Your text style immediately revolts me, sorry but it will influence my response so I should disclose it, you sound like an uppity nigger, cuckchan cancer, or a derisive faggot.
Just to let you know firstly, kike immigration was severely limited before the 1880s, with only 250,000 sephardics estimated in total to be in the USA (but probably fewer) until a sudden rise of nationalism in Europe led to an exodus of ashkenazis. It peaked at 2 million yids fleeing to the US by 1924 as the intimidating goyim now launched pogroms on those poor, defenseless Jews. Immigration act of 1924 founded on principles of racial realism and a sort of points system for immigrants, kept them at bay thereafter until a series of executive actions during WW2 and the Nationality Act of 1965 opened us up to all sorts of jewish poz.
You are taking my statement to the extreme. I never stated kikes were barred access. I said a majority of the founding fathers weren't kike sympathizers, which in my view would be a converted jew or an outspoken critic of kikes. Of course that's relative as a kike sympathizer to you may mean any public act of tolerating judaism.
I don't argue that we aren't and haven't been a kike den for quite some time, but you're overplaying their influence in the formative years. Instead you could say the founding fathers had the mercantile class at the forefront when they were planning their system, as shown in their adoption of the East India Tea company's flag. This class likely included residuals of Euro aristocracy, and other trade controllers like pirates, in addition to the jews. Go ahead and look through records from the original states to see what the composition of kikes was in positions of leadership vs. trade.
Back to plebbit faggot. And yes, Benjamin Franklin was one of the first politicians to build a Synagogue in Pennsylvania.
However, I always take my history with a certified kosher label and trust wikipedia with my life. Surely meta-narratives which are favorable to the ruling capital elite will not be deconstructed or censured.
As far as the quoted Franklin image, it's from a man, Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a south Carolina statesman, that was an attendee of the Constitutional Convention, who transcribed the chatter between other statesman. Of course the evidence doesn't exist anymore after it was destroyed in happenstance so the quote can't be considered valid, now can it? Just as the Protocols have been sufficiently debunked there is no way to prove the veracity of the document if the author's are dead and the original copies are deemed fraudulent. The Jefferson quote if you read it plainly, you'll see is not anti-Semitic but rather praising 'god's chosen people'. The George Washington quote is just substituting currency-speculators with jews.
Back to the thread topic now faggots, this isn't about burgers as we're already in decay.