K/r Selection General

A lot of the times White Knight/cuck behavior is explained as being the product of r-selected individuals, but what reproductive advantage is there in being self-hating?

I could understand a weak r-selected person sucking up to women in an attempt to get laid. It makes some logical sense that if you're not tough enough to attract women with your strength, being a deferential yes-man might be your best (and probably only) shot at getting sex.

But what's the reproductive strategy behind being not just deferential towards women, but downright self-hating? What's the reproductive strategy to fellating yourself at the thought of your own destruction? I can't think of how that kind of attitude would ever help anyone as a reproductive strategy. Can anyone explain how self-hatred is a viable r-selected reproductive strategy?

Also general K/r selection thread.

Its not

Its just that thirsty betas THINK that chicks will dig them if they join in on the latest pop culture phase (feminism, SJW)

There isn't one. They don't want you to breed user, that's why they're pushing this so hard.

Or in Michael Moore's case, Tyrone will want to fuck his tranny ass because he/she/xir is sympathetic to the black man's plight

Michael Moore is rich and thus isn't a r-selected individual.

Before birth-control it might had worked. When one fuck was all it had to take, any and all strategies might have been viable. No matter how extreme.

But that era is long gone. Some SJW's will wake up, but the ones who are truly r-selected will all be dead-ends in 1 generation.

Moore is referring to himself and the left, right? Cos they sure are confused, fearful and angry at Hillary's loss and chimping out everywhere.

self-hating is virtue signalling as a survival technique.

When you live in a major population center with huge amounts of black and brown people, you better bend the knee to them or else they will ostracize you.

Of course the liberal type doesn't understand this. They assume they are working towards a brighter future for everyone. They want to be on the right side of history.

It takes strength, courage, and intelligence to stand up for yourself and recognize those like you. To protect the noblity and dignity of humanity. These people have taken the easy, self-destructive path so that they can feel like they're morally superior while being weak.

They need to overtly attack whites even more than they're doing right now. I think Trump got 59% of the white vote. Next time it'll be higher.

alternatively

If you are on the losing side of lethal conflict, you are more likely to survive if you are a sniveling nu-male faggot who immediately submits to stronger men.

Chicks dig emotions as a compromise for a second rate protection.

Molyneux has a multi-part series on r-k selection. Opened up my eyes to human nature substantially. Really put perspective on politics, religion, rise and fall of empires, and so on. Here is the first part, you should be able to find the others from here.

r/K has been debunked mate. It doesn't hold up to actual scientific inquiry.

Your post has ben debunked mate. It doesn't hold up to actual scientific inquiry.

Arguing like a liberal sure is easy.

Just like "race has been debunked", right Chaim?

Pointing out that a theory is flawed isn't arguing like a liberal. It's simply telling someone to do more than read an e-book. r/K doesn't hold up because it ignores male/female mating strategy is different and lumps both groups together. You cannot have a unified theory which includes men and women as the same group as they are never the same group in reproduction, they are rivals not allies.

Making up random statements and pretending that they are objective truth is arguing exactly like a liberal.
Yelling "debunked", "discredited" or "sample size" at everything you don't like is exactly what they do.

Unless of course, the refuting studies have actually been published by someone we know is unpozzed. Otherwise, we're most likely just snorting in 'facts' made by the (((real experts))) of the field.

GIGO, mates.

It's refuted by evolutionary psychology at a basic level

You cannot have men and women sharing the same mating strategy. As such r/K does not work because it's applying female mating strategy to men and male strategy to women, which is obviously flawed.

Wrong.

Hitler said that the Jew wanted men and women to hate each other, you know.
MGTOW get out.

Men and women are rivals in nature.

...

...

Can't tell if JIDF disinfo agent, or just miserable MGTOW loser.

If latter then go fap to your porn and feel liberated in not needing women you self-cucked failed male specimen.

There are plenty of characteristics that primitive humanity developed which made perfect sense at the time, but gradually became unnecessary and/or detrimental. For example, much of the modern obesity epidemic can be traced back to prehistoric behaviors where humans would overeat during times of plenty in order to store calories during times of scarcity. The best case scenario is that they atrophy, like the appendix. The worst case scenario (Which is more common in social/psychological evolution) is that they warp and adjust superficially to changing conditions. This process has only been exacerbated by modern genetic stagnation.

In other words, cucks are literally on the wrong side of history.