Assange: 'Google is not what it seems'
archive.is
http s://www.sott.net/article/333960-Assange-Google-is-not-what-it-seems
Assange: 'Google is not what it seems'
archive.is
http s://www.sott.net/article/333960-Assange-Google-is-not-what-it-seems
Other urls found in this thread:
xyzcase.xyz
atvmdoe.wordpress.com
thesacramentocaper.files.wordpress.com
8ch.net
github.com
aarontgrogg.com
archive.is
twitter.com
First for dead.
Are you faggots going to stop using their products now?
Serious question: am I really any less of a chump if I use Bing or the Duck?
I'm not a big fan of duckduckgo, it doesn't seem to have enough web crawlers or the right algorithm, but Bing is a huge improvement over Google in web searches (still Micro$oft). Google image search might be better. Use TinEye or some other image reverse lookup before using Google.
I bet you use Chrome.
Startpage
Switched to firefucks last month. Out of the frying pan, into the fire?
Anyone use Qwant? Is that still an uncompromised one?
So what's the story with the hash and shit not matching? Wikileaks confirmed compromised and Assange confirmed quadrapelic hooked up to a pain amplifier?
This is the only decent search engine.
Searx isn't bad either.