That video is fascinating to me. Degeneracy seems to a degree archetypical: like it can't be real, that is only a metaphorical benchmark to explain our own personal failing (and resulting attempt to escape it in a tragic fatalism.
Viewing degeneracy to us serves this kind of purpose, and yet it is real and so real to others, embedded into their very ethos. And at that it would be perverse to even think of this conduct as character, to even be able to find this mode of living as some kind of idea or archetype.
But when you are degenerate, you tarnish the gift of intelligence, this shit becomes all facets of your mind. When you are on the bus, making a meal, whenever your thoughts are idle: you are consumed with your own hunger. You become what you think about. You could be simply thinking about a Thesis you will write, or a song you could be writing, or what you will do to solidify you and your lovers future (perhaps buying diapers), or you could be consumed with how you are going to get "laid", taking care of your fursuit, or buying diapers for your ABDL group.
All of this human energy, aggregated at an axial century in human development, a genetic structure moving throughout billion years using relying on our action to carry not only genes, but memes forward. And at this crucial point, this human effort is absolutely wasted.
Hatred is such an intimate emotion, it can only come from an intense desire to see better out of us. It can only be defined opposed to love, which is absolute faith in how we will end up. Faith that we are capable of so much great. Despite all of our mortality and vice.
The anger we get at seeing degeneracy is a constant reminder of our own vulnerability. And perhaps angst at our own limitations, that something so profane we have to be vigilant against.
–
An extension of faith in me is that I like to view feminism as a result of our intelligence, somuchso that it is hyper-rational (tries to justify things in an internal logic that makes no sense) and self-defeating, but in finality it is a resulting growth pain of a developing species (exploring new ideas). How males would compete for females is physically: sticks and stones and what not. But with feminism it is basically a modern extension of a more emotional/political method of sexual selection: namely men that are intelligent/sane enough to not only avoid degeneracy, but also save women from it will raise families while everyone else will abort and be "liberated" and die.
You can view the reception of the ideology as women upset that modernity derives them of natural functions so they "blame men" in a gesture that basically prods them "what do we do now?" (Women are confused in modern environment so the default state is cynical hedonism until men solve the problem, save themselves and subsequently save a mate from modernity)
Essentially you can view it as a nuanced evolutionary challenge to overcome and turn the tables, alchemize the despair and win out.
For if we don't do that, as is evident with Islam, our chance to use feminism as an intelligence method of sexual selection (i.e those emotionally intelligent enough to redpill them out of feminism breed). This meme will do as it was designed to do: destroy western civilization. And our sexual selection will regress to barbarity at the hands of defending against invaders.
