Just hear me out for a second guys.
As far as I understand it, 'alt-left' is meant to refer to leftists who are against idpol, correct?
Now I completely understand that this makes no sense, because obviously the real left has always been against idpol from the start, so we're not alternating from anything, BUT I think there are reasonable ground to consider it.
Today, the term alt-right is meant to refer to rightists who are right winged but do not fall into the stereotypes of the MAINSTREAM right wing, like no sex before marriage, no drugs ect, basically republicans. They're basically the cool, hip down with the kids rightists.
Now, in today's western world, weather we like it or not, the mainstream left is considered to be SJW liberals. You can go further left economically on places like reddit and some parts of tumblr, but they're all still into idpol just as much if not more. That is the mainstream left.
We are very much the minority, and when compared in relative terms to today's society, I think it is perfectly reasonable for us to be called alternative, not from the original teachings of leftism but rather from the current mainstream idea of leftism.
As well as this, it would actually give us a term to instantly separate us from SJW's so we not longer have to explain the difference, and we dont have to use retarded terms SJW's made FOR us like 'brocialist' or 'manarchist', which on it's own perpetuates more idpol.
So, I think at the very least we should consider it.
Vote here: strawpoll.me