandez
Redhat is alright, they make no proprietary software. Google on the other hand leeches off of free software and turns them into proprietary products that take away users' freedoms and spy on them and thus make google profit, primarily through google chrome (a fork of khtml) and google android (a fork of linux) (aosp+gapps). Not to mention the gajillion cuck licensed libraries they use. And they "contribute" DRM to the linux kernel. But they are great at PR and suck up to other abusive developers with permissively licensed open sores, so they have an undeserved great reputation.
Angel Morales
but it is jews. it's their invention
like how google took linux kernel and used it to make world's most successful spying device (Android) open source community is biggest cuck that I know
Nicholas Lewis
This. GPLv3 software stays free. Anything else is donating code to proprietary software vendors.