CLOUDFLARE COMPROMISED

twitter.com/Radomysisky

HATREON / GHOSTGUNNER TERMINATED

NO JUSTIFICATION GIVEN

TDS WAS JUST THE START

BAIL SAILOR BAIL BAIL BAIL

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/eastdakota/status/898602565713002498
twitter.com/Radomysisky/with_replies
archive.is/yVQ8V
bitmitigate.com/
dailystormer.lol/matthew-prince-of-cloudflare-admits-he-killed-the-internet-because-he-thinks-andrew-anglin-is-an-asshole/
zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-19/truth-will-not-be-googled
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

What exactly is CloudFlare for again?

Basically people use it for it's anti dos protection.

Are there any alternatives? Sounds like it would be difficult because AFAIK it works by redirecting DDOS attack traffic right?

I heard it was for keeping bad traffic away from legitimate websites

It's a filter more than a redirect. They have a shitload of bandwidth and use some traffic analysis to filter out traffic that doesn't look like your normal use case.

It' also used as CDN afaik

They MitM your SSL connections to act as a edge proxy as well.

Consumer protection must be great in murica.

Isn't it possible for the consumer to sue the company?

Yes, it is entirely possible. But companies have lawyers, and lawyers are great at dragging a case on longer than it needs to be when the company realizes that they are at a greater risk of losing the case. This way they win by default as the person suing will end up riddled with too many legal fees to carry on the case.

Fixed that for you. They just kicked out some trailer trash, that's all. Most people wonder what took them so long.

I warned them. I warned them, but they didn't listen.

The 1st amendment doesn't apply to Facebook, Twitter, and so on because they're not government owned. They can set up their own terms of service.

I fail to see how building lower receivers for guns equates to trailer trash.

Yeah well I fail to see how a website purely about the 2nd amendment needs DDoS protection

Probably because protecting the US constitution is considered Nazism these days.

twitter.com/eastdakota/status/898602565713002498


He moved his name servers. Cloudflare didn't do anything.

Somehow I have a hard time believing this, considering Cody is going fucking nuclear on the guy.
twitter.com/Radomysisky/with_replies
Cody maintains that he moved Hatreon straight to CF's nameservers, but his account was still terminated with that vague message. At the very least, they should be sending e-mails which explain WHY they are being terminated.

maybe you're not being honest about your website's purpose

What do you think its purpose is?

all about the Arbor

source
archive.is/yVQ8V

not sure if b8 or shlomo

If I own a cafe, can I not serve niggers on the basis of their political beliefs? It seems like tech companies are allowed to not serve customers because of it, do physical store fronts come under different laws regarding this issue?

You can refuse to serve whoever you want, just don't expect good press about it.

except you cant (unless of course you dont serve straight white males, neonazis, ...)

m8

LMAO Holla Forumstards btfo

Cody Wilson is not a poltard, he's a lolbertarian.

L-LMAO lolbertarians btfo ...??

Don't bother, libtard mental gymnastics are in full force atm.

People don't realize that the left has been continously winning for the last 50 years of so with the emancipation of the modern woman and the deploration of racist behaviour.

They'll throw everything under the bus thanks to "hate speech" which atm is just some white dues scared of jews. Precedents are being created and no one realises, the just jump on the nazi meme and scream.

What amazes me is that even public figures who are knee deep tech don't realize.

Alternatives to Cloudflare do exist by the way
bitmitigate.com/

Subtle, m8

It's shit

Add DigitalOcean to the mess

I get that you are upset about them kicking out people they don't like for childish reasons, but there's really nothing wrong with it at all. Cloudflare is not a public utility nor a government entity. Cloudflare is a private service. They have the right to deny service.

This is Holla Forums. Stop whinging about it and engineer an alternative.

it's a CDN and also (((Security))) (((as a Service))) bullshit that hipsters use for their webshit. it happens to provide "DDoS protection" as well, by reverse proxying to a website. however you can just get the site's real IP address (via DMCA complaint, leakage) and DDoS it directly. or simply DDoS all the less than 32-bit of IP addresses N at a time until your target site goes down. they often publish novice technical articles and post them to HN to get hipsters to suck them off. they also post a lot of FUD about DDoS and these retards think they are the savior. they also block half the web from being accessed by shared IP addresses (VPN, tor, work, uni, etc) because (((security))). come think of it, the only way their retarded anti ddos "solution" can work is stop people from accessing the proxied site period because they cant mirror the dynamic content themselves (however, they claim this blockage is only for (((security))) and not DDoS).

Are you fucking retarded? The only two demographics I'm aware of on cuckflare are:
1) Hipster company bootstrap landing pages hosted on .io domains
2) Shitty warez sites, image hosters, ad revenue shortlink services with 10 second countdown timer until you can click link
pretty much everything on cuckflare needs to be "CLEANED" as well

this.

remember these are the same people who cite businesses freedom to not serve gays. principle or bigotry?, this will be a good test to proble true intentions.

So are cake bakers that do not want to bake gay cakes yet there they are being sued

anti discrimination law shouldn't exist either

what amazes me is that you think public figures of tech know anything

really makes you think

I like how this is literally the only argument you Holla Forums queers have

you're aware that DDoS was a thing and was solved before cuckflare existed, right?

kill yourself polnigger. there's nothing "lefty" about arguing this.

Don't forget Holla Forums.

Just because I don't agree with their actions, just because their actions actually OFFEND me, doesn't mean that their actions were somehow stepping outside of the framework of the society we've built and the rights we've been endowed with. But maybe the people who got kicked off don't feel the same way, and the people who got kicked off of Cloudflare have the right to sue just like the people who wanted their gay cake.

Cuckchan also uses Cloudflare but I wouldn't be surprised the least if Holla Forums gets the boot and nothing happens to them

torrents, porn, and all kinds of free shit you pirate is now in limbo

it literally isn't though.

how the fuck do you think all those sites existed before cuckflare?

even if you're not in the United States you should see the benefits of Free Speech. Actual free speech, not this "big corps should not be criticized because reasons" shit.

fuck off queer. i dont care what some faggot company chooses to kick off their service. this is exactly what you should expect when not using decentralized protocols

Age

...

dailystormer.lol/matthew-prince-of-cloudflare-admits-he-killed-the-internet-because-he-thinks-andrew-anglin-is-an-asshole/

it's over

I see them but I also derive sick pleasure from playing devil's advocate on both sides and then laughing my ass off as brain-dead USians slaughter each other in the streets

Well Linus knows enough to always surround himself with his entourage at public press events and conventions due to outrage mongers trying to pin rape allegations on anyone they can.

Torvalds or Sebastian? Because I can see that applied to either of them

Torvalds

They really didn't think this through.

The gays that sued and judge that allowed the case to proceed set the norm assisted by the media who blew up the gay cake thing. Once a decision is reached one way or another we will know if a business can freely deny service or not. I agree it is up to them to sue if they wish to do so.

a single good argument is enough an argument. learn2logic redneck. is cloudflare in its right to cancel services or not?

go find some legal means to retaliate if you wanna do something productive with your shitty outrage.


i'm glad both bitmitigate and cloudflare are free to do whatever the fuck they want. i'm not a fucking hack like you, and OP, and the rest of your assmad Holla Forumsnigglets.

cloudflare being forced to serve your shitty cult leaders would be the actual violation of the First Amendment. do you even fucking law?

But Christians being forced to make Fagcakes is perfectly fine?

ICANN is a governmental organ that prohibits these companies from violating the constitution.
This is completely different from baking cakes.

didnt Obama sell it to the UN or soemthing?

Holla Forums is just pretending to be retarded to entertain us, right?

Right?

So, it's starting to spread to the mainstream:
zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-19/truth-will-not-be-googled

Many neutral partisans and politicians are starting to realize that a bunch o mega corporations control what can be on internet or not, and that they're silencing both opposition and competition.


Dailystormer is back up. Go check it out.

Might have a big impact on net neutrality they are all fighting so hard for.

Lol no it's fucking not. ICANN is a multi-national non-profit organization. I bet you think the Federal Reserve is a government agency too.

That's false. Please do not conflate a web search engine as being the same as the Internet. Please don't make the mistake that other businesses are required to hold your speech in your behalf.

>Lol no it's fucking not. (((ICANN))) is a (((multi-national))) non-profit organization. I bet you think the (((Federal Reserve))) is a government agency too.

Well technically all of those are (((corporations))). But at this point what difference does it make when confusion and lawlessness reign?this is a work of fiction

...

These are businesses that hold platforms of speech on the Internet. None of them are required to hold your politically incorrect speech. When they refuse to associate with you, that isn't the same as taking control what can be on the Internet, they're actually taking control over what they will hold on their services.

What you should do when you hold an offensive opinion is host your own speech on your own platform.

Very correct, that's what the Dailystormer did. Competition will thrive in this vacuum.

But still doesn't matter, you have out the control of the internet on the hands of a bunch of non-accountable private individuals.

Stick to shitposting about stallmeme and obscure linux distros.

so the 1st amendment allows you to get out of a contract?

let's say you sell me something and i take it. can i invoke the 1st amendment to not pay you? and everything is hunky dory?

selling shit is an informal contract. so if you are ok with cloudflare changing theirs on the fly you should be ok with the example i gave above.

...

If you actually read the terms of service of Facebook/Twitter, you'll find that you have to allow them to boot you off their service at any time.

A sales contract is valid according to common law understanding of a sales contract. If you can prove that a legal sales contract was bound between buyer and seller, you have the right to sue for breach of contract.

thanks for the info. i did not know such clauses are allowed.

legality aside, thats immoral either way

So they're allowing a nazi website to exist because "free speech"? My school told me that nazi is bad!

im not defending cuckflare, you fucking autistic moron, im arguing that retarded laws shouldnt exist

...

...

you can discriminate you just can't make it against a protected class. wrongthink isn't protected by law the same way being a tranny is

Rules for Radicals by (((Saul Alinsky))). Liberals entire platform is cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy, they're not going to care about forcing one rule on Christians and another on anal marriage followers.

I love how many people once for a free and open internet are now fucking left wing facists.

i oppose both and consider myself a liberal.
who's the hypocrite again?

>DS hosting the donation system on (((DigitalOcean)))
Therefore DigitalOcean should be marked as "not recommended" host

This board I swear