I hardly see how this is relevant to anybody on Holla Forums, we're not really interested in identity politics.
I think you're exaggerating the issue of SJWism. Their bourgeoisie moralism is leading them to tear each other apart, and because of that, they can't form a cohesive social movement. Workers are becoming increasingly alienated from movements like BLM and SJW.
I absolutely fail to understand how Bell Hooks is at all relevant in today's society. I remember Sargon of Akkad mentioning her in a video about Anita Sarkeesian, and then subsequently denouncing all Marxism as SJWism, which I thought was a bit ridiculous.
Bell Hooks has never been a relevant philosopher to anybody in serious Marxist circles. People that follow Bell Hooks have, historically, been on the fringe in Leftist circles and are often denounced as bourgeoisie feminists.
If feminism is going to have a role in the Leftist revolution, it isn't going to be led by the fat, content bourgeoisie "womyn" that are the figureheads of the SJW movement, it's going to be led by women in the vein of Alexandra Kollontai, Clara Zetkin, and Rosa Luxemburg.
Once again, you're creating a racial and religious narrative that doesn't exist in the West. Unlike what Holla Forumsyps would like someone to believe, we're not on the brink of Helter Skelter or some type of great Islamic jihad. I find it ridiculous to suggest that, somehow, 13.2% of the population is going to rise up and slaughter 77.35% of the population.
However, I will acknowledge the problem of Islamic violence. It's evident to everyone that Islamic terrorism has created an atmosphere of fear in the west and destabilized the east.
But, Holla Forumsyps are too quick to denounce the issue by saying that Muslims are inherently violent, or that their religion alone leads them to be violent. While unreformed Islam certainly preaches violence, I sincerely doubt that these people are violent on faith alone.
This violence stems from alienation. Why did the Mujahideen rise up to fight the Soviets? Because they were fighting against western imperialism. These young Mujahideen fighters were alienated from the western ideals of equality, republic, etc. and instead turned to Islamic teachings of Shariah, Iqta, etc.
The Mujahideen would go on to form the Taliban and al-Qaeda, organizations which worked to further Muslim alienation in the western world. Most often you'll find that Muslim terrorists who come from the western world are alienated in some way, and are then manipulated by already-radicalized Imams.
So then, I believe that the solution to Islamic terrorism is not to further alienation against them by encouraging discrimination. Discrimination against peaceful Muslims will turn peaceful Muslims violent.
While Liberals certainly form a majority in the Left, SJWs do not. You'll find that their reach extends only to the movements that they've created and the internet. The BLM has become too large for them to manage alone, as evidenced by Dallas.
Surely not. More radical left organizations engage at a community-level worldwide than far-right organizations, mostly because far-right organizations have been far more demonized by the worker. This is evidenced by the rise of B████ ██████, who was able to successfully identify as a "Socialist" without being thrown out entirely.
