Gentoo VS Funtoo

3..
2..
1..
Debate!

Gentoo has a lot of shitty bureaucracy but you can still circumvent that by running personal overlay and it's pretty stable
On the other hand, Funtoo is a personal nuclear playground for drobbins

There's really no competition here imo

So Gentoo is the superior form of autism?

Well, I guess. Really, it's only the greater manpower that makes it better.

can you elaborate on that?

Typical fag thread template:

debate

I'd also like some clarification

Gentoo's development team is really small and sort of tight-knit. It's much much harder to become a Gentoo dev than, let's say, a KDE dev.
Which means some obscure bugs may take years to fix, even if someone posts a patch, because it won't be approved until a Gentoo dev will take a close look at it.
They've circumvented it a bit by integrating with github and introducing the concept of proxy maintainers, where basically people work on specific Gentoo packages without getting commit access, and Gentoo devs are more lenient in accepting patches from proxy-maints, because you're supposed to deal with any issues with this package in the future as a real maintainer (yet some people work for years as proxy maintainers without ever getting actual commit access).

On the other hand I suppose it ensures higher quality of Gentoo packages, and it's not much of a big deal since you can run a personal overlay with your fixes or your packages anyway. But it's kind of unpleasant.

And as far as Funtoo being a "personal nuclear playground for drobbins". Is it really that bad?

both fucking suck

source based distros are only good for servers, people who actually use gentoo as daily driver are all autists who fell for the meme