I'm ending a Holla Forums meme

Okay I'm ending this blacks are subhuman meme once and for all

pt. 1

racialreality.blogspot.com.au/2011/11/african-iq-and-the-flynn-effect.html?m=1

Proposed causes of the Flynn Effect include improvements in test-specific skills (Greenfield, 1998; Wicherts et al., 2004), improvements in nutrition (Lynn, 1989, 1990), urbanization (Barber, 2005), improvements in health care (Williams, 1998), a trend towards smaller families (Zajonc & Mullally, 1997), increases in educational attainment (Ceci, 1991), greater environmental complexity (Schooler, 1998), and the working of genotype by environment correlation in the increasing presence of more intelligent others (Dickens & Flynn, 2001). Many of these environmental variables have not undergone the improvement in developing sub-Saharan African countries that they have in the developed world over the last century. This suggests that the Flynn Effect has great potential in sub-Saharan Africa (Wicherts, Borsboom, & Dolan, 2010b).

Although the implications of our psychometric findings for the potential of the Flynn Effect in sub-Saharan Africa remain unclear, the Raven's tests and other IQ tests have shown robust increases in many populations (Daley et al., 2003; Flynn, 2007). So suppose that there were a well-validated IQ test that showed measurement invariant scores between westerners and Africans. Even then, lower IQs of Africans still would not support Lynn and Vanhanen's (2002, 2006) assertion that countries in sub-Saharan Africa are poorly developed economically because of their low "national IQ". Wicherts, Borsboom, and Dolan (2010b) found that "national IQs" are rather strongly confounded with the developmental status of countries. Given the well-documented Flynn Effect, we know that "national IQs" are subject to change. An average IQ around 80 among Africans may appear to be low, but from a historical perspective this average is not low at all. A representative sample of British adults, who took the SPM in 1948 would have an average IQ of 81 in terms of the British norms of 1992 (J. C. Raven, 1960; J. C. Raven et al., 1996). Using older British norms, the average IQ of Africans would be much closer to 100. This is evident in Figure 2, where we compared SPM scores of Africans to older norms. In this figure, the average IQ of several African samples is near or above 100.

Present-day sub-Saharan Africa is one of the poorest regions in the world and the home to some of the world's most deprived children. The majority of sub-Saharan children are chronically malnourished, not only from lack of food but particularly from food lacking vital elements related to both physical growth and intellectual development. It has been estimated that up to 70 percent of rural children live in absolute poverty and 90 percent suffer severe deprivation (Gordon, Nancy, Pantazis, Pemberton, & Townsend, 2003). A substantial number of sub-Saharan African children are under-educated. According to Garcia, Gillian, and Dunkelberg (2008), only about 12 percent of sub-Sahara African children have attended preschool, and this generally for well less than a year. They note that children who do not attend or have only minimal experience in pre-primary school tend to do less well in primary school than children who have had that experience. Further, it is important that the preschool experience be successful. For example, Jaramillo and Mingat (2008) have shown that children who have a poor experience in preschool and have to repeat a year or part of a year have a high drop-out rate in primary school (r = -0.875). The probability of preschool without repetition and who complete primary school is low but positive (r = 0.209). With or without preschool experience, approximately only fifty-five percent of 10-14 year-olds in sub-Saharan Africa complete primary school.

Other urls found in this thread:

unz.com/article/the-iq-gap-is-no-longer-a-black-and-white-issue/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_inventors_and_scientists
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_jurists
debunkingstormfags.blogspot.com.au/2016/07/with-rise-of-alt-right-far-right-neo.html
health.usnews.com/health-news/health-wellness/articles/2015/04/17/why-kids-are-hitting-puberty-earlier-than-ever
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-cell_disease#Epidemiology
medium.com/utopia-for-realists/why-do-the-poor-make-such-poor-decisions-f05d84c44f1a#.szu5juwgb
sciencemag.org/news/2014/10/genes-dont-just-influence-your-iq-they-determine-how-well-you-do-school
pnas.org/content/111/42/15273
notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/01/15/iq-nutrition-disease-and-parasitic-load/
jn.nutrition.org/content/136/4/1126.full
wmbriggs.com/post/5118/
youtube.com/watch?v=LpFm6SeMgM0
pss.sagepub.com/content/23/2/187.long
www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
rense.com/general32/americ.htm
archive.is/c1LBW
youtube.com/watch?v=bV81z8kegh8
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_organizations_in_the_United_States
theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/oct/11/how-fair-is-britain-data
ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2013/03/back-to-basics-integration_Mar2013_10525.pdf
jbhe.com/latest/index012209_p.html
jbhe.com/latest/index021209.html
serc.carleton.edu/sage2yc/broadenparticipation/stereotype/stereotype.html
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/6223968.stm
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2670433/Black-pupils-achieved-biggest-rise-test-exam-results-ethnic-group.html
humanvarieties.org/2013/05/03/hvgiq-bermuda/
humanvarietiesfiles.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/2006-riley-alls.pdf
motherjones.com/environment/2016/02/lead-exposure-gasoline-crime-increase-children-health
scientificamerican.com/article/kids-and-animals-who-fail-classic-mirror/
theguardian.com/education/2016/apr/04/white-children-falling-behind-other-groups-at-gcse
drjamesthompson.blogspot.com/2013/11/iq-and-gcse-results-in-england-r081.html
poverty.org.uk/06/index.shtml
itmtrav.ie/irishtravellers
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.12.002
psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/2010 Editorial for Intelligence.pdf
saboteur365.wordpress.com/2015/08/13/the-mirror-test-white-babies-recognize-themselves-at-15-months-black-children-not-until-6-years-science-video/
www2.psych.ubc.ca/~henrich/pdfs/Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology-2010-Broesch- Cultural Variations in Children's Mirror Self-Recognition.pdf
youtu.be/Yo4WF3cSd9Q
reliawire.com/intelligence-gene-clusters/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect
theamericanconservative.com/articles/race-iq-and-wealth/
ronunz.org/2012/08/05/unz-on-raceiq-response-to-lynn-and-nyborg/
theguardian.com/education/2016/apr/04/white-children-falling-behind-other-groups-at-gcse
notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/05/22/the-black-white-iq-gap/
therightstuff.biz/2015/09/02/race-and-iq-genes-that-predict-racial-intelligence-differences/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19251490/
notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/06/26/climate-violence-black-crime-rk-selection-theory-and-the-vindication-of-jp-rushton/
notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/06/15/neanderthals-inbreeding-and-rk-selection-theory/
notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/05/08/sickle-cell-anemia/
notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/02/09/towards-a-theory-of-everyone-chisala-rebuttal/
unz.com/pfrost/the-jews-of-west-africa/
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html
eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ368279
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469797/
dare.uva.nl/cgi/arno/show.cgi?fid=176083)
notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/05/11/arthur-jensens-method-of-correlated-vectors/
notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/01/21/refuting-richard-nisbett/
laplab.ucsd.edu/articles2/Lee2010.pdf
narrative.ly/nick-brown-smelled-bull/
cpsimoes.net/artigos/art_reply_rushton.html
scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1327&context=articles
theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/02/why-we-write/459909/
labs.la.utexas.edu/tucker-drob/files/2015/02/Psychological-Science-2015-Tucker-Drob-09567976156127271.pdf
web.archive.org/web/20160301064409/http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/sampson/files/2005_ajph.pdf
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440514000831
arxiv.org/abs/1408.3421
blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/08/half-the-variation-in-i-q-is-due-to-genes/#.V4XZQFeOLqF
emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/Is-the-Flynn-effect-on-g-A-meta-analysis.pdf
erectuswalksamongst.us
ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/traits/intelligence
sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150726200059.htm
arstechnica.com/science/2015/08/your-inherited-genes-control-your-iq-and-may-affect-how-well-you-do-at-exams-too/
iq-tests.eu/iq-test-Genetics-versus-environment-400.html
newscientist.com/article/dn1520-iq-is-inherited-suggests-twin-study/
nature.com/ejhg/journal/v14/n6/full/5201588a.html
sparknotes.com/psychology/psych101/intelligence/section3/page/2/
youtube.com/watch?v=JE-OMF-O27c
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0030320
nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/faculty/block/papers/Heritability.html
blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/08/half-the-variation-in-i-q-is-due-to-genes/
broadinstitute.org/news/6119
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encephalization_quotient
history.nasa.gov/CP-2156/ch4.3.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakicetus
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basilosaurus
scholarpedia.org/article/Punctuated_equilibria
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_European_countries_by_average_wage
iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country/by-belarus
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States
reddit.com/r/OpenandHonest/comments/3evdd3/blacks_in_the_us_and_in_africa_consistently_score/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_education
theconversation.com/intelligence-inheritance-three-genes-that-add-to-your-iq-score-31397
journals.cambridge.org/images/fileUpload/documents/Van_Lange_BBS-D-15-00646_preprint.pdf
ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/POS-2000.pdf
gelfand.umd.edu/papers/PSYS602860_REV.pdf
8ch.net/leftypol/catalog.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

unz.com/article/the-iq-gap-is-no-longer-a-black-and-white-issue/


Without accepting this fact, the IQ approximations of Africans do not make sense in the context of their academic achievements in the US compared to black Americans. For example, when one HBD blogger broke down the IQs of black Americans by state using one of Lynn’s methods for estimating national IQs, he found over 30 states that had black IQ above 89, i.e., higher than the black African immigrant IQ found by Richwine. If these black immigrants really have a representative mean IQ from a normal distribution that is lower than the black mean in 30 whole states, there is no way they would dominate the native black Americans so conspicuously and predictably in all academically elite institutions. The black Caribbean immigrant IQ of 83 (assuming it is represented under “Central America/Carribean”), which is lower than Alabama’s black IQ, is even more implausible in the context of their well-noted achievements. Correcting the different states’ black IQ by subtracting 5 IQ points from each state would still not fix the problem of plausibility: if there is even one state with blacks that are definitely smarter than (or just equal to) the black immigrants, it would be the children of the blacks from that state who would be conspicuously over-represented in those elite programs. There certainly would be no Caribbean names there.

The most definitive proof of Africans’ grossly underestimated genotypic IQ (80 according to Lynn, or 70 according to Jensen and Rushton, et al) has come in recent years from the performance of African school children in the UK. These results sparked instant reactions in the IQ debate world as soon as they started being reported by the news media, with some strong hereditarians suddenly becoming some kind of neo-environmentalists just to explain why white school children were not showing the kind of academic superiority over blacks that they have become accustomed to in the United States (wrong tests, declining white culture, an alleged war on whites, etc – the same kinds of reasons they always dismissed from liberal environmentalists explaining black underachievement in the US).

The first report that caused some consternation in the IQ blogosphere indicated that black African pupils were apparently catching up with British white pupils on their GCSE tests and that in fact, they had already overtaken them at the lower end: the poor black kids were now performing better than poor white kids

See pic. The rest of this thread will be filled with heated arguing but just know that you will literally never be able to convince a Holla Forumsack to abandon racism

this. /thread

Holla Forumsyps deserve only to be ironically gassed

This is seen in the first graph.

what most scholars and bloggers in the IQ world seemed to not know is that by the time these pieces of news were coming out in the media, there were already African nationalities that had overtaken the white average by a significant margin. The reason it seemed that the black Africans were only trying to catch up now was the usual academic tendency of lumping Africans together into one big racial group when other groups were being identified by nationality (e.g. Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, etc rather than “Asian” or “South-East Asian” etc). Grouping Africans into the monolithic “Black African” ethnicity concealed the different experiences of African immigrants from different nations, some of whom had emigrated as refugees from war-torn countries, while others lad left countries that did not speak much English and were thus disadvantaged in the tests. A negative correlation with English as Another Language was evident on both the CAT scores and the GCSE scores.

This is seen in the second graph

To elaborate on the second graph

As the table above shows, some African nationalities, particularly Ghanaians and Nigerians, score way above the England mean (and the white British mean), while others, like the Somalis and Congolese, score way below (but still not as low as the Portuguese immigrants, apparently). The low scoring African groups are the ones that migrated as refugees and/or could not speak English, besides being very poor. Improvements among the Somalians have been impressive, especially due to programs dedicated to teaching them English.
Although the Chinese and Indians are still very conspicuously above even the best African nationalities, their superiority disappears when the Nigerian and other groups are broken down even further according to their different tribal ethnicities. Groups like the famous Igbo tribe, which has contributed much genetically to the African American blacks, are well known to be high academic achievers within Nigeria. In fact, their performance seems to be at least as high as the “model minority” Chinese and Indians in the UK, as seen when some recent African immigrants are divided into languages spoken at home (which also indicates that these are not multigenerational descendants but children of recent immigrants).

(Be free to read the unz article article in full, which debunks the blacks are dumb as a race etc, but I shall continue with other sources)

Nisbett (2012) suggests that high SES individuals are more likely to be able to develop their full biological potential, whereas low SES individuals are likely to be hindered in their development by adverse environmental conditions. The same review also points out that adoption studies generally are biased towards including only high and high middle SES adoptive families, meaning that they will tend to overestimate average genetic effects. They also note that studies of adoption from lower-class homes to middle-class homes have shown that such children experience a 12 - 18 pt gain in IQ relative to children who remain in low SES homes.

A large number of studies have shown that systemically disadvantaged minorities, such as the African American minority of the United States generally perform worse in the educational system and in intelligence tests than the majority groups or less disadvantaged minorities such as immigrant or "voluntary" minorities, as stated by Neisser.

"The differential between the mean intelligence test scores of Blacks and Whites (about one standard deviation, although it may be diminishing) does not result from any obvious biases in test construction and administration, nor does it simply reflect differences in socio-economic status. Explanations based on factors of caste and culture may be appropriate, but so far have little direct empirical support. There is certainly no such support for a genetic interpretation. At present, no one knows what causes this differential."

make a blog and post it also there so it can be handy as a way to link it to the wandering retards who come here.

That being said, if we are going to continue with the whole IQ factor and why blacks as an average tend to perform badly academically…

The explanation of these findings may be that children of caste-like minorities, due to the systemic limitations of their prospects of social advancement, do not have "effort optimism", i.e. they do not have the confidence that acquiring the skills valued by majority society, such as those skills measured by IQ tests, is worthwhile. They may even deliberately reject certain behaviors that are seen as "acting white."

Environmental factors are also why blacks tend to score lower on the iq test. Environmental factors including lead exposure, breast feeding, (as stated by Campbell, 2002) and nutrition (as covered by Ivanovic, 2004 and Salojee and Pettifor, 2001) can significantly affect cognitive development and functioning. As stated by Qian (2005), For iodine deficiency causes a fall, on average, of 12 IQ points.

Such impairments may sometimes be permanent, sometimes be partially or wholly compensated for by later growth. The first two years of life is the critical time for malnutrition, the consequences of which are often irreversible and include poor cognitive development, educability, and future economic productivity. (As covered in The Lancet Series on Maternal and child Undernutrition, 2008)

The African American population of the United States is statistically more likely to be exposed to many detrimental environmental factors such as poorer neighborhoods, schools, nutrition, and prenatal and postnatal health care (Nesbit, 2009 and Cooper 2005).

Mackintosh (2011) points out that for American Blacks infant mortality is about twice as high as for whites, and low birthweight is twice as prevalent. At the same time white mothers are twice as likely to breastfeed their infants, and breastfeeding is highly correlated with IQ for low birthweight infants. In this way a wide number of health related factors that influence IQ are unequally distributed between the two group.

Three other adoption studies found contrary evidence to the Minnesota study, lending support to a mostly environmental hypothesis:

Eyferth (1961) studied the out-of-wedlock children of black and white soldiers stationed in Germany after World War 2 and then raised by white German mothers and found no significant differences.

Tizard et al. (1972) studied black (African and West Indian), white, and mixed-race children raised in British long-stay residential nurseries. Three out of four tests found no significant differences. One test found higher scores for non-whites.

Moore (1986) compared black and mixed-race children adopted by either black or white middle-class families in the United States. Moore observed that 23 black and interracial children raised by white parents had a significantly higher mean score than 23 age-matched children raised by black parents (117 vs 104), and argued that differences in early socialization explained these differences.


Studies have employed different ways of measuring or approximating relative degrees of ancestry from Africa and Europe. One set of studies have used skin color as a measure, and other studies have used blood groups. Loehlin (2000) surveys the literature and argues that the blood groups studies may be seen as providing some support to the genetic hypothesis, even though the correlation between ancestry and IQ was quite low. He finds that studies by Eyferth (1961), Willerman, Naylor & Myrianthopoulos (1970) did not find a correlation between degree of African&/European ancestry and IQ. The latter study did find a difference based on the race of the mother, with children of white mothers with black fathers scoring higher than children of black mothers and white fathers. Loehlin considers that such a finding is compatible with either a genetic or an environmental cause. All in all Loehlin finds admixture studies inconclusive and recommends more research.


Recent reviews by Nisbett et al. (2012b) and Mackintosh (2011) consider that current data does show an average difference in brain size and head-circumference between American Blacks and Whites, but question whether this has any relevance for the IQ gap. Nesbitt et al. argue that crude brain size is unlikely to be a good measure of IQ; for example, brain size also differs between men and women, but without well documented differences in IQ. At the same time newborn Black children have the same average brain size as Whites, suggesting that the difference in average size could be accounted for by differences in postnatal environment. Several factors that reduce brain size have been demonstrated to disproportionately affect Black children (Nisbett 2012)

tl;dr blacks are not subhuman, they are not dumb as a race. Read these.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_inventors_and_scientists en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_African-American_jurists

Do this op. This is really good shit