Sick fuck curses godemperor Noam

And yet, judging from your flag, you probably believe such things as "Deconstruction" which is nothing more than Jewish kabbalah applied to literature, specifically its assertion that all existence is a product of language and all language is inherently broken aside from the sacred language of God.

archive.is/w1Pz9

newkabbalah.com/JDK.pdf

SJW calls to "deconstruct X" are nothing more than mysticism given their emphasis on changing language and what's in the mind in order to change reality. That's supposed to be legit?

ur bad at leftism tbqh famalam

Have you actually read him? He doesn't just name-drop atrocities he actually goes into the reasons behind policy decisions.

You're grasping at straws there, Emma. It's pretty clear Chomsky does not give comprehensive analyses as to why and how imperialism and hegemony actually work. He gives a nice overview of how imperialism is evil but aside from that he's useless and there are authors who are much better on the subject.

No. Again, straws.

He loves using tu quoque fallacies. I honestly think Lenin explains imperialism much better.

Here's the fucking thing lads. Ultimately he peddles the "incompetent empire" theory, which is despicable apologism for the acts of imperialist nations. Parenti covers the same subject area, but much better.

There's a reason the MSM gives Chomsky a platform for his views - because they are liberal friendly.

In what context?

LOL

The entire basis for his position is that power over others is inherently unjustified. You can't get less apologetic than that.

Are you fucking kidding me? You cannot get a more meticulous analysis of imperialism than Chomsky without personally browsing through State department documents.

This so much

Is this legit?

Upvoted!

Check em

...

damn, shes ugly

Chomsky fans are worse than Stalin fanboys hands down.

Fundie bitch is mad Chomsky talks shit about Israel.
REEE harder.

Noam Chomsky is the benevolent ray emitting proletarian sun that Mao puffed himself up to be but never was. Chomsky is liberation and communism in human form, he is divinity.

I can't imagine what how deranged, twisted, and diseased your mental state must be to wish harm upon this selfless saint-like Liberator. Every word from his lips is a blessing and a gift. Comrade Chavez (PBUH) was martyred for the Chomskyan cause, we must be as willing and ready to do so as he was.

Chomsky is basically worthless aside from being a mouthpiece for anarchism. His actual views are totally archaic

Screencapped.

So much for "no gods no masters".

Kill yourself.

Daily reminder the Spanish Anarchists were pretty hard on free speech, and ANTIFA is no different.

Fuck off liberal scum. I don't support your retarded rights discourse platitudes.

t. white liberal

Emma Goldman

Wew just BTFO'd you didn't I?

Every fucking post you make just exudes angsty teenage LARPer.

Hi, it appears you are attempting to be racist. Would you like /r/socialism to help you with that?

Same to the rest of Holla Forums famrade ;^)

Goldman =/= CNT/FAI

Yet they both claim to be anarchists. There seems to be a flaw in your argumentum ad verecundiam.

Who else should we restrict free speech to? I mean Nazis aren't the only bad guys.

"Everyone who doesn't agree with me avout everything".

I never said all anarchists oppose free speech, idiot.

Oh boy.

Yes but I think we can safely assume any ideology that advocates genociding millions of people should be shut the fuck down.

...

...

Hello fascist enabler

It is you who is the fascist enabler.

Nazis prey on the underlying fears and asumptions of a certain subset of the population. Trying to censor them doesn't change the underlying material conditions that allow their beliefs to spread.

This is fucking hilarious. 10/10

He's right on Israel and Feminists wrong on everything else

He cannot into Zizeks power level

What? Most white liberals would disagree with him.

You serious?
He's spent a lifetime investigating and explaining the workings of power in autistic detail.
Praise the Chomsky.

Slavoj Zizek would crush his tiny frame

Really?
Because I hardly ever see him on.

Nod really. They'd likely just talk past each other. Chomsky would blather on about policy and Zizek would rant about sugar without cream or whatever.

He's big in Europe, probably because he doesn't talk about all the horrible shit Britain, France and the EU do. Hes only suppressed in the US

...

Now hold it right there, comrades. There's no reason to fight. We can work this out.

The Leninists on this thread are just butthurt that he slagged on Lenin. What do you expect, he's an anarchist. This is obligatory.

There are also a few others who got their commujimmies rustled when he slagged on !!!Sexyman!!! Slavoj Zizek. Something along the lines of "Gibberish. He's a posturer with no theories."

Now at the time I was like "WOW cool your bagpipes, oh great one! That's a bit too savage even for me. Somebody might have to put a leash on ya m8." Slavoj then proceeded to disgrace himself on BigThink by hitting back with the most Holla Forums-tier, debunked, 1st page of google search attack on our great Lord there is. I have since forgiven Slavy Zizzy as he was having a bad day and he's too cool to hate.

The fight between Chom-SkyLord and Zizmaster reeks of Analytic-Continental catfight so I'd dismiss it. We have enough pointless sectarianism as it is.

Also, Lenin wrote some cool shit.
Now let's all kiss, make up, and get back to the giant orgy known as Leftism.

This 100%
Both need to pull their heads out of their asses

Yes, Benjamin and Derrida both based the bulk of their work on Jew-voodoo, and both of them were total frauds.

hate both of them tbh - zizek is quite simply a racist, and chomsky is an apologist for imperialism

Prove this.

wrong on both counts

Jacobin mag pls go.

jacobin mag is the exact type of rag that would praise these sort of figures to the high heavens

lorenzoae.wordpress.com/2016/05/31/chomsky-vs-parenti/

Try again next year.

when has Jacobin ever attacked Chomsky?

...

I'm Jewish and what is this?

Take a fucking joke

The woman in the video got butt hurt and decided to a Pulsa diNura curse on Noam Chomsky.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsa_diNura

He's 87 years old. He'll probably be dead within a year or two. Why not just wait?

It's to bring on the Happening.

Jews don't believe in "waiting around" for Messiah to come. They believe they can bring his coming through holy acts (where do you think our favorite from the Hotdog School got that idea?). You knock off a Jewish traitor and you'll be setting the conditions for Messiah's arrival.

Funny, because Chomsky is despised on Palestinian nationalist sites like Mondoweiss and Electronic Intifada.

Proof nationalism is a giant spook and nationalists of all sides will get triggered by everything.

...

He'll be fine.

How does everyone think liberals and anarshits are going to respond once Chomsky finally dies?

I see him being given a state funeral in Massachusetts attended by thousands of weeping hipsters.

I just dont trust the old cunt hes so fucking quiet what the fuck is wrong with him he just bla bla blas like a hypnosis tape

Hes fucking covering for someone, I know it, trying to lull us into sleep so his accomplices can pull some shit, i can feel it in my dink

im not saying he hasnt written some good shit on coined some good phrases, but now is not then be wary

Most people grow out of Chomsky once they realize he's a one-trick pony as far as politics and political theory go.

...

Got me there.

Take your meds.

Chomsky needs to die.

You don't support letting the masses speak as they wish because you're not an anarchist. You're the liberal here and should take your clique to go play with the other liberals pretending to be anarchists on plebbit.

test

...

In my opinion, Chomsky is a dilettante at best and a hypocrite at worst.

He's made himself quite a pile of money giving talks and writing books touting leftist causes, but his actual contributions to leftism are open to debate.

I will say he's quite good at getting people who can't or won't form their own opinions on a given subject something to argue over, but outside of linguistics (and within it, depending on who you ask), I don't think he's ever published anything that has been universally praised as game changing or indispensable reading.

He's a controversial figure that's aware of his own ability to polarize any subject, but to my knowledge has not sacrificed his own blood or treasure to any particular cause.

He owns two homes, one on the Charles River (I've seen it) and another in a very posh suburb of Boston (Lexington, have been inside it). I've met Chomsky several times actually.

Yeah, people describe him as a "gateway drug" into radicalism but honestly he's nothing more than a one-trick pony.

I'd suggest people read Lenin, Gramsci, or other theorists who actually dig into what imperialism and hegemony are and how they function from a historical materialist perspective rather than an emotional/moralistic one.

His idea of revolution is basically like Bernstein's. He thinks the unions should do their thing and pressure the state into more social democratic reforms, which will then pave the way for anarchism in the near future. All of this is extremely deterministic and ultimately assumes a linear view of history.

The other problem with Chomsky is how he's essentially popularized the use of emotional blackmail as a political tactic. "It's more moral to report on X than on Y because all Americans are responsible for X and they should feel bad." Sure, it's one thing to point out how the media functions as a tool of hegemony but it's a whole other thing to insist on guilt-tripping others into being "aware." That never works and often backfires, plus it portrays narcissistic abuse tactics as something profound.

Kek.

Wew he must have really pissed the state department off.

←

One of the most meaningless words ive ever heard regardless of how you misapplied it, you bootlicking tard. The definition for "conspiracist" is

Pretty much the exact opposite of Noam "It Doesnt Matter who did 911" Chomsky

What you probably meant is that im accusing Noam of being involved in a conspiracy. If I make an appointment with someone in private im technically involved in a conspiracy, so again, meaningless.

I guess what I really should have said is hes western liberal controlled opposition, his entire act is designed for other western liberal faggots like you, that they can feel better about themselves, while at the same time ensuring that they will never actually do anything.

This:

all correlates with my gut feeling, and its not just a gut feeling, there are plenty of characters like him, establishment-sanctioned "dissidents" that lead a pretty fucking comfy life, and whose exact contributions are a wee bit hard to grasp. You should look up words. Especially meaningless ones

totes, the state dept. is super worried about Noam, that hothead is crazy revolutionary…

What they are actually assmad about is RT, they consistently whine about it and call for it to be banned/combatted with gibsmedat shekels, its hilariously salty:

blogs.state.gov/stories/2014/04/29/russia-today-s-disinformation-campaign

not trying to shill russia, just pointing out that nobody with any actual clout in US gov gives a lices cough about Noam and his radicals, if you really think they percieve him as a threat you are delusional and amusingly buji

back to /fringe/ faggot

fucking ebin. read wittgenstein.

wew lad that's a whole load of smug unjustified assertions. I'd like to see some statistics please.

wow I'm so fucking convinced bro

you know, unlike slavoj zizek, chris hedges, or any other famous author ever who just wallows in squalor and loneliness.

foreignpolicy.com/2013/08/13/exclusive-after-multiple-denials-cia-admits-to-snooping-on-noam-chomsky/

you're super butthurt about something, but have no arguments to offer.

wow so much Inhalt, what am i going to do with all this information.

wew, entrenched this one is

why would I want to read the irrelevant ramblings of a sperglord whos entire family was mentally ill, a man who was so insanely autistic he tore down a house because the ceiling was a few cm too high?

I get it, people misinterpret things, yadda yadda, yadda. Case in point, I still dont know what you meant with your original comment, because you used a retarded meaningless word you didnt understand.

How am i supposed to provide statistics on a nebulous topic like this, and where exactly are you on the spectrum that you would ask for such a thing?

Look, im not saying hes never said anything good, he called out Obongo on being Bush 2.0 with some nasty added features, he calls out the MIC, hes explained many things in acribic detail and a sane person tends to agree with almost everything he says. He probably started off meaning well with a fire burning in his heart but at this point theres really no denying what he is, regardless of what he himself might believe

Im gonna regret even offering up something because you are probably gonna ad-hom it with muh conspiritards judging by the vibe im getting, but whatevs. I think this is semi-decent, half the damn thing is agreeing with him

youtube.com/watch?v=EEDf7OkRCxk

You can wail all you want however, if you arent really offering any solutions it almost becomes worthless, it probably even has the effect of making people feel powerless. And when you are a figurehead like he is, it becomes very easy to limit the spectrum of what is considered "sanctioned" debate, as he did with 911 in barely a sentence. Probably the reason you react with /fringe when I only mentioned it

I like Hedges more than Chomsky, he should avoid getting into small airplanes.

Zizek lives in Ljubljana, burger boy

muhahaha you are on a roll here buddy…I think you would be hardpressed to find a flock of presstitutes closer to the intelligence community than foreignpolicy.com, outside of perhaps RadioFreeEurope.

You are hilarious, are you playing a character or something? The "completely oblivious american liberal arts major"?

If im right, its a pretty good reason to be a little salty. I like you though, you are enjoyable

Prove your position.

"One who participates in a conspiracy", dumbass.

Then don't make assertions you can't back up with evidence, fucking imbecile.

He supports strike actions.

People need to know exactly what kind of situation they are in.

You can claim the attackers were helped along by US intelligence and still claim to live in reality, but if you're one of those "jet fuel can't melt steel memes" tards then you've lost it. Either way it changes nothing about subsequent US policy.

He barely lives anywhere, he travels to speak so much.

andmagazine.com/us/1376444316.html
rt.com/usa/chomsky-cia-file-destroy-457/
alternet.org/civil-liberties/cia-spied-noam-chomsky
independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/memo-shows-cia-did-keep-file-on-noam-chomsky-8760093.html
This isn't Holla Forums. Insulting the source is not evidence.
Oh. You're an actual Holla Forumstard. That explains everything.

One minor footnote, that deepstate press release you linked to talks about the fucking 70s, big fucking whoop they were spying on chomsky in the 70s, they were also entrapping people, setting them up for murder, handing out two-to-the-heads, and doing a whole bunch of other nasty shit I will refrain from going into. Spying is almost foreplay compared to that.

Literally the next article on FP is crying about russia today and the "disinfo campaign", le fucking mao, called it, I really hope you dont read that bilge regularly and just googled an article

...

what are you talking about muchacho, you want me to prove that you immediately think of retarded /x tier shit when someone mentions 911? You already proved that above

Or do you want me to prove..who masterminded 911? I cant do that, who do you think I am?

I suppose you could look to the government you trust so much, they just released SOME of the Joint Inquiry from the Senate Select and House Select committee, the "28" pages(they are actually about 30 i think)

its pretty much admitted that the saudis were involved at this point, bandar and friends, are you denying this? would you agree that it "doesnt matter"? theres also a bunch more that is redacted, plenty of credible people naming a few other possible actors

you really dont know much at all about 911 do you? the event that has defined the last 15 years and you know almost nothing about it.

I hold to the theory that this is because the impotent academics you look up to have told you to dismiss all analysis of 911 in a very underhanded way.

"Saudi Arabia being involved in 911 changes nothing about US foreign policy", you heard it here first, folks.

the legitimate investigation that has been done into 911, both from elements of the government and independent parties, has fuck all to do with steel beams and holograms, you are making my points for me here, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about in this regard, like most Followers of the Noam. It sad, ive encountered it many times before. /pol too has forgotten the facts long ago, sucked down into the brown sinkhole

we can talk about 911, but this is getting long as it is

can you please contain your auts here, what in the fuck does statistics have to do with it, do you solve a crime scene with statistics? stop being so anal-retentive

You asked for some sources or something to go on, i gave you a well put together, hour long video(which you ignored)

fine I shot the messenger, but youve gotta admit the messenger was a real piece of shit. I like your selection this time, especially alternet(heres something the conspiritard will accept) Im not denying that he was spied on, but again, as i said here

big whoop it would be almost insulting if they didnt, this was the 70s, if he had been a genuine threat he wouldve gotten the Malcolm X treatment, or is COINTELPRO "tinfoil" for you too?

this isnt moving the goalpost, the article isnt really relevant to Chomskys status as an intellectual gatekeeper. On the other hand, maybe they got to him, found out some dirty secret, and then forced him into an uneasy alliance. this is speculation obviously

I take great offence at that, yer not exactly being a Mensch here, yiddish is a great language, its always fascinating to me how similar it is to german.

Seriously, the chutzpah of such an accusation, are you really shouting "anti-semite here" no one has mentioned jews and pol is a cesspool

There are legitimate criticisms to make of Chomsky. Thanks to his recent "vote for Hillary" shtick he's actually losing a lot of former followers right now.

Chomsky stopped being cool after he lost the debate with Foucault.

If you don't have reasonable evidence that your position is correct, then you cannot in good faith believe it.

no shit they were.

to the effect of what it caused, no. the point is, governments jump at the chance to tighten their grip whether they orchestrate the events or not.

name one single fucking thing about it that matters for shit.

I have yet to hear one of these magical facts that will change everything.

you have no argument and you must post.

yes you fucking do it all the time.
-blood splatters are simulated statistically
-dna samples are tested statistically
-suspects are profiled statistically according to relationships, etc

totally missed that. i'll watch it later.

I know nothing about it.

so what, they spied on their buddy just for funsies as a coverup in case the documents get released 30 years later for a couple of losers to speculate about on a taiwanese nail polishing forum?

COINTELPRO targeted political organizations, retard

ayy lmao. so if he can't be a willing gatekeeper, he's an unwilling gatekeeper.

so what, you said "oy vey" because you're jewish?

WHY CHOMSKY IS MORE REDPILLED THAN YOU:

1) He made millions of dollars as a contractor for the Department of Defense helping them be more efficient at training soldiers

2) He invests his money heavily into petroleum, pharmaceutical, mining, and agribusiness firms

3) He creates an irrevocable trust, pours his assets into it, and avoids paying 99.5% of the income tax he would otherwise pay

4) He writes books, assigning the copyrights to his children (so they will be under copyright protection longer) and then places the royalties into the same trust, so profits are tax free.

5) His tax lawyer has arranged the trust so his children will inherit his millions tax free.

6) He charges universities $12,000 (plus travel and lodging expenses) for him to come and tell college students that people who don't pay income taxes are bad; that people who don't pay estate taxes are bad, and that petroleum, pharmaceutical, mining, and agribusiness corporations are bad

7) The he returns to his mansion inside a gated community with private (armed) security guards and with 99% White residents

Face it - you will NEVER troll Progressives as hard as Noam!!

...

Chomsky's financial assets can be easily googled.

That's just leftists being baseline hypocrites as always.

It's okay for the socialist elite to shoot guns, invest in oil, cheat taxes and live in their racist gated communities. Party members always get the perks; remember that some animals are ALWAYS more equal than others to their ilk.

Communism is just a scam to enable the proletariat to enslave himself under a different name.

Hoooooooooly shit that's crazy. Finally a substantative criticism.

So Chomsky gets off because he never specifically opposed setting up trust funds. Lel.

The tax dodging is shady as fuck.

TIAA-CREF is some sort of teachers financing association thing, I guess he's a part of it because he's a professor. And I guess it happens to invest in big oil companies and shit. Not surprising, most funds invest in all that shit.

Well, I guess it's good he advocates revolution, so we can confiscate his financial assets when it happens. Lel.

Chomsky doesn't believe in lifestylism and postmodernism so of course he's going to want to save money and ensure his kids and grandkids get trust funds. What do you want him to do? Live on the street to prove his "commitment?"

...

Lol based Jason Unruhe on the scene.

youtu.be/EJSHLjwBRmc

Criticisms:
Stupid. Anarchists want to abolish the state but they can use it to their advantage while it still exists. An anarchist society would be highly democratic.

What the fuck?

Looks like this material was reported by a right-wing breitbart editor.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Schweizer

Typical. A common tactic is to point out liberals engaging in activities they claim are abhorrent. They then turn around and gleefully engage in the same activities. As if this gives them the moral high ground.

I'm interested in Zizek's finances. He's got to be pretty rich from being a successful author and speaker.

Fuck off.

>youtube.com/watch?v=EEDf7OkRCxk
hahaha fucking dropped.

How right you are. pic related.

Look at Chomsky's recent vids. He's already dead.

Blatant lie. Kill yourself retard.

Also his work is much more pristine than Parenti's.