Jews have subverted physics for the last century and replaced it with kabbalistic thought magic that is inherently...

based, good link

vibration and resonance is another topic that is shy'd away from by (((them)))

American education everyone.

Read a fucking book nigger. If nothing else, you're sliding decent threads.

There is a lot of shit that isn't mentioned in schools, if you haven't noticed.

here we go…

you fags want to argue about what a second is, what it was, and what the change implies?

Einstein was a fraud and nothing more than a Jewish "guru" pushed to celebrity by Jewish media. It's insane he gets any praise at all.

THE TIMEPILL

The last Jubilee, 1967 (((they))) got together and changed the international definition of Time.

The word "Second" is derived from it being the 2nd division of an hour by 60.

checked
You really don't know anything about physics Holla Forumsuddy. We have this amazing theory, quantum field theory, which fully combines special relativity and quantum mechanics. The waves, including light, have a medium which we call the interacting vacuum. The only thing we don't understand is general relativity at the quantum level, in order to understand black holes and such. But totally leave that aside for now!

You're mostly concerned with special relativity, and QFT is a very beautiful theory that combines it with quantum mechanics. In QFT, every particle/wave is a combination of information (quantum numbers) and energy. It says every particle is made of information (memes) and energy carried by a vacuum with very strange properties. Particle physicists study that vacuum.

checked
You really don't know anything about physics Holla Forumsuddy. We have this amazing theory, quantum field theory, which fully combines special relativity and quantum mechanics. The waves, including light, have a medium which we call the interacting vacuum. The only thing we don't understand is general relativity at the quantum level, in order to understand black holes and such. But totally leave that aside for now!

You're mostly concerned with special relativity, and QFT is a very beautiful theory that combines it with quantum mechanics. In QFT, every particle/wave is a combination of information (quantum numbers) and energy. It says every particle is made of information (memes) and energy carried by a vacuum with very strange properties. Particle physicists study that vacuum.

No, you're clearly scientifically illiterate. You're not "ripping the band-aid off" or "exposing the truth about science" as you may think, you are only exposing yourself to be a moron.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect

Once again, you are sliding threads of worth. Saged and Hidden. Ciao.

SI seconds are not divisions of an hour. Hours are from what I call "observational" Time. SI time is based on Atomic Theories.

This is as retarded as timecube and nowhere near as entertaining. You don't have the faintest clue what you are talking about.

Probably because it essentially doesn't exist outside of the sun and is irrelevant for 99.99% of people

I didn't even learn anything about ww2 in school, we read Ann frank and elie wiesel for a couple weeks in English class and that was it. None of my history classes covered it for some reason so I avoided the propaganda.

nigger, you're literally just rebranding Kelvin's vortex theory kill yourself.

user I….

...

Well nobody really took it seriously including the teacher, I literally don't remember anything about it. Kind of second guessing myself if I even read oven ann.

oh boy! :3

By your logic, everything that isn't mentioned in school must be somehow wrongthink territory.

My school didn't have a band. Must be because music is just too dangerous, huh?

So we have two distinct things being measured both called seconds.

First a second was simply a fraction of a day. 1/60th of a minute. Observably by watching the Sun.

Now we mix in SI seconds. The SI second is officially.
Absolute zero implies no movement, and therefore zero external radiation effects (i.e., zero local electric and magnetic fields).
^ it is theoretical, unobservable

I've played violin since I was 9. I pity you sage-user.

Music is the acoustic Jew user, don't you know that?!

Have you never heard of a quantum computer? They're fucking built on it, they would not function if superposition did not exist. I'm guessing you'll say quantum computers are faked too.

You forgot about muh nukes not real

Sage for no arguments.

There is empirical evidence. GPS would not even work if it were false among other things.

So is Einstein's discovery of the photoelectric effect not real either? It's sort of important to QM.

He was half jewish. You do realize he and Einstein were not in agreement, right?

It was demonstrated in 1981 by Alain Aspect during the Bell test experiments. You cannot have quantum entanglement without superposition.

It's too bad that this is your attitude. You should learn QFT – it brings the aether right back. The real aether just isn't luminiferous, because it covers all particles. Of course, QFT requires a heavy math background.

I thought that Tesla was the one who discovered the photoelectric effect, under his term of "radiant energy"?

You are right OP, enough evidence for me is that Tesla believed in aether and rejected Einstein's BS, but this board is full of shortsighted fools, who think that kikes subverted only governments and media, the truth is that much more has been subverted by them - biology, history, medicine, everything is poisoned in the (((education system))).

More on the timepill,

I hope you can start to see some major metaphysical implications with redefining time.

The new Atomic Clocks were more accurate than mechanical clocks, there is no doubt about that. The issue is that they were no longer measuring Time, as in day-fractions. The new clocks measure SI time, atomic reactions. Atomic clocks experience all the effects relativity describes. Time dilation is an atomic sub process which is effected by velocity, gravity… that is where the mix up gets confusing.

Einstein's Nobel prize was for the photoelectric effect, not relativity. Tesla probably observed the phenomenon himself but never bothered to publish a paper.

Fuck off with your schizophrenic bullshit. If you're going to sperg about science at least try to make sense.

a new theory called quantum meta-physics dispels some of the myths of quantum physics and science in general. Its an interesting read - books.qmetaphysics.com/Quantum_Metaphysics.pdf

http:// gnosticteachings.org/introductory-information.html
this site has teachs true kabbalah if ur interested
the site/gnostic movement was started by a mexican named sameal aun weor who openly taught the universal science of kabbalah, which the jews attempt to hide, claiming it as there own

http:// gnosticteachings.org/introductory-information.html
this site has teachs true kabbalah if ur interested
the site/gnostic movement was started by a mexican named sameal aun weor who openly taught the universal science of kabbalah, which the jews attempt to hide, claiming it as there own

thanks.

GPS is the kicker. Think about this.

A few different GPS satellites are spinning around in different orbits, varying speeds… they are all experiencing different length SI seconds, easily measured with their atomic clocks.
If we asked each atomic clock how many seconds it measures in One Day. Each clock would have measured a different amount of SI seconds. (((They))) will say it has experienced time dilation, that some clocks are now older than others.

(((They))) will say it has experienced time dilation, that some clocks are now older than others.

I will say all the clocks aged One Day.

this is visible in all fields of mathematics and science. physics, classical physics especially, is more hit by this due to the designateds, sandnigs, and chinks taking up the university positions. the shitskin entry into physics departments across the planet was so nearly complete by the late 1980s, facilitated by the grant system gifts and the like, that all progress halted quite sharply. expansions in any academics usually require a greater pupil than the master, which has been the opposite case for a while now. each successor is a lesser instead. to make up for this, everything has become hyper-specialized – but discovery is rarely verifiable in a practical sense, if every single person is their own field of 'expert'; no time, money, incentive, or even random path to cross another work and validate it.

in crowded fields, any gift bestowing of credit, currency, or position is an insane unmitigated advantage. if you work along side someone who doesn't work and gets gifts, you will fall behind in rank, association, citation, influence, and far more often than not, motivation, and desire to explore – especially when surrounded by frankensteins, and under coercion to play along and capitulate at every single handshake.

science is day care, it is not science. science is jew, is communism, is marxism, is the jewish way done for jews, it is not science. this is the subversion that happens when the inseparable race-language-culture-genetics agent is switched out.

It's easy to forget that nearly the entire physics community was extremely skeptical of relativity early on and weren't willing to accept it until it could be experimentally demonstrated. Which wasn't possible until the 1919 total solar eclipse and then again in 1922.

I do read gnostic texts. I like Thomas, Enoch, Pistis Sophia.

Hermetic Qabalah I've scratched the surface of, I do not like the mysticism.

Tell that to all the new advancements in MR that are being applied to both body armor and weapons.

sage

Do you understand spacetime curvature?

Beginners list of bullshit (((science))):

All utter nonsense.

Sauce pls? I'll give you that jews are scheming manipulators out to destroy the white race, but I'm not convinced they set out to destroy physics and I'm not aware of any Einstein "antisemitic" stuff other than he left Germany fairly early on, '33 or so.

There's not that much left learn at human scales in some fields. Math progressed out of necessity because there were still basic concepts, and simple paradoxes, that everybody could see and understand, which could not be properly described. But when your maths can already describe every visible phenomenon there's not much practical demand for more.

slide thread alert

Your ignorance makes Holla Forums look bad. Get the fuck outta here, really.
Actually, as much as I like Holla Forums for political news and I agree with them about the jewish/pro-israel control of the media, it's not the first time that I notice an huge ignorance when it comes to science subjects.

The relativity theory has been proven correct times and times again. The most notable and old one that convinced the scientific community is the total eclipse in the 1919. Of course, that doesn't mean that it's bullet proof. The newtonian physics resisted without any substantial modifications for centuries, and that's exactly why science cannot be hijacked by any (((central authority))): it doesn't appeal to authority and if you discover an error in a theory you can submit your paper and fix the wrong shit.
However, OP is just a schizophrenic sperg without any understanding of science whatsoever and thinks that whose a theory is matters in the slightest in sciences.

This user gets it.

Real, empirical based science continues to exist under those studying plasma in what has become known as Electric Universe Theory. Theoretical astrophysics is pure wankery.

This is true. The commificaiton of Physics is a big problem, and is basically killing it.

its not mysticism at all, its completely practical, its the true wisdom thats hinted in all of those texts

Ah yes, good old gravitational lensing.

Light doesn't bend. Spacetime bends.

The observations fail to account for the suns plasma

Eric Dollard, honorable mention.

gotta go

here's Holla Forumss knot for it's vortex/electromagnetic symbolism

Yes, such as the fact that other people died in WW2 aside from the 6 gorillion,
More on this please
Is it true that Asians are basically walking computers, capable of retaining and processing information, yet wholly incapable of original thought?

(wannabe mathematician here)
you sound like a person who has never put a foot in a math department. Believe it or not, byt not every academic field is a shithole like (((gender studies))). actually you even sound like those niggers who shit on science because they understand jack shit about it and they think that it's all related to race. In science, it's not. There's not appeal to authority. The whole concept is that it's decentralized. You cannot hijack mathematic research, anyone with enough competence can verify whether a proof is correct or not. The hyper-specialization of modern science is a direct consequence of the fact that our knowledge has become so broad that is impossible for a person to have a mastery of all the subfield of math. In fact, the last mathematicians who were considered expert in all fields of math date back to the former century (poincare and hilbert). Nowadays, you cannot be both an expert in algebraic topology and in analytical number theory, or you cannot be both a number theorist and a category theorist because it's all too broad to be mastered by a single person, doesnt matter how talented he might be.
And don't start with the crap that we don't see the 'real life applications' of science because we are witnessing them more than ever everyday: just give a look about at artificial intelligence and brain mapping, instead of whining like an ignorant sperg.

Another ignorant braindead.

its well poisoners and other shills, just don't engage them and theyll go away

Except current models for gravity don't work, so (((scientists))) hide their ignorance behind "dark matter" so that their erroneous pseudoscience isn't called into question.

No, it does not. How the fuck 'constant speed for all observers' can even imply sentience?

And then gone beyond these limits. No surprise it turned into 'wut the fug i am equating?', but that fug gives testable (and tested) predictions.
Yes. Because it is purely mathematical construction. It is part of larger quantum theory, that does have observable evidence

No, of course it wasn't. It played it's role in evolution of physical knowledge and then was discarded once better models appeared.

That's another invention of the kike.

Both mechanical and atomic clock measure exactly the same - number of times some constant-time process (pendulum swing or emission wave) happens. Only way to measure 'Time, as in day-fractions' is by astronomic observation
All clocks experience relativistic effects. But only atomic ones are precise enough for them to be noticeable.

How is it possible to claim on paper that -1 is bigger than -2, if it happens that when I apply it to an object in 3D, -1 is obviously smaller than -2 ?

As soon as I see fractional and negative numbers, I laugh at how unreal the whole thing is.

in brief, that wasn't einstein. i'm a little lazy, but it memory serves well enough:

Faraday - experimentalist, electromagnetism, chemistry
Maxwell - mathematician, electro with more magnetism, others
Hertz - mathematician, electromagnetism, waves, light
Boltzmann - mathematician, statistician, atomics, quantization, particles
Lorentz - god-mathematician, gravity, others
Poincare - god-mathematician, relativity, others
-
Planck - liar, falsified data, invalid black body conjecture
Einstein - liar, falsified credit, trivially applied an algebraic transform to convert frame from classic to quantized physicis.

the transforms were lorentz's. the classics started around faraday, voltaire, et al. they were ratified with maxwell's math, and had light parts from hertz (your photoelectrics), of which poincare was doing the math on by then. the chemical and atomic parts lead to the quantized stuff, starting with hertz and boltzmann and others, though the math would come later. the lense equations were already well known (1600s). more crucially, the gravity part was all lorentz, and it was his work that left everybody guessing – gravity looked the same as magnetism, but magnetism was electro, which by hertz was light and by boltzmann atomic. lorentz figured out the transforms to go from classical frame to light frame. but that meant everything was a wave too, including gravity – which poincare carried on and showed. the bridging of everything shown by einstein by the lorentz transforms was a plug-in-chug demonstration of algebra, nothing more. a transform matrix is just a transform matrix, it doesn't actually exist.

quantum mechanics is an interesting field. a lot of theory is granted to planck, einstein, and others, but all applied science doesn't actually use their work. distance temperature sensors don't measure black body radiation, they send a infrared beam and measure the difference in properties. direct black body radiation can't predict temperature outside of soot, and even then only in a narrow range in a highly contrived room. the alain/bell experiments, and later cool stuff, use lasers, not special relativity – elements of photons, waves, electrons and atoms, the science and math of which were established by otherwise not einstein. gps uses lorentz and hertz in application, but don't have to (the electronics are stupid simple: just measure delta and keep clock. get enough satellite signals, and you don't need to care about exact travel distance of a single photon's signal. gps needs accurate clock synchronization, not actual time prediction).

While jews have subverted science what you're saying is some next level retardation.
This is a kike shill trying to make Holla Forums look retarded.

While jews have subverted science what you're saying is some next level retardation.
This is a kike shill trying to make Holla Forums look retarded.

oh come on now mr wantanabe. i was talking physics departments as my primary example. it was right there, i said it, did you not read it?

my note on hyper-specialization is universal, but some fields suffer a lot more than others due to their members being quite small to start with. exploration requires collision of sorts - you really do need different testaments/eyeballs to actually go past observation and into knowledge.

as for theory. well, let's just say you wouldn't drive on a bridge built by someone who only does theory and never builds anything. nor would you want to drive on a bridge built by someone who only builds and never looks backwards or forwards. theory and practice are not separable. barbell, tool, and book are all requirements that must be met. better to be a master of a smaller space, than an impotent fool who thinks leaving part of the work to others is anything other than artificial.

not so much that, as granting credit doesn't help any body. which is what i wrote. you become dependent, by definition of the word grant, and it shows up everywhere. take a job as a scab, can you do the job, or were you just granted position because you took less pay/entitlement? how would you know, if you did that? you'd be in a reality-bubble.

you fucking idiot

bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm

the last decent thread on this board was slide off back in 2015.
For about 14 months its been trump and Hil threads ad-nauseam. So whats getting slide? OH FUCK LOOK! A TRUMP VS HIL THREAD HAS JUST BEEN SLIDE OFF THE BOARD! QUICK GET THE ADMIN FOR EMERGENCY RECOVERY

Dark energy and dark matter were also introduced to underpin or support the Big Bang theory.
There are a number of quotes that Big Bang theory has parallels with the Lurianic Kabbala. E.g. web.archive.org/web/20161014200358/http://www.levity.com/alchemy/luria.html
Must be pure coincidence.

In the early 20th century, the Big Bang theory was popularized by the Belgian, Jesuit-educated catholic physicist Lemaitre. "Lemaitre was a pioneer in applying Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity to cosmology."
Worth noting that the Jesuits were originally very Jewish. Diego Laynez, a founder and successor of Ignatius Loyola as the second Jesuit general was of converso origin. Loyola's secretary was also of Jewish descent. A further list of Jesuits of Jewish origin: web.archive.org/web/20110210171631/https://sites.google.com/a/jewishjesuits.com/www/
Of course, the converso (marrano) term is directly related to crypto-Jew. And the concept of crypto-Jewishness is related to Kabbala or Kabbalasitc Jews.

The Lurianic Kabbala is from Isaac Luria in Palestine. Luria was a disciple of Moses Cordovero, a Jew of Spanish origin. (To demonstrate a link back to the Jews of Spain.)

The Lurianic Kabbala is associated with the thing called Sabbatean movement, of Shabtai Tzvi, who declared himself messiah in 1665. (Obviously a numerology driven fuckery prior to the year 1666. Shabtai means Saturn btw.)

The European center of Sabbateanism was Amsterdam. But for example it is known that Henry Oldenburg took interest in Sabbateanism and was even a friend Manasseh ben Israel of Amsterdam. Henry Oldenburg was later the first secretary of the Royal Society. (The scientific society.)

In the Middle East the center of Sabbateanism was Gaza, but also Aleppo. (By the way also places where shit is going on today.) A coincidence maybe worth noting, Dennis W. Sciama was a Jew and his grandfather was from Aleppo. "Sciama was one of the fathers of modern cosmology."

From the OP you can conclude that he didn't.

practical demand is everywhere. there is a very real need in production, development, and trade, for physicists.

what isn't practical is what it is now. it just isn't quite needed to be pay-for-my-life-and-family university as a government granted job. that is, you're supposed to be maintaining your own and hopefully producing (net positive), not consuming others' production via govt currency hand outs (complete negative).

each step men take requires work to keep and maintain. we're not necessarily talking advancement. it's like holding up yet another plate to balance, on top of all the others men balance, which is on top of their personal lives. if you can't do all the work required, the institution simply shrinks – just no one notices it right away if you lie about it.

the members you select for your church make all the difference.

You just fucked up there, go mix with a nigger, your genes are no use to the white race

Dr. Sage and Mr. Hide

still better than schizophrenic bullshits spouted out by retarded spergs whose understanding of science is 0.

and btw, thanks for confirming that it's a slide thread, CTR.

another sperg who thinks that science is about appeal to authority. I'd bet all my savings that you don't even know how to solve a basic differential equation.

You actually manged to write a few correct lines. wow. But then…

Where the fuck did you get that crap from?

I don't give a fuck. _Anything_ that isn't a trump vs hil thread will improve the cancer board, even white women getting fucked by niggers threads, or rate my dick threads.

You more or less skipped over my point and then rephrased it. I didn't say there's no demand, I said there's no demand for more, ie. what we have covers our needs. It doesn't so much matter how pathetic the theorists become if there's nothing for them to contribute to the applied fields either way.

Die in a hole

nice try round-earth conspiracy nut

THANK YOU GREATEST ALLY FOR SUCH A BREAKTHROUGH!
I'M SURE NO NATION OR CIVILIZATION WOULD BREAK THAT CODE! :^)

I mean, I don't even mind talking about science, but most people here in this thread don't even know vector spaces or linear combination are and yet they think to understand the theory of relativity and even to be taken seriously when they claim it's wrong.
KYS

If you are trolling, then well played, you got a (You) out of me.
If you are serious, then I highly recognize you do the following experiment to verify that the speed of light is constant in all inertial frames of reference en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson–Morley_experiment
Once you realize how humiliatingly stupid this thread is, then you have my permission to die.

recommend**

...

is not the verification problem –the– problem? theory that cannot find application has no verification. einstein and planck aren't used, though they are theorized and cited in yet more unapplied theory. if you can't verify it, then it itself is hijacking any validity granted to it. even in application, if you can't do the application, such as your own cern megacollider (as an extreme case, since we are talking about advancement at times), then not anyone can verify. claims of decentralization simply cannot be attained, nor can theory only, prevent hijacking.

french bogeymen. for realz this time. from ohio. black body does not exist as stated by planck's publication. it is not universal in body. and it is not universal in black/light spectra.

vixra.org/pdf/1310.0126v1.pdf

there's the butthurt american who can't process english language and had his feelings hurt.

I said repeat the experiment. Verify it for himself. Results must be repeatable in science.

No shit, we have discovered other waves that travel through space since so limiting the aether to light is kind of stupid. Doesn't change the fact most of this is just rehashing of 18th and 19th century science that seemed to be tossed aside because of relativity.

You might as well cite the talmund at this point moshie.

you're basically the very definition of nigger. just get a book and educate yourself. do you even know what a differential equation is and how to solve it? or what a vector space is? KYS

go to 8ch.net/politics/

this is the politically incorrect board, for talking about things that the jews don't want the goyim talking about such as : the holohoax, jewish paedophile hebohphile rings, false flag operations, genocide thru poisoning via the WHO, genocide via jewish imposed racemixing, historically buried genocides. Blood libel. To name a small fraction.

FUCK OFF WITH YOUR 70 TO 150 TRUMP VS HIL THREADS ON THE BOARD AT ANY ONE TIME

...

Didn't he plagiarize a bunch of that too? The guy was typical kike

this is the 4th rule of Holla Forums:

so you're wrong again, CTR.
Also, not talking about politics doesn't mean you have to spread pseudoscience crap on the board, do you get it? Go to study some basic math first, kiddo

He was a nobody kike working at a patient office. What do you think?

haha.

did i remove your 'muh competence'? besides, i thought you were concerned with theory, decentralization, and verify – yet now not so much. the differential of your statements is undefined, you have a null vector, but you are taking up space.

you don't know wtf you are talking about kid. There are physicists on this board who will sniff u out quickly.
Planck's goal with his 'discrete packets' of radiation was not to get precise physics for any one element, it was just to get a better model than classical radiation theory, which was clearly wrong with its 'ultra violet catastrophe'. In that respect he was entirely successful, he paved the way with understanding so that his successors could study and explain real black body radiation, warts en all.
Quantum theory was not completed until decades later. You can't expect Planck, one of 1st pioneers of quantum theory, to nail it all down right 1st time in the 19th century.

I was talking about math and yet you mentioned einstein out of your ass. There's quite a difference between a mathematical proof and physics theory. Besides, let me repeat it: science, as long as it is, let's say, open-source, cannot be hijacked.
it's like the linus's law in software development:
"given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow" (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus's_Law)
but of course you gotta have "muh competence" to fix scientific theory, not being an autist sperg like OP and those who melt as soon as they see a jewish name among the authors of a scientific paper

You're part of the problem.
Sage and report.

this 4th rule was written by kikes, and is a defilement of the correct path of politically incorrect. It is the natural decoy that any jew would use

its easy to see why jews choose this path to derail Holla Forums from its natural path. The derailment onto politics would divide the community, many of the kids not being about to see that politics and 'politically incorrect' material are 2 very different things, only occasionally and co-incidentally sharing topics , but otherwise unrelated.

i see you got back to picking up planck. i thought you had forgotten about him, with all your nogvector victory spam. but there seems to be two of you, yet you talk the same. two against one in a slide thread hardly seems fair.

oh wait, don't care. 'pave' the 'open-source' way with your 'enough competence' with 'theory' only 'verification', and a few 'decades later' we'll meet again as 'pioneers'. for reelz.

lame reelz. don't you fucks have any fucks given? i've already answered all your claims.

Good, I'm happy to be the supreme leader of the problem, if it means sliding just one fucking trump & hil thread, then I know I'm countering the utter shittery that u and other hooknoses like u have dragged this community into

As a mathematician this is literally /x/-tier. You can't red-pill academics if you try and push theories which have been experimentally shown to be false.

The most Jew thing Einstein did was steal the theories of special and general relativity from non-Jews. See the works of Lorentz, Riemann, and Gauss who were all Christians.

Cool it hothead. Those threads will stop popping up by Nov. 10th.

You're a faggot or a woman. I routinely have to take on 1v20 odds when I go SJW sites such as kikebook. Now you are crying cos its 2v1.

erm, no

checked and
/thread

Except I really don't think Einstein stole anything. The jewiest thing he did was renounce his citizenship in his teens and criticize nationalism his entire life.

It's funny when jews try to LARP here

Wishful thinking. I've tried posting old Holla Forums tier threads on this board, and they get deleted and I get banned with the reason " not politics ". The election will not change this.

do you use two accounts when you do so?
do you pose as fag? a woman?
is level 20 the same as 1v20?
does crying help? what about crying no while i remove ((())) from (((science)))?

sadly dubs confirm thread over. you lucky bastard. damn it.

The mods are compromised. This is not new. If you want to change things, figure out a way to convince people to migrate to a better board without the attempt being subverted.
Every time gg did it they lost a very significant portion of users, perhaps over half.

...

Actually the guy who spearheaded the project of D-Wave says some pretty insane shit. Like our brains are using infinite number dimensions and he's trying to replicate this.

Look up "relativity priority dispute" and you'll see what I mean

But can you disprove it? Not even neurosurgeons are 100% sure how the brain works. At most they know which section does what and what types of chemicals are used to influence things like emotions and the hollow fluid pocket in the middle of it is actually pretty damn important. Outside of that, they don't know how electrical impulses turn into thoughts and memories. We are running on a computer that we have no fucking clue what OS it's running.

shutup and read.

truedemocracyparty.net/2013/03/einstein-fraud-plagiarist-documented-the-einstein-fraud-thief-liar-borderline-retardation-judaic-media-created-celebrity-hero/

E was a stooge frontman for an operation to steal the decent science theories at the time and attribute it to a jewish public figure. All over Europe b4 WW2, the goyim societies were producing excellent scientists, and this was considered unacceptably out of control by the jews, who wanted to a big piece of the action : so infiltration into physics was for the 1st time being considered necessary as part of their full spectrum dominance.
Since then, kikes have featured repeatedly in the nobel prizes, and hold high positions in science. But kikes are by their nature, only gifted in kikery - i.e. criminality and paranoia, they do not make the best scientists - hence all the shittery in so-called science today - dark matter dark energy, blackholes, string theory, big bang, CERN etc. its all expensive horseshit, but jews can't do any better and from their point of view, they don't give a fuck as long as the cash comes pouring in.

Show me a quantum computer.

D-Wave is a scam despite all the industry hype, just like Theranos.

Think again.

And today we have snarky high school students mocking the stupid goyim aether theorists while fellating Einstein for no reason.

Tell me the truth, how many (1)s ITT are you

I'm working on it. I'm the owner of /pil/ - red pills. It won't be another Holla Forums restart : if we keep doing the same thing, it will keep failing the same way, this is why endchan/pol/ is doomed. I talked with endchan/pol/ mods and they are just skittles ready for the jews to knock them over if and when the community migrates there.

I know that D-Wave computers are not particularly special. But no I can't disprove it.

As a biologist, I can tl;dr almost every biological phenomenon, I can decently explain chemistry as well. Why the fuck don't mathfags and physicsfags do the same thing with this shit?

I spend time debunking the abiotic oil bullshit, anti-evolution, and a fair amount of the other shit. Hell, I can even explain how "climate change" works because I know about the fucking carbon cycle.

Yet here we are with physics shilling and zero mathfags or physicsfags show up to give anything in the way of proof. Are your fields that fucking cucked? So far I see a lot of ad homs, but no fucking science. I predict the very first response to this post is some faggot linking wikipedia and telling me to "git gud." Meanwhile, nobody here can be assed to run a single calculation. Lazy faggots.

The TL;DR is called "practical" physics, and some TL;DRs sounds like magic.

Did you even read my post

Yes

Everything here is correct. Physics (and all science) was subverted as soon as they did away with Newton's "Hypotheses non fingo." It doesn't help that scientists maintain haughty disdain for and ignorance of any philosophy (they consider it a virtue even). Science today is merely ideology.

Fucking this.

I have been working on fundamental physics obsessively for two years. Props to Lorentz Aether Theory.

Attached is an incomplete summary of my work so far. All I have left to do is determine exactly how a unidirectional force, when bent three dimensionally, results in imbalance.

There is a religious mindset in the scientific community right now against aether theory. The other day, I was speaking with two nuclear physicists working for CERN and they absolutely refused to consider this type of thinking.

Richard Feynman, coincidentally a Jew(?!) said the following in his lectures on physics:

There are many theories of push gravity / ether theory that DO have a lot of problems, because they assume the existence of particles. These that assume the exists of particles are deficient and easily argued against. Members of the scientific community now believe that the very idea of ether is unscientific, despite the Lorentz ether theory being completely sound and equatable to Special Relativity.

In closing:

I'm using a tripcode so I can answer questions in the future and not be cheated of a nobel prize lol

Nice nigger tier logic

Kill yourself immediately

i was taught plasma exists, maybe because you haven't been to school in 20 years they didnt teach it to you

I don't know much about that theory, and wouldn't personally say that clicks with me intuitively even. Just to say I'm not a believer in it. But do yo say as a biologist that there's oil that possibly comes from dinosaurs?

When I heat iron up in my forge, it glows. Explain that.

You know jews are shit at science because there aren't any good jewish engineers. Engineering is science that is put to use essentially. It has to produce results, and those results can easily be measured. So jews stay the hell away from the field.

Here is a link to the Richard Feynman chapter on Gravity: archive.is/mOmYn

...

D-Wave computers aren't quantum computers. It's a scam.

What makes you think otherwise? Their marketing materials? The reputations of the people who associate with them? Certainly not an in-depth independent examination of their basic operating principles, since D-Wave forbids such examination.
Just like Theranos.

Just like Theranos.

And then what happens? You unlock the physics of portals to a 5th dimension, so u can create wormholes at will to any part of the universe? Obviously you'd use it to get into a medical lab and steal the anesthetic, then spend the rest of your life wormholing into 13-19yo girls bedrooms, gases them, them raping their unconscious bodies.

So you start by saying that modern science is "thought magic", then go in to say:

I stopped reading there. You have no grasp of physics whatsoever. I'm guessing you're just a CTR shill trying to find a fracture point.

Either you found the Time Police first, or somebody else does and shuts you down.

If time travel is possible, somebody during sometime will seek to militarize and control it, using their time traveling capabilities to monopolize the technology. Either you become the Time Police 'first', or the Time Police will shut you down.

Then stick to music. You aren't good at physics.

I honestly don't know. The intuitive understanding of fundamental physics allows for massive manipulation. While the potential for wonderful things like Zero Point Energy and anti-gravity are possible, you would also be opening the door to weapons the likes of which have never been known before, like anti-matter bombs.

Yeah, I should clarify that OP's post is right mainly in that there is a significant push against what is logically the correct way of thinking in terms of physics. The details that OP gives aren't always on point, like the one you mention. As for light, light itself is the medium for its own travel. There is baseline c^2 which is c*c and then each additional c slows the motion of that unit. I'm over simplifying but basically.

A few more notes:

Would it, over the 80 or so years of your life, ever occur to you to post some supporting evidence to your assertions? Or do you think questions are settled just by saying. 'It is' or "it isn't ", and then everyone following matter would agree it has been fully explored and discussed.

Fuck Holla Forums, where on this cursed Earth, in which foul crevasse of this depraved society do you find such individuals with such retarded facilities of arguing? - Must be nog land.

...

GPS is radio signal (and corresponding algorithms) probably propagated through skywave propagation. So there's a problem there with the proof with GPS and satellites. But if you want to live in that world where there are satellites up there 10s of thousands of kms away course correcting and other risky stuff like brought there by space shuttles to send radio signals, okay.

Provide evidence for the claim that D-Wave have built a quantum computer. You can't, because D-Wave hasn't and won't allow independent investigation.

...

Do you seriously not know why they are not letting people look at it yet?

By this logic all tech covered by trade secrets act doesn't exist, and never existed in the past.

I really don't see why you think q-bits are so impossible to engineer. The theory of them is over 80 years old. I studied them in the 3rd year of my degree.

...

That's your assumption, not? Or belief? What's the actual basis for it?

Trade secret tech can be known to exist if the results are public. D-Wave has not produced any verifiable results that could only be produced by a quantum computer.

Theranos claimed to get results, but concealed their "tech" in trade secrets. They refused independent investigation until the FDA raided their offices and discovered that it was all fraud. The tech they claimed to have but refused to prove did not work. The results they claimed to get from their machines were forgeries, produced by traditional equipment manufactured by their competitors.

The only reason you believe D-Wave have build a quantum computer is because they claim they did. That's it. That's all you've got.

"You have to prove it's not."

I'm not saying they have it or they don't. I'm saying if this is as big as they are hyping they are either being secret to prevent sensitive information from leaking or they really don't have anything. It's true they could not have anything but are you really going to denounce it simply because they are being secretive about it?

D-Wave makes the claim but refuses to prove it. They refuse to let independent researchers attempt to prove it. The only reason to believe them is because you believe what their marketing staff say.

...

Another note:

Physics as they are today leave a lot unaccounted for. Lorentz ether, when properly understood and applied, has greater explanatory power and 100% prediction rate while also providing the mechanic behind the phenomena. I would suggest thinking about it on a fundamental level. For example, has anything been witness to express fundamental attraction? No. When you pull something, you are pushing it from the other side. Vacuums 'suck' because there is greater pressure outside of the vacuum, which pushes things toward the vacuum. A fundamentally attractive force has NEVER been observed and explained. People will say gravity is a fundamentally attractive force, or that strong force is fundamentally attractive, but they can't provide a mechanic for it, so they don't have any authority to say what type of force it is fundamentally. Since we can easily observe and explain the nature of repulsive forces, but cannot explain the nature of 'attractive' forces, it is logical to assume that the fundamental force is also repulsive. The only force is a repulsive one. Subjectively, you may view many of its effects as either attractive or repulsive, depending on the perspective. Gravity, for example: attractive perspective=earth is pulling things toward itself, repulsive perspective=earth creates a vacuum of ether (as a result of its mass) and, as their is greater force on the opposite side of the object from earth, the object is pushed down by space/ether. Simply, space/ether pushes things down to earth.

kekd hard, this is a good copy pasta user

If D-Wave wanted to prove it without giving away their secrets, they would use their tech to compute something that was not feasibly computable with traditional computers. They haven't done this, despite claiming that the tech is mature enough to sell already (dwavesys.com/our-company/customers).

Mature enough to sell to people with very deep pockets….

tl;dr

Just like Theranos was trying to sell their fraudulent tech to the DoD. They even got Holla Forums's favorite general, General Mattis, to help them defraud the military.

Also, care to elaborate on the weird effects they try to explain?

But that's wrong.
The moons moving around distant planets in our solar system are consistent and measurable like hands on a clock. When the planets are far away the clock is slow while when it's close it is on time. The amount of time it is out by divided by the distance between that planet and ours is the speed of light.
It takes light either 35 or 52 minutes for light to get from jupiter to us depending on which side of the sun it is on, meaning the difference is 23 minutes (or 1380 seconds). The distance is 588 million kilometers at its closest point and 968 million km away at its furthest for a difference of 380 million km.
380000000/1380=275362.318 km/s whereas the speed of light is 299792.458 km/s. Out by about 24000 km/s but my distance measurements are rounded to the nearest million km and the time between them is probably shit too because I just googled it.

Anyway, my point is you can measure the speed of light without having to get the average speeds of there and back reflected off a mirror.

Tf? I was taught this, but not in detail, I was just taught that it exist.

I am fully aware that I don't have evidence one way or the other on D-wave.
But just telling me D-wave doesn't exist\work and then backing it up with
Isn't going to convince me or anyone else.

This isn't how truth movements \ exposes come into existence. There are lectures, expert criticism, and documentaries uploaded to the net.

Until I've watched a few hours of that stuff, my dis\belief in D-wave isn't worth shit anyway, so I don't know why you're pushing you're own belief on me or anyone.

If you had any worth in assessing D-wave you wouldn't be here just spouting your 2 line proof, you'd have written and produced your own documentary.

I have, but its not about D-wave

Plasma is a soup of electrons, protons, neutrons, electromagnetic waves and some unstable larger particles. This soup allows the formation of heavier atoms (higher atomic number), which otherwise would not form.

...

Off the top of my head, the Michelson-Morley experiment which failed to give evidence of the ether is taken as evidence for relativity
Also that relativity seems to predict some other stuff, like the perihelium off mercury, the red shift, deflexion of light. These are usually taken as evidence take relativty is correct, and although it correctly predicts some off it, there shit unaccounted for, like how most celectial bodies are not perfect spheres which could lead to deviation from orbit, as I said I'm just an undergrad, an I haven't invested much of my time to this shit, so take my word with a grain of salt

Unfortunately we can assume certain folks ((())) are doing the real science and as such technology will become irrevocably worse for us goyim, i would refer to Ted K.

unless……………………………………………….

gravity is not a push force .. its a pull…. opposites attract. That is where they are getting it wrong.

This is true, what do you think the swastika represents.

>I believe D-Wave isn't a scam, despite D-Wave failing to provide any evidence
You need to de-jew your thought processes.

No matter what you do you little shits, we ll get to you.

Swastika is the cube of life in 2D which is the formation pattern for light or matter or planets or something

...

Okay.

oh stfu, you don't know how to, or are too lazy to red-pill. You are deluded if you think Holla Forums with yield an army of supports if you come here with fuck all counter evidence.

If you've got nothing, then shove you D-wave conspiracy up your ass.

No idea what you are even rambling about. Care to try again in english?

The Michelson-Morley provides evidence against 'particular' ether, not Lorentz luminiferous ether, which is basically just spacetime. Lorentz ether is not an ether composed of particles, but rather spacetime itself. Lorentz assumes certain properties of the spacetime that would allow it to act as an ether. I'd suggest reading the wikipedia page on Lorentz ether theory, particularly the "Shift to Relativity" subheading. It explains the deal quite well. The perihelion of Mercury, the deflection of light, and red shift are all perfectly acceptable in ether theory. Basically, Lorentz ether and special relativity use the exact same math and are perfectly compatible. The only difference is that Lorentz ether proposes a fundamental mechanic, a cause, for the effects, whereas special relativity does not. Lorentz ether is essentially Special Relativity + ether.

If you have a tube with a ball in it and take away pressure from one side, in which direction will the ball move? It will move toward the lower pressure until the forces on both sides of the ball are equal to one another. It is the same for gravity. Opposites attract refers to electromagnetic charge and ether theory explains both. For magnets, it is a flow of electrons. For electromagnetic charges of subatomic particles, it is a lock and key system, to oversimplify. The lock and key system is one of the more difficult things to describe/explain and I honestly haven't reached a satisfying description of the phenomenon. However, the accepted theories of the Standard model offer no explanation whatsoever, so the theories are equal in that respect.

A note about the solar system rotating counter-clockwise. That depends on perspective. Space doesn't really have an 'up' or 'down'. If you look at it from 'above', it moves counterclockwise, but from the other side, 'below', it moves clockwise. I wouldn't overthink symbols.

Wrong, at such a point it will stop accelerating, but not necessarily stop moving,

If the movement pushes it past the point of balance, it will go back the other way. It will go back and forth until it reaches an equilibrium on both sides. Think of a pendulum. When it is swinging, unless it is 100% perfectly balanced in the swing itself, it will slowly but surely reach the point of balance in the middle.

Now your starting to get it, As Above so below, as within so without.

If you want the answer to how things work on a macro vs micro level.

The starting point is a single point with no width depth or length from which all things spring. If you find out how things expand from this point, they you can answer your questions as the same ideas aply over and over.

I would not take too much of what is "known" because we all know (((who))) is telling us.

ok the last two you can call bullshit because theres no real observation of it, its just been theorized to explain something they couldnt explain
the first ones real though, maybe not all the theoretical stuff about it but black holes are real
I've seen images from the hubble telescope of a star being devoured by a black hole, all the plasma getting sucked out of a star into nothingness
the plasma circles the event horizon spinning inwards so it looks like a star is being sucked into this massive ring of fire with absolutely nothing in the center

Can physics go full retard?

Yeah it smells like one
but there are genuinely scientifically illiterate people on here and since i've spent years studying it id like to offer what little i know to clarify
the number of NatSocs on here who talk about eugenics with about the same level of knowledge as a first year studying agriculture at a community college is depressing

evolution on a macro scale is bullshit. advancing via evolution is bullshit. natural selection (killing of the weakest of the living generation) is as far as it gets.
is taking place but has fuck to do with fucking carbon.

No, but people who don't understand it can.

I know what the Smaragdine Table means. And yes, I don't trust the accepted theories or any other theories unless the theories provide evidence for themselves. It's true that an infinite singularity can have infinitely diverse effects. For others reading: imagine how much complexity arises from protons, neutrons, and electrons.

Na it is some intel faggot shilling retarded shit since these little faggots with their average intelligence iqs and creative writing training love shilling these boards because their even more retarded superiors told them.
You can physically feel their retardation and instructed posting by reading their little bullshit.

Another note on the lock and key system. It's like how enzymes work. It's just difficult to conceptualize a four dimensional, cyclical phenomenon into two or three dimensional space.

what even the fuck
if I could just show you the fossil record for whales hngghhh

Kek enzymes
you cant expect many anons to get that analogy
heres a video to help

Michelson-Morley actually proved that the earth stands still. Concave geometry applies. All known equations are still valid, as this is just a transformation of coordinates. The earth rests; the stars rotate "within".

Now let the shills scream, but anyone who acutually researched this knows that the concave earth model is perfectly valid (thus the flat earth bullshit to discredit every non-convex theory). There are even *.edu site discussing this.

You have to use your imagination!

I just meant that indeed sometimes it's warmer, sometimes colder. but this is triggered externally, is not man made and has nothing to do with any carbon at all.

Those digits. Checked.

Link to some of these edu sites? Or just what to look up? The earth standing still idea sounds absolutely unnecessary and preposterous. Everything we have ever observed indicates that everything has some amount of relative motion, even ground-state particles.

You have to provide an alternate explanation if you're going to refute something.

Carbon does affect it
but so does solar activity
water vapour
the ellipsis of the earths orbit
etcetera
theres tonnes of reasons why the Earths weather fluctuates
we're in a warming period because we're coming out of the last ice age
but solar activity in the next decade will trigger a mini ice age
the ice in antarctica is receding at an alarming rate
but the arctic ice once thought previously to be receding is now being viewed as largely unchanged relative to the seasonal melts and refreezes
see what im getting at here?
most of what they push about global warming is just the media taking scientific reports out of context and scaremongering
but those reports arent for the media they're supposed to be for the unbiased scientific community
its not there to spread propaganda its an update for the academic community

Yeah didnt Galileo or Newton already prove the earth was in motion

Like this.

You could think of it that way, more effectively though, it is the pattern or matter away from the center point through time.

Remove time and you get a point with no width, depth, or length.

...

spoopy. I'll look into this.

Did you draw that yourself?

Potentially mind blowing though.

t. retarded normalfag when it comes to physics

Mercury and Venus have no moons but they still spin

As above so below, as withing so without. If you want to know how things work at any level, look at how they work in the sky, or in the particle level. They usually match.

Read these if you want the Illuminati secrets.

Truth is they already have all this shit figures out they just don't think humanity is ready yet. And (((some))) want to use it to oppress humanity.

free-energy.ws/edwin-gray/

I'll save you guys 25 minutes.

Block and tackle.

The guy just used a block and tackle. Here is a picture of him using it too.

We all got that now?
Coral Castle isn't a mystery.
Move along.

But you would think them being that close to the sun might account for something. It might explain why the more moons the further back you go until the sun can't really "reach" those planets. That might account for satellites that orbit them and the rings. It could almost be a bell curve where the apex is around Jupiter.

But I could also be talking out of my ass as well since I know jack shit about the nitty gritty details of this model.

Thanks user, for solving the mystery :P Ockham's razor. Simplest is usually true.

The solar system is a complex system with a lot of parts. You also have to consider things that happened in the past that we didn't observe. For example, we didn't observe the birth of the moon so we have to try to work backwards and come up with the best explanation. It's just super complex, honestly.

I know the so-called "illuminati secrets" and the nameless. And yes they do somewhat apply to physics. An intuitive understanding of the "secrets" have helped me in my studies but they don't make the answer immediately obvious from a mechanical perspective.

Its something to do with heavy elements
Mercury and Venus most likely have no moons because of their proximity to the sun, the suns gravity accounts for any stray asteroids or matter
remember the Moon is theorised to be the result of a proto-planet being torn apart by Jupiter and Mars's gravity and flinging a chunk into the early molten Earth
Deimos and Phobos are seriously tiny moons and they're the only moons on Mars
small enough to be asteroids flung loose and getting caught in Mars's gravity
Jupiter is HUUUUGE some of its moons might have formed similar to how planets form inside Jupiters gravity well
Saturn is similar in size to Jupiter, Uranus is large and Neptune is similar in size to Saturn
and they all have many small moons
Pluto is tiny and so are all the other dwarf planets so small they might as well be large asteroids and they all have tiny asteroid moons
I wonder if any physicists still ascribe to the Nemesis theory at all, I recall only a tiny amount about it these days

They already proved way back in the 80's there was no way he could have moved those size blocks with that setup.

he was using magnets in some kinda vibration pattern to collapse gravity of the blocks particles making basically weightless, then he would carry by hand.

you have no idea how torque works

First for Nuclear weapons being a hoax
Look into the Manhatten Project Participants

First for Nuclear weapons being a hoax
Look into the Manhatten Project Participants

ya its not going to move 6 blocks in 30 min onto the back of a truck. Or cut the stone out of the ground with almost no tools.

Yeah I'm with this guy . You can lift several tons of rock with enough rope and distribution of force, as I understand.

How would they fake the big boom boom videos of nukes? What else would it be? What about radiation read outs?

Thanks for the insight anons. I forgot that I use to really enjoy this part of science as a kid.

How about that pediatrics hospital in Japan the american military ran as a front to conduct medical experiments and tests on Japanese children who survived the bombings of nagasaki and hiroshima for 20 years
there were a lot of naked jap kids paraded around on stage riddled with tumours so jew doctors could poke them and look at them
nukes are definitely a thing, you can build a gun-type fission bomb with enriched uranium, depleted uranium and some dynamite
the hardest part is getting the uranium and constructing a fissile reactor

oh astrophysics is great
I didnt go into physics though because complex mathematics gives me a headache
but alot of astrophysics is conceptual so its easy to understand and remember, just not the predicts orbital paths and whatnot

Schools and loans are killing the love of learning. Now, schools are focused on getting good grades, rather than actually learning things for the sake of learning them. Get good grades in high school so you can go to a good 40k a year college so you can get good grades there so you can get a good job so you can pay off your student loans. Don't let the world crush your dreams. It's not hard to learn little things every day or think about things throughout your day and try to reason through situations and problems.

The maths at the level I'm working on are so insane I don't even bother. It would be like writing a formula to predict the dispersal of water thrown from a bucket by a four year old child on a sugar rush. Can it be done? Absolutely (theoretically). Is it at all reasonable to even try? no. Would it be useful in any way if you did write such a formula?probably not.

How about the stories of holocaust survivors?
Otherwise, of course it's impossible to perpetrate such big lies for so long. 6 million Jews died in WW2.

There were a few government image processing facilities similar to what the Soviets used set up around 1942? I believe one of them was called Lookout Mountain, but I can't seem to find the Wikipedia page any more. Or maybe there was another. Anyhow just rewatch the videos. I discussed it with others, it seems as though the shots have been overlayed with a video of another explosion though I can't remember the name of the technique. The Hiroshima smoke towers and other images/videos are definitely fake anyway.
I'm relatively new to this theory but from all the (((coincidences))) and from looking at the bomb invention time frame and results, I'm thoroughly convinced.
Geiger counters you mean? They're not as reliable as you would think. If you like I will look at it more when I have some time, I'm rushing atm.
Have you seen the permanent residents of Chernobyl btw?

Also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Physik
For the Physics discussion

Joke's on you. Bankers and kikes killed it when I was forced to take a 40+ hour job during jr high to keep a roof over my head.

well for the jap american ran pediatrics hospital thats a fact
the military has that operation on record and the research gathered went into early cancer/radiation theories like how long it takes malignant cancer to kill a child because you intentionally deny them treatment or trick them, like giving them sugar pills and saline drips and tell them its chemo

its also more believable because of how much the US government likes to sweep it under the rug
along with those 2-3 million filipino civilians killed in the invasion of the phillipines

Kek
Yeah i struggled with the Hardy–Weinberg principle ive got no chance with what you're doing

Academia should be free
the scientific papers you need to piece your own conclusions together are $20-$40 a report if you dont belong to an academic institution
the only possible rationale i have on this is its probably not good to give out for free the knowledge needed to make chlorine gas from tapwater, salt and direct current

Great thread

BREAKING
Letting the state/(((private institutions))) educate your children for the majority of their childhood to become good goy workers is bad!

Yeah, what about radiation read outs?

"The rabbi directs the classified research of 350 physicists and engineers. The synagogue’s religion chairperson explores the interface of biological and inorganic materials; the president is an MIT-trained computer analyst in America’s most important defense laboratory. The local Hadassah president works on radiation detection. "

web.archive.org/web/20160123123738/http://www.hadassahmagazine.org/2005/05/09/letter-los-alamos-nuclear-jewish-family

...

Holy shit. Where do you find out your stuff? Many of the nuke-hoax forums are gone and it's a stretch to find stuff that isn't overlapping with reptilians and flat Earth.

So what are the high-gravity areas found in the universe then? Im curious.

honestly, user, it's a timescale thing.

mostly it's from swamps, not so much "dinosaurs." Think of country-sized rotting marshes buried under millions of tons of rock, for millions of years.

99.7% of matter in space is plasma, you ignorant, retarded, hook nosed, smelly, dirty, curly-mopped, inbred pig fucking jew.

oh look another /x/ thread on Holla Forums

Wrong, superstring theory has come a long way and gotten closer to becoming accepted as true. This was made plausible due to advancement in computer modelling demonstrating Calabi–Yau manifolds. Though OP I will grant you that "superstrings" are essentially referenced in many of the same ways "aether" used to be, the difference is that string theory has a mathematical basis.

This is wrong too, otherwise nuclear reactors and bombs would not exist. Einstein's e=mc2 allowed Rutherford to actually begin figuring out the exact atomic structures of nuclei, which created nuclear chemistry as a result.

pic unrelated

web.archive.org/web/20161027223906/https://8ch.net/pol/res/7994011.html

Personally I'm more interested in learning about how kikes stole the work of aryans, everything I've ever done in terms of physics/relativity seems to check out.

...

So without nuclear bombs and reactors this theory has made nothing else of real life application? They're as fake as the holocaust
Also yes, less /x/ threads we need more Trump/election threads right newfag?

Different aspects of the same oppressive system. Too bad Hitler lost :'(

There is some strong and sensical science behind radioactive critical mass. What exactly are you contesting? The nature of radioactivity or merely the existence of nuclear bombs? How was Hiroshima destroyed?

checked. They're all effects of kinetic motion and imbalance/balance.

Checked. I looked for a physics thread but can't find any T-T

Beautiful ~100 double check.

This is wrong, though I don't disagree with universities becoming shit. For starters, since the 1980s we've had a massive revolution in medical science thanks to a better understanding of human biology. The human genome project, completed in 2003, has led to the development of better antirejection drugs. On that comment, organ transplant costs have fallen as procedures to do it have become far better. We are even nearing the stage where 3dprinted or cloned organs are not only plausible but might be commercially available within the next one or two decades. However most of this happens inside private companies, and not university labs. In a similar manner, things like hydrogen fuel cells and batteries have come a long way. But not inside schools, inside universities.

Development has continued but it's become increasingly clear that brick-and-mortar universities are no longer needed. Today their purpose is mostly of certification for the masses, not as hubs of scientific research like they were before the GI Bill and the baby boomers. And of course the Jews want this because it allows them to socialize the losses (namely employee training) while privatizing gains (as new research is all privately owned).

I provide them as examples, more modern examples would be a thing like CERN or Thorium power. Both (at least in some manner) modify or use properties of atomic nuclei in their operations and this is where e=mc2 comes into play.
Given that this election will decide if Hilary burns the entire planet down, I'd say that issue is more important.

...

Hiroshima was made of paper gook houses aside from the concrete buildings that survived. It was bombed in the same way the rest of Japan was and they even began rebuilding soon afterwards. Until the US and Soviets occupied it and proclaimed they were nuked and distributed propaganda leaflets and tested for cancers (the cancer rate was average).
I'm familiar with the workings science behind it but the idea that Jewish physics is a sham throws a lot of that under the bus. X rays and gamma rays ofcourse do irradiate things.
The same Jew that observed the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings also observed the bomb testings.

How long have you been here redditfriend?
What happened to the days when Holla Forums didn't buy into elections.
None of those have real life applications, thorium power being used in nuclear power plants? Dump loads?
Again this relies on the assumption that what we are told is true

Nice video. I've enjoyed watching it.

I think the big bang postie in science is the biggest jew trick of them all. It literally violates laws of physics. Namely, that something can't come from nothing.

4/pol/ originally had a hard on for Ron Paul in 2008 and 2012, so I don't get your point here. The only election since 8ch began was the 2014 midterms.
What exactly are you trying to say here, when my entire point was that they have real life applications. Pic related is the amount of nuclear energy in the US, which is only made plausible through understanding how atomic nuclei work.

There are rumors of the Universe not having a beginning at all, but rather an eternal cycle. Just rumors.

Interesting idea. Idk what to think about it. I'll have to think more about nuclear bombs.

Pretty. Sensible.

theres also the multiverse theory where each universe is began with the destruction of the old one
that the big bang is nothing less than the aftermath of the last universe's big crunch
an implosion caused by the rapid contraction of all matter in the last universe
samsara on a reality wide scale

...

You ask a good question; why did they destroy science? I believe this is one of the most important questions of our times, and so I'll try my hand at this one.

First off, let there be no doubt that science has been totally corrupted. The age of enlightenment, where the top minds of the west were drafted into the academies and a foundation of testable theory and practice was built upon, is gone. This is the age of information, where you are told what to believe and should accept it on authority of those that tell you. "What, you dare question? It has been confirmed by this one and that one!" is the mantra of today. Make no mistake, this new system is more akin to religion than science. A sick and twisted religion based on the science of yore. The argument has already been made in this thread that no real progress seems to have been forthcoming from the "scientific" institutions for a long time now. It's true. No real discovery that isn't just smoke and mirrors has been made for a long time. All the fantastic stuff and illusionary promises you see in the propaganda rags are mostly just vaporware, and the real stuff that you can actually see, test and interact with are mostly just old tech refined and streamlined.

Normalfags look at their smartphone and think, "man this is cutting edge stuff." But all it's components were known and understood (at least in theory) almost a hundred years ago. Practical, hands on sciences like surgery and engineering are still not too bad, although development has slowed down immensely there too. The purely theoretical subjects, however, have mostly veered off in strange directions where no one are able to follow, whether from not understanding it or understanding it too well.

Let me give you examples, where I try to keep it simple so that everyone can understand. Let's take mathematics, where somewhere along the way the idea of infinity was adopted in very strange ways as a truss to fix a lot of problems with their shit. Understand this: infinity is a purely theoretical concept that is both impossible to envision and to test. How do you know your idea structure is correct when you start putting infinities into your calculations? Well, the short answer is that you don't, basic logic will tell you that. You can tinker with the algorithms until they work for the simple purposes they are meant for but that's as far as it goes. That is fine in itself if you just keep that algorithm as a tool and remember what that tool is and what it's for. It's not fine when you build untestable theories upon it to solve problems with the previous. Notice that I'm not really saying infinity as a concept in a calculation has no value, it's about how you use it. But this is the way science works now, imaginary brick upon imaginary brick until your castle of illusions reaches the skies, the emperors new clothes guarded by a corrupt and degenerate peer review system. And from there it works it's way into culture. Logic has been worked over until it's as illogical as an LSD trip, the word remains but the meaning has changed.

More examples? Let's take physics. Well, the theory of relativity is obviously wrong. So many people are beginning to realize this that it's becoming somewhat of a joke. Basically, it doesn't work and all the twisty curves in "space-time" and unobservable, untestable dark matter you can imagine won't save it in the end. I've yet to see someone even begin to explain gravity in a coherent way. When it comes to astrophysics, I'd be amazed if it was even close to on the right track. What we have to observe in deep space with our crude tools are points of light with intensity and frequency. A huge mythos of science fiction have been built around the geomantic interpretations that are being done on this very sparse dataset. Biological physics are probably not correct, with strong indications of biological transmutation happening in nature. That related subjects like biohistory and evolution are (and have been for a long time,) completely obfuscated is probably no great surprise to anyone here.

cont.

If you want to get technical, big bang theory states that matter didn't spontaneously exist but that at some point it was compressed into a very small ball (if I remember my college physics right, it's diameter was the planck length) which then exploded out when time "began" (technically, time was always happening but events inside the minuscule universe were happening so slowly that our understanding of time can't easily apply. But for some reason it then got too hot and sped up, causing rapid expansion and an immense "explosion").

But you are right that nobody knows how time or matter themselves began.

I could go on and on and on, but who has time for it all. That science has been mostly bogus at least since WW2 and the corruption building way before even that is easy enough to see, but motives, politics and backroom deals are harder to understand. So the question remains, why? The true answer is of course that we on the outside doesn't know, me included. But I will try to speculate.

Perhaps the powers of this world thought things were getting out of hand during the age of enlightenment, with too many people too close to the pleb class starting to discover and understand too much about reality. Before that it was the degenerate church who supplied the information and the height of critical thinking was looking for omens in the constellation of hedgerows and shit like that. With science destroyed, that's the direction we're heading back towards. Perhaps they thought that keeping the normalfag mind in complete darkness when it comes to understanding of his surroundings was a good deal and they wanted this situation back. This theory is supported by how much of the pop-science that is propagandized to the plebs and the surrounding alternative psy-ops align with medieval thinking. It's an emotional and religious mindset, not a logical one (almost no one today understands logic and academics are more often than not the worst.)

For the eternal normie, they are building a new dogmatic cult and they use the science of yesterday to legitimize it. Today as in medieval times, God sees everything (total surveillance network, propagandized heavily in the media with no evidence of it's existence other than some power point presentations by that effeminate faggot.) Angels and Demons making their return with AIs (without any AI to show for except for completely deterministic simulacra and not even an inkling of a suggestion of how the real thing would be possible to construct.) The hope of life eternal or miraculous healing with gene therapy (good luck solving enzymatic balancing, call me when you've begun to formulate a rudimentary theory of what cancer even is.) Hope of a new world through space exploration (even though every record of going outside the radiation belt are complete and obvious forgeries. Yes.) Even original sin has made it's return, with the bogus science of climatology (how about you accurately predict the climate next year with your mysterious and inaccessible supercomputers before you start talking about 100 years from now.) I'll not even get started on the crazy stuff of all these new pseudosciences like psychology, sociology, gender studies and whatnot go into with their strange religious ideas and moralism.

So that's what I think. A two-fold operation to on one hand lead the brighter ones (those who are drawn to science) down the garden path of irrational infinities and all sorts of crazy stuff, until they have no foundation to make their own discoveries and resign themselves to becoming engineer monks, just endlessly rehashing and refining the old stuff. On the other hand a pop-sci pseudo religion for the plebs to worship. No logic, only emotion and authoritarianism. All the potentially dangerous discoveries safe and sound back in secret bunkers and the plebs back to la-la land where great and mysterious forces will solve their every problem, graciously presented to them by their priesthood. A priesthood now in white instead of in black. Barring a revolution and complete reform of society, the future of science is even darker than this present dark age. Heretics are ridiculed and guilted by association with false dialectic psy-ops like flat earth today, but tomorrow it's more likely you will be burned as a wizard for having displeased the Gods of climate and gender ethics. Science will survive, but in the secret bunkers of the elite and in the hidden basements of rebel pleb heretics.

Question everything and test everything. The only truth you really have is what you can verify for yourself. Greed and conformity is what they appeal to. The primary tool they use is the argument to authority, be wary of it.

Read into dump loads like i mentioned, nuclear plants technology isn't what it is said to be.

I read one theory where in the miniscule universe there existed anti-matter and matter in perfect equilibrium but something caused an instability and the anti-matter went critical and reacted with matter
the resulting monumental explosion was the big bang and it was theorized to account for the rare presence of anti-matter in nature

I agree, samsara is no joke. We're stuck in some kind of cycle seemingly. I think the "big bounce" theory is the most logical one, but even that is subject to the same question.

Yeah, all the matter in the universe was compressed into an incredibly dense ball, but that still doesn't make much sense. Maybe humans are just doomed to cause and effect thinking, when the answer might be something more nebulous. Some say that time is fluid after all. Past, present, and future coexist, I've done a good amount of research into this and it's a stable idea.

So what OP is saying is that I can join the Boros and help defeat the (((Orzhov)))

This is wrong. Know what an insulin pump is? They didn't exist twenty years ago and they were not widely available until ten years ago. Right now there's a huge revolution in robotic surgeries, which Jews want to expand because it means they will be able to outsource surgeons rather than print them H-1 visas.

Which is why you're spouting off stupid shit. Gravity itself is certainly not an easy concept to understand (as a force in regards to other forces like electromagnetism) and the only current workable (ie mathematically provable) explanation behind it is sting theory. How much of that have you read up on.

I should also answer the OP.
Why divert Physics?
Political control. Nuclear weapons plans were 'given' to the JewSSR by some other kikes. This allowed for the cold war which completely pacified the world. Everything from the control of nuclear information and weapons distribution is influenced by Jews and Israel who 'sell' it to developing nations while Iran still fails to build one - whereas Stalin built nukes in only 4 years. German engineers took decades to engineer the rocket and the jet.
They now have total control over our societies and nations.
Step back and look at how they use this physics nonsense to take our shekels and build tensions and declare wars with other nations,.

Not gonna give them the clicks, just tell me in brief.

That's one theory, but relies on "antimatter" which isn't proven. Though this is where string theory comes into play, as superstrings could connect superparticles (I think that's the word) to their real equivalents and thus explain exactly how major forces (ie gravity and electromagnetism) work. But this is also just a theory and is unproven.

The Nuke changed everything, now there is this idea that, we don't want to go too far or someone may get something worse than a nuke!

Biggest pile of shit, its why they justify hiding all the new technology. Only (((they))) can handle it for the goyim.

just an add on
i dont know if its proven or not but CERN claims they have antimatter
they claim they can create it using the LHC and they keep a miniscule amount in storage by storing it in a vacuum between two polarised magnetic fields operating in an hourglass like structure
I find that unlikely though, a power failure and you're looking at an explosion large enough to vaporise the LHC and any towns/mountains in the local vicinity
if you think nukes are bad the projected blast radius from anti-matter reacting with matter was 10 to the power of too many zeroes

FYI I am the guy that wrote the OP in a thread last night and I didn't start this thread.

Don't want to detract your pretty good post on one thing, but Robert O. Becker said that cancer may be cells that dedifferentiated without purpose, compared to dedifferentiated cells in salamanders for instance when one of their legs are amputated which leads to limb regeneration. He found that this regeneration process is heavily reliant on electrical fields, the fields instructing the cells what to do when. His theory is that cancer is a result of an imbalance in one's electrical field, since we don't know alot of about that, there's plenty of theories as to what leads to an imbalanced field. I'm sure being around electrical devices all day doesn't help.

The Body Electric by him is an easy read, the only reason why Becker wrote a book rather than scientific journals and being famous for that is because the (((scientific community))) actively worked against him at every occasion, his success only being from networking with like-minded people who wanted him to succeed. This was the 50s, 60s and early 70s when science wasn't entirely overrun.

You know how a dump load works right? Many energy plants have them. You have too little electricity supplied? You have brownouts/blackouts. You have too much electricity? You dump the load, some companies do this by diverting it to a water source.
A dump load controller, also known as a diversion load controller, diverts electricity from a battery bank once the charging source (wind turbine, PV, hydro turbine, etc) has fully charged the battery bank.
Nukes are a larger version of this. you can even use it to keep the electricity cost up, though it's mostly for keeping the electricity supply constant.

actual answer:

because free sci-tech generates too much new grassroots industry and commodity too fast, all outside jewish control.
Within 50 years, jews would have lost control and would forced back to major boom - busts cycles using bank crisis and usury to retake the economys of the west.

Sci-tech is therefore heldback enough that new discoveries and inventions are either completely owned by jewish companies or are starved of funding until they submit patents and manufacturing rights to the jews.
no major invention is allowed to the free market unless its been koshered.

Math isnt science. Only experiments can be science. Ive taken most higher level maths except the completely abstract ones so you can save your "you need to be ejucated redneck" social shaming you keep bringing up.

The D-Wave is the only thing claiming to be even remotely close to a quantum computer, but it almost certainly is not. There are people who have actually put hands on it and run tests and say its bunk.

GPS does not use nor require special relativity to function. Here is a great paper that tears up that assertion if you care to follow along my.mixtape.moe/mtjhye.pdf

Since when does having only one jewish parent qualify you as an honest goy? Completely beside the point that him and Einstein had some squabbles, we are talking about what they did.

Quantum entanglement has never been demonstrated to be an active link, and doesn't really change the situation at all. If you understand QM to any degree, you know that entanglement is simply a scenario where particles are produced in pairs with complementary properties.

Antiparticles (ie, "antimatter) are only partially proven, problem is that there is no single theory and the two top theories (an explanation of which here would be exhausting and take up 5000+ words) cannot coexist. This is how superstrings (ie string theory) came about, because their existence (which still has not been proven) would unite everything both one theory and offer a unified theory behind force. This is why CERN was built and so far the data remains inconclusive because they still can't create the high energy states some of these antiparticles exist at.

And it's important to remember that nothing is actually proven here, string theory could be entirely wrong. But there is just not enough evidence to prove or disprove it at the moment.

It wouldn't blow up. If power failed, the vacuum would likely break and the particles being studied (or attempted to be studied) would no longer exist (they'd turn into some other particle). This is one of the difficulties of studying quarks and sub-quark structures.

Careful, high levels of autism incoming.

Not all of Physics is cucked. The mathematical basis of Relativity revolves in the Lorentz Transformation dictating the limit velocity of our universe, c.

y = 1/ sqrt (1 - v²/c²)

That equation, mathematically, has velocity as the only unknown variable, but v cant be equal or bigger than c, cause then you get a division by zero or a negative root.

Studied a couple of semesters Physics and much of what is said is true. Flat Earth is bullshit based on the experiments we can make. The Formulas we use for our mundane existence work, but when we try to describe interactions that are really far away (galaxies and other constellations) or abstract phenomena like quantum mechanics, you can't come to a overall agreement because many people can't comprehend the idea of everything being only the product of a possibility.

Einstein is a jew and most likely he stole most of his work, but his work is based on real Mathematicians and Physicists.
I am currently working on trying to dispute Lorentz transformation as being incomplete. Remember, it relies on the speed of light being the boundary of our understanding.

If our universe really is infinite, then the speed of light is only a boundary to our means of measurement, not to the creation of possibilities in our universe.

Pic related, my visual representation of infinity.

Just another scare story

I was more curious to how you thought that applied to nuclear power existing/not existing here
or did I read your post wrong?

If you are looking at opposing Lorentz, start by working out light speed measurements around a closed loop. It is not nearly as complicated a problem as the jews would have us believe, just a clever trick.

I don't know about that in particular so I can't say anything about the validity of it, but yes, I'm not saying scientific progress isn't happening. That's exactly it, it's happening outside the academies and the scientific communities.

Would also be interesting to look into the ratio of Jewish companies related to nuclear plants. (I also recall there some prominent freemasons in the electricity industry in France. Something like that.)

For example the defense system of the Fukushima, Japan plant was upgraded by an Israeli company, of all places.

Good show fam, may the aryan spirit guide you.

String theory has not produced a single tangible or empirical thing, and is exactly what I am talking about when I say that physics has stalled. Physics used to produce frameworks to do useful things, but now only produces empty pages of math.

Einstein did not originate the idea of mass-energy equivalence nor the formula e=mc^2. He did write a proof using circular logic that depends on light having constant velocity across frames, but that proof was thoroughly attacked by every physicist of the day and is generally left in the dark.

Fun fact: most physicists arrived at e=(3/4)mc^2 before Einstein, and continued supporting that well into the 1960s. If that 3/4 factor is there, thermal neutrons do not introduce enough energy to overcome the activation threshold for nuclear fission and so fission with a net positive energy output is not possible.

don't get stuck in 3 dimensions, and don't let time hold you back

It's faker. Lower class Jews suffered throughout WWII. But working nukes never existed. (But of course there are many real consequences from this scheme.)

Apologies, I misread. My theory was simply that they're not really nuclear, the (((company))) that installs the reactors (who do the same in nuclear subs and boats) just says they are. For example, nuclear submarines actually utilise a type of Stirling engine to remain quiet and patrol for weeks at a time - similar to the fleet of new Swedish subs. That is why they deplete their diesel reserve stores significantly when they return from a patrol.

What I wrote is kinda relevant

On the nuke topic, almost every single person involved in the development of nuclear weapons was a jew with questionable political connections.

So was einsteins work kabbalistic jewish nonsense or did he steal it from gentiles?

"Frameworks" are math. String theory is exactly that, a framework. But it is unproven, though CERN was supposed to conclusively prove it (at least, in theory). It's inability to reach higher energy states is why physicists aren't exactly certain on what to do now, except build a bigger collider.

So then how do nuclear fission reactors (or at least the facilities they are located in) produce energy?

so how would you describe the large craters made in the 1950s at the Nevada Test Site?

Pretty funny that Einstein won the nobel prize for a paper on someone elses experimental and data. Hertz and millikan and im sure lots of others.

Man, it's been a long time since we've had one of these threads. Were are all my nuke hoax brothers at these days? Do any of you know any good forums to discuss more into it?
There isn't even anywhere to discuss Deutsche Physik except for blog post comment sections.

Patent Jew only stole the credible theories and half-baked theories.

Have thought about that, but how to be able to get reliable measurements or proofs that c is not the fastest thing, although most (wouldn't surprise me they hide the "undesired" papers) measurements point out as c being the fastest thing we can measure.

Trying to use the double slit experiment as proof, but still working on it. Trying use the particle-wave approach to show that causality, possibilities, are that which control everything. Making that duality the fundamental "state" of matter. Energy in its "purest" form. The distribution of possibilities making the basis of all Matter, "condensed energy".

Pics related, my idea of a posibility distribiution based on 2^n, which also has the basis on pythagoras, infinite dimensions as>>7997961 said and the prime numbers.

Lots of work, but remember…

Arbeit Macht Frei

There is where it gets interesting, take any figure you want, throw it to infinite dimensional analysis and you get a sphere. It is the perfect form because it doesn't matter where you start, you will always find a starting point that defines all points on it's volume.

Pythagoras comes into play here.

I welcome your
My father is guiding my way. He died with the dream of me being a physicists. Don't want to get into the poz'ed academia, want to reshape it from outside and retake our wisdom with us to the stars.

So as I said, we are still waiting for string theory to produce a single tangible result. I would call that a stall. Just like everything else in physics for the last century.

They probably don't. They are probably running fission reactions as energy sinks, which is why power grid dump loads have largely disappeared as nuclear power has been introduced over time.

Because conventional explosives can't throw dirt up in the air.

2m and still kicking.

I thank you for the good wishes.
Doing it for the kids.

The amount of antimatter CERN can bottle is small, not enough to vaporize anything. We are not Angels and Demons yet. The original experiment trapped 300 atoms for 16 minutes.

'sup weev

What I see, those doesn't look extremely large. Aren't there even videos from the military showing they're stacking hundreds of tons TNT for comparative purposes? I would assume exploding hundreds of tons TNT in one pile can create craters.

Exactly, dimension 0 is a point with no depth width or height, Dimension 10 (or 12) is a point with ALL previous points combined.

So to end up where you started. A circle.

Special relativity, general relativity, quantum mechanics, the photoelectric effect, and Brownian motion are real, and have nothing to do with Einstein.

Einstein was a lying plagiarist and the Jewspapers and accusations of anti-Semitism against his betters who had important work to do helped him claim discoveries that, in the cases of QM and GR, it is clear that he did not understand.

If a nuclear fission reactor cannot provide net positive energy (even as heat), then how is it operating as a sink?

Or it could be the gradual computerization of the power grid, allowing for more accurate power generation (in regards to a load) and power distribution. Also states that shut down their nuclear power plants (notably California) do not have issues from a electrical oversupply.

what, do actinides not have 1MeV/nucleon less binding energy than nuclei half their mass which could be released if a neutron came along and destabilized them?

You'd need to bury them pretty deep, and I'm doubtful that the government could be fucked enough to do that assuming they find enough explosives they want to dump anyway.

More to the point the NTS has abnormally high levels of background radiation, due to nuclear fallout generated when atomic bombs are detonated underground. Given the amount and spread of such fallout it seems very unlikely that the government could get enough sufficiently radioactive material to spread across such a wide area.

Never heard of them, post them if you got it.

All physical processes were running slower for atomic clocks that ticked less time. Effectively, time was running slower for them.

nigger I want you to read what you just wrote and think long and hard about it.

Computers aren't magic, they don't make it any easier to shut down power generators and quickly bring them back up. Anyone who has ever investigated installing an isolated solar or wind system on their property has quickly learned that there is no way around needing these loads.

I'm mostly bothered by how they memed Einstein like he's the smartest guy ever. His IQ was relatively average for a Nobel Laureate, around 160. Not to mention his contributions to maths & science aren't even anywhere near as great as those of Euler, Newton, even Poincare and numerous others. Even every Nazi scientist and engineer is greater.

Funny you should mention that. Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.

The fact that we are on pol means we should both know better than that.

The only question, what does exists inside it?

That is the question we should be asking ourselves.
How to reach those "points" and how to recreate them in terms of energy. Instead of colliding them, how to create them.
I think of electromagnetism (Tesla) being the key here, but can't be sure how far from reason am I here.

ALBERT EINSTEIN is held up as "a rare genius," who drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. However, using the technique known as 'The Often-Repeated Lie=Truth,' he has been made an idol to young people, and his very name has become synonymous with genius.

THE TRUTH, HOWEVER, IS VERY DIFFERENT. Einstein was an inept and moronic person, who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed NOTHING ORIGINAL to the field of quantum mechanics, nor any other science. On the contraryhe stole the ideas of others, and the Jew-controlled media made him a 'hero.'

When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find that his only 'brilliance' was in his ability to PLAGIARIZE and STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S IDEAS, PASSING THEM OFF AS HIS OWN. Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of this story.

The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early education that he "showed little scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of 15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he left school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his "lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school in Zurich.

This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to be mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the engineering school he could not get into, but after graduating in 1900, he still could not get a position at the engineering school!

Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert third class, which meant that he was not competent to hold a higher qualified position. Even after publishing his so-called ground-breaking papers of 1905 and after working in the patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he was only rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was reviewing technical documents for patents of every day things; yet he was barely qualified.

He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying to get a position at a university, but without success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the myth.

Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid of university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905.

Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any real education.

THE TRUTH IS: HE STOLE THE IDEAS AND PLAGIARIZED THE PAPERS.

I had a Jewish physics teacher in college who always had these Einstein memes everywhere.
None of the tests he would show us worked.

Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the source of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are presented by Einstein's worshipers as totally new and completely different, each of which would change the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the following four ideas, respectively:

The foundation of the photon theory of light;
The equivalence of energy and mass;
The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
The special theory of relativity.

Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with what Einstein called the Special Theory of Relativity (the General Theory would come in 1915).

This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two premises:

In the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same for all observers; and
Since the speed of light is independent of the motion of its source, then the time interval between two events is longer for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur at different places than for an observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in the same place.

This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower velocities where time would pass faster.

This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the basis for modern physics. But these two premises are far from being originally Einstein's.
FIRST OF ALL, THE IDEA THAT THE SPEED OF LIGHT WAS A CONSTANT AND WAS INDEPENDENT OF THE MOTION OF ITS SOURCE WAS NOT EINSTEIN'S AT ALL, BUT WAS PROPOSED BY THE SCOTTISH SCIENTIST JAMES MAXWELL in 1878.

Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature.

James Maxwell wrote an article to this effect for the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was known 27 years before Einstein wrote his paper.

This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and Morley to conduct an important experiment, the results of which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not understand relativity.

They had attempted to detect the motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for the propagation of light. In response to this problem, in 1880, the Irish physicist George Fitzgerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the results of the Michelson Morley experiment could be explained if, ". . . the length of material bodies change, according as they are moving through the either or across it by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their velocities to that of light."

THIS IS THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY, 13 YEARS BEFORE EINSTEIN'S PAPER!

Assuming I read your post correctly, you said that a nuclear reactor is acting like an energy sink and is absorbing energy from a higher power source (such as the grid) as a dump load. Is this correct or not?

Your comparison doesn't work. I'm talking about computers of industrial appliances like boilers (ones used to generate power) which can more easily have their power output adjusted (either through the flow of material into it's burner, or through the pressure inside the tank, etc). This is much different than renewables, which operate on completely different mechanisms which are not as easy for an operator to control.

government = lazy, especially when they wouldn't need to blow holes in the desert to get the public believing a certain type of bomb is real

FURTHER . . . IN 1892, HENDRIK LORENTZ, of the Netherlands, proposed the same solution and began to greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890's, both Lorentz and Fitzgerald worked on these ideas and wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction.

In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations explaining the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and its relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper. By 1904, "Lorentz transformations," the series of equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz. They describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity of light. In short, by 1904, everything in "Einstein's paper" regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had already been published.

The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper unifying many of these ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's paper: ". . . we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order of their succession, as well as the equality of two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible."

Professor Umberto Bartocci, a mathematical historian, of the University of Perugia claims that Olinto De Pretto, an industrialist from Vicenza, published the equation E=mc^2 in a scientific magazine, Atte, in 1903. Einstein allegedly used De Pretto's insight in a major paper published in 1905, but De Pretto was never acclaimed.

De Pretto had stumbled on the equation, but not the theory of relativity, while speculating about ether in the life of the universe, said Prof Bartocci. It was republished in 1904 by Veneto's Royal Science Institute, but the equation's significance was not understood.

According to Professor Bartocci, a Swiss Italian named Michele Besso alerted Einstein to the research and in 1905 Einstein published his own work. It took years for his breakthrough to be grasped. When the penny finally dropped, De Pretto's contribution was overlooked while Einstein went on to become the century's most famous scientist. De Pretto died in 1921.

"De Pretto did not discover relativity but there is no doubt that he was the first to use the equation. That is hugely significant. I also believe, though it's impossible to prove, that Einstein used De Pretto's research," said Professor Bartocci, who has written a book on the subject. ( The Guardian Unlimited).

Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein.

Thus, we see that the only thing original about the paper was the term Special Theory of Relativity. EVERYTHING ELSE WAS PLAGIARIZED. Over the next few years, Poincaré became one of the most important lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but he never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein.

Thus while Poincaré was busy bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed regarding relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent office in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it necessary to give much credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early physicists knew that he was a fraud.

This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject of another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes the irregular motion of a body arising from the thermal energy of the molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The movement had first been observed by the Scottish botanist Robert Brown in 1827.

The explanation of this phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the American Josiah Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the motion contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between these two men, they had explained by the 1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper regarding Brownian motion.

The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained in a third paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is expressed by the famous equation E=mc2. Einstein's biographers categorize this as "his most famous and most spectacular conclusion." Even though this idea is an obvious conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was not included in that paper but was published as an afterthought later in the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass equivalence was not original with Einstein.

That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been shown in the laboratory in the 1890s by both J. J. Thomsom of Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré had shown that there was a mass relationship for all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant, yet unappreciated physicists of the era.

Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many of the German scientists who would later become famous for a variety of topics. He had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and energy for many years and had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the very same journal which Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant work in this area, Hasenöhrl had received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences.

Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was a simple deduction from the already well-known equations of Scottish physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long understood that the mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc2 was the logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it.

THUS, THE EXPERIMENTS OF THOMSON, KAUFMANN, AND FINALLY, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, HASENÖRHL, CONFIRMED MAXWELL'S WORK. IT IS LUDICROUS TO BELIEVE THAT EINSTEIN DEVELOPED THIS POSTULATE
, particularly in light of the fact that Einstein did not have the laboratory necessary to conduct the appropriate experiments.

Is this how you kill threads

In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to the scientific community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of radium)."

This remark demonstrates how little Einstein understood about science, for this was truly an outlandish remark. By saying this, Einstein showed that he really did not understand basic scientific principles, and that he was writing about a topic that he did not understand. In fact, in response to this article, J. Precht remarked that such an experiment "lies beyond the realm of possible experience."

The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the foundation of the photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect is the release of electrons from certain metals or semiconductors by the action of light. This area of research is particularly important to the Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he UNJUSTLY received his 1922 Nobel Prize.

But
AGAIN IT IS NOT EINSTEIN, BUT WILHELM WIEN AND MAX PLANCK WHO DESERVE THE CREDIT.
The main point of Einstein's paper, and the point for which he is given credit, is that light is emitted and absorbed in finite packets called quanta. This was the explanation for the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect had been explained by Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp Lenard, worked on understanding this phenomenon.

Lenard was the first to show that the energy of the electrons released in the photoelectric effect was not governed by the intensity of the light but by the frequency of the light. This was an important breakthrough.

Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of modern day quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his and Wien's work, had shown that radiated energy was absorbed and emitted in finite units called quanta. The only difference in his work of 1900 and Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein limited himself to talking about one particular type of energylight energy. But the principles and equations governing the process in general had been deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein himself admitted that the obvious conclusion of Planck's work was that light also existed in discrete packets of energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was original.

After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific community took little notice and Einstein continued his job at the patent office until 1909 when it was arranged by World Jewry for him to take a position at a school.

Still, it was not until a 1919 A Jewish newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety. With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a position where he could begin to use other people's work as his own more openly.

He engaged many of his students to look for ways to prove the theories he had supposedly developed, or ways to apply those theories, and then he could present the research as his own or at least take partial credit.

In this vein, in 1912, he began to try and express his gravitational research in terms of a new, recently developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding relativity. This was the beginning of his General Theory of Relativity, which he would publish in 1915.

BUT THE MATHEMATICAL WORK WAS NOT DONE BY EINSTEINHE WAS INCAPABLE OF IT.
Instead, it was performed by the mathematician Marcel Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical principles developed by Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all mathematics used to describe relativity.

The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of relativity to the universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of planets and their orbits, and the general principle that light rays bend as they pass by a massive object. Einstein published an initial paper in 1913 based upon the work which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to Relativity. But this paper was filled with errors and the conclusions were incorrect.

It appears that Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it out for Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look elsewhere to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published his correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its publication that he, "completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert and Klein." He is referring to David Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliant mathematician of the 20th century, and Felix Klein, another mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the area of calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General Theory of Relativity for Einstein.

Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader to believe that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's opinions regarding General Relativity, and that he had influenced them in their thinking.

However, the exact opposite is true.
EINSTEIN STOLE THE MAJORITY OF HIS GENERAL RELATIVITY WORK FROM THESE TWO MEN, THE REST BEING TAKEN FROM GROSSMANN. HILBERT SUBMITTED FOR PUBLICATION, A WEEK BEFORE EINSTEIN COMPLETED HIS WORK, A PAPER WHICH CONTAINED THE CORRECT FIELD EQUATIONS, OF GENERAL RELATIVITY.

What this means is that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper, with the same conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have had an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along, because there were friends of his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not necessary, for Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of publishing his own. Both of these papers were, before being printed, delivered in the form of a lecture.

Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert an advance copy of his.

Therefore, THIS SERVES AS INCONTROVERTIBLE PROOF THAT EINSTEIN QUICKLY PLAGIARIZED THE WORK AND THEN PRESENTED IT, HOPING TO BEAT HILBERT TO THE PUNCH. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began to belittle Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he had praised him in an effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert made the mistake of sending Einstein this draft copy, but still he delivered his work first.

Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much higher quality than Einstein's. It is known today that there are many problems with assumptions made in Einstein's General Theory paper. We know today that Hilbert was much closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper is the forerunner of the unified field theory of gravitation and electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger, whose work is the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics.

That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community all along. In 1940, a group of German physicists meeting in Austria declared that "before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations of the theory of relativity." However the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The Jewish media did not promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew Albert Einstein.

As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory, as postulated by Hilbert first and in plagiarized form by Einstein second, stated that light rays should bend when they pass by a massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse of the Sun, light from distant stars passing close to the Sun was observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence supported the General Theory of Relativity, and the Jew-controlled media immediately seized upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a hero, at the expense of the true genius, David Hilbert.

On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the headline of which proclaimed, "Revolution in scienceNew theory of the UniverseNewtonian ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of the force- feeding of the Einstein myth to the masses. In the following years, Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the originator of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the Jewish media, in 1922, EINSTEIN RECEIVED THE NOBEL PRIZE FOR THE WORK HE HAD STOLEN IN 1905 REGARDING THE PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT.

The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was an important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as Einstein had been established as an idol to the popular masses of England and America, his image was promoted as the rare genius that he is erroneously believed to be today.

As such, he immediately began his work as a tool for World Zionism. The masses bought into the idea that if someone was so brilliant as to change our fundamental understanding of the universe, then certainly we ought to listen to his opinions regarding political and social issues.

This is exactly what World Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of social engineering. They certainly did not want someone like David Hilbert to be recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come from a strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's two middle names were 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live Right.' In August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken regarding installing Adolf Hitler as President of the Reich, Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of Adolf Hitler, along with other leading German scientists, that was published in the German newspapers. So the Jews certainly did not want David Hilbert receiving the credit he deserved.

The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved either. This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been important German theologians, and during World War II he would stay in Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the best he could.

The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin Schrödinger to be heralded as a genius to the masses. This Austrian physicist would go on to teach at Adolf Hitler University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter expressing his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's work on the unified field theory was a forerunner of modern physics, even though it had been criticized by Einstein, who apparently could not understand it.

The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a rare genius, even though he would go on to solidify quantum theory and contribute to it greatly, as well as develop his famous uncertainty principle, in addition to describing the modern atom and nucleus and the binding energies that are essential to modern chemistry.

NO, THE JEWS DID NOT WANT HEISENBERG PROMOTED AS A GENIUS BECAUSE HE WOULD GO ON TO HEAD THE GERMAN ATOMIC BOMB PROJECT AND SERVE PRISON TIME AFTER THE WAR FOR HIS INVOLVEMENT WITH THE THIRD REICH.

No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen, Englishmen, and even Americans who had contributed to the body of knowledge and evidence from which Einstein plagiarized and stole his work.

Instead, they needed to erect Einstein as their golden calf, even though he repeatedly and often embarrassed himself with his nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work he had supposedly done. For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a front page article in which Einstein gave an "emphatic denial" regarding the idea of practical applications for the "energy of the atom." The article says, "But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that man will someday be able to harness this boundless energy-to drive a great steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for instance - then, according to Einstein, you are wrong"

Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time theoretical research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear energy.

But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he made no real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his real purpose - evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did publish other articles after this time, all of them were co- authored by at least one other person, and in each instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the research that led to the articles; he was merely recruited by the co-authors in order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the pretense of academia, Einstein began his assault for World Zionism.

In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a fund- raising tour for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and to promote Zionism. In April of 1922, Einstein used his status to gain membership in a Commission of the League of Nations. In February of 1923, Einstein visited Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he became a founding member of the Association of Friends of the New Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist and Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself scientifically by criticizing the work of Schr"dinger and Heisenberg. Following a brief illness, he resumed his Zionistic agenda, wanting an independent Israel and at the same time a World Government.

In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war, although he would reverse this position during World War II when he advocated war against Germany and the creation of the atomic bomb, which he thought was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the request of other Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt urging an American program to develop an atomic bomb to be used on Germany - not Japan. Einstein would have no part in the actual construction of the bomb, theoretical or practical, because he lacked the skills for either.

In December of 1946, Einstein rekindled his efforts for a World Government, with Israel apparently being the only autonomous nation. This push continued through the rest of the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental in the creation of the State of Israel, both politically and economically, was offered the presidency of Israel. He declined. In 1953, he spent his time attacking the McCarthy Committee, and he supported Communists such as J. Robert Oppenheimer. He encouraged civil disobedience in response to the McCarthy trials. Finally, on April 18, 1955, this Jewish demagogue died.

Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making stupid statements. His death was just the beginning of his usage and exploitation by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled media continued to promote the myth of this Super-Jew long after his death, and as more and more of the men who knew better died off, the Jews were more and more able to aggrandize his myth and lie more boldly. This brazen lying has culminated in the Jew-controlled Time Magazine naming Einstein "The Person of the Century".

Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice for the "Person of the Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler was indeed named "Man of the Year" while he was still living by Time Magazine, and according to a December 27, 1999, article in the USA Today, Einstein was chosen over Adolf Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public relations fallout" that would accompany that choice; yet in internet polling by Time, Hitler finished third and was the top serious candidate. Still the issue of Time Magazine dedicated to Einstein, which has articles by men with names like Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt, is interesting to read. For one, they found it necessary to include an article rationalizing why they did not pick the obvious choice, Adolf Hitler. But more interesting is the article by Stephen Hawking which purports to be a history of the theory of relativity. In it, Hawking admits many things in this article, such as the fact that Hilbert published the General Theory of Relativity before Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept of relativity long before Einstein. Hawking also writes:

"Einstein was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schr"dinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. Einstein was horrified by this. Most scientists, however, accepted the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent agreement with observations. They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics and the foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the past half- century".

There are plenty of shit in space moving very fast. Try measuring its speed and see if there's a pattern.

when I first heard this theory I thought that good old w ev had overdosed on redpills. but the more I look into it the more it makes sense. crazy shit, maan.
cultural marxism is also cultural relativity.

This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all of the modern developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein was so stupid as to be vehemently against the most important idea of modern science, just as he opposed Schr"dinger's work in unified field theory which was far ahead of its time. The same magazine admits that "success eluded" Einstein in the field of explaining the contradictions between relativity and quantum mechanics. Today, these contradictions are explained by the unified field theory, but Einstein, who proved himself to be one of the least intelligent of 20th century scientists, refused to believe in either quantum theory or the unified field theory.

To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of the most ludicrous and absurd lies of all time, yet it has been successfully pulled off by Isaacson, Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners of Time Magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give the title to an inventor or scientist, then the most obvious choice would have been men like Hilbert, Planck, or Heisenberg. If they wanted to give it to the scientist who most fundamentally changed the lands 20th century science, then the obvious choice would be William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist invented the transistor, which is the basis of all modern electronic devices and computers, everything from modern cars and telephones, VCRs and watches, to the amazing computers which have allowed incomprehensible advances in all fields of science. Without the transistor, all forms of science today would be basically in the same place that they were in the late 1940s.

However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William Shockley because he spent the majority of his scientific career demonstrating the genetic and mental inferiority of non-whites and arguing for their sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led the Jews to financially destroy Shockley who founded Shockley Semiconductor the first company in Silicon Valley, his hometown, to develop computer chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff and used them to start Fairchild semiconductor in 1957 (co-founded by the "Traitorous Eight": Julius Blank, Victor Grinich, Jean Hoerni, Gene Kleiner, Jay Last, Gordon Moore, Robert Noyce and Sheldon Roberts. Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore left Fairchild in 1968 to found Intelco . Many other Fairchild employees later the company - later called Intel.

No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our time be recognized, not Henry Ford, not the great German scientists who helped the National Socialists in Germany, not Charles Lindbergh, who was sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and certainly not William Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists and geneticists of our time. Instead, the Jews propped up the Zionist, Communist Albert Einstein who hated everything white.

After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White Race and of the Germans in particular in the following statements. He was asked what he thought about Germany and about re-educating the Germans after the war and said:

"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since 1870. Behind the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book and in his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding. The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting".

Otherwise, make a particle accelerator and see how fast could it move if you continuously accelerate it.

you are a butthurt jackass, but this shitpost gave me a genuine chuckle

Lewis L. Strauss, the Zionist Chairman of the US Atomic Commission, must have had in mind storing the world stock of A and H bombs in the neutral country of Israel (also chosen for the United Nations' permanent headquarters) for safekeeping to 'satisfy Russian demands,' when, as reported in the London Jewish Chronicle of 11th December, 1953, he 'assisted' President Eisenhower in writing the speech in which Eisenhower told the UN General Assembly that the USA would be prepared to ease international tension by handing over her Atom and Hydrogen weapons to UNO. Eisenhower does not hesitate to accept the advice of Strauss, although this Zionist financier is senior partner in the New York International Banking firm of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. which in 1917, under the direction of Jacob Schiff, then the acknowledged leader of world Jewry, financed the Bolshevist revolutionary Trotsky to the extent of 20 million dollars.

Albert Einstein, the Zionist scientist, (described by Pravda as one of the ten best friends of the Soviet Union in the USA) was also thinking along the same lines when he persuaded Roosevelt (Redfield) to authorize research into nuclear fission, and recommended the employment of other Zionist scientists, who were later to pass the result of the researches to the Soviet Union.

Oppenheimer, the chief Einstein appointee, now in disgrace for Communist sympathies, and holding up production of the hydrogen bombs until Russia came into possession of its secrets: Pontecorvo, the entire host of Zionist scientists and agents working for Communism in the notorious spy rings of America, Canada, Australia and Great Britain: all have obviously been striving to bring about the present situation.

It is this overriding ambition which drives Zionists, even the most wealthy, to support Communism, either openly or secretly, only to bring the world to a point where it would seem it must accept their long envisaged 'peace plan.' "One of the major reasons for my visit to the United States," said the mayor of Jerusalem, according to the South African Jewish Times of 14th March, 1952, "is to interest Americans in the beautification of Jerusalem, the Capital of the World, no less than the Capital of Israel."

It all has been decided as described above. Why has so little been heard about it? For the simple reason that IT HAS BEEN DECIDED. The matter will not be thrown open for Gentile discussion in the popular (?) press UNTIL the Nations are browbeaten to the point where they are ready to acknowledge the Zionists' "International Super-Government, and WITH SUBMISSIVENESS".

(Note: On November 21, 1954, Czecho-Slovakia called upon the Western Powers to delay signing the Paris Agreement regarding the re-armament of West Germany, until they had discussed with the Russian bloc an agreement which might eventually result in a United States of Europe. A 'United States of Europe' was the aim of Trotsky stated in Bolshevism and World Peace, published in 1918. "The task of the proletariat is to create a still more powerful fatherland with a far greater power of resistancethe Republican United States of Europe, as the foundation of the United States of the World").

The reason particle accelerators probably can't get something going faster than the speed of light is simply because they use electromagnetic waves, which are effectively light, to do the acceleration. As the speed of a particle approaches c, it becomes harder for something moving at c to transfer energy to it.

Here's one quick, with 450 tons of TNT. youtube.com/watch?v=hhu6Ya_bF0o
And modern production cranks out huge amounts of stuff, that also includes explosives factories running 5 days a week.

It uses magnetic field to do that, you mongoloid.

Jews have been heavily overrepresented among the ranks of theoretical physicists. This conclusion remains true even though Einstein, the leading figure among Jewish physicists, was a strongly motivated Zionist (F"lsing 1997, 494505), opposed assimilation as a contemptible form of mimicry (p. 490), preferred to mix with other Jews whom he referred to as his tribal companions (p. 489), embraced the uncritical support for the Bolshevik regime in Russia typical of so many Jews during the 1920s and 1930s, including persistent apology for the Moscow show trials in the 1930s (pp. 6445), and switched from a high-minded pacifism during World War I, when Jewish interests were not at stake, to advocating the building of atomic bombs to defeat Hitler. From his teenage years he disliked the Germans and in later life criticized Jewish colleagues for converting to Christianity and acting like Prussians. He especially disliked Prussians, who were the elite ethnic group in Germany. Reviewing his life at age 73, Einstein declared his ethnic affiliation in no uncertain terms: 'My relationship with Jewry had become my strongest human tie once I achieved complete clarity about our precarious position among the nations' (in F"lsing 1997, 488). According to F"lsing, Einstein had begun developing this clarity from an early age, but did not acknowledge it until much later, a form of self-deception: As a young man with bourgeois-liberal views and a belief in enlightenment, he had refused to acknowledge it until much later, a form of self-deception: As a young man with bourgeois-liberal views and a belief in enlightenment, he had refused to acknowledge [his Jewish identity] (in F"lsing 1997, 488).

so what does this all mean? is it possible that something could go faster than the speed of light?

Hot damn that video is on point. I am saving that one. Good work user

What the fuck am I looking at here? What do the lines represent?

...

Albert Einstein is a good example of another deception and hoax involved with the atomic bomb program. When many people think of the atomic bomb they think of Einstein. He was presented as the world's greatest scientist, and a hero of the atomic bomb program. Upon closer inspection, you will find that his major contributions were his use of his influence to obtain President Roosevelt's support for the bomb and he was the one personally responsible for bringing the major Communist atomic spy Klaus Fuchs into the Program. The Russians know nothing about the atomic bomb until Fuchs brought it to their attention in 1942. (*Heisenberg's War,* p. 524).

Thanks to Fuchs, (and to a massive amount of Secret material illegally shipped through Lend-Lease) they were able to explode their own bomb in 1949. Einstein was a communist cell member with Fuchs. Fuchs was the top scientist on the Manhattan Project and he gave the atomic secrets to the Soviets. (Jordan, George Recey, *From Major Jordan's Diaries,* Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York, 1952.)

We are taught that Einstein is the author of the Theory of Relativity, yet evidence has come for the proving that the real author was Mileva Maric, Einstein's first wife.

Einstein had a reputation at the Swiss Polytechnic Institute in Zurich of being a man with poor work habits and was often reprimanded for laziness during all his school years, including the University. He developed a romance with classmate Mileva who helped him with his math. His autobiography says "In my work participated a Serbian student Mileva Maric who I married later." She had an illegitimate daughter in 1902, which they gave up for adoption. They got married in 1903, separated in 1912 and divorced in 1919. This is when Einstein married his FIRST cousin Elsa, typical of Jewish inbreeding. The original manuscript of the *The Theory of Relativity* submitted for publication had Maric's name on it as co-author.

For more proof, see the article "Theory of RelativityWho is its Real Author?" by Dr. Rastko Maglic and J. W. McGinnis, President, International Tesla Society, in the Jul/Aug 1994 issue of *Extraordinary Science* magazine, which contains references for further documentation.

Einstein was a hoax and fraud saddled on the scientific community to prevent them from learning too much and to promote Jews as being superior, sort of Nazism in reverse.

Einstein's famous equation "E=MC squared" is WRONG, or at best only partially correct. His definition of energy is WRONG, his definition of mass is WRONG, C is defined as the top speed possible for anything, then it is squared, which would be even faster and thus contradicts the definition. Light is described as a constant, which is WRONG as defined. In a higher understanding, light does not move, our perception of the speed of light is WRONG.

Those who REALLY understand, and who can prove it by creating matter out of "nothing" for instance, say that the original WHITE LIGHT is invisible and still. Read books by Walter Russell for more information.

Einstein was a Zionist with membership in at least 16 Communist front organizations such as Friends of the Soviet. Einstein was head of the Jewish Black Book Committee, which was listed as a Communist front in the 1947 House Un-American Activities Committee Report.

The correct science being discovered and revealed by such as Nikola Tesla, Walter Russell, Tom Bearden, Andrija Puharich, etc., was suppressed to prevent humanity from achieving energy independence (and thus political and military independence) from the Rockefeller/Rothschild oil/nuclear energy barons. This same technology leads to understanding of good health, and thus independence from the drug/medical crowd, who happen to be the same oil crowd crooks.

implying a neet has enough space and resources to create his own particle accelerator and disprove (((their))) research.

Better find the loopholes in their measurements and theories and show the somewhat awaken normies what the fuck is happening.

You are forgetting the principle of electromagnetism. Each electric field creates an orthogonal magnetic field. And light has electromagnetic properties.

tl;dr

Anyone who has studied much Physics will tell you that Special Relativity was mostly created by Poincare and Lorentz. The seminal 1905 paper by the plagiarist Einstein had no references! His 1915 paper on General Relativity, was submitted for publication two weeks after Hilbert's deduction of the equations, and it is Hilbert's Lagrangian technique that is used today to derive the field equations, not the idiotic heuristics of Einstein. Even E = mc2 was derived in the mid 1800s (well before Einstein ever stole anything).

Nikola Tesla regarded Relativity as the greatest historical aberration of scientific thought. Relativity is no more than a philosophical standpoint, a virus to infect a "New Age". From the standpoint of the electrical engineer Einsteins Relativity is "Bravo-Sierra"! However, it has sunk its roots into the basic consideration of Inductance and Capacitance. L and C represent co-efficients of aetheric processes, and as such represent the aether, not Relativity. Albert Einstein stands in the way of Michael Faraday, and Pharisees are now Physicists (Eric Dollard).

I've seen a term Holla Forumstard used on multiple occasions, but I didn't expect to come to Holla Forums to see it's a literal description rather than a snarky remark.

Doesn't change the fact that energy transmission simply can't be instantaneous and still must travel to get there. Even if you are projecting waves perpendicular to the path of the particle, the speed of the field that is influencing the particle is still only capable of communicating energy at c. There is no scenario where this does not apply, not matter how you try to throw waves at it.

Please tell me you're trolling or Jewish.

Excuse me for being too simplistic; Are you suggesting that a static magnetic field is doing work on the particle?

Yea I didn;t get subjected to much Holocaust shit either. I remember taking world history, then US History which I remember as just being a kind of summary of America so far, then AP European history, which looking back on was pretty cool.

Even my University history prof. for a gen ed was almost redpilled. He told us the Jews didn't build any pyramids, then paused and said it again for emphasis. His specialty was German history, namely communists in Weimar Germany. I'm willing to bet his studies redpilled him a bit.

If the nuclear bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were detonated before reaching the ground, would they still be able to produce a mushroom cloud?

Man, Holla Forums really took the STEM major meme hard. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Better than liberal arts and x studies bullshit

He was right. That's mostly what it's been used for at least, because it sure as hell doesn't work all that well when you try to use it to explain observable physical phenomena in this universe.

Oh yeah, muh mystery matters, right. I'm still waiting on the edge of my seat. But that's what CERN is here to prove, isn't it?

To summarize it and make it as 101 as possible.

The sphere represents infinity, as said in .
Seen in all possible dimensions the most perfect from is a sphere, because of all points depending on a radius and an angle.

Throw the radius to infinity and you get all possible numbers inside that sphere. In my Hypothesis, that sphere is 0.
For each point in our 3D coordinate system (Koordinatensystem) to exists, must come from zero. You can't have 1 if you don't have a starting point, zero.
Each coordinate in our 3D plane must come from a starting point, the center of our model or the 0.
That being said, the sphere contains each possible point on its area, thus making a sphere the only thing that can describe everything, because everything is inside a sphere.
Mathematically see the number pi.

The cube inside the sphere has not much significance in that drawing as in the other ones before it, but the curves touching the sphere represent the only points from which we can come to the sphere, in a 3D plane, would be the six faces of a cube. Don't worry, you can always rotate to get every direction you want.

Feel free to ask, its hard to explain it in a comment box.

Pic related would be the boundaries of the sphere, a box with 2 times the radius as the lenght of it's sides.

Are you suggesting that it doesn't?

I know you don't know dick about actual science so here's case and point pop culture reference.

Underrated post (and dubs)

That is why I think accelerating the particle is not the way to find the answer, but to let it move as freely as possible and from that point work on how does it behave.

The moment you give a direction you are deciding the path, deciding the path destroys the wave function and proves a particle. I want to study the wave function not the particle.

Is that infinity countably infinite or uncountably? Also in what space does it resides, R3 or something else?

For the purpose of our reality in R3, but the same principle can be applied to all dimensions.

It is uncountably infinity, but still bounded. You will never know the last number of pi, but you know pi is smaller than 4.

can you tell me why I had to learn fucking trigonometry again? and fucking science in general? I woulda been a lot happier had more been left out/ none of this selective bullshit

It cannot be bounded unless the boundary is an exact number.

Yes, but the number is real, not natural.

That is why I used the example of pi. There is way you can order it's digits, but you can still define the process that created those digits as different from another process that created a natural number, bigger than the starting digit of pi.
You can't grasp infinity, because infinity will never be something finite, but I can draw a circle which by definition contains an infinite (in its digits) number without breaking the fabric of reality.

Dunno if we on the same page now.

no way*

At the end of the day, everything is a question of geometry, at the smallest possible level reality is question of whether a point on a functionally infinite grid possesses quality (a thing exists at this point) or absolutely lacks quality (no thing is found at this point) Physics is the understanding of how existential points move through this grid and cause other points to move in reaction. Time is the sum of all of the transitions of points on this grid in a single instant of transmission.

Reality is the cosmic equation graphed.

...

The relativistic "corrections" are too small to be significant for GPS, they are included purely for ideological reasons. And they actually introduce error, not correction.
youtu.be/dH7zOX5PrVw

My body is ready.

Yes. The mushroom cloud shape is a result of explosion size, gravity and atmosphere density. Any explosion, no matter the source, will produce such a cloud if it is strong enough and altitude low enough for air pressure to be significant.

That is why I firmly believe Pythagoras in addition to Hermetic principles are the Philosophical basis to our universe.
I have been working hard on geometry trying to find relations on the patters of circles and the data gathered from the Academia.
Much might be false information, but come on, we shitpost on Holla Forums, our brains already know the smell of false information.

Here, have a spiral

Don't try too hard, I'm just poking fun at you for spouting nonsense. Of course Pi is an exact number, and being bounded only means it doesn't include what's beyond the boundary (may also not include the boundary points). Which is nonsensical again considering it's supposed to be infinite and thus would need no boundary, since unbounded intervals extend into infinity already. That also bears nonsensical notion that the universe is necessarily flat and spherical, and that there's a center of it which in no way ties up to it being infinite.

580 meters at a size of 13kT though?

meant for

Tell me, why was Kurt Gödel friends with Einstein then?

We all know that Gödel absolutely destroyed Hilbert's dream to provide a secure foundation for all mathematics with his incompleteness theories.

So tell me why you can't for fucking once provide mathematical proofs that Hilbert wrote instead of literary sources in textbooks for the things you say tor poster?

Tell me, why was Kurt Gödel friends with Einstein then?

We all know that Gödel absolutely destroyed Hilbert's dream to provide a secure foundation for all mathematics with his incompleteness theories.

So tell me why you can't for fucking once provide mathematical proofs that Hilbert wrote instead of literary sources in textbooks for the things you say tor poster?

Keep poking, I keep practicing my writing skills.

Every point in the universe is it's center point. Remember infinity?
And a sphere because it's the most sure way at describing the max length from the center point.
The boundary can only be seen from outside, making the infinity inside that boundary equal to zero.
Applying that idea to what we think of the small sub-atomic particles; which the further we look the nearer to zero they become, we can explain why colliding the particles and trying to read those almost-zero things transform the foundations of our reality. We are merging infinities by trying to open other infinities.

The only explanation I can come up with trying to explain why the world is currently so strange, besides the jews. Also why suddenly meme magic seems to really have an effect.

From what I know Kurt Gödel was pretty based.

Next time you want an intelligent discussion make sure to bring some numbers and math along. Bonus points for any of it being substantiated and not a schizophrenic verbal diarrhea.

Here, have a function which describes the relationship between circles, thus spheres, thus infinities, bounded by zero and infinity. They all rely on the same constant and can be measured pretty easily.

Just gotta find the Physical representation of that constant and I will be enjoying your salt as the God Emperor trusts me the inter-dimensional program of Neu-Evropa.

Godel was a useless tryhard who just repackaged that deranged loonie Cantor's religious musings on infinity.

to stifle and block fundamental physics research, obviously.

Until they are used to break RSA encryption, they might as well be.

archons -> virtual reality -> control&exploitation
redice .tv/red-ice-radio/the-archons-the-transhuman-con-and-divine-transactions

I've think it's possible that if you are to travel in a straight line you would eventually end up where you started how ever many eons later. That kind of being the 4th dimension.

I always though that the universe having limits, or just expanding to be a little strange. Because that would have to be something beyond what already expanded.

that's the thing user, string theory is maths not physics as it's not testable.
and this shit started with quantum mechs and relativity
so the maths are actually the issue: their overuse and posturing for physics (experimental science)

Hilbert actually liked Cantor, so I think you're just shitposting.

art, music, time counting (including calendar), social organization (at work, home, etc), religion, industry (how we deal with nature), we could go on
then we could try to get a glimpse of the damage done in different metrics (lost advancements, deaths, debilitations, lost cultural and knowledge riches, etc)
feels like if we eradicated the jews tomorrow we could still spend centuries assessing the damage done by their existence

Not super on topic but I thought this was interesting and there won't be any other thread where it would be at all relevant to post. Saturn's hexagonal pole changed color sometime over the past 4 years. It's NASA so who knows if it's true, photoshop, or what, but it's at least interesting that they're saying it for whatever reason.

space.com/34508-saturn-north-pole-hexagon-color-change.html

it's about basing the definition of time on nothingness, on virtual non-reality. Virtual reality which is critical to our domination and enslavement, if you check john lash's archons material.
time used to be observation of natural phenomena at our size and range, the sun, the earth, the sky. It inserted us in the great whole. It also wasnt about running against the clock every minute of our waking day. There were hours and that was enough, basically. Also they were changing size along with daily sunlight time. Each day of the year was split into 12 hours, same with nights. This happens to be the mystical/magical hours you still need to use when dealing with natural, magical phenomenae.
Our timecounting use to keep us in tune with Nature, and thus empowered. Basing it on abstract atomic BS is just another way to uproot us.

My post wasn't a defense of Hilbert, but a detraction of that retard Godel.

Who liked who and drama doesn't change the fact that Cantor was a cunt and his ideas was idiotic. His whole metaphysical idea is circular reasoning presupposing the existence of infinity. If I presuppose crazy shit to be true then I can prove whatever I want too. Good job, me.

The notion that you can use infinity as some sort of truth with concrete existence instead of a theoretical approximation is a religious notion and has nothing to do with mathematics.

But please, show me some infinity and I'll change my mind.

archive.org/details/TheManufactureAndSaleOfSaintEinstein-ThePropagandaOfSupremacy

just so we're clear, where is the barrier of our "finite" universe.

And on another note without Godel and Turning, we wouldn't have computers.
You hate math and inductive logic, I get it.

How the fuck should I know? I don't know that there is one, but that's the point: neither do you or your metaphysics gurus.

To turn the tables, describe a model of how an infinite universe works? By simple logic alone we can say that you can't fit an infinite model into your finite mind, so you can't.

See how we are now in a theological discussion already?

Without Jews we wouldn't have Hitler, ergo Jews are good?

Well, that's an argument you just pulled out of your ass, but even if that's true it's no proof that your voodoo math is any good. Newtonian physics and relativity is useful too, even if they obviously aren't correct in a larger sense than for what they work for.

k

Never thought I'd see Holla Forums go anti-science. What happened to reals over feels?

Anyway. A few points. Einstein even admitted that while relativity can explain things without the aether, that it doesn't prove there isn't an aether. Maxwell started modeling electromagnetics with an aether, and wound up removing it because it was not needed. The aether is still more or less around, but now they call it 'vacuum energy' or 'vacuum potential.'

Physics has layers like an ogre. Relativity is just one layer. It still doesn't explain everything, and neither does quantum mechanics. Ultimately, these are all approximations for what's really happening. Maybe one day the government will release Tesla's dynamic theory of gravity, and it will revolutionize what we think we know about physics. Maybe it won't.

Magnetic fields can not do work. They can transmit force, but the field itself can not do work. Hence my point, that the force acting on the particle is due to a wave.

Fucking retard sitting here telling me I don't know about physics and hasn't even taken undergrad electrodynamics.

Then why have pictures of him using that setup?

If he had "magnets that collapsed gravity" why even bother with the block and tackle?

He had a few other people help him, so its still not a mystery.

I wish there was some cool gravity gizmo too, I want to go to space. But dude, Coral Castle is a BAD example.

Just don't bring it up. He used a block and tackle.

Move on to something else.

he didn't want anyone to know he was doing it for some reason, so he made up the hoist as an excuse. He would put on a show for people but then do the real work when no one was around.

Plenty of stories of people leaving overnight and coming back and he had built half the thing which was impossible.

plus he wrote a bunch of books on magnets and sheeiiit

kinda looks like

That's right. The jews are masters of deception.

* There is no nuclear reaction in the sun. It is made of plasma. That is why its surface is hotter than its core.

* There are no black holes. Even the mathematical formulas are a scam. You cannot have black holes in an expanding universe simultaneously.

* There are no Higgs bosons. Their existence is justified by the dodgy statistics produced by the jews at the large hadron collider.

* Extinction events are most likely associated with magnetic reversals than change the polarity of earth's magnetic field. When that happens, there is a tremendous increase in radiation on the surface of earth.

* The ozone layer is produced by the ionization of the atmosphere by ultraviolet light from the sun. The ozone layer hole does not exist. They just show the satellite images taken during the southern hemisphere's winter, because if you look at images taken during summer, behold, there is no hole!

* There is no global warming. The global climate invariable changes in accordance with the sun. It has nothing to do with humans. There is no anthropogenic global warming or cooling. CO2 increase is an effect, not a cause.

* Cancer is caused by oxygen deficiency at the cellular level. When that happens, the cell goes into survival mode and starts processing sugar only, instead of sugar and oxygen.

* The increase in skin cancer is not caused by exposure to the sun, but by sun tanning lotions. Ultraviolet light from the sun is healthy for humans if received in moderation. You can healthily tan with a midday sun for 7 minutes without tanning lotion. Ultraviolet light helps keep a healthy eyesight as well. If your eyes do not receive UV light, they will be prone to disease. If you wear glasses, remove the UV protection. The body needs UV light to produce vitamin D which is essential for your metabolism.

* I could go on but I will stop here. Be wary, there are so many jewish lies out there!

You're taught about plasma in high school science in Canada.

That's the fucking point.

...

please go on

anything about evolution or origin of mankind?

No, keep going.

hehhehehe
you were dreaming about that, user, or looking at some artisic representation of BH bullshit
pics or gtfo

Keep going, user.

Doesn't NASA manipulate color on nearly ALL of their space photographs?

Gravity is another lie

not just that, space programs are a hoax.

youtube.com/watch?v=r6IZUq6v92I#t=33

But that's fucking wrong you retard

Invariance of the speed of light was well demonstrated by the Michelson-Morey experiment, which was the major result disproving Luminous Aether theory.

Don't fucking talk about shit you don't understand

I fully agree on the ozone layer and global warming hoaxes. This is an attack on Western industry to get a world government, when the real polluters are shitskins. Led the Goldsmith family and Goldman Sachs.
I can agree on the Higgs Boson hoax, based on Miles Mathis' critique (milesmathis.com/higgs2.pdf).
Didn't know about the rest. Sounds legit.
You forgot about Zika - to justify abortion laws in Latin America, and HIV - was meant to deflect guilt from the sleazy bathhouse gays onto heterosexuals.

by the way, is there any website to grasp the latest aryan alternative theories in science? well I suppose there's the fear of being stolen or not paid, but this is 2016, the big online crowd of antisemites will always defend their fellow geniuses.

you won't get the (((nobel prize)))

could you elaborate

i believe it.
After confirming shadow governments, Shillery being the most untouched personof the law after her horrible crimes, meme magik, Overton window moving this much in less than a year, im willing to accept this.

The Michelson-Morley experiment gave a null result for the presence of an aether wind. Hendrik Lorentz formulated his "Lorentz Aether Theory" based on the results of Michelson-Morley. Einstein didn't propose the abandonment of the aether until many decades after MM, and even then most physicists went to their deaths denying Einstein's ideas.

If you think Michelson-Morley disproved the aether or showed constant c in all frames, you are very poorly informed on the matter. Even university physics programs won't teach that.

BTW check out Sagnac's interferometer if you want your mind blown - moving the apparatus causes a detectable wind.

What is the most efficient way of removing the jew now?

What is the most efficient way of removing the jew now?

Great captcha, well done. Holy shit, get it together.

You had me really intrigued with this post chain until this line, I went ahead to see if Schrödinger really was a Third Reich supporter since I never heard this claim before and went to kikepedia first for ease of access.
I immediately found the lines and I quote one "had problems because of his flight from Germany in 1933 and his known opposition to Nazism." but I didn't stop there. I don't trust kikepedia for details one bit so I looked up the source for this claim.

It sources a book called "Models and Modelers of Hydrogen" on page 147. Unfortunately I can't check what the sources for this particular book are because the preview on google cuts right before the annotations for that chapter and I can't find a pirate copy anywhere. Buying it is out of question because it costs 80 fucking euros.

I ended up googling this claim and supposedly the school he was working on just got renamed to an Adolf Hitler school and I can't find absolutely anything on whatever Third Reich support letter he wrote.

Unless you provide an alternate (preferably better) source, you lost all your credibility in my eyes.

I'm gonna wait though, who knows maybe you can source your shit.

Here's that shitty meme again. Oldest thread in the catalog is some shitty LARP thread from the 19th, how dare OP slide that down a slot to have a philosophical discussion! God forbid we have a discussion that isn't just about the US election, who will think of the super important threads that are already stickied and slide-proof? Throw yourself off a tall building you filthy anti-intellectual kike.

>>>/gamergatehq/

That is one smug galaxy cluster.

No you're right, the Michelson Morey Experiment alone does not disprove aether, that was shorthand.

The MM experiment required a dragged aether while other experiments (Fizeau specifically) required a stationary ether. Contradictory results are quite faux pas for a hypothesis.

By the time you get to Lorentz Aether Theory, you have a theory that is essentially special relativity (it has all the bells and whistles, Lorentz Transformations, No absolute space or time, time dilation, and length contraction) but with an added undetectable stationary aether. While that aether makes sense as an an artifact of its time - in the late 19th century everyone exclusively believed in the wave model of light, and waves understandably leave mediums wanting - its wholly unnecessary since the explanation of the photoelectric effect and the vindication of Newton's particle theory of light. I prefer to subscribe to Occam's Razor.

I don't understand why you bring up the Sagnac effect. It's well understood, has practical uses in modern technology, and ACTIVELY DEPENDS on the INVARIANCE OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT IN DIFFERENT INERTIAL FRAMES OF REFERENCE, which is exactly what you're trying to disprove for some bizzare reason.

They taught me that plasma was just gas that is more heated, or something.

Absolutely not, even Sagnac proposed it as a demonstration of the existence of the aether. Of course, if you are honest about all of this, you realize that special relativity depends on being mathematically and observationally equivalent, and there is a mathematically valid interpretation for Sagnac in both systems.

Why is it bizarre to take issue with special relativity? What empirical evidence is there to suggest that special relativity is true? Why is it preferable to twist your mind to believe that light behaves in an incomprehensible, unobservable way that is counter to every other objective experience we have in the world?

Occam's razor has nothing to do with empirical science and shouldn't come up at all. Science is what we can observe and use in a predictive manner. If it doesn't fit, it belongs in another discipline. If you really want to drag Occam into it, how is the simpler explanation one that requires religious faith in unobservable phenomenon that is not seen anywhere else in nature?

What next? Flat Earth?

SAGE!

Reported.

Low energy.

clock-out was 9 hours ago, shill

Checked.

((x)^0.5)^0=1
what's the point of this post?

Well done.

The pupil of an old god dilates as it levels its gaze at its chosen who have let its plans get so close to unraveling.

I remember when comfy af threads with deep, well researched and sourced discussion lasted for months and months. before the flood of normalfags and memelords I could always count on those threads still being there if I wanted to later go back and look into a matter deeply. Now all those wonderful threads are lost in time. Like tears in rain.

Fuck you and fuck your dubs. I want my cozy/pol/ back.

...

nobody cares faggot

Clearly you don't know what breaking links is for and when it is enough.

polite sage for off topic post

So basically, Jews feed off of supressing Aryans and forcing them into a repetitive destructive cycle on one planet. If Aryans were to truly succeed in physics without disruption, they would use the aether to NOCLIP through space and essentially migrate across the galaxy with ease, leaving the Jews behind because they don't understand how it works. The concept of building civilizations would then be expanded to mean per-planet. Entire planets devoted to a single civilization. Your backyard would become an entire continent. The entirety of planet earth will remain as nothing more than a museum.

if gravity = mass
how come gravity affects light which has no mass?
check mate science majors

Need sources/explanation of mechanism. No cell is able to survive without oxygen for respiration and energy production, how would lack of it cause uncontrollable cell division under "survival mode" circumstances? What of lung cancer, absence of oxygen too?

The cognitive dissonance on you /x/ fags is astounding.

one result of using Holla Forums for 6 years is at the end you're certain of nothing anymore

...

And on top of that, there's the idea that all of this forbidden field stuff has already been explored in secret after it was subverted, and for some reason they think earth is not ready yet? What could possibly be the problem?

I would like to title your piece "Possibility frame matrix on a timeline"

Thank you.

Go on.

If you have a finite object, something has to limit it in order to make it finite, implying that something exists outside of that finite object. As this external object is interacting with the finite object in order to contain it, the external object ought to be considered part of the same existence as the finite object. So, therefore, the finite object does not constitute the total reality. It is also reasonable to assume that whenever there is a finite object, there must be an external object to define it as finite. This can be repeated ad infinitum. Therefore, infinity exists.

If you have a finite object, something has to limit it in order to make it finite, implying that something exists outside of that finite object. As this external object is interacting with the finite object in order to contain it, the external object ought to be considered part of the same existence as the finite object. So, therefore, the finite object does not constitute the total reality. It is also reasonable to assume that whenever there is a finite object, there must be an external object to define it as finite. This can be repeated ad infinitum. Therefore, infinity exists.

THIS

Maxwell's original equations are in a form called Quaternion. In this form the natural torques and rotations induced by magnetic forces are implicit in the equations. In the linear cartesian forms of the equation taught in school the torques and rotations cause enormous confusion with the dot product & cross product, curl and divergence.
You only have to look at current computer animation to see which form of mathematics they use to model the real world in computer code. I'll give you a hint it isn't Cartesian.

One cannot learn electrodynamics using only the simplified Ohm's law.

OP thinks

Okay Holla Forums, highschool bio-chem here last year of highschool 18 years old, soon will go into medicine or some shit

How do I get into physics as a side thing? Any good books to read for a beginner who has only the most basic knowledge about science?

you could teach the op

You would have a blast if you studied the Hermetic tradition, trust me.

I obviously mean the mathematical and physical sciences. I know a little bit more about maths than physics, but I want to learn more so that I can become better at scientific stuff.

Generally I never had any problems with understanding physics but I was kind of forced to abandon the subject and put it as a side thing because of my main subjects so I forgot a lot of stuff I kind of regret the fact that I did not remind myself the information that I have learned before, but I was too busy learning chemistry and biology to do that

Wait what

Not even a shill I remember plasma being mentioned in highschool Chemistry

Not in great detail but I knew it existed, also knew it existed from playing Halo as a kid

had a kek

I am holding a flashlight, standing on a cattle car moving at 100mph, and I shine the light at a jew hiding in the bushes next to the track. For the speed of light to be invariant, the light must move the same speed from my point of view, and for the jew, whereas if I were maybe throwing a net at him to trap him he would see it approaching with the combined speed of the train and how fast I threw it.

How can light behave this way without somehow receiving information at a distance about each observer and adjusting its properties accordingly?

I am holding a flashlight, standing on a cattle car moving at 100mph, and I shine the light at a jew hiding in the bushes next to the track. For the speed of light to be invariant, the light must move the same speed from my point of view, and for the jew, whereas if I were maybe throwing a net at him to trap him he would see it approaching with the combined speed of the train and how fast I threw it.

How can light behave this way without somehow receiving information at a distance about each observer and adjusting its properties accordingly?

This is trash.

this electric universe shit triggers me almost as much as the flat earth and hollow earth people.

It's slightly more offensive given they are using computers and satellites to communicate these ideas. Both which rely on quantum effects to actually work and be accurate.

this electric universe shit triggers me almost as much as the flat earth and hollow earth people.

It's slightly more offensive given they are using computers and satellites to communicate these ideas. Both which rely on quantum effects to actually work and be accurate.

Absolute stupidity. There is a rough post-hoc explanation for semiconductors that includes some QM principles, but first, it came years after their invention and widespread use, and second, it doesn't involve things like the copenhagen interpretation of QM or the invariance of the speed of light.

You are a fucking retard if you think quantum superposition must be a physically real state for your computer to work.

(((kheked)))

my-oc-math=(pic-related).jpg

I thought that the whole quaternion thing was a silly distraction, but then I got some books by Hamilton and Tait and went through the original systems used in the 19th century. It really comes from a fundamentally different school of thought and is part of a very different way of approaching physics, which consequently all of the physicists who did useful things were following.

...

Fine, prove it.

This is a completely metaphysical, religious, discussion that has nothing to do with science. You define a lot of musts and oughts that we know shit about, and naturally come to the conclusion you want to.

What if nothingness defines your finite object? You might object to the concept of nothingness, but it's as abstract and irrational as infinity. The truth is we know fuck all about how things work as you approach something like infinity because we can't observe it, we can't test it and rational people leave it with that.

This discussion is not new, it's a metaphysical discussion that have been going on for thousands of years. What's new these last hundred years is trying to circumvent the paradoxes inherent in these theoretical ideas and just boldly define some of them as true to fix some shit with their shit theories.

That's why modern math has so very little application outside the propaganda pieces you get about CERN and other intel strongholds. No evidence ever manifests though. Their theories are wrong, consistently produce wrong results and no inventions are forthcoming from them.

They are very apt for religion though, which is what is really coming out of these institutions, camouflaged as pop science.

I'm tired and as I said don't know too much about physics so I'm thinking right now might be completely wrong and be completely bullshit. But would they really notice the difference in any way? Even if the speed of light is constant, it is still far faster than the trolley. So the train speed would be irrelevant because the observer wouldn't be able to observe it.

You would have to use an another way of determining this to prove that light doesn't have a constant speed because even in your example, the difference between the speed of light combined with the speed of train and the speed of light if we assume that speed of light is a constant is too small for either you or the Jew to see any difference. And even if the difference was bigger, then that still would be unnoticeable for a human eye. Knowing that light has different properties from the net that you're throwing, it may act completely differently and you wouldn't be able to prove that it does act the same way as a typical physical body does in this instance. So I don't think you can base your explanation on this example. After all you can just say that there really is not difference, but we can't see that because our eyes are not fast enough to notice that.

I think there is a way to check if the light is truly constant but I might be completely wrong.

Is this the fringe thread? I wanted to ask something.
I have memories from a very young age of simple things, like being in my yard or cousin's house talking about stuff. The catch?
I remember those memories from a bird's eye view, a perspective away from my body.
Now this hasn't happened in some time, but I've always been incredibly curious about why I remember these so incredibly well. If I recall, these are some of the first ever memories of my life that flashed by before I gained full control of my memory.

I had the same thing, probably just your imagination though. Or maybe you're remembering something that happened in a dream. I have this problem where I sometimes have very realistic dreams+I am a sleepwalker and after a while I can't remember if things really happened or not.

Sage for offtopic.

I got clued in when I tried to figure out how a piece of equipment I was responsible for operating & maintaining / repairing worked. I'm an old electronics fag, tubes are no problem but a klystron doesn't work by the ordinary vacuum tube principles it uses a phenomenon known as velocity modulation which is kind of mind bending until you grasp that we haven't been taught electrodynamics correctly. I went to Purdue for EE when they still required engineering students to use slide rules for calculations

how does a laser or a microchip work?

Do you happen to have the titles of those books? I'm an EE student and I'd be interested in digging into them.

Gravity occurs to the interaction of mass with the spatial material medium

Time is the measurement of movements

Energy is movement

Gravity occurs to the interaction of mass with the spatial material medium

Time is the measurement of movements

Energy is movement

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_Hamiltonian_quaternions

WEW

This thread has really blown up. It's not an often talked about topic, but it is a very important one. One of (((their))) principle methods of control is the control of information. If you indoctrinate scientists into refusing to consider a luminiferous ether, they will waste decades upon decades of potential progress. The scientific community is religious on this aspect. Coming from a radical fundamentalist background, I know what wild and frenzied belief looks like. The scientists I've talked to have the same look in their eye when I tell them about the feasibility of the ether. They believe it's been disproven when it has not been disproven at all and is perfectly reasonable and acceptable. The implications and explanatory power of a luminiferous ether are far and beyond anything else offered. Luminiferous ether is a much more likely path toward a grand unified theory. The four fundamental forces are easily united. The luminiferous ether uses all the same math as the current accepted theories but for some reason the burden of proof rests on the ether's part? Even though they are equally legitimate, if ether isn't even more legitimate than special relativity? The attitude toward the ether is ludicrous and unscientific.

This thread has really blown up. It's not an often talked about topic, but it is a very important one. One of (((their))) principle methods of control is the control of information. If you indoctrinate scientists into refusing to consider a luminiferous ether, they will waste decades upon decades of potential progress. The scientific community is religious on this aspect. Coming from a radical fundamentalist background, I know what wild and frenzied belief looks like. The scientists I've talked to have the same look in their eye when I tell them about the feasibility of the ether. They believe it's been disproven when it has not been disproven at all and is perfectly reasonable and acceptable. The implications and explanatory power of a luminiferous ether are far and beyond anything else offered. Luminiferous ether is a much more likely path toward a grand unified theory. The four fundamental forces are easily united. The luminiferous ether uses all the same math as the current accepted theories but for some reason the burden of proof rests on the ether's part? Even though they are equally legitimate, if ether isn't even more legitimate than special relativity? The attitude toward the ether is ludicrous and unscientific.

(((They))) understand the aether just fine. With decades of secret research, which I upon no proof assume they have, they have antimatter bombs, plasma death rays (basically liquifies into atomic soup), molecular deconstruction rays, anti-gravity technology, visual and spatial cloaking technology. The implications of aether are mind-boggling. This is coming from someone who doesn't even fully understand its mechanic, but the possibilities for which it allows are undeniable. If any one person demonstrated the mechanic from the singular force into all that is reality and uploaded it to the internet, it would be potentially catastrophic. I would understand if (((they))) or anyone else, maybe the ayyyes, suppressed the knowledge for that sole reason. It's incredibly dangerous because it allows for almost the complete manipulation of matter. I'm not sure if it could build things easily, but hell if it can't break them apart.

Are you being funny? Light does have mass. It's an incredibly small amount, but it's certainly there, even if it's just a small bump in the plane of existence.

even Einstein admitted the æther exists

Sauce on the sun lotion claim?

Hey that's actually correct.

If you want an introduction, people seem to really like (((Richard Feynman)))'s lectures on physics. Just take everything with a grain of salt. Trust your intuition and observational/empirical evidence. Newton's laws of motion are priceless.

Alternately, "atoms should be shaped like a tree because they are part of the tree."

Spinoza proves it in the first part of his Ethics. I can't do a better job than he did. Think long and hard about what nothingness implies. The only way you can define something is by comparing it to something else. We define existence by saying it is opposed to nonexistence. The universe by saying it is opposed to nothingness. I don't know if you are capable of understanding, no offense, but it's a hard thing to understand. A universe defined by nothingness is not complete. If you understand nothingness, you understand everything. If nothingness defined a finite object, that would mean the finite object is actually infinite. You can never arrive at nothing from something and vice versa. The universe is one infinite eternal continuation of itself. All that's left to understand is the cycle through which it does this.

To clarify, the speed of light is presumed and measured as a constant in a 'vacuum', the vacuum of space. Other mediums, like the atmosphere and water do actually slow light down, iirc. When scientists perform experiments with light, they do so using a vacuum tube.

Look into false memories. Otherwise, keep yourself open to possibilities.

There is some sort of weird indoctrination going on with the physics community.

read some Heaviside and his thoughts on the subject.
>books.google.com/books?id=evl_AAAAMAAJ&pg=PA528&lpg=PA528&dq=Hamilton and Tait&source=bl&ots=XhTrXjsvw3&sig=zf0BkHwP-vhxmjv4XXVuuWZPuk0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUnsfw8f3PAhXM34MKHV_aB-EQ6AEIQzAI#v=onepage&q=Hamilton and Tait&f=false

Before you waste 3 hours of your life watching this guy, you should be aware of these stories he starts talking about after the 2 hour mark. Maybe this is the guy you want influencing your scientific positions, maybe not… but just be aware.

Dollard is a rambling course through the weird. Much of his ramblings are based on reality but you must take him with a grain of salt. He was persecuted and hounded by TPTB and if he were to tell the whole truth in a believable way he'd probably end up dead real quick. As long as he appears the crackpot he's tolerated.
The greentext quote you've got is in reference to his meeting Philo Farnsworth's son. And most likely they lit up an original Farnsworth Fusor which is a known fusion device and a source of neutrons.
fact is stranger than fiction

wrap your minds around this little conundrum of electrodynamics
Re:
Faraday disc generator
a. if you spin the disc but not the magnet you get current
b. if you spin the disc and the magnet you get current
c. if you spin the magnet but not the disc you get NO current

animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/homopolar.htm

Anaerobic glycolysis. It's about limited oxygen not 0 oxygen otherwise the cell would die you are correct… But cancer is a lot more complicated than lack of oxygen, it's just that they go hand in hand most of the time.

Anaerobic glycolysis. It's about limited oxygen not 0 oxygen otherwise the cell would die you are correct… But cancer is a lot more complicated than lack of oxygen, it's just that they go hand in hand most of the time.

GJ Holla Forumspoos.

ok ok wait i just thought up something in my brain.

So as our movement reaches the velocity of light, time slows down right. ok so, bear with me. so movement has a relationship with the passage of time right. so we know that the earth orbits around the sun and we are in constant movement around the milky way.

So I might as well presume that the milky way is moving at some km/s in space right. So perhaps, the time we perceive is the related to the velocity we are moving about in the galaxy.

ok ok wait i just thought up something in my brain.

So as our movement reaches the velocity of light, time slows down right. ok so, bear with me. so movement has a relationship with the passage of time right. so we know that the earth orbits around the sun and we are in constant movement around the milky way.

So I might as well presume that the milky way is moving at some km/s in space right. So perhaps, the time we perceive is the related to the velocity we are moving about in the galaxy.

Dinosaurs in oil is just a meme. Oil is formed from the building blocks in all organic material, so most of the shit we're digging up used to be forestry.

It spins because current exists independent of anything spinning, as a result of the electromagnetic potential stored in the battery that you just shorted through a wire and a metal-coated magnet.

The current moving in the wire produces a magnetic field that interacts with the permanent field of the magnet. The unique shape of the wire works as a DC commutator that effectively "reverses" the polarity at the right time to maintain motion without getting locked in a single position.

(chKEKed)

not even close user… you really do not understand electrodynamics, which is not surprising considering the way it is taught.

you got that part correct, but there is no reversal it's a faraday motor, a homopolar motor and it works a bit differently than a normal DC motor.
It's all part of the dumbing down of the population so they don't learn enough to be dangerous.

Could you rephrase that for dummies like myself?

pls respond

he's not correct, if you want to understand a bit more check out the animations of a Faraday / Homopolar generator at the link
>animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/homopolar.htm

I have my doubts about most space program stuff, but was just pointing out why believe that the color of the top of Saturn changed when nearly all of their space photos are admitted to be "color enhanced"?

Personally I'd disbelieve the entire thing about the hexagonal kippah that Saturn wears. It's unprovable and fits in WAY WAY too well with what the kabbalistic fucktards building a new religion for redditors would want.

Even half of the people here are content to point to unverifiable "evidence" from NASA, CERN, or whatnot as support for their arguments.

No he's right and I was wrong, it's been a long time since I last studied this stuff so I had normal DC motors stuck in my head. That site is slightly misleading because it pretends monopolar motors are conceptually easier to understand compared to regular motors, but it's actually not because unlike regular motors where you're thinking in terms of "same poles oppose, different poles attract", this thing is operating on a lower level with emf and torque and Lorentz force and you have to understand basic vectors.

The gist is this: battery+wire makes a circuit, current (I) moves from one end of the battery to the other. Current is made up of charges. When a charge (I) moves through a magnetic field (B), it will experience a force (F) in the directions shown. This relationship is at a maximum when they're perpendicular like this, and since the (I) in the horizontal parts of the wire are always perpendicular to the (B) no matter what rotation position it's in, there's always going to be an (F) – AND since the (I) is always moving in the same direction, then the (F) will always be pointing in the same direction.

Consistent force applied over time usually results in motion.

so much of electrodynamics is simple once you get the right framework. Modern education isn't very effective. Plus as OP has pointed out that over a century ago there was a concerted effort to obfuscate the true nature of the phenomena involved.

you now understand the Faraday motor in action as demonstrated by the gif.
Now consider the conundrum, three conditions
A. the disc spins, the magnet doesn't… emf produced.
B the disc and the magnet spin… emf produced.
C the magnet spins, the disc doesn't… NO emf… ???

is very enlightening about the properties of permanent magnets and the field they produce.

Faraday's Law states that the emf produced is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux. For the same reason the perpendicular current doesn't care about rotation – it's still perpendicular – the magnetic flux (that is the density of the magnetic fields) through the disc isn't changing. No rate of change, no emf, no current.

You would need to slide the magnet to make emf in the disc, not rotate it. Just like in this image, if you rotate the magnet but don't slide it then you won't get anything.

so explain why there is an emf when the disc and magnet spin together

The magnet doesn't need to spin to make emf if the disc is spinning. Your experiment has already proven that. Disc spinning is what produces emf, completely independent of magnet spinning. If anything case B is a red herring.

case B. & case C. illustrate that the magnetic field does not rotate with the magnet. As you pointed out it is the conductor (disc) moving in the magnetic field that produces the emf. I just find it fascinating that the field will rotate with the permanent magnet in two axis but not in the third.
Heaviside's simplifications of Maxwell's equations have led to many misunderstandings due to the cartesian system's treatment of rotations and torques that are inherent in magnetic fields

Well the field can be rotating, but the issue is that there is no physical phenomena associated with a stationary charge sitting in a rotating field (at least not one that's rotating on this axis). All of the phenomena are related to a change in that field's intensity or density – a change in magnetic flux.

Even our simplified, "not really how things are", way of visualizing the magnetic field as a bunch of discrete vector lines doesn't conflict with this. If you have 10 lines hitting the disc, and you rotate them, the density of lines hasn't changed one little bit. It's still 10 lines.

It's conceptually analogous to a flashlight shining on, say, a solar panel. No matter how much you rotate the flashlight, there is the exact same intensity of light on the solar panel – BUT if you move the light further away, or closer towards, or half off the side, everything changes.

We call it false vacuum today.

that's the point… you cannot rotate a magnetic field along that axis.
But we digress from OP's main point of the subversion of scientific knowledge. I'm not certain it was Jews specifically although I'm certain (((they))) were involved because the major reason for suppressing this knowledge of electrodynamics was money plain pure and simple.
The corporate power structures of energy, transportation and communication did not want the technological disruptions that proper understanding of electrodynamics would suddenly bring.

yep.

QM
youtube.com/watch?v=dEaecUuEqfc
Electricity
youtube.com/watch?v=TttHkDRuyZw
Gravity & Black Holes
youtube.com/watch?v=wRsGPq77X0Q
TRUMP knew 911
youtube.com/watch?v=23yfBWH8Hjk
youtube.com/watch?v=aoYXihwcp8c
GLOBAL HOAXING
youtube.com/watch?v=Gh-DNNIUjKU
youtube.com/watch?v=ExgKJpJyDXQ
youtube.com/watch?v=tbAgl7w_Vws

pastebin.com/3xsHaTFc

pastebin.com/iAWRb7Mx

Equal opportunity (((science)))

makezine.com/projects/make-36-boards/nuclear-fusor/

Probably made one of these.

How does the apple get up there to fall in the first place? This video explains that experimentally.

It's ionized gas. Basically atoms with more or fewer electrons.

Well, there's gravitational lensing for starters. More recently there's laser interferometers which are able to detect gravity waves. Also GPS satellites have to compensate for relativistic effects.

nothing to see here goy, it's real simple stuff.
Try getting a rational believable explanation of the source of Birkeland currents out of most physics teachers

If it's untestable, isn't it philosophy?

That's not saying much. Physics teachers usually can't even tell you how a plane flies.

isn't that just a crying shame.

Most people are so turned off by modern education they just don't care about advancing our understandings of the universe.

Darwin came up with the theory of evolution in response to a religious observation, and not a scientific observation. A religious observation that is easily answered by actually reading the Bible, which Darwin obviously never did. Hint: The world sucks because of Satan. Darwin's career was concerned with dismantling religion, and not actually furthering science. The theory of evolution was never scientific to begin with. It is a bullshit science that can never convince anyone of all of its assertions without goalpost moving and bullying dissidents into compliance or silence.

I always suspected the kikes blocking the advancement of human knowledge to further their greed and satanic idiocy. The recent discoveries in all fields from medical, chemical, physical and religious only confirm my suspicions. They must be eliminated as a species, they are the enemy of mankind.

Send them to their beloved Satan, where they all belong, along with all the rest of these sandnigger abominations. They are unworthy of life.

Read this:
en.metapedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein

Most jewish scientists are very scum, plagiarizing works, gaining entry into the scientific community by nepotism, peer-reviewing each-other's shitty works and so on.

The only jew I ever half-respected was Jack Kirby and that's because everything that man did was anti-jewish in a way (and he suffered a lot for it)

...

If we're talking about the real numbers -1 and -2, then it is true that -2 < -1, and it is also true that |-1| < |-2|.

You've confounded two concepts (the greater than relation and the magnitude of a number) into a single concept "bigger than".

Uh, holy shit. Have you seen these?:
youtube.com/watch?v=7eH6bsJcwgY
youtube.com/watch?v=nA1CeAbJhug

This kid is debunking the fuck out of plate tectonics. Look at his comments, there's some Jew spamming the fuck out of his videos trying to discredit the findings.

also gel and non-Neutonian fluid

Hello Axeman.

If any of you unironically believe in curving 'spacetime', you are actively denying that gravity exists and that weight scales aren't supposed to work.

'Spacetime' is bullshit.
The observation made with eclipses is actually the chromosphere's plasma refracting the light.

Mein neger

the video is great example of pseudo-scientific gibberish of the highest order.

the author doesn't understand what he's talking about.

There are no "versions" of the truth, OP. There is only the truth.

Physics is by far the most rigorously investigated and well-established observational science there is. Getting mad at the truth won't change a thing about it.

why is plasma dangerous thought territory?

I was taught in my school of its existence, we never delved into the details..

School was bullshit, but this was still mentioned. What about plasma is dangerous thought territory? Genuinely curious.

Notice the technological achievements of the Germans in a relatively short time, after they threw the Jews out of academia & engineering.

Who made Satan?
Who could have easily unmade Satan, if he wanted to?
Who could have simply put Satan to sleep?

Don't need a PhD in physics to understand that.

That's why so much well documented time and money was invested into research reactors to enrich U-235 and transmute U-238 into Pu-239.
That also explains criticality accidents like the Hirochi Ouchi incident, which had a solution of Uranium act as a reactor and run at power for almost a day.
It also explains why a cold water charge in a boiling water reactor creates a more violent reaction if the control rod is withdrawn fully than a water charge close to boiling temperature.
Denying that nuclear power exists is like denying that internal combustion engines exist.

And you've verified all that research. Not really, cause one can't, only insiders to it can. It's a closed system.

Actually nothing you cited relates to whether or not nuclear fission releases net positive energy. Nuclear fission and fusion are both real, demonstrable processes. The issue is that if e

Jesus. This thread is bananas. Didn't Weev make a video on this subject not too long ago by the way?

We need more /scipol/ threads tbh lad

It's borderline /x/-tier but I don't mind it personally. Honestly a bit sick of reading about Trump and e-mails.

ive worked around nuclear facilities (one that had a major accident) you are a ctr idiot poster

shiggydiggy

it's a damn shame the MODs let Space Escalator threads get trashed til he gave up

sattelites are bullshit. how often do you hear about them falling to earth? like, ever? also y'know how you're out looking at the moon and a sattelite flies infront of it? The moon is way outside the orbit range of sattelites, or so we're told. Gravity itself still isn't understood.

Or maybe you're some kind of freemason shill or even shiling from Israel, considering your choice of words in 'idiot poster'.

...

...

Shit like this is why no one takes you seriously, user.

Think about it more.

The only problem is that the physics community unduly dismisses other theories (though admittedly a lot of them are shit) while clinging to certain theories that are just as fundamentally baseless.

lurk more before you post.

The electromagnetic field is curving the surface of space/time as it travels to form a self discrete packet. The oscillation of the electromagnetic property of this packet creates a phased locality which in turn produces a wave.

If you express a photon as a geometric body of dynamic shape you will find the answer is relative to the Riemann Zeta equation ζ(s). In order to solve this concept of geometry first you must comprehend the expression of space, time, entropy and propagation.

x^2(γ)Φ

I realize you're a ways down this path already. You may not realize it yet, but the nature of a wavelength in a photon is relative to the energy of the photon. The higher the energy, the smaller the wavelength. The relative energy of the wavelength is the property which defines the rate of oscillation due to relativistic curvature of space.

The higher the energy of the photon, the greater the spatial deformation of the stable packet. The actual rate of oscillation is a constant and the rate of spatial curvature per unit of energy is as well. By applying this knowledge to create a discrete packet of space and using the Riemann Zeta distribution, you can use the angular moment to derive the wavelength of a given energy propagating in a direction from a point of origin while understanding the oscillation of the electromagnetic field within the discrete space.

Holla Forums: Never heard of the Jew-Cube meme before.

sometimes I'll think I'm smart and then read threads like this. ive got no idea what's going on

Funny enough WW2 wasn't extrapolated on heavily in my school, I don't even think the shoah was mentioned
WW1 was covered more than WW2, then again I guess it's because of the ANZACs

Don't worry, no one else does either.

...

...

I can never tell if he's insane, a genius, or just full of shit and having a laugh

This video is fucking stupid. It claims that tunneling is the reason that we are reaching size constraints in semiconductors, when that is patently false. The issue is that lithography techniques to etch the features on a microchip are running up against the wavelength of the light used in the process, and some of the materials applied to basic structures are limited by the size of the atoms of the materials used.

Also that video still fails to show a real life quantum computer, so not sure why you posted it as a response to

It's a shame that Space Escalator threads were full of reddit and scientificamerican.com tier bullshit that never amounts to anything except fragments of a new religion

Because "God can do literally everything" is and always was a subversive meme. Satan is a deceiver and a coward who works his will through men, and never actually risks his own neck. This is a 1:1 parallel to the Jews. It is men that must cast out Satan, because it is from men where Satan gets his power, and God cannot magically fix everything without violating His gift to men of free choice and reasoning. Hence why the Bible mentions Jesus being the Son of man far more often than being the Son of God, because Christ's role as a man in cleansing the world of sin is more powerful than his role as the Son of God.

So… god fucked himself?

Sounds like you really hate God for giving you the ability to reason. Because you sure are trying hard to belittle Him.

He's a flat earth shill, as he comes from the same stable/works the same agenda as Sinead Mccarthy.
Video related.

(in case it wasn't obvious who started this thread)

youtube.com/watch?v=NbzWYjVrvpI

Shit on him all you want but don't make things up. He's not a flat earther and is in no way connected to Sinhead.

How can one have such religious devotion to the tenets of jewish physics that he takes japs with burned skin as proof of nuclear weapons?

...

(Checked)
In my anecdotal experience that is entirely true about chinks. There's a reason we call them Rice Calculators.

I've always known psychology was a farce. The academic's in the field were clowns of scientific endeavor and thought.

And now I'm hearing people speak out against the mainstream sciences. Why, this reminds me this man's work of dissecting the jewish/intelligence agencies work:

mileswmathis.com/updates.html

Whether or not he's right about all his claims, his central point is powerfully true; human and western society is and has been ruled by intelligence agencies. His research of European history and its endless subversion by jewish secret societies is a hard pill to swallow.

true, but interestingly, 1st generation light bulbs were actually longer lasting than the crap we have now. they purposely designed light bulbs to be shit so people would have to buy more of them. somewhat off topic i know, but your logic has a flaw: technology doesn't always necessarily improve

milesmathis.com/updates.html
if you really want to see some salt, link his science page. as soon as knowitalls see the pi=4 they blow a gasket, without even considering the article (ill give you a clue, pi does equal 3.14 in static situations, in systems of movement however…)

I haven't read this whole thread but I presume it has its share of misinformation. Just don't scare away the uninitiated with miles assertion about pi.

I really like Mathis' stuff. I don't usually agree with his proposed alternative answers to physics questions, but I really like some of the angles from which he attacks various aspects of modern physics.

haha, fair enough. however, if they are mature enough to at least consider it then they are worth actually talking to, in my mind. did you see the video experiments that show it in action?

I'm not gifted or invested in scientific testing. I value his work for its enlightenment of how much intelligence agencies control our society, through all of its layers.

It doesn't matter if he's right or wrong about pi, what matters is his work at dissecting western societal engineering.

That is basically what the Pope said about two years ago.
They where shocked, shocked! I tell you.

No attractive forces is an interesting idea. How about 'Van der Waals' force.
The supposed to be an attractive force between molecules to explain things such as friction between materials and differences in melting/boiling points in pure compounds.

I always found it amusing that the 4 states of matter could be linked to one of each sterotypical element you see in videogames and such.

Plasma - Fire
Gas - Air
Liquid - Water
Solid - Earth

It's a dream to be able to solve even one of the unsolved problems in physics but getting funding for anything is such a pain. I was born during the wrong era, Nazi Germany funded science to death like it should have been.

One of the most studied subject in chinese 'higher education' schools.
Used a lot in modern IC & nano development.

Check the kike furries for links to journals.

was an attempt to determine if light was affected by an ether by measuring the speed of light in perpendicular directions. It seemed that there was no difference in speed and from this it was assumed that there was either
1) no ether.
2) ether that was not interacting with light.
3) ether that was static or uniform.
4) 2 & 3.

Though what was taught was 1) no ether, and light moved in a vacuum and at a constant speed 'c'.

Even thought 2,3 or 4 are possible conclusions.

I'm not going all flat-earth here, but another possibility is that the earth is the preferred reference frame for the ether. Not that MM suggests that, but it is yet another scenario that would be consistent with the results of the experiment.

Poster of >>799578 here. That's some dense kek, user. Thank you for your reply. I wasn't familiar with the Riemann Zeta equation. I'd love if you expounded a bit on what you're saying. I get that gamma has more energy and a smaller/shorter wavelength while radio waves are long and have less energy. On the other hand, it's like they all have the same energy, it's just a function of time/space. I'm a bit tired right now so maybe not making much sense. Thanks again.

Those comments on the black hole video are depressing.

no goy all is well go back to sleep
i guess goy u gonna have to go learn math to prove jew wrong
DOO IT

Exactly the point of this thread. No one knows what's going on because (((scientists))) have hidden and obscured knowledge and accurate perspectives.

However much the 'science' of psychology is false, the idea of psychology is true. If the idea of human minds having tendencies wasn't real, how could people be brainwashed? What's the whole argument against psychology anyway?

Attractive forces are simply not possible. The closest you could get to an attractive force is a force that creates a vacuum, but it would still be doing this by pushing outwards, like inflating a balloon mechanically without air from the inside. I am open to there being an attractive force, but I've seen no evidence for one. Every proposed attractive force can be just as easily and legitimately seen as an attractive effect from a repulsive force. We know that repulsive forces exist, inertia essentially, but there is no inertial counterpart. There isn't an opposite to inertia. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction implies, in my mind, a repulsive force, because where in the universe or existence could a vacuum manifest itself without a repulsive force causing it?

I don't know what that picture is trying to say, but ether composes mass, it doesn't just push against it. A separate ether doesn't work. The ether has to be the foundational entity of the universe. Mass = concentrated ether.

Holla Forums is filled with paranoid schizophrenics. When will you guys start dedicating your autism to actual material and degeneracy instead of focusing on

You can be a force for good Holla Forums, but you gotta look at yourself and know when you have lost a fight. It's getting old.

Kill yourself.

In the work mentioned in the OP "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field" Maxwell supposes that something about the aether's interaction with mass creates the scenario that large distances from any massive bodies reflect a higher energy state. He doesn't go so far as to speculate what the particular details of interaction with the medium are that lead to this, and says it requires some experimental work. Interesting food for thought though.

We get it, you don't understand any of this stuff well enough to engage in criticism of it.

ayo u whiteys kno black hole n sciants b racis n shiiet?

youtube.com/watch?v=yJtGKb_bZyc

youtube.com/watch?v=h-akk3gog34

youtube.com/watch?v=tYz4-HqOtac

youtube.com/watch?v=oc1zGRUPztc

youtube.com/watch?v=Hu2rluUb8ck

youtube.com/watch?v=HRhIwNrW1Zw

youtube.com/watch?v=GtECHTVhBVU

fuk whitey n fuk sciants!!

The cuck mods even ban for saying things like
On a saged post.

Between muh joos, tha CTR and pretending James O'queef has done anything relevant for this election I might as well be on Reddit

The unsolved physics problems are hardly impossible. You want difficult? Try to solve the unsolved math problems.

The current argument against ether is a total straw-man. I find it hard to believe that those who aren't brainwashed truly can't conceive a 'static' or constant ether. If you're falling in a closed box, how can you measure how fast you're falling? You can't. You can't even know if you're falling, or what the real gravity is, if in a controlled descent. We don't have an external reference frame so of course we can't detect the basis of reality. Everything we use to try to detect it is made of the thing itself. Idk about the constant speed thing though. There is at least ONE constant in the universe, whatever it is.

Ether has no preferred reference frame.

A lot can be understood without math. Math is only written proof of the obvious. We don't need math to know that things fall to the earth. We don't need math to know that fire is hot. Math merely translates these truths into a different form, a bit like an answer key. As for proof, special relativity has yet to supply any. The competing theories of Special Relativity and Aether both use the same math and equations.

I'm also surprised this thread hasn't died yet. Why don't you go show the alt-right that Hitler had high opinions of the Japs and the Arabs and even named some jews honorary Aryans? Talking about being a force for good, they can't even accept what nationalism actually means.

Yes, Maxwell is right. Concentrated ether/mass does something (still working on it) that results in a lower energy output. Vast oversimplification on my part but it will do. The higher energy state away from mass then pushes matter towards the mass body due to the imbalance of three dimensional forces from opposing sides. Like so -10>-10>-10>O-9>-9>-9>-o

been posting 'round these parts for years user and the magical jewish red pill has yet to come. Power is concentated in the hands of a kabal that cares little for each others faith or ethnicity as long as they can attain more power. Have those of Jewish descent occasionally had more impact then the native populations? Of course, but you can easily make the same argument about the Irish.

On the contrary, ether would almost certainly be the preferred reference frame. I worded that poorly though in my last post, I should have said "The earth is at rest with respect to the ether, which is the preferred reference frame."

Get back to me when potato niggers manage to get the whole world indebted to their central banks.

I agree with "ether is the preferred reference frame." That makes more sense. Still, no one thing can accurately be said to be at rest or motion in relation to something else in regards to the ether. Subjectively, you can frame the whole universe around any one point, like the earth or center of the milky way. Either way of looking at is accurate in a bizarre way, no matter how contradictory, because of ether's limitless nature. Cray stuff user.

How many potatoes does it take to kill an Irishman?
——Zero——-

Banks were an Italian thing, the Federal reserve was founded by congress, and the IMF is currently headed by a Frenchwoman. The IMF holds a ton of the world's debt, so why isn't the head a kike?

the proof is incredibly simple, get 2 steel balls, and 2 clear flexible plastic tubes, curl one into a circle (not a perfect one, the ball has to come into it). this circular tube will be 3.14r long. then get another tube, which is left straight, make it 4r long, and put a marking at 3.14 length. roll both balls down indentical ramps so they are at the same velocity, and they enter the tubes at the same time. the ball that goes through the circular tube will travel 3.14r in the time it takes the straight tube ball to travel 4r.

put markings on the circular tube at 1/4 intervals, and markings on the straight tube at each 1r and you will see that the ball going around the circle is actually taking the same time to travel less distance than the ball going through a straight path.

...

if you do the experiment, you will see its not me saying it, it's physics that is saying it. the misunderstanding of pi is one of the reasons we aren't getting anywhere in physics

I'd like to see what would happen at 2pi and 3pi. They would be 8 and 12 respectively right?

GPS wouldn't work without an understanding if time dilation and length contraction; it's actually a long enough distance between the earth and satellites that a person's position would be read as several miles away from where they actually were.

Besides that and space missions, the only thing I can think of is how CRTs had to be calibrated because the particles coming out of them were fast enough to have length contraction.

As far as QM goes, I mostly agree. The majority of modern physics is based upon an abstract mathematical framework that requires what is effectively a dual doctorate in math and physics. I went through 3 years of physics undergrad before swapping to engineering, mostly because of how impractical learning modern physics is. That being said, QM motivates Solid State Mechanics which explain how transistors work, and is the basis of our ability to create progressively more compact computers; but that's basically the only application of it.

Dark Matter/Energy is literally just the aether theory rebranded. Aether was a means of explaining time dilation and to a lesser extent black body radiation. The latter was explained to a point with classical physics, and was resolved with the introduction of a constant by Max Planck. This in turn motivated the Schrodinger wave equation, which is the backbone of modern physics. The former, the energy latent to the fabric of reality, is more or less the same as Dark Energy.

Part of my physics curriculum involved reviewing the history of physics and effectively following through the major steps that were taken to revolutionize our understanding of how things work. I talked to my modern physics professors, and they admitted that there are a body of physicists today that are proponents of aether theory still, and that it's not an implausible model; just that the currently accepted one is more flushed out.

2pi as in two turns of the flexible tube? yes it would be 8r in the straight tube

It is quite well established that GPS doesn't use SR in its calculations. A government sponsored paper from the 1990s demonstrates that not only is it not necessary, but actually introduces a slight error. You need to brush up on the topic beyond the haphazard blurbs thrown around in Google results.

Semiconductors were not only developed independently (and accidentally) of quantum mechanics, but they absolutely do not depend on the non-empirical areas of QM that come from jews such as the idea that superposition is a physically real state.

The 'darkies' are not aether, but rather fudge factors to correct the unpredictable motion of distant stellar bodies so they fall in line with the current physics orthodoxy.

...

Please cite your source on the paper, I'd be happy to read it.
If you read my post you may have seen that I went through the bulk of a physics undergrad; I realize that this is an anonymous chinese cartoon board, but I don't see why we can't maintain civility.
Part of my modern physics courses were working out the position difference in gps based upon classical and relativistic models, and there was significant error.

Superposition isn't magic, I'll give an analogy. Move close to your screen: you see pixels. Move away from your screen: you see an image. It's the same idea; based on your frame of reference a photon can be either. I understand the motivation for it, but I don't entirely agree with it as the end all explanation.

You can argue semantics, but they seek to resolve similar things similar ways.

There's definitely a lot that needs to be explained still, and it's not like what we have is indisputable fact. We still don't have a unified model of physics, and it aether may very well be a part of it.

One of the things that is sort of bullshit is the lightyear long stick paradox. Say you could make an infinitely dense stick of one atom thickness, and poke it. Congratulations, you just violated QM.

Another one is the uncertainty principle: by knowing the position of a particle you can't know the momentum and vice versa. Tracking a particle between two points immediately gives all other kinematic data (assuming you know the mass).

I wasn't being uncivil, I was plainly stating that you are speaking with very limited knowledge on the topic. I happen to have well beyond three years of undergrad physics under my belt, and know that what is covered on the topic in that time will not even come close to honestly assessing GPS.

The paper, btw, is my.mixtape.moe/mtjhye.pdf

The primary cause of confusion in the GPS question is that most people are under the false assumption that GPS receivers are tracking local time and comparing that to the time stamps received from the satellites. In reality, GPS receivers simply compare the difference between a minimum of four signals, which negates the need to correct local time.

You're right, superposition isn't magic, its a mathematical expression of observational limitations before measurement of particular qualities of a small object. The jewish try to sell superposition as a physically real state as opposed to a mathematical artifact, when in fact there is absolutely no empirical evidence to suggest that is the case. In fact, the famous and famously misunderstood Schrodinger's cat scenario was originally presented as an argument that superposition was not a physically real state.

This isn't an issue of semantics, they are dramatically different things.

Then how do you explain slinkies falling?
Look it up on youtube. A stretched slinky would experience a push force from top and contract before it falls down.
Gravity is a scam to pin you down the green meme.
What's the green meme? A dystopian meme where we live in a spherical oblique spheroid or what ever the fuck NASA claims it to be where thousands of mega blackholes are waiting to suck all your retarded planet while the planet is suffering "Global Warming" so we have to thrive in Mars that is experiencing much worse than "Global Warming" so "Please fund NASA 2020 we need $6 000 000 billion to make a rocket that explodes during takeoff, ha! rocket science bitches!"

They just kike you american idiots. All your taxes go to NASA zeroG and underwater videos and photoshopped CGI (bonus for photoshop EXIF save-modified tags). Look it up on youtube. There's bubbles caught floating in your "space live streams." I think the vids were already removed, typical kike-owned youtube.

Thanks. Just read up to the initial proof of Doppler shift being independent of the Lorrentz factor. That's pretty neat.

It's nice to see people who take education seriously here, it sometimes feels like it's not that common. If you'd be up for talking over skype/conventional email I made a throwaway: [email protected]/* */

1.123
is almost 1.125= 1 and 1/8 = 9/8
~= 9/8 R^2 area of pentacle

I remember when we used to have space elevator threads, now we have this garbage. Great.

You literally read this in a fictional book (Angels and Demons) and are trying to pass it off as truth (I heard so and and so)

Go fuck yourself retard. Anti-matter exists, otherwise something like PET imaging would not work

You literally read this in a fictional book (Angels and Demons) and are trying to pass it off as truth (I heard so and and so)

Go fuck yourself retard. Anti-matter exists, otherwise something like PET imaging would not work.

You literally read this in a fictional book (Angels and Demons) and are trying to pass it off as truth (I heard so and and so).

Go fuck yourself retard. Anti-matter exists, otherwise something like PET imaging would not work.