Nothing about Saudi Arabia and the 28 pages?
Before I start, what does left/pol/ think? Did the Saudis do it or not?
Nothing about Saudi Arabia and the 28 pages?
Before I start, what does left/pol/ think? Did the Saudis do it or not?
Youdungoofd
Anyway i am a saudifag so ask away comerads
I already asked. The 28 pages. You think they will confirm or refute Saudi involvement?
The only problem is the report doesn't tell the whole truth. We already know the Saudis are involved the more interesting question is who else is involved? This report is a limited revelation and still doesn't give us all the answers.
KEK
Maybe so. But it does highlight that the CIA and FBI suspected direct Saudi invovment. Which must make you question the motive of every single politician since the publication of the commission report, probably before, in covering for the Saudis. Only a handful have come out and mentioned the saudi state involvement. Most of them have bent over backwards trying to keep the spotlight of Saudi.
It also raises the much more interesting question of why were these pages hidden in the first place?
ehhh. Tried to post and this happened.
http: iCCP: profile 'icc': 'RGB ': RGB color space not permitted on grayscale PNG `/tmp/phpwTPe4J' @ warning/png.c/MagickPNGWarningHandler/1656.
http: iCCP: profile 'icc': 0h: PCS illuminant is not D50 `/tmp/phpwTPe4J' @ warning/png.c/MagickPNGWarningHandler/1656.
http: iCCP: profile 'icc': 'RGB ': RGB color space not permitted on grayscale PNG `/tmp/phpwTPe4J' @ warning/png.c/MagickPNGWarningHandler/1656.
http: iCCP: profile 'icc': 0h: PCS illuminant is not D50 `/tmp/phpwTPe4J' @ warning/png.c/MagickPNGWarningHandler/1656.
http: iCCP: profile 'icc': 'RGB ': RGB color space not permitted on grayscale PNG `/tmp/phpwTPe4J' @ warning/png.c/MagickPNGWarningHandler/1656.
the fuck?
well. I can't post the caps cause reasons. So if you want to see em, you're going to have to do something you will hate…
boards.4chan.org
or here
trying again as jpg.
One interesting tidbit is the role of prince Bandar. He was connected to Abu Zubaydah and Osama Bassnan among others involved. At the same time he was really close to Bush and pushed for the war in Iraq. Perhaps they kept everything under wraps because they didn't want people to ask questions about why were attacking countries like Iraq totally unrelated to 9/11. Now that the Iraq war is over they can release more information but perhaps not everything.
No need to post all the pages as images.
Yes, with the help of the CIA and Mossad.
He is called by some Bander Bush. Very close. And who was the saudi flown out of the country just after the attack?
No mention of that in the 28 pages. This is a limited revelation so if other actors are involved that isn't to be found here in these pages.
CIA and Mossad helped with 9/11?
I think the best that can be said re this is the US MAY have allowed it to happen. There were rumours. The FBI tried to warn specifically of this attack. Luck Larry. The lack of immediate fighter response after the first plane went off course.
These pages do however all but explicitly confirm saudi involvement. The real telling part is that somebody somewhere saw the need to suppress this information. What is it they say? Nothing to hide, nothing to fear? Clearly somebody thought there was something to hide. So what did they fear?
Thanks comerad I will share this with the others
I will get in prison for this I just know it
Will this have any impact on the fact that the Clinton foundation's largest donors were the Saudis?
wait. You're role-playing. Right?
You should look into the Operation Gladio program. It was a program used by NATO to engage in false flags across Europe as part of the Cold War assault on socialists, communists and to a lesser degree anarchists.
They used independent far right agents to engage in these attacks. These agents were not simply mindless puppets but neither were they conscious conspirators: they had an ideological commitment to subverting the left and were willing to cooperate with the authorities on those grounds. Some later decried the program as they felt they had been used.
The basic modus operandi of the program was to find an independent far right cell and then aid them in carrying out attacks, sometimes under the guise of a left-wing group. It was very difficult to trace these attacks to the authorities because as far the uninformed public was concerned it would appear to be the independent action of either a left-wing or right-wing group.
The authorities would simply have to propose a course of action to the group through an agent and then ensure a series of "security failures" to allow the attack to take place. US ally Saudi Arabia is intimately involved in 9/11. Former US asset Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility. The attack could only take place due to a series of security failures. This should alert you to the possibility that 9/11 was the product of a successor program to Operation Gladio.
If i used my phone and social media I well get in trouble no doubt
I well do it when I get back home to use tor and fake twitter
Yeah I've heard of shit like this before. The London bombings for example, tehy were runninc a very similar drill that very day. Multiple bomb attacks on public transport. And the Boston bombings, the guy was apparently appraoched by spooks in the run-up to the attack. A method I've always thought plausible for bomb attacks would be an attempt at a sting. This is something that has been confirmed as a tactic. A handler gives the would-be bomber a 'bomb' that is deactivated or inert. Now imagine would be bomber has some smarts about him and suspects this, changes the dud detonator for a live one, then carries out the operation just as instructed to by the spooks.
But here's the thing with spooks. They put out information, disinformation and misinformatnn on any given operation. So you may find some compelling evidence in an old news article or somewhere and think you've cracked it. But really again you're being played.
If you are serious, play it safe m8. But really, how could they hide something this big. I mean it's all over twit…. wait.
bbc.co.uk
And this is how they bury news.
I told you comerad they blamed the son of Zayed the UAE monarch
I will share this stuff later using tor
See you later space Cowboys
wait. Here's a question.
It seems almost certain that the Saudis were involved to some degree. Why?
Bin Landen family was rich as fuck and very well connected. Even if the royal family didn't know about it, some higher ups or rich billionaire princes definitely knew something.
As for motivation? The answer is they are fucking crazy, same as ISIS's motivation, policy of escalation until the West turns against all Muslims.
Deserves to be Cheka'd
How do you watch porn in there
I understand this rationale from ISIS and Al-q perspective. But the Saudi royal family has so much to lose. You could be right I guess. They fund the building of mosques and madrasas across the world. But it just seems so irrational.
There are a few explanations offered. Let's assess them.
therealnews.com
They confirm it. Saudi intel even paid for the fucking flight lessons. It's fucking criminal that this info was kept from Americans while we went to war in irrelevant countries.
...
Jesus christ. I've always been against the idea that this was a super complex conspiracy, but this is some real shit.
Don't get publicly executed based Saudi comrade.
wtf
The government of NORWAY donated $10,000,000+ to Clinton's campaign…?
how are you alive ?
i think bush called in favors with his friends
so he could invade afganistan for the opium.
and iraq to take, care of saudi arabia's problem.
i hope they both burn
what about the cuban false flag
then burn saudi scum
Remember that one kid you knew in elementary school who was kind of a jerk but you had to put with him because he was rich and let you play all the new video games?
That's what Saudi Arabia reminds me of.