gnu.org
>We want to provide a warm, friendly, and harassment-free environment, so that anyone can contribute to the best of their abilities. To this end our project uses a “Contributor Covenant”, which was adapted from contributor-covenant.org
Sigh another project that's being poisoned.
Bored.
Thread was already posted.
I guess you can just edit the code and remove all the metadata embedding.
...
So how fingerprintable is this data really?
Will most users generate a unique settings profile? Will they generate that profile over an over enough to crosscontaminate into their various video projects and become traceable?
Such a nf wanna be Holla Forums post, sigh.
before you worry about ffmpeg, you should consider you cannot trust the source not to be already fingerprinted with the camera serial number and datetime. Or for connected cams with lots of other info.
Friendly reminder that hp printers fingerprinted every fucking page with yellow ink.
Uh and btw you dunno what fingerprinting is.
Library version is a mere string and encoding settings are all editable and meant to be changed.
OP is paranoid because he tries to share his cp but couldn't because of the metadata. Listen OP, all camera fingerprints metadata and you're fucked either way.
Daily reminder that cp is against the law and you're going to jail for it.
The skills to do that aren't any more than typical stuff you see in the daily programming challenge thread. If you can fizzbuzz, you can remove the code that outputs metadata. In fact you don't even have to remove it, you can just change it to output "nigger" or empty/blank strings instead.
But, the cianiggers that run your distro will overwrite your changes during the next update if you let them.
Any info you leak can be used to track. It's better to give away the least amount possible.