Why is it that (((((Marx))))) only criticized white european industrialist capitalists that actually produced things in...

Why is it that (((((Marx))))) only criticized white european industrialist capitalists that actually produced things in their factories, while letting financier and banker capitalists like (((((Rothschild))))) off the hook?

Was it (((((pure coincidence)))))?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_capital
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_parentheses
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_capital

Educate yourself OP

Also

lol

explain this meme

you put them around people's names to let others know they're ((((jews))))

Why do you keep insisting that the workers, who work, and are called workers, don't do any work?

(((you're))) not even using it right dumb altright shit, it's three brackets

...

Have you even read ((Das kapital))?
Want me to send you a link of ((the mango))?

In short: he didn't. Capital is accumulated through the exploitation of workers, managers of capital like financiers and bankers are no less "guilty" than industrialists.

But the bigger point that you Holla Forumsyps seem to miss is that Marx's analysis of capitalist political economy wasn't just worker-oriented version of your ideology, where, instead of Jews, it's the bourgeoisie corrupting the otherwise harmonious natural order. The capitalist system itself is corrupt and flawed at a fundamental level, and the bourgeoisie are simply the highest actors within the capitalist edifice. This is one of the major points of Das Kapital if you had ever bothered to read it. Our enemy is Capital, and the bourgeoisie simply the foremost lieutenants of Capital.