Right Always Attacks Their Extremists But Left Supports Them

Why does the right always attack and disassociate from its extremists?

The left doesn't do this.

If you're a hardcore white nationalist though, you're bound to be attacked and disavowed by civic nationalists / pussies.

We need to stop hating on our extremists.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/Race.pdf
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Because the left has been allowed to control the moral argument while the right had been reduced to just policy. We now have the power to make sure that never happens again.

left has nothing to corrupt

it is already morally bankrupt

by which I mean

by sheer force of entropy, the left moves left

while the right also pushes left because of entropy, until there is a violent shift all the way right

we don't do the long march, we do krystallnacht

Hear, hear!

Is that a Hitler quote or a Trump quote?

…I can't tell sometimes.

heh

No shit

Because they live complacently, when they need to be in perpetual crusades.

this is some

annoying spacing

i mean, cmon, it's like a haiku

do you come straight from reddit

or change proxy first?

Because the conservative movement gave up actually contesting an ethical philosophical defense of conservatism/right-wing thought decades ago, and instead restricted themselves to criticisms of the perceived "impracticality" of liberal policy ("too expensive" etc).

The problem is that once you give up the moral argument, they win in the long run by default. You need to defend right-wing thought from a philosophical perspective (Aristotle, Plato, Confucius - hierarchy is intrinsically good because it leads to order, equality is intrinsically and morally evil because it leads to chaos etc).