Green Party leaders doxxed
This article presents evidence linking Jill Stein's running mate, Ajamu Baraka, directly to Soros, and exposes their mutual agenda.
It also contains considerable amounts of personal information on the Green Party leaders, members and donors.
Large trolling campaign incoming?
Other urls found in this thread:
It's "dox", as in "Green party leaders doxed."
t. /baph/ oldfag
… and?
Jill (((Stein))) has been BTFO of Killary - outright telling people not to vote for her.
Soros has certainly been supporting the globalist glowbull worming scam but this particular cunt seems to be under her own steam.
I don't understand though. Supporting Jill Stein takes votes away from Clinton, so why wouldn't they just ignore them as they disappear into obscurity? The only reason I can think of is bribing someone to actively sabotage her campaign.
thank you
Read up the part about the NGOs, they're actively influencing the government without ever being elected. It's just faux-grassroots, but the have real influence. Stein's just another piece in that puzzle. If she ever became a factor to be reckoned with in the election, I imagine they'd very quickly find a way to (((shut it down)))….
So the not so subtle plan B if Hillary gets a heart attack is to accident Stein so Baraka can take Barack's job as Soros' pet nigger.
Maybe to attract Bernout faggots from voting Trump.
I have some respect for Stein, even though she's a communist kike, she speaks a lot of truths on Twitter?
I think Jill is legit and just wants to help yet misguided but Ajamu is definitely a Soros henchman.
...
This strikes to the heart of it.
The first thing that you have to understand is that (((they))) do not have an instinctual urge to fulfill the plans of dominating the world. They average (((one))) owning a kosher deli in the streets of New York has about as much of a link to George Soros and the Rothschilds as any of us do. That one of them could find a way to notoriety without the backing of (((their))) "betters" is not impossible. Jill Stein seems an example of that. She herself has her own objectives, which in many respects align with (((them))), and in some respects diverge. She is for the most part an enemy to them just as we are. Is she our friend? No. But depending on the cycle, people like her may lean towards our side or (((their))) side.
The second thing is that controlling the head of a movement is only a rare way of operating in things. If you actually look into how the FBI or CIA deal with organizations, they never infiltrate and stick a man at the direct top. You see, the founder of a movement is nearly always an incorruptible figure with "purer" objectives. It would make no sense to subvert then. So what they do is get someone in who the founder is able to trust. This person waits in the shadows, becoming respected as a right-hand and possible successor to the leadership, deceiving the members of the organization and the head as well. Should that organization ever pose a threat, the founder is killed, and the falsely grieving infiltrator takes the stage, leading the movement, and either driving it into the ground or diverting it away from its original purpose. You can see what has happened with the Libertarian party - their so-called leaders have no interest in actual libertarian policies. If Jill Stein ever looked like she had a chance at getting elevated, they would find a way to dispose of her, and put a group of puppets in charge.
The reason why Trump got as far as he did is because that was exactly what (((they))) expected him to do. (((They)) saw him as the subversive tool into the Republican party to help weaken it, guaranteeing the win for Hillary. This was a mistake - they already owned the GOP, after all. Why put on a dramatic show? So they let Trump get too far along, and by then, they could no longer pull back. If they had just given him the Ron Paul treatment and ignored him, this election would have swung in a very different direction. In a way, you can thank our enemies for every success Trump has had.
Among many other things, the Podesta leaks have informed us how fragmented the political camps are at the elected government official level. They may be all financed by the same kikes, but there are still clear factions and differences of opinion.
Example: Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime advisor to the Clinton's, caused the Hillary campaign some grief because he and his son supported the BDS movement and were scaring away the jew donors.
I find it plausible that Jill Stein is sincere, if only because Nader was actually redpilled on Israel. He did a speech once upon a time, I think during the 2004 campaign, about the USS Liberty incident. I do wonder how Soros will respond to Jill shitting on Hillary, though.
Come the fuck on, man.
I don't get it.
She oppose war, oppose lsrael and even endorse Trump over Killary.
Yearh, right.
Why would we ever assume the jews are playing both sides? That surely never happens^^
Greens aren't really a threat. If anything they take ex bernout and killary votes. They certainly aren't stealing Trump votes. I'd know, I voted green 4 years ago, then got redpilled around a year ago, die hard Trump supporter now.
oy vey, the spelling is so triggering^^
glad to see there's other /baph/oles still alive and kicking
yeah, I've been wondering about that.
baph's dead, anonymous pozzed…what happened?
for some reason, people here are actually defending (((Stein)))….guys, anything exposing Soros as the cancer he is will have a net negative effect on Clinton as well. This is an opportunity.
If you were a (((world government))), would you really want groups like that around?
...
we're on irc now
irc.poundan.us
6697 ssl
6667 without
I recognize your posting style and I'm getting really tired of you spreading misinfo about Trump. The only reason they boosted Trump was to push Rubio/Bush further right as they were convinced one of them would win regardless and they thought this would make things easier on them in the general. Go fucking read the goddamned email already, I've told you this multiple times and yet you still keep spreading the same disinfo.
You're right about Stein though.
Its not difficult to understand, her running mate is owned just as Pence is.
noice job sparta, you forgot to tell the shills which room
we're in #anus btw
GOODBYE SUBVERSIVE GOBLINS
FORGOT TO LINK YOUR BULLSHIT LMAO
>>>/trs/
>>>/polmeta/12189
Indeed. Stein is actually somewhat repilled in the conspiracy sense. She's drank the koolaid on man made, CO2 based climate change, which is the whole reason for the financing of movements like the Green Party by power figures like Soros, which is probably why they see her as useful and continue to employ her despite her somewhat anti-status quo, conspiratorial mindset. The best outcome of this would be for Stein to wake up to the fact that the Green Party, as the political representative of the man-made-CO2-climate-change narrative, is actually a power consolidation agenda being run by people like Soros, and for her to take all her followers with her further towards the truth.
fuck off cuckservative
enjoying the salary from the heritage foundation?
Well hello there newfriend. I like how you said "cucksevative", that's how I can tell you're a legit oldfag who represents the core ideology of the board.
Sometimes I wish this site would go a little lighter on the autism…
now we've derailed twice, once with some petty squabble about TRS, then with global warming.
All I intended was getting some dirt on Soros out there….get to social media, hijack #NoDAPL and their other silly little hashtags, and post a link:archive.is
That's all I'm suggesting, naming the jew.
Oy vey, think of the ideological purity, goyim! That's more important than forming a coherent movement that could actually change something….
doxing some harmless old hippy candidate…stay classy, pol.
Stein most likely doesn't care for Soros or his politics, but that won't stop Soros and his ilk from controlling those that surround her. She's a kike, but having dealt with her in person I don't believe she's a subversive kike. She's just another useful idiot who happens to be a kike.
Surprise, surprise.
I'm a former Green. I got tired of the diversity angle and skeptical of the more socialist take on economics, plus Trump came along and surprised me by taking on the whole establishment. I imagine most Greens would be unhappy to be linked to Soros or to terrorism. Most of the Greens I've known are pretty savvy when it comes to conspiracy and would deeply resent being manipulated by a globalist financier. The hard part would be persuading them that Ajamu Baraka has knowingly been a Soros agent and/or ally of terrorists. Coming on too strong with the "anti-American" angle is likely to make Greens double down; they're used to being accused of that by establishment types.
Tendrils will be in everything till jews are permanently removed.
Nothing is beyond Holla Forums's reach. Doesn't mean we care about this granny's personal info though. The Soros connection is more of an issue however.
...
wh Jill Stein though, of all people?
GOODBYE TRS
jack fell down
and broke his crown
and jill came tumbling after
trs is good you faggot stop being autistic
Because she is a Jew and an enemy and stands against most of what we believe in.
But focusing on her does seem like a waste at the moment. She's doing more good than harm for us in this election and the election is priority number one at the moment.
Put this in the back pocket for later. There will be plenty of time for people like her.
Your foreigness is showing. GTFO
well, I think that is something we can all agree on…
...
bump