Retaking Feminism

This. It is a serious injustice that women earn on average $0.79 to every $1 earned by men. The female wage gap and sexist video games are far more important to address than doing away with the labor-for-income paradigm, automating jobs and providing an abundance of vegetation for people.

"Feminist" is a dead label.
Less and less people indentify as feminists, even though in our academic bubble you don't notice it.
Simultaneously the number of people saying they support equality for men and women is absolutely huge.
"Feminist" is a dead weight of label and should be jettisoned.

also the whole world is the united states
we need to remember that

What a redundant thing to say, comrade.

You're literally using the leftism = liberalism meme but just limited it to feminism you fucking retard.

Read Goldman

also this

This. Hillary Clinton has run her campaign almost entirely on presenting the best policies that will benefit the American people. She has not capitalized on her gender at all to appeal to her voters.

Wait, actually, not I'm not sure if you were being sarcastic or not.

Poe's law famalam

Nope, nevermind.

This. Because of Hillary running on 'because of vagina' and 'because of feminism', nobody supports Trump and he literally has no chance of winning.

pls respond

Degenerate cum worshiper.

If women had access to more traditional roles, they could spend their free time at home coding things that would benefit their community at large rather than their exploitative boss and the jews on Wall Street. That sounds pretty communist to me.

Coding will be the new knitting, tbh fam.

It took my less then a minute to find the source. Learn to google and stop bumping shit threads.

peppertode.deviantart.com/art/Downtime-535205135

I should also add that leftists, libertarians, jews and puas are all conspiring to make women crave cummies, whereas traditionalists seek to free them of those semi-translucent shackles.

We're the real feminists.

???????

There's an anfem here that hates cum…

Confirmation_bias_much_?

You cannot retake feminism, as, just like state capitalism in the ussr, it has lost it's point and refuses to move on.

The nomenkature of feminism, like the nomenklature of the USSR, doesn't want anything to change. They don't want to imporove anything.

Know Kavafis? He was a member of the LGBT community in early 20th century alexandria.

He wrote the following poem on the subject.
poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/51294

Now what’s going to happen to us without barbarians?
Those people were a kind of solution.

What is feminism to be if gender equality has been achieved and the patriarchy is no more? They'd then have to deal with real problems!

So, if there are no barbarians.. .. We'll have to invent them!

...

pretty sure that's the whole gimmicky liberal "women in tech" thing

She may hate cum per se, but that is irrelevant because she still worships at the altar of cummies.

Jack Donovan gave a speech on that very subject…

You seem mad, comrade.

thk but I'll but for drama's sake

That's some major projection going on

Nah. Just laughing at how retarded that sentence was.

And you worship at the altar of jingoists. Either case no one really cares until you bring it into the workplace, which you do more than her necessarily as a part of the definition.

It sounds like you're treating women like sex objects there, commie

What's?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Donovan

YEP! You realy don't get it. You, same as them, need to have your barbarians or you'll have to face reality.
Without ZE JOOS UND ZE COMMIES you'd have no reason to exist. Even if hitler did the final solution.. then what?

And no, we do not need barbarians. We are not about "ending capitalism". We are about taking the next step in history. The bourgies are not the "enemy". They are to be defeted only cause they hold history back.

While all Id Pol needs an enemy or it's existance is pointless.

What is a feminist without patriarchy?
What is a nazi without jews?
What is pol without "the establishment"?

PURE IDEOLOGY

The definition of jingoism includes place.

I'm against all gender centered hierarchy, which includes patriarchs, yes, but also matriarchs.

And I think you are missing the point, comrade. Here's a full transcript of his speech :
radixjournal.com/journal/becoming-the-new-barbarians

Humans define themselves based on conflict, and the most noble conflict is that against nature itself.

Also

What?

Ye, sure, ok.
The Patriarchy as defined by Engels is no more. You can now inherit and sooner or later we will have monogamy abolished.

Then what?

Why will you be a feminist then?

Also, what about OTHER GENDERS??? HOW ABOUT GAYARCHY???

SARCASM

>implying monogamy isn't real feminism.

This is the most ideological bourgie BS I've heard.

Conflict exists because scarcity. Remove scarcity and you remove conflict.

Unless conflict is all that you have been left with and you are now a zombie that only wants to eat normal people….

Monogamy is patriarchical tradition, cause you need to know your son is yours in order to pass onto him the field or the herd.

It's amazing how leftists choose to ignore select laws of the universe so that their utopian worldview doesn't fall apart.

You don't understand why I am now so you'll get a moot answer as if I could predict the course of alternate histories anyway.

I don't think I've seen evidence of a state excluding those that aren't third-gendered, intersex, or trans.

Sounds like it could be fun and jolly.

The man made a series of post-hoc untestable assertions on the subject. Moreover, I would argue that patriarchy is feminist.

Ye, ye. Tell the robots "THE TOOK R ZOBZ!"

The moment when am not sure if you're joking anymore…

MODERN FEMINISM IS SCARY!

Of course, we feminists love a good, spooky joke. Haven't you seen the new Ghostbusters trailer? :^)

Also, I should add that nature itself must be be completed against in a way that you don't have to compete against other humans. Nature will attempt to murder you and always will win.

do you honestly think we mean absolutely no scarcity? obviously that's absurd. what do you think we mean? assume we're all rational adults here having a discussion where we're trying to understand what the other person means

Ok, that one was good.

I cannot compete against nature cause I AM PART OF NATURE!

SOILENT GREEN IS PEOP.. … eeer.. no not that…

…

DUST TO DUST!

Nice going user. I shouldn't have been nice. Look what you've done we've got a Nazi and that anfem piece of shit.

Just report them.

What a beautiful picture.

This is now a cat thread. Post cats.

How ironic.

I believe there is no retaking "feminism" as there is no need too. The idea of "feminism" is dying. Only ravaging /idpol/tards are keeping this useless label alive.

Instead what needs to happen is to actually convince women that these initiatives are worth their time. Other wise they will be too worried about their fee fees and /idpol/ shit. But that is just my opinion of the matter at hand.

I believe there is no retaking "socialism" as there is no need too. The idea of "socialism" is dying. Only ravaging liberals are keeping this useless label alive.

Instead what needs to happen is to actually convince leftists that the proletarian protagonist is an abstraction. Other wise they will be too worried about their base and superstructure shit. But that is just my opinion of the matter at hand.

Shit nigga you would get unbelievable amounts of free publicity from all the feminist rags losing their shit at you.

No, something like that should be for everyone.

Feminism would be alright if they only focused on things that only effect women rather than things that just by chance and society and slight psychological differences effect them more or problems just made up that aren't problems. Everything else is an egaltarian, political, psychological, and sociological issue.

How about we just dump this fundamentally charged phrase and revive egalitarianism as a movement.

Sure, let's retake it from media whose reach dwarfs ours that labels stronk women CEOs and Shillary feminist icons because workers are being fucked by women now. I'm sure it will be just as easy as convincing people that socialism ain't anything gubbermint does, anarchism ain't no rules maaaaaan, and that communism ain't the gubbermint controlling everything.

defeatist attitudes are for losers, and you sir are one of the largest losers

Feminism in itself is an outdated idpol at this point

Yes, let's take back nationalism while we're at it too.

Being associated with feminism is literally one of the fucking things keeping us down.
It's a huge enough fight to explain that socialism=/=government, no need to carry any extra weight up this hill.

...

lol. no such thing in nature.

What are you, some kind of primitivist? Nature is gay and stupid.

Holla Forums's retarded memespewing degenerate is back :D

Leftism is a death cult.

...

Defecating in toilets doesn't exist in nature either.

dad this is not facebook

What the fuck are you even trying to say?

Death is a part of nature. Death is stupid idiot retard gay ballsacks. Let's abolish death.

i still like how her very "calling out" is in itself a red herring.

Free software or bust.

youtube.com/watch?v=zRlfbUr852o

how does that contradict what I said? This is an example of ravens displaying natural fascist values.

Yes it does. We are in nature, and we defecate in toilets. Well, I do at least. I can't speak for you.

*Faceberg

Inequality is the nature of anti-entropy.

Let's attempt to, certainly.

Abolishing death would be against nature! And nature is obviously the ultimate unquestionable authority, that's why equality is bad.

The thing is, many if not most of the big names supporting feminism barely give a shit about women, and that's mostly because they barely give a shit about anyone at all. Feminism's existence is very cynical and has been coopted by liberals to mean women who want to raise a family are dumb, evil slaves but women who work for wages (meaning a 30k$/year management job) are "truly independent"

It's a sham. Stuff like the Ghostbusters 2016 film has nothing to do with feminism, it's about pouring gasoline on the stupid gender war and making legbeards feel their failure of a life is the responsibility of neckbeards

i fucking hate it all so much, there are really only a few people who can think about these problems in a more serious way and they're the quiet ones.

It's some faggot trying to force his meme

I don't think you understand what any of those words mean.

Post scarcity world is achievable without capitalism. The universe is a big place, hell there's literally trillions of dollars of metals floating around in space ripe for the mining. But we don't, because it would take too long to profit and we need a profit THIS quarter. Also those resources would never be fully exploited because introducing that much metal would cause prices to fall, and we can't have that. Gotta make a profit.

Well yeah, actually doing things as opposed to making tweets sounds actually empowering or something.

...

are you high?

I dont get why it should be only women? Everyone should be interested in those.

Also
thats pretty autistic though

Then it loses what it originally was. An advocacy group for women's interests. It's never been anything else.

Saged for being an obvious urbanite retard

Found the indian

...