A sane programming language

That's a shitty excuse. God said that he would continue to scatter the people upon the earth. He said nothing of them having one language again.

To be fair, it shows how the libc and the size of the image hurt the startup time, something to consider if your writing a program that would be run repeatedly in a loop (ie.: in a shell loop).

you faggots just never quit do you? you poz up literally every thread that has to do with programming.

Crappy compilation model, tons of undefined behaviour and a pretty horrid syntax for meta programming. Also, it sure as hell isn't easy to learn unless you love said undefined behaviour.

redstone

Show us how easy is to write quicksort in haskell
not that meme 2-liner, but real, iterative in-place quicksort which will have run time and memory footprint comparable to a proper implementation in C

No.

The best option will be a combination of a simple easy to use scripting language where you don't need to care about safety and the like, and a very low level language like C where you have very high level of control over the data and there's no magical mumbo jumbo doing things for you.

There's already tons of options for the simple language such as Python, but there's no very good modern performance language.

It's already there (Python 3), but implementing it in a way which will do fast speed and correctness proving will be unimaginably hard.
And when language shifts the burden of optimization and correctness hints to the user (Rust), it of course makes it less ergonomic.
You can't have both ergonomics and compiler doing maximum grunt work for free, implementation complexity is a major factor too.
It's certainly possible to define an super duper ideal language but it will be almost impossible to implement, so it will be useless ultimately.

Gee, can't argue with that.

AI-assisted compilation?

No
God fucking no
Jesus christ no
Not as much as C
Runtime yes, compile-time you've got to be fucking kidding me