USA NO

White House wants to add new racial category for Middle Eastern people

WASHINGTON — The White House is putting forward a proposal to add a new racial category for people from the Middle East and North Africa under what would be the biggest realignment of federal racial definitions in decades.

If approved, the new designation could appear on census forms in 2020 and could have far-reaching implications for racial identity, anti-discrimination laws and health research.

Under current law, people from the Middle East are considered white, the legacy of century-old court rulings in which Syrian Americans argued that they should not be considered Asian — because that designation would deny them citizenship under the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act. But scholars and community leaders say more and more people with their roots in the Middle East find themselves caught between white, black and Asian classifications that don't fully reflect their identities.

"What it does is it helps these communities feel less invisible," said Helen Samhan of the Arab American Institute, which has been advocating the change for more than 30 years. "It’s a good step, a positive step."

On Friday, the White House Office of Management and Budget advanced the proposal with a notice in the Federal Register, seeking comments on whether to add Middle Eastern and North African as a separate racial or ethnic category, which groups would be included, and what it should be called.

Under the proposal, the new Middle East and North African designation — or MENA, as it's called by population scholars — is broader in concept than Arab (an ethnicity) or Muslim (a religion). It would include anyone from a region of the world stretching from Morocco to Iran, and including Syrian and Coptic Christians, Israeli Jews and other religious minorities.

But the Census Bureau, which has been quietly studying the issue for two years, also has gotten caught up in debates about some groups — such as Turkish, Sudanese and Somali Americans — who aren't included in that category. Those are issues the White House is trying to resolve before adding the box on 2020 census forms.

Adding a box on the census form could have implications beyond racial identity. According to the White House notice, the new data could be used for a wide range of political and policy purposes, including:

• Enforcing the Voting Rights Act and drawing congressional and state legislative district boundaries;

• Establishing federal affirmative action plans and evaluating claims of employment discrimination in employment in the private sector;

• Monitoring discrimination in housing, mortgage lending and credit;

• Enforcing school desegregation policies; and

• Helping minority-owned small businesses get federal grants and loans.

Adding the classification also would help the government and independent scholars understand more about trends in health, employment and education.

"We can't even ask questions like that, because we don't have the data," said Germine Awad, an Egyptian-American and professor of educational psychology at the University of Texas at Austin.

The racial classifications have been unchanged since 1997, and Michigan's congressional delegation has argued that they're due for an update. Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-Mich., said Friday the White House action was good news. Adding a MENA category, she said, would allow many of her Michigan constituents to "accurately identify themselves and access the employment, health, education and representation services that are based on census data.”

There are an estimated 3.6 million Arab-Americans in the United States, but that doesn't include other ethnic groups that could put the total Middle Eastern and North African population above 10 million. According to the Census Bureau's American Community Survey — a survey conducted in between the 10-year census cycle based on a statistical sample — about 1 million people from the region are first-generation immigrants to the United States.

In the 2010 census, many Middle Easterners skipped the question entirely — an action some activists encouraged as a form of silent protest. "Check it right; you ain't white," went one campaign.

"You have individuals within this designation that would consider themselves white, and they certainly have a right to their identity. It’s not about identity in the psychological way. It’s about where would you fit the best on this form," Awad said. "If you talk to anybody at the census, they’ll tell you that their job is not to help anybody with their racial or ethnic identity."

And some, especially in the Muslim-American community, are also concerned about how the data might be used — especially given proposals by Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump for a moratorium on Muslim immigrants and for increased surveillance of Muslim communities.

(1/2)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.fo/7NDMD
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

"It just aids and facilitates the state's ability to know where these communities are in a very specific fashion," said Khalid Beydoun, a law professor at the University of Detroit. "My inclination is to think that individuals who might identify might not check the box for fear of retribution — especially if Trump wins."

But Beydoun, a naturalized citizen with Egyptian and Lebanese parents, said he still supports the proposal as an expression of Middle Eastern identity.

"In the grand scheme of things, it’s really a progressive stride forward," he said. "But in the broader landscape, it’s taking place in the context of greater animus against Arab Americans, and really, Islamophobia."

Comments on the proposal are due in 30 days, making it possible for the Obama administration to enact the change in the last three months of a presidency that has spent considerable effort to be more inclusive of Arab-Americans and other Middle Easterners.

"I think with him being the first African-American president and being an obvious example of making the American fabric more diverse, that this could be great sign of inclusion about what it means to be an American," Awad said.

(2/2)

archive.fo/7NDMD

Too bad there still isn't a separate category for Jews. Also, shouldn't a distinction be made between white Hispanics (AKA Spaniards and Portuguese) and mestizos?

I actually agree with this post.

Middle-Eastern

So it's primarily about (((civil rights)))

This
They're gonna use this to jew people

We need to go comment on this in the positive. Keep it clean and use science in your arguments.

Act like a SJW.

It's a double edged sword but it's a more honest categorization

Exactly, as I posted in the PREVIOUS thread about this.

What, we're not fading out fast enough for them that they've got to fuck things up even more?

Mention something about Jews having more similar DNA to middle easterners than whites also keep mentioning how if Israel is their home land then they must being native to there.

No just be like

It makes a hell of a lot more sense than calling pakis "asians", at the very least.

I support this, we need to quit classifying middle easterners as white since it arbitrarily inflates the white population percentage. Real whites need to see how far we've fallen, how white people are already a minority.

I agree that there should be a Middle Eastern racial category.

The way we have racial designation isn't accurate anyway (true anthropological races are caucasoid, negroud, mongoloid, australoid, capoid, etc), but this new designation will make it so that you don't have Middle Eastern niggers of the sands pretending to be white and skewing white numbers.

You won't have low IQ sand niggers skewing European-American IQ, sand nigger crime skewing white crime and basically every other category in which sand niggers are inferior in (all of them).

You won't have schools that are 70% "white" when in reality, they are like 30% sand nigger and only 40% actual white. This actually hurts sand niggers because it makes them a lot easier to statistically identify when they would otherwise go under the radar.

You would be able to differentiate neighborhoods more easily because they wont look "white", but instead will have 60% sand nigger populations, so there would be a more efficient allocation of police resources when it comes to investigating terrorism and many more positives that come out of this.

This

Bring up how white privlege doesn't help people that whites don't consider white since everyone knows every white person wants to stick a knife in every arab they see all the time

Thats the Brits, and even then Pakis aren't middle eastern

Those are not white. Everything beneath the Rhine is not white.

Caucasoid has caucasian (whites) and caucasoids (aryans, middle easterners, north africans) as subgroups.
Negroid has capoid (below the Congo basin) and congoid (Congo basin and north to the south of the Sahara) as subgroups.

DEUS VULT!

With this, the census will know where they all live.

Not sayin, just sayin.

Actually, I am saying one thing:
RIGHT WING DEATH SQUADS.

...

Will they include Indians?

In some classifications, Capoid (African Bushman) is considered a separate racial category than Negroid due to their vast genetic differences compared to other sub-Saharan Africans. No other group is described as Capoid besides the Khoisan (African Bushman) of Africa.

In any case, the original point is that our racial categories don't make a scientific distinction, only a colloquial one (scientifically, would list Latinos as Mongoloid-Caucasoid hybrids or full Mongoloids/ full Caucasoids depending on level of native admixture. Same for various types of Asians and Pacific Islanders.

Census
Are you white?
How about categories for Celtic, Anglo-saxon and Nordic. People dont even know and when they lump everyone in to one shade theyll never find out either.

I think you mean USA YES. They're doing this so that they can make officially make them a legally protected class just like niggers.

Could be useful to hunt down shitskins when we take control of the government.

Indians and Pakistanis are already classified as South Asian, I think.

REMINDER THAT THE KIKE WHORE IS PLAYING JACKIE KENNEDY, AS A FINAL INSULT TO THEIR HOUSE

The Kennedy's went to shit decades ago
purging the world of their line would be a blessing

wew

This, they will force hiring quotas and such.
I do agree though that this will make it easier to go RWDS in the near future.
One other thing is that Soros was trying to affect the 2020 Census so that they can gerrymander our electoral system to stack the advantage in favor of dems even further.
This could help with that.

Wew what, lad? India is literally "Asia Minor".

*east of "Asia Minor"

Fucking cuckchan faggot.

So they're admitting that Whitey wuz kang?

Pakis, Indians, North Africans, and Middle Easterners should be under one category called "sand nigger". Anything else is misleading.

Americoids aren't actually very closely related to Mongoloids, although Mongoloids are their nearest relatives, there's a genetic ocean between the two groups. Americoids are much more violent and dim-witted.

More data!

Oh fugggggg

Yes, although groups like Hillel are very proud of jewish overrepresentation in college so they collect data for us.

Silly goy

This. They aren't doing this to acknowledge they aren't white. They are doing this so they can make terrorists a protected people.

RELIGION OF PEACE GAIS

terrorists already are a protected people under religion.

They're doing this for big data reasons and for gerry mandering against the white man.

Great, so if action is taken by a white against a filthy migrant for culturally enriching us, it can be considered a hate crime.

They're doing it so muzzies won't be proggromed when they start going ham on whites.