What's the difference between classical liberalism and neoliberalism? Can you please explain...

Sorry to keep pushing the point but I think it IS pretty important to understanding a lot of the shit going down right now.

You may have seen this video before.

youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw

Neocon fingerprints are all over this shit.

And I'd point you again at this article>>785649

Anyway, I'll drop it.

Here you go.

The next president might be a neocon. It's still pretty relevant.

Thanks m8. Lost it on the third panel. The whole thing is fucking hilarious.

Classical liberalism - liberalism before the 20th century
Neoliberalism - policies of privatizations and free market/free trade reforms that arose in the 70s.

The 19th Century was a pretty good case study for the point that classical liberalism couldn't achieve the sort of society classical liberals wanted, so in the first decades of the 20th century, classical liberalism died and became social liberalism.

Neoliberalism was a political movement based around reversing the many social reforms that had built up over the course of the 20th century. Unlike classical liberalism, it had no ambitions to create any sort of free and equal society, it was nothing more than economic powers destroying the labor movement and welfare state while enriching themselves.

"Zizek is a fascist" is actually more of an idpol meme that developed outside of Holla Forums