The same Bible says that the days will be every time shorter.
Implying reconquista was something bad and please stop believing that a little branch of american protestants is every christian in the world.
Young Earth creationism isn't Biblical, and really has only existed for about the last 150 years or so basically since Darwin's 'Origin' book gained notoriety.
From Ellis island to christianity.
Yes. But not the idea that the flood was global for the whole planet, but merely universal for all mankind. That is, all humans and the animals they had infected with sin were wiped out by drowning with the exception of Noah and his family, and all the animals God directed in the ark Noah built.
Flood was actually global, it was the end of the last ice age and before that you had ice walls taller than the Everest.
Absolutely. There is literally no Christianity w/o Jesus Christ. As to His existence that's historically irrefutable. As to His Divinity that's obviously a matter of faith for the individual. Only the Holy Spirit can lead you to a Salvation experience, your mind can't. However God wants us to share the Gospel with others so they can apprehend the basic requirement for salvation, namely faith.
Incorrect on all counts. James Ussher, writing in the 17th century (two centuries before Darwin), calculated the time of Creation as around 6pm on October 22, 4004 BC. He wasn't the only one to do this, either: lots of scholars tried, and took it quite seriously, and literally. And while he used some non-Biblical historical information like the reigns of Alexander the Great and Nebuchadnezzar in his calculation, it was almost entirely the Bible and the chronologies listed therein that he used.
Actual days? old days? Btw, one thing are freemason's calculations, other a trend.
So it is Biblical, it dates back farther than 150 years ago, and has nothing to do with Darwin or his Origin of Species.
Already refuted, quoting cause i want to use the Ellis island joke again and for this:
Matthew 13:11 King James Version (KJV)
11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.
he rest of your post is similarly amusing. Please do tell how "Genetics and Archaeology" support the account of the creation of man found in Genesis. Well, one of the accounts. There are two, actually! I'm sure you'll explain that away in the same tiresome fashion as other apologists, though.
Its pretty shocking, sexist and racist, you have two stories, one of the creation of man and another of Adam and Eve, ribs can be easily related to chromosomes, humans lacks a pair compared to other apes and they gave the y chromosome, its pretty shocking once you understand a little about chromosomes, no mayan, egyptian or sumerian text is so graphic.
I saw the genesis of the "flat earth" retardation, it was a fedora meme made to troll christians into thinking that the earth was flat, the problem is that atheists believed that crap and they still believe in that even if you show them when Moses was raised to Heaven and saw a sphere, atheists behave like cucks when their gfs are having sex with other men.