I'm a liberal American college student Holla Forums, but I've been sliding further to the right recently with shit like BLM and trans kids. I can agree with you about the policing of black neighborhoods and the extreme immorality of giving young children hormone therapy, but I still find many of your viewpoints on Jews ridiculous. There is an obvious hypocrisy in our culture regarding ethnicity when it comes to Israel/Jews (borders, migrants, morality of ethnic pride, etc.), and regarding white privilege, while Jews comprise some of the most privileged people in the U.S. we never hear about "Jewish Privilege". However, the idea of a conscious Jewish effort to control white people comes across as fucking retarded. I want your redpills on this Holla Forums.
Liberal Looking for Redpill on Jews
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
archive.fo
archive.fo
archive.fo
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
theoccidentalobserver.net
huffingtonpost.com
theoccidentalobserver.net
archive.is
youtube.com
youtube.com
pastebin.com
pastebin.com
counter-currents.com
henrymakow.com
dailystormer.com
theoccidentalobserver.net
theoccidentalobserver.net
forward.com
img.4plebs.org
mondoweiss.net
holocausthandbooks.com
holocausthandbooks.com
thegreateststorynevertold.tv
angelfire.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Friendly sage, since I imagine these kinds of threads are not looked kindly upon.
1) en.wikipedia.org
Which of these are Juden:
2) I invite you to research whenever you come across an anti-white/pro-degeneracy journalist, business executive, or politician to search Wikipedia/Jewgle to see if that person has Jewish ancestry.
That's what I was thinking too, but I figured I'd give it a shot. Thanks for the think btw, I have heard a little about the 1918 revolution, but not much. I'll look more into it and communism in general.
You can read "The Culture of Critique" bu Kevin McDonald if you want a book one the subject. There is also "The jewish century" by Yuri Slezkine.
Website recommended:
therightsttuff .biz
thealternativehypothesis .org (very good on race and biological diversity)
countercurrents .com
dailystormer .com
Somewebsite that are closer to what you think now
vdare .com
stuffblackpeopledontlike .com
unz .com
You have really shitty taste fam. Daily Stormer is the only worthwhile website you mentioned.
:-DDDDD
...
Understanding Anti-Semitism - Why Do Some People Dislike Jews? [FULL]
...
...
Thanks for the links. I'll check out McDonald later this week. I've always found well educated white nationalists to be the most interesting, like William Pierce and Jared Taylor, since they break the stereotype our culture has.
...
...
What World-famous Men have said About the Jews
...
...
...
...
...
Read the Culture of Critique by Kevin McDonald.
He's a former professor of psychology from UC Berkeley who did work with evolutionary psychology. He wanted to investigate why Jewish culture hadn't really changed in recorded history, well, that's what the book is about. Jewsish evolutionary psychology. It's pretty fascinating and very red-pilling
some of the jew shit is a running joke and only the most severe Holla Forums autists actually believe it, like the holocaust never happening and shit. There are aspects of the holocaust that are false of course
The real thing you want to look out for is pedophiles. At the core of every single fucking SJW/liberal/jewish circle is kiddy fiddlers. Dig deep enough and you'll always find it. It always comes back to child porn, child sex trafficking, child molestation, something. And I'm not talking people who like loli, but actual human children abusers. It's like how extreme homophobes usually end up being closet gay. It's my theory that all their posturing about being progressive is leading up to a society free of morals and laws where they can finally indulge in their degenerate desires without repercussions.
The jewish connection to this is circumcisions. The ultra-jewish version/ceremony (performed in a church instead of a hospital) involves the rabbi literally sucking the kid's dick. Look it up.
...
...
I've never understood why SJW types do this. They'll slam anybody who doesn't agree with them 100% with any accusation (pedophilia, rape, harassment), even if false, but when their own group does it, they just ignore it. They have no consistent concept of ethics.
...
...
...
...
...
Kevin McDonald is the best analysis on why jews do what they do. It is explained very well. Whats funny about him is that when he started the series "Culture of Critique" he was using it as a case study of how races will act in a predisposed way and he had no issue with jews he just thought they were smart guys who were good with money. By the end of the 3rd study he flat out say his opinion of them did a 180 he thinks they need to be kicked out of government positions and positions in banking.
...
...
...
>>>/reddit/
Because SJWs, and the left in general, plays to win, whereas the right in general believes in what they say.
...
I've heard similar stories of many liberals, one of things which has made me question my liberal beliefs. It reminds me of the experiences of white teachers in "diverse" schools, or how whites in more Hispanic areas are more likely to support Trump.
One of the first things which pushed me further to the right was a post on Holla Forums saying that, just like whites, blacks deserved their own nations in Africa, and that white people shouldn't fuck with them in the same way that he perceived Jews to be fucking with whites. You would never hear something similar from the left.
Refer to Prof. Kevin Macdonald on youtube and on his site:
You have to go back, cuckchan.
>>>/cuckchan/
>>>/plebbit/
Particularly this one::
I recently moved from Northern Virginia to a nice town in Indiana. Went a roundabout route cause was visiting friends along the way
In NOVA and a lot of Virginia there a FUCKTON of trump signs. Can't go 5 miles without seeing at least a small sign. 10 miles and you see 3 or 4 signs some of them huge. But see, Virginia has a really bad problem with illegal immigrants (latinos) bringing crime and drugs there. People there know how bad shit is getting. Went down to North Carolina and across it and hardly saw any campaign signs at all. Total of 10-15 Trumps signs and 4 or 5 Hillary signs. North Carolina has this atmosphere however. Things are pretty slow moving and most people know each other one way or another and they really don't care about anything out side of NC. They have a very large black population but it's pretty complacent due to the sheer amount of weed in NC. So that may have something to do with it.
West Virginia and Kentucky were a little different. I hardly saw any signs there but the few time I did it was Trump. I have never stayed long in those states though.
Where I am in Indiana is beautiful, quiet and of course, white. People here are super polite and religious. I've been here little short of a month and have yet to see a black man. Saw several latinos but it seemed like they were just passing through. the ratio to hillary to trump signs is very close here.
I 100% believe "good times make weak men, weak men make bad times, bad times make strong men, strong men make good times".
read the sticky
and stay awhile :^)
(that and go visit >>/polarchive/ – Yuge redpill dumps to be found)
Good luck, and remember, you can never go back.
Have you ever listened to SJWs? They openly state they think the idea of objective reality is just the evil white patriarchy imperialistically shoving its cultural experience down the throat of the poor pocs and the wxmmxn and so on. They don't just think its ok when they do it, they think its totally different in kind for one of their own to rape a child than for anyone else to do it.
Forgot to mention, the important thing to keep in mind, and you'll see this the deeper you get, is that behind everything that is bad for Whites, you'll find a Jew. Hence
Remember this, you'll notice that trend eventually.
...
Can back this up. I will say though that what gets the conspirtards going is the nepotism. That's all a lot of it really is. Jewish society is pretty insular and while the American Jewish version of it is slightly less so, it's still fairly insular. even the secular liberal ones. It's why they have a disproportionate representation in media and academia. I have no ill will towards Jews specifically. Some are upstanding patriotic Americans, others are corrupt dipshits that should be purged. It's pretty much like any group of society.
I wonder who could be behind this post
How much does Moishe pay you ?
>>>/cuckchan/
This too. Part of the experience of being here are the biweekly articles like this:
huffingtonpost.com
...
...
This is a great source for Jewry in genera, esp as relates to the West. Dr. Macdonald, who runs the site, is a a former Professor of Evolutionary Psychology at UC Davis.
(NOTE- THE JEWS HAVE ALREADY REMOVED THE YT VIDEO).
theoccidentalobserver.net
Whatever you intend on looking up, start with Yuri.
You have to go back
Does anyone know this about Yuri? If he was a valuable asset and was in the KGB, why didn't he defect and get put on the payroll by the CIA immediately? He mentions he worked a shitty job in the US, which just seems weird to me for an influential former Soviet spy.
Usually, they walked into US embassy at that time, they get safe passage and are set for life in exchange for info. (see book on history of the CIA "Legacy of Ashes").
The thing that confuses most libshits is that White Nationalists and Black Nationalists are natural allies. They want the same thing. Segregated, homogeneous societies free of the poisonous cultural Marxism that has brought the West to its knees.
If you're really interested on kikes, the biggest redpill is learning about Communism and the spread of its doctrine in the west. It goes much deeper than that, but that is a good place to start.
Holy shit please spend some more time reading and understanding before you start spewing that drivel.
It's never failed to amaze me how limousine liberals will change their tune once they have to live with the diversity that they force upon poorer whites. I live in a 90% white state (the others are mostly Indians who keep to themselves), but anytime I've gone to a bigger city, democrats I know will start telling me to keep to the whiter, richer, neighborhoods. They know what the effects are, but voting blue makes them feel good, so they keep doing it. As a result, no trump signs, and a ton of Hilary voters.
They reject all forms of objectivity, except for the unwavering belief in the objectivity of their own ideology. Reminds me of this youtube.com
The shekels have been deposited in my Swiss account goyim
You're onto part of it, but read more of Dr. Macdonald's works, esp his trilogy on Jews: Culture of Critique, A people That Shall Dwell Alone, etc..
You have to think of it in terms of group evolutionary strategy. If you start understanding it from that perspective and you go back at look at Judeo-Bolshevisim (see Churchill article on jews in Bolshevik revolution) it will start to make sense.
It may seem odd at first, but you start digging and you will me amazed. By the way, know where that video comes from? An Israeli foundation that goes and watches every Arab show and watches if they say anything mean about Jews.
Yet, they'll go to extreme lengths to excuse black nationalists, even though both have similar goals. Assata Shakur dindu nuffin, but George Rockwell is basically satan. Segregation is good when blacks want it, but bad when whites want it. The lack of consistent moral principles on the left is why young people are moving to the right in droves.
And they also go to extreme lengths to promote mass immigration of non-whites into Western countries, and promote the idea of miscegenation.
If a community is 95% white it is considered "too diverse" and is frowned upon. If a community is 95% non-White? Oh, that's perfect and diverse :)
European nations are the only nations facing this insane hypocrisy. Japan is still for Japanese people. India is still for Indians. Cultural Marxism, in effect, is a genocidal social policy. Marxism has been spread rampantly throughout the West. I'm sure you know tribe is responsible for the formation and spreading of Communism, don't you?
typo
meant
It's 5 AM and I haven't been to bed yet, can't type very well in this condition
Which of these are Juden:
these ones
From what I've seen liberals vote for mass immigration to feel good about themselves and because their social group does it too. Many of the people higher up who have done this are Jewish, but its the conscious collusion I don't agree with. They're subject to their own biological tendencies and social pressures too. Just like Muslim's tendencies express themselves in political ideology, so do Jew's tendencies express themselves in political ideology.
Look, I'm not a practicing Christian, I don't go to Mass, but even I know that's bullshit. Despite what Neil Degrasse Tyson, Bill Nye and reddit would have you believe, Christians don't take the Old Testament all that seriously. They never have. Not even in the """Dark Ages""" despite what pop culture would have you believe.
The evangelical idea of taking it totally literally is a relatively recent one, from around the late 19th/early 20th century. And what other position do evangelicals hold above all others? Prostration before Israel. Look hard enough at the founding of the evangelical traditions and I'm sure you'll find more than a few echoes.
I'm always baffled by people who claim Christianity was a Jewish trick from the beginning. It's ludicrous on the face of it. Read any Jewish source talking about Christians. They hate them, and they despise Jesus. A lot of this comes back to the fact that the Jews view race and religion as intertwined. When they talk about Christians as their great enemy, they mean whites.
All that aside, I'm not going to defend the church of today. Every Pope since WWII has been a puppet.
That's because it's not conscious (at least not for all of them). It's a racial trait. In-group preference is a strong part of their biology (and everyone as well, but they've been actively subverting it for generations in white people).
The jewish control is only a conscious effort by the cabal at the top (read the protocols), but that's all it needs. It spreads down easily enough, and with jewish nepotism being such a central part of these institutions, their control only spreads and spreads. Most of the jews pushing these agendas don't even see or care about the bigger picture (they're in it for the shekels, and the cabal determines where the shekels go). That doesn't make them less dangerous.
On top of that, it's a part of their religion. The jew sees every non-jew as animals, etc. I'm sure that anons here have the talmud stuff saved, but the essence is that Jews believe in their core that they really ARE the CHOSEN ONES, and that everyone else exists only as a tool for them. Non-jews are literally thought of as inferior slaves. The "goy" meme has real basis.
On top of that, the structure of the religion itself is one of top-down control (the semitic religions have this in common vs the white religions that are more based around grassroots family structure). It's part of their ideology that they have the right to control us, it's bred deep into them. It's not a consious effort, but an unconscious/subconsious one– and that's why it's so deadly.
I hope you aren't serious, OP. The nature of Jewish control is the most blatant thing possible. Look at the wikileak emails or how every single election cycle and this one being no different is just "muh israel" over and over again on both sides. Mass media is heavily liberal yet paradoxically zionist, something that is anti-liberal. Well, I could go on and on but just read through all these pastebin collections because they really tell it all
Not some, user. Jews are the most privileged, by far. So much so that if you account for Jews, whites are actually extremely underrepresented in a very large amount of things but are blamed for all manners of "privilege" that are actually Jewish.
counter-currents.com
henrymakow.com
dailystormer.com
forward.com
All those "white" hollywood actors? Look at this :
img.4plebs.org
mondoweiss.net
Ask yourself this very simple question, you can criticise and even openly say to kill whites but can you do the same about Jews? Can you criticise Jews for anything openly? That is true privilege for if whites were truly privileged then nobody would be able to speak against whites whatsoever because they would be oppressed from doing so.
Jews are the ultimate in privilege.
That's why it's so fucking brilliant, most of it isnt' conscious. Most people who are straight up Marxists in the West don't do it because they have some secret Jewish agenda, they do it because they legitimately believe in it.
The spread of this ideology is 100% a result of two things: public education and mass media. Guess who has a massive hand in both of those things? Kikes. It's a small number of people who do have a legitimate globalist kike agenda who are spreading their ideology to the masses.
OP what do you think about Israel occupying Palestine. Also AIPAC.
Regardless, look into the greater Israel project and consider how ISIS never attacks Israel and how much Israel benefits in having Assad removed from power in Syria, not to mention how Hezbollah is categorized as a terrorist group when they are the only reason that Israel hasn't invaded northwards towards Lebanon (Hezbollah is 10 times the size of the Lebanese army). Also Golan Heights and oil,
There's just so much fuckery it's ridiculous. Hopefully you know about how Israel was even created in the first place with the Balfour declaration (though most don't know how the British made contradictory promises to the Arabs with the Mcmahon-Hussein correspondence)
I'm talking about a genetic trait the predisposes them towards extreme liberalism, just like many of us have genetic traits that predispose us to extreme conservatism. I think whites should be evidence that it is certainly possible to betray your ethnic in-group. Rather than a cabal I see Jews having a tendency towards liberalism and power. This results in a bunch of powerful, and liberal, Jews spreading communism without a conspiracy. Also, many of the powerful Jews were and are just Jewish genetically, but religiously secular.
I think its pretty fucked how Israel occupies Palestine. I might not want Palestinians in my country, but they do deserve their own nation, just like any other people. I don't know much about the balfour declaration though.
Powerful Jews have been disassociating themselves with religion for a long time. That started in the Communist movement. In the course of only a couple years, the USSR filtered out all of the well-known Jews in positions of power and tried to take a "secular" stance, to disassociate kikes and Communism. Interestingly enough all of the money that went into the spreading and backing of Communism still came from the same "secular" Jewish families.
Can't argue with that, if you read any of their holy books they are completely fucked. They are filled with a bunch of rules, and long explanations of how to get around those rules. It's essentially a system of extreme religious regulations and utilizing loopholes to get around, and they grow up learning how to Jew their own god and religion. It's become very ingrained in them.
While it's true that the bullshit in the Talmud/Torah will have a cultural effect, which is something from liberalism I think is rejected too quickly by conservatives, on secular Jews, there does need to be the distinction between the orthodox jews who believe every word of their fucked up books and the secular jews who don't.
You are, like most when first confronted by the Jewish Question, interpreting our concerns as if they are of literal conspiracy. Powerful jews do conspire, but it would of course be ridiculous to suggest that their entire race is in on it together, directly receiving orders from George Soros and Tel Aviv.
You need to become racially conscious if you are to understand how the jews think. White people tend to think of themselves as "cultureless," and they tend to think of jews as just white people with a funny religion. Jews do not and have never felt this way. They have been outsiders in western civilization for thousands of years, and to this day they are raised to be keenly aware of their otherness. This is one of their defining traits: where other tribes would assimilate and become "French" or "German," the jews always held onto their identity even as they outwardly assimilated.
Everything they do is self serving, for their loyalty does not lie to their country or their neighbors but their tribe. They have always taken advantage, always betrayed their hosts, always practiced nepotism and discrimination. By itself this behavior, in-group preference, is normal. But within the context of a minority, it is treason.
Just as the jews know they are outsiders, they know they are parasites incapable of living on their own and defending themselves. They have evolved to be that way; those jews that attempted to stand their ground, like every other weak tribe, were repeatedly purged over the course of history. The jews of today are here because they were good at infiltrating and dispersing at the first sign of danger.
Some jews celebrate this fact; they see themselves as kings, and the goyim as their unwitting slaves. They poke and prod the goyim as amusement and proof of their dominance.
Others are deeply bitter about it, and come to hate the goyim and all of the positive values they represent that deep down they wish they had: kindness, chastity, family, self-sufficiency, affinity to nature, and most importantly, strength. These jews are driven by hate and jealousy to deliberately undermine their hosts.
This trifecta of greed, cruelty, and bitter hatred drives the jews to act as one parasitic organism undermining civilization. This is the "Jewish Conspiracy:" a people who exist, who are programmed at the genetic level, whether they are fully conscious of it or not, to infiltrate and dismantle civilization to suit their own needs.
This is why Hitler was ultimately right. He realized that civilization was incompatible with the multiculturalism and the minority, that only the bond of blood could hold a nation of industrialized inequality together. And he saw that so long as Jews lived in Europe, they would undermine it and backstab it at every step of the way. Whether ghettoized, deported, or exterminated, the people could never have a cultural order on their side until every last Jew had been totally stripped of power.
The greatest tragedy of the 20th century is that he failed, and in doing so gave the Jews ammunition they never could have imagined: Guilt, victim status, the holohoax, a state of their own, and most importantly, casus belli against the white race. They have become emboldened by their fear of another Hitler, by their fear of white racial consciousness, and so they work a breakneck pace to tear down civilization, impose martial law, and create a multicultural dystopian hellhole that only they will know how to navigate.
Our resistance begins, not with a Day Of The Rope, but by attacking every destructive Jewish organization and social movement, feigning innocence to the normalfags, redpilling the youth, and quietly whispering the Jew's name in his ear.
Not really. Secular Jews are still extremely tribal and thus still a threat if we seek to remove Jewish influence from the West. They also have a tendency to be liberals as well, which is a threat for obvious reasons. Jews have been expelled from Europe over 109 times. Simply asking them nicely (like the Haavara agreement) to leave isn't enough. Leaving any genetic trace of them is a mistake.
Their books reflect their race. An ultraorthodox jew has the same soul as a secular jew, if he justifies his deeds differently.
fucken saved user
capped for propensity
I'm glad to hear this, because I had always thought that you all believed that Jews, as a race, were all consciously conspiring. This makes much more sense. However, I don't even believe that the powerful Jews conspire due to their Judaism, but that they are similar, and do similar things, because of their genetic tendencies. I say this by just applying Occam's Razor. There is no reason for the assumption of a conspiracy. You are right about assimilation. The Franks, Gauls, and Romans merged to become the French; the Saxons, Britons, and Normans merged to become the English, but Jews have always maintained their racial identity. I'll mull this over for a bit, and also check out McDonald's book.
Secular people in general have a tendency to be liberal, but yes I do agree that Jews, in general, have far-left tendencies and their culture reflects this. However, we would only need to remove the malignant genes, there are certainly benign Jewish genes.
That is quite possibly the most newfag friendly breakdown of the JQ ive ever seen.
Is that you Jared?
They have no place in our society, why should we risk our group solidarity for the preservation of a few kike "nice" genes? Come on, now.
It takes effort to get rid of genes. The more genes that are included that harder it is going to be. Plus, the idea of getting rid of certain genes, compared to an entire subgroup's genome, is going to be received much better.
It's not really all that relevant to anything about the jews, I doubt anyone born after 1990 who isn't a massive ethnomasochist or a jew gives two shits about the holocaust one way or the other, so there really isn't much point in discussing this, I'm only saying it because a couple guys claimed the opposite here. The holocaust probably didn't happen.
I'm not a scientist, I don't know shit about whether zyklon b is going to leave stains on walls, I don't care either, this isn't what disproves the holocaust. First off, 6 million. Conceptually I have no problem with the idea of nazis commiting genocide, it isn't some far out "But they're great people, they'd never do that!" or "No one would possibly kill that many people!", mass murder has been a common thing throughout history, the mongols would line up civilians and execute them in the hundreds of thousands, quite possibly killing over a million in Baghdad. The issue isn't that the nazis would kill 6 million jews, the issue isn't that there isn't documentary evidence of the nazis ordering the mass murder of jews, the issue is the manner in which they killed the jews, the manner in which they disposed of the jews, and the ability of the allies to figure out that exactly 6 million jews were killed when the nazis allegedly burned all accounts of the holocaust and burried, then dug up, then burnt, then burried them again, to ensure no corpses were found.
1: Manner of execution. The Mongols perfected genocide almost a thousand years ago, I refuse to believe the Germans would go with a quite frankly idiotic system that let so many jews fall through the cracks, and that was laughably inefficient. There are two ways direct genocide is commited, you put people in certain locations and take away their food (Armenia, holodomer, etc), you line people up and kill them (Most every genocide). Putting people that you intend to eventually kill in forced labor camps is a sensible idea, especially if they're malnourished, isolated, and unable to resist, so building a big supply chain is still compatible with either eventually starving them, or eventually lining them up. What isn't compatible is building camps dedicated solely to execution, if you're going to kill someone you don't put them on a train and drive them down the track for three hours in order to gas them, you line them up and shoot them, or, if you're afraid it'll scare the other jews, you march them off for half an hour, then shoot them. Building gas chambers is a waste of money, if you're gonna argue that the Germans theoretically couldn't spare the bullets but can spare the zyklon B (for whatever reason), they could just stab the jews, or slit their throats, knives can be reused.
2. Method of disposal. So now we're at the end of the war and the nazis are losing, they know the allies are days away from the camps, they've been smart and burrying, digging up, burning and burrying the jews again, to ensure corpses can't be found, as long as there aren't witnesses it's impossible to prove any murders took place. Naturally they're speeding up the gassing process, killing everyone they can before the allies get there, unfortunately you can only fit so many jews into a shower room at once, so when the allies get there, there are living jews left. This doesn't make sense, if you were at the face of a genocide, why in gods name would you leave witnesses? I know if I'd played a part in the murder of thousands, I would be focused on ensuring no one could point out my face or my name, the whole burrying, digging up, burning, burrying again thing is a costly process that could only make sense if you're trying to conceal what took place, if you're trying to conceal what took place, you wouldn't under any circumstances leave witnesses. You know the allies are coming, you either abandon camp, fight to death, or surrender, why would you leave people who can point you out? Line everyone up, kill them, it takes a few minutes to a few hours, depending on method of execution, you can don civilian clothes, run to the nearest town, pick a new name, and you'll have gotten away with it, why waste time following gassing or relocation procedures at the very last days? Finally you don't need to be a scientist to know that cremation is a costly way to dispose of a body, it takes a lot of fuel, one of the primary reasons the nazis lost the war is due to lack of fuel, so why waste time with cremation? Cremation is typically seen as a fairly respectful way to dispose of a body, why not feed it to starved animals, heck even feed it to other jews, then grind down the bones, I just saved the nazis a fortune.
3. 6 Million. Seeing as the nazis burnt the jews (providing ashes have been found it'd be impossible to figure out how many people those ashes came from), seeing as the nazis burnt the documentation, seeing as the death tolls given by tortured nazi officials aren't the accepted death tolls, how can you possibly get any real precise number?
I never really got holocaust denial, or bothered looking into it, because I didn't care, but once someone confronted me with those logical holes in the story I couldn't argue against them, the whole idea of something you've been taught since childhood being bullshit seems silly and unbelieveable, but once you get over it, the whole official story just sounds silly.
Culture of Critique might change your mind on this point.
A lot of the figures examined in that book do have explicitly Jewish motivations. Freud, for example, who was an atheist, nonetheless had a strong Jewish identification and saw his work in those terms. He envisioned himself as a Moses figure who would help his people by undermining traditional Western values and norms. It sounds outrageous, but it's all there in his diaries and private communications.
Jews make up 2% of the population in the West.
Also, considering that most of us here want to have a completely homogeneous society that is completely free of non-whites in the first place, I don't think it would be that big of a leap to also exclude Jews, seeing as they aren't white.
Secular Jews are the worst. They pretend to be liberal on issues but bring up Israel and it makes the Nazis look like girl scouts. This is why all liberal mass media is zionist without question and it's completely oxymoronic. It makes no sense but in the insane inbred Jewish mind it somehow does to them. That or they have malicious plans. But no matter what the reason they must go.
One more thing, the fact that you have poeple in camps that were never officially recognized as death camps claiming they were gassed, or warned by fellow jews that they'd be gassed (I remember one lady claiming she was told she should let other jews eat her food because gassing went quicker on an empty stomach), means that rumors of nazis gassing jews likely originated from jewish ghettoes, seeing as the nazis allegedly set up basic propaganda (auswitz football team, etc), means they were putting up real appearences of the camps being safe for jews, in order to lull them in without resistence, so as the nazis obviously wouldn't be shouting from the rooftops that they're gassing jews, how would the jews in camps were no one was gassed know about the gassing?
Agree completely. Leaving just one is a mistake.
I was quite hostile to holocaust revisionism until I checked out this book in one of the Holla Forums book zips:
holocausthandbooks.com
It's edited together from a series of lectures, and involves Q&A with audience members. It provides a very useful overview of many of the key issues, and got me interested in checking out specifics. That site has a lot of other (freely downloadable) books that go into more detail on specific topics.
There's another, much bigger book which is a collection of essays from topic experts, but the lectures are a better entry point to get you interested and give an overview:
There are Jews and then there are zionists. I would argue most Jews especially in Israel are useful idiots. Zionists appear in power centres in politics, business, academics. They act Jewish but I doubt they are religiously Jewish (or observant) and they are definitely not ethnically Jewish (Ashkenazi).
But then I would argue all Catholics and Greek Orthodox Christians are not Christians but Luciferans and Pagans respectively. Christianity was a small death cult centered around a martyr, it objectified piety, poverty, sacrifice, non-violence. The octopus monster that became the Holy Roman Empire then the Catholic Church and Orthodox religion are something completely different hijacking the Jesus meme.
If you're goal is so abhorrent it requires complete secrecy to gain power and success you need to hide behind language and labels, subvert other groups and religions, or you run the risk of getting squashed.
It's not like they all sit in some room somewhere, it's just like how black people always take eachother's sides against the cops, but with multi-million dollar media corporations, lobbying firms, and financial institutions.
The gassing rumours were probably sparked by the delousing facilities at the camps. New arrivals had to remove their old clothes, have their heads shaved for lice, and take a shower before being issued new clothes. The old clothes were hung on racks, queued up to be processed in heated and ventilated delousing chambers which used Zyklon B. These delousing facilities had gasproof doors and gas warning signs.
There actually was Zyklon-B that came out of showerheads in the camps. It was used for delousing. Zyklon B was designed to be dispersed out of shower heads onto human's heads to kill lice. That is what it was used for.
Typhus was the biggest killer in the camps, and it is spread by lice. That is why Germany went out of its way to import and expensive product all of the way from America. If they had intended to use it to kill people there were plenty of cheaper, more accessible options. Zyklon B would have highly inefficient at killing people due to the fact it was actually meant to be used on humans. You would have had to use a lot of it. It simply isn't a practical means of execution.
THIS
Its actually a more open way of stating what both hitler and trump have said about the states of germany and america. Actually, no, scratch that, its even more fucking racist and disrespectful to other racist and is a few words short of outright calling everyone who is not jew a monster. Hitler at least showed respect to the negroid, the arabian and even asians, despite not being whites, aknowledged their strengths (raw strength, solidarity, and intellect respectivly) and trump only ever talked about those who were scummy, and never really generalized by race or religion, but by actions (illegal mexicans are illegal, the media acts like they are above the law, countries that do not have proper background recordings are not a safe place and high risks to recive immigrants and refugees from). I hope devine retribution in the form of meteors falls on isreal, which should have been one of hitlers earlier stops after getting the middle easters to help out in ww2.
Take your meds and go back to bed
That's absolute nonsense. No historian, either revisionist or mainstream, believes anything came out of the shower heads other than water. Why are you spreading this disinfo?
No, this is simply not true. No such equipment has ever been found. The showerheads in existing camp buildings are either connected to hot water boilers or are fake showerheads, not attached to anything, which were installed by the Russians after the war (all documented).
There is no documentation of showerheads being used with Zyklon B, nor would that be practical. The hydrogen cyanide gas released from Zyklon B is slightly lighter than air. It would come out of the showerheads and collect in a pocket at the ceiling.
If you look at US gas chambers which use hydrogen cyanide, it is allowed to rise up in vents in the floor.
Shaving and a hot shower is enough to kill the lice, and clothes are fumigated separately.
This is again categorically false. You can examine the original documents that state the conditions under which Zyklon B is to be used. It is for the delousing of clothes and buildings, and requires a particular temperature range, exposure time, ventilation. There is absolutely no mention anywhere in the literature of it being used directly on humans.
Hey OP, I'm not sure if someone posted this link to this documentry yet, but a really important video to watch is TGSNT, atleast the first few parts. It provides a lot of insight on Jews in the 1920's - 1935 and how shockingly similar their situation was to ours now. Jews were pushing degeneracy, homosexuality, Prostitution, drugs, they said Berlin had "a different fetish around every corner", it's definitely worth a watch. I was like you once, I think most of us were. Goodluck friendo.
ONE OF US
N
E
O
F
U
S
If that's the case, my mistake. I haven't done much Holohoax digging in a long time. If either of you have a decent source to drop I would appreciate it, haven't redpilled myself on Holohoax since I was around 14 and discovered Holla Forums.
my own ignorance, not because i'm shilling. check my post history.
by Professor Kevin MacDonald
read
angelfire.com
or
Professor Kevin MacDonald Prof. Cal State (FULL) Jewish Influence
youtube.com
An explanation of Jewish influence, why Jews do what they do, why they see whites as a threat.
Primary points.
OP, you want the ultimate redpill, you see it everyday. You just don't realise it yet. Israel is the single most racist country on the entire planet. Look how mass media hardly says a peep on it but sure enough they'll focus on the most inane shit about whites but when it's about Jews? They flip the fuck out like the little heebs they are rubbing their grabby little inbred hands together along with their little ADL criminal cabal. They should get treatment worse than South Africa did but look at behold.. Nothing. More than that, the US gives Israel more shekels than any other with a ridiculous amount of disgusting asskissing on top of it as if Israel is the superpower and not the USA thanks to the help of their criminal lobbying cabal. All of US politics and western media seems to be nothing more than shilling Israel this or Jew that. It's not something you can ignore. It's too damn obvious.
At this point, I couldn't care less how it's done. The Jews need to be stopped. They have become what the great Voltaire had predicted, "dangerous to mankind".
It did not pop out of nowheres, and if hitler got the middle east to activly fight the jews and stop them from fleeing like locusts the world would have been different. I did not know isreal was a young country.
learn how to spot a jew, start listening to NPR, and look at the world through the lens of tribal survival. You'll start seeing how fucked up everything is.
Don't forget that Zyklon-B was invented by a JEW. Nothing about it makes any sense. They could have just used a damn bullet. They did it for others we know they executed for real.
Fair enough.
The official narrative is that the Nazis dropped Zyklon B pellets into the shower rooms via cut holes in the ceiling. The body temperatures of the crowd of Jews then caused the pellets to release gas.
Make sure you check out the Holocaust megathread:
>>>/polarchive/7
I love other cultures. I love learning about them and seeing how different they are. Indian, Japanese, Chinese, natives, the middle east, Europe. I have friends from around the world. But that being said, if you mix 4 drinks together that you like, the end result will taste like shit.
Understandable.
I dropped a few links to the Holocaust Handbooks series a few posts back. That's where I got into it, they are all excellent, well researched, scholoarly and not at all conspiratardy.
As for how I jumped on the Zyklon B stuff: one of the books available at that site is the Leuchter Reports. In connection with a Canadian revisionist libel case, a guy called Fred Leuchter prepared a report on the alleged gas chambers.
Fred Leuchter was the leading expert on gas chambers: he was the consultant engineer who designed many of the hydrogen cyanide gas chambers used in the US for execution.
As such, he's very familiar with all the things you have to take into consideration when designing such a chamber.
He visited the alleged "gas chambers" in the camp museums, took samples from the walls, and went through witness reports.
He basically ended up coming out with a barrage of reasons why they could not have possibly been used as gas chambers.
Of course, that was the end of his career.
More recently, there has been the Rudolf Reports (also available at that website). Germar Rudolf is a former Chemistry PhD at the Max Planck Institute who got interested, and took samples of the walls of the supposed chambers. They did not have levels of the required chemical deposits consistent with use as gas chambers, whereas the delousing facilities did.
Of course, that was the end of his career too.
"As for the Jews, their explanation of anti-Semitism is more characteristic yet. In addition to the usual cliche, 'with hatred and savagery' - naturally with no motive, they do not care to discuss motives - according to them, anti-Semitism is a madness, an intellectual degeneration, an affliction of the spirit…"
"It was this savagery and madness which darkened the understanding of the most prominent representatives of the culture of all nations, such as Cicero, Seneca, Tacitus, Martin Luther, Giordano Bruno, Frederick the Great, Voltaire, Josef II, Napoleon I, Goethe, Herder, Immanuel Kant, Fichte, Schopenhauer, Charles Fournier, Ludwig Feuerbach, Richard Wagner, Bismarck, Rudolf Virchow, Theodor Billroth, Eugen Duhring - and countless others in all fields to come out against the Jews. Savagery and madness,
"And the venality of those Judaized is incapable of explaining anti-Semitism as a social phenomenon…" People are instinctually repulsed by Jews and feel them to be a threat.
Often an instinctual reaction to the Jews is accompanied by "savagry and hatred", since instinct is blind, although it is essential to one's own existence and survival. Then, among intellectuals and later common people, a concious realization of the Jewish problem followed by a scientific-intellectual study of the problem occurs.
"The science of anti-Semitism has as its object Judaism as a social problem, being thus, necessarily, the synthesis of all sciences that can contribute to its solution."
"History establishes that from the earliest times the Jews have been a people wandering among others, nomadic, country-less. The science of anti-Semitism establishes that this nomadism is contrary to the well-being of agricultural, sedentary peoples and cannot be tolerated.
Anthropology establishes that Jews are a mixture of unrelated races, differing among themselves, as the Semitic, Aryan, Negro, Mongolian. The science of anti-Semitism explains the sterility of the Jewish nation in the domain of culture, as a result of this mongrelization and shows that this mongrel cannot contribute anything to the culture of other nations, which they only falsify, denaturing their characteristics.
Theology establishes that the Jewish religion is an exclusivist religion, based on the special covenant made between their God, Yahweh, and the Jews considered as a chosen, sacred (am codes) people, apart from other peoples. The science of anti-Semitism rigorously deduces that such a concept excludes the possibility of any peaceful cooperation or any assimilation with the Jews.
Politics establishes that everywhere, within the other nations, Jews have their unique social organization, constituting a state within the state. The science of anti-Semitism concludes' that Jews are an anarchic element, dangerous to the existence of all states.
Political Economy establishes that Jews have lived in all times, even in Palestine, as a superimposed people over other nations, exploiting their labour, themselves not being direct producers. The science of anti-Semitism says that any people has the right to defend its productive labor from exploitation by Jews, who cannot be tolerated living like parasites, jeopardizing peoples’ existence.
Philosophy establishes that Judaism’s concept of life is an anachronism contrary to human advancement. The science of anti-Semitism imposes, as a duty toward civilization, that this cultural monstrosity be eliminated by the united efforts of all nations."
Cuza finally concluded that "The science of anti-Semitism finally comes to explain this phenomenon, enlightening further the consciousness of people, fully satisfying their instinct and its violent eruptions thus legitimized by revealing their cause - the parasitism of the Jews. Thus it gives us the formula of the scientific solution for the problem of Judaism, which in order to realize we have only to apply."
I always figured that the worst the jews got was neglect and a unrecorded disease which harmed the jew becase they lacked an antibody, and if any corpses were burnt, they were corpses made from the disease, not by nazi hands.
Depends on the drinks, orange juice, vodka, grenedine and 7up is bretty good. But subpar vodka and rotten orange juice jews and muslims, take your pick on which is which is still shit.
Because you'd have to be retarded to put a defector anywhere near sensitive material or operations. His best use was to communicate the threat of cultural subversion to make the public aware of its dangers.
Lol you're right, I was thinking more along the lines of like Pepsi, orange juice, mountain dew and lemonade or some shit
It should be noted that the hole in that picture was added by museum staff long after the war, and that the original alleged "holes" have not been located.
In other alleged gas chamber sites, like at Birkenau, wartime aerial photography clearly shows no holes.
Pretty much the analogy is some cultures pair well with others, like lemonade and whisky, american and japan while others do not pair like orange juice and milk niggers and whites and some are so bad that they can't mix with anything like rotten fruit juice islam.
And I should ad while mixing is fine, we should be able to enjoy the drinks straight at times to and be able to appreciate and respect them.
Ryan Dawson of the antineocon report is good aswell. He has gathered a lot of research on the behaviour of jews in the US and the relationship between the US and Israel. There is a strong connection between the CIA, zionism and US gangs/mafia, the connect between goverment and crime is something that is often overlooked.
Believe it or not, the jews are almost the root of all evil in modern society. Read what everyone said about them throught history, learn they rule today, and then you understand.
is there any hope, my dudes?
will we ever fix this problem?
or shall we forever remain slaves of the merchant?
This isn't the 1400s where people could just freely skip a border and have their reputation be unknown. If the mask gets pulled off now, it gets pulled off globally, leaving them nowhere to run to.
Want to hear something hilarious? The bullshit reason I've heard for why they didn't just execute Jews with bullets was because "it was too traumatizing for the German soldiers".
PFFTHAHAHAHAHA
The merchants are trying to make the world islam, a religion that hates them and is activly violent, they have little foresight that they are making the world into one where killing them will be encouraged. Its ironic, in their pursuit to kill the white man, they will end up killing themselves.
Good analogy, good perspective. Have a rare Chloe.
Out of curiosity, weren't the Jews persecuted by the Christians during the time before Ferdinand and Isabella took over Spain? Furthermore, I read that the Muslims, before they got ousted from Spain, pretty much let the Jews do whatever (but made them pay the double tax).
I don't know how much of that is truth, but I wanted a second opinion on it.
Jews were working with the Muslims to keep Christians as serfs. When Isabella and Ferdinand drove them out, they had a choice to convert or leave.
Many Jews went to the netherlands and immediately got involved in the slave trade. Others "converted" and, surprise, a few decades later they were still practicing Jewry and now in the royal court. Thus the reason for the Inquisition and the rise of "crypto-jews" or marranos.
Except Benedict XVI. That's why he was ousted.
How do you separate them though?
I don't think the drink analogy works with culture. Different cultures are as fundamentally different to each other as different races are.
If I were to put forth a different analogy still relating to drinks, I would view your own culture as a nice glass of water. Other cultures would be like a glass of whisky, or a pepsi, or even a bottle of cyanide (kikes and muslims).
Of course, whisky and pepsi and all other kinds of drinks can be exciting and interesting, but can be dangerous if consumed too much. Ultimately nothing will be as fulfilling as that water.
In any case, cultures are not single ingredient drinks, they are more like full, several course meals, in which case you'd never really mix them together because you'd spoil both.