The fuck happened with this? Did it slide or get debunked?
POSSIBLE LEAD?
Other urls found in this thread:
quicktake.morningstar.com
en.wikipedia.org
archive.is
gocct.com
ca.linkedin.com
newelectronics.co.uk
en.wikipedia.org
ctc.com
who.is
books.google.com.au
reddit.com
twitter.com
Bump
CTR succeeded at sliding it into oblivion
Israel again.
AUTISTS GET IN HERE
link to the donation list?
Looks dank, have a bump.
Post links and shiet.
bump
Regular payments sound like either:
Given that I don't think the Clinton foundation really needs to blackmail people for cash (especially small sums lik 1500$) this sounds a lot more like a service they give out to the store.
Maybe you guys wanna jump to the "1500$ a kid" meme, but there's other possiblities here.
They could also be laundring money. In which case, you'll end up finding about a hundred 1500$ payment every month somehwere.
100 x 1500$ = 150.000$ per month.
Repeat with a few more shell companies and you can launder millions of dollars.
I do hope it's CP however, normies will get angry about the money laundring but they don't really understand how that shit works and why it's bad. Kiddy fiddling however is universally bad.
How fucking young are you? That's industry standard practice. Geektech.com immediately springs to mind…
Bump
This is money laundering more than CP, I think
They probably have thousands of "businesses" like these
...
guess which one's easier to tax.
have another bump
come on
Is it possible that both businesses rent different suites in the same office building? They might not actually be related to each other beyond that.
...
Because it would be embarrassing for the CF to have a porn shop on record as a donor.
bump OP post the donation list
It's probably a money laundering front, not a CP studio.
Do they rent out movies? Maybe have some rooms for visitors?
There's no regulation with who visits those stores, or how much money is spent on renting porn. And of course there shouldn't be.
But this seems sketchy as fuck.
So if you want to launder 15 million dollars? Just invent customer that watch movies and jerk off in your store. BAM! The IRS wouldn't check if there actually were these customers, they'd just accept the tax cash. And suddenly, you have 14 million - taxes in clean cash that you can funnel into your foundation.
...
...
Btw: googling "Concurrent Technologies" shows up a bunch of diferent but similar companies.
Sounds like money laundering even more.
Also this:
en.wikipedia.org
Aparently, there was an article about it.
archive.is
A gang of about two dozen Democrats mill around his seat. A procession of others walk back to request pet spending projects, known as earmarks. And Republicans come by, asking him to enlist some of those Democrats to join them on close votes. “Whether they get what they want in the bill or they get the votes they are looking for, nobody ever leaves completely disappointed,” said Representative Paul E. Kanjorski, a Pennsylvania Democrat often found in what is known as the Murtha corner.
Sounds fishier enough to be a Lovecraft story.
I've always spaced like that, I find that it eases the reader's burden and makes it easier for me to review what I've written so that I can stay on track if I want to make a point.
Get back to frech faggot. We already have enough ways to single out Redditors. If you don't know them, then you're not from here and need to go back to 4chan and hangout with the rest of the cucks.
go away with your period separators and postfix currency symbols
COCURRENT Technologies
not
coNcurrent
Ok, everybody calm down. Let's start from the beginning. Where's that donor list? Don't proceed without it.
Can't find a donor list. Punched in the address in OP's screencap and found this website
gocct.com
Bottom of the page says it was updated Nov 2nd, if that's relevant
See, if we can't find step 1, we can't proceed. It could have been made up and we're being taken for a ride.
The only reason any of this might be of interest to us is if it's connected to Clinton. The screencap just says it makes a bunch of donations, not even to the CF. OP here is the one that tells us the CF link.
So there isn't even a basic interest established here.
Shit OP, suspicious content.
I bet you use the Imperial system too, you pig.
Well, in that case the only lead that pops up is this guy:
ca.linkedin.com
Seems like a slimy asshole. But everything in his profile relates to mortages and economic shit, nothing about tech or tech firms, despite being the CEO of COcurrent Technologies.
He only has two public posts on Facebook, both begging people to take a mortage.
Pathetic.
Disregard this, Gleen Fawcet is actually this guy:
newelectronics.co.uk
Any anons that wanna dig can start with him.
Too bad though, that Murtha guy seemed a lot more suspicious. Maybe the guys fillin the donations made a typo and punched in "Cocurrent" instead of "Concurrent"?
Suspicious indeed. But the court asks that the jury disregard this evidence until a an investigatory directive is established.
Right now this is just aimless digging, unconnected to anything, no purpose or motive known.
Yeah, I'm suspecting a typo to be the cause of all this.
That's why I recommend anons begin by finding that 'donation list', and not with anything else.
Probably best to stick to what we know re the Clintons then. Saved the screencap incase it becomes relevant later.
by that I mean, the troves of incriminating sources
Hey wtf, the OP's pic says coNcurrent, not cocurrent.
You're full of shit
The post text says concurrent, the whois lookup says cocurrent.
Again, that's why I suspect this is all because of some moron's typo somewhere along the line.
Donor list was leaked by Guccifer a few days ago.
Anyone has it?
I can only find sites publishing the top donors (that all got granted federal positions).
We could also use their own site, but I'm not at my computer right now, and that site is a piece of shit.
Adult video stores have been the gateway for the uber rich to find cp and cp snuff movies.
There was a guy in Europe in the 70s who discovered this. He was rich and one of his rich friends told him about it. He spent tens of thousands and was able to aquire cp, snuff and set up a personal shoot which he did not attend.
Believing that society was just he compiled everything and sent it off to Scotland Yard. The store vanished and they denied ever receiving any information.
Adult stores are physical distribution points for the underground market….not the Internet as you have been led to believe. Distro is physical not digital. The uber rich aren't very tech friendly and they like to own what they pay for.
I could well believe this, but do you have any evidence?
That's not the reason.
If you do business online and get betrayed/blackmailed, you can't call one of your friends and have that site suicide with three shots to the back of the head.
But a physical store? It makes the guy behind the counter think twice on his lead alergies before even thinking about messing with someone willing to pay several thousand dollars for a porn vid.
Regardless, I think the vid store is a red herring.
I'm thinking the user who did the whois on it did the typo himseld. The reason being that "COCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES" doesn't seem to pop up anywhere else. But "CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES" already have some shady shit related to them.
Maybe it's bias in my part though, so I advise people to dig on both.
Also, dig on the store, see what you can find.
I'll get home in a few hours and dig on that too.
Yeah, maybe that typo led to the porn store.
But look at this shit:
en.wikipedia.org
Everything about this fuck screams CORRUPTION.
Can't hurt to check. Is he even active? Is he doing anything nowadays?
Well, Murtha might be dead which never stopped anyone from voting Democrat but this is the current board of Concurrent Technologies:
ctc.com
Might wanna dig around about Howard M. Picking III or some of the other fucks in there.
Concurrent technologies website, gocct.com
who.is
The address on google comes up with the company, but when you google "book" after it, it comes up with;
books.google.com.au
Also found this, i'm guessing OP didn't take the screencap himself. (I'm OP, I didn't screencap this myself)
reddit.com
Downloading the guccifer leak to see if I can find the donations, but if the reddit post is 20+ days old, I dunno how that'll go.
Reddit post suggests nothing too sus is up.
Autists able to verify?
Evidence? Post a link or something. Is that too much to ask?
try opensecrets.org
Nobody told me this would require work
yes, I've noticed a lot of people have also been attacking people on their use of punctuation lately. this is just the newest incarnation of the 'reddit spacing' d&c tactic that they considered so successful. these people must know theyre pathetic losers, they spend their time trying to disturb natural movements instead of being part of one themselves
This.
These threads are getting shilled heavy as fuck. Keep fucking digging and get a decent trail built together. The shills are out for a reason. Look at all the three word replies to these threads, it's absolutely hilarious.
Tbf, the "lose" "loose" thing is fucking annoying.
Bump
as opposed to BJ Bill being a rapist/sex offender/kiddy diddler? dunno mayn I think porn shop money is the least damning
Money laundering would be another great charge to add. If they're doing it with this place, they're doing it with others. You're right that being a porn shop is irrelevant.
Bump
Bingo.
Before you guys jump down a rabbit hole accusing this of being a cover for CP, I have a more logical explaination on why this may be the case.
California is trying to pass some insane laws on porn where all porn made in California. It's the Condom law, however the way the law would be implimented would force serious OSHA liability on the producer. Sounds fine and dandy, except in the modern era of internet commerce most of the stars are also the producer and opens them up to ridiculous high insurance premiums, fines and costs all overseen by a single self apointed moral arbitor.
Also OSHA doesn't exactly know how to classify porn, meaning they get regulated the same was as medical and hospital ER staff.
This position would only be able to be changed by a the US HOUSE, not even the california gov could overturn or block this position.
I recomend listening to the Brandi Love episode of porn director podcast for more info on the subject. But given pay to play system and California being a blue state, it seems more likely the porn industry is using a shell company to lobby indirectly than secret CP shell laundering.
However given the crazy bullshit in this investigation, I would not be surprised either way
You know you have a problem, right user? You're so far gone, that you're taking on a Jew industries problem as your own, because your addiction to watching dicks is threatened by the sight of these other dicks having a rubber on it.
Or, you know, he's just a kike shilling for the porn business.
He also has that picture saved on his harddrive, and listens to porn podcasts for whatever reason, he is probably right that the donations are about Prop 60 but he needs the gas or at least serious noporn detox and lifting, fix yourself or gas yourself user, you are a mess, a waste, a big fat mistake, and everybody knows it.