If asset prices fall by just 1% after the Fed raises interest rates, they will become insolvent

In the modern history of the US economy over the past seven decades, the longest period of time the country has gone without a recession was 10 years.

Since the end of World War II there have been 11 recessions in the United States of America, so the average time in between recessions is 6 years and 5 months.

The average length of recession was 336 days; the longest recession in modern history was 18 months in 2008-2009, and the shortest was 6 months in 1980.

And whenever a recession hits, the all-knowing, all-powerful Federal Reserve attempts to stimulate the economy by cutting interest rates, typically multiple times.

The smallest interest rate cut was 2.03% during the 1990-1991 recession.

The largest interest rate cut during a recession was 9.84% during the 1981-1982 recession.

The average interest rate cut during a recession is 4.03% based on sixty years of Federal Reserve data.

In fact in every single recession in modern US history, interest rates were always MUCH lower at the end of the recession than they were at the beginning.

So if historical averages are any indicator, the next recession should begin some time between now and mid-2019, with an interest rate cut of 2% to 4%, presuming it’s just a mild to average recession.

This isn’t some wild fantasy.

Even the government’s own Congressional Budget Office recently revised its projections, stating that America’s prodigious (and rapidly growing) $19.5 trillion national debt “blunts” the prospect for meaningful economic growth.

Now, here’s the problem–

Interest rates right now are at historic lows. The effective Federal Funds Rate as of the first of this month was just 0.29%.

So unless the Fed raises rates by a LOT, and does so VERY quickly, the United States is virtually guaranteed negative interest rates in the next recession.

Negative rates, of course, are almost invariably accompanied by capital controls– legal restrictions to trap savings in a failed financial system.

We’re already seeing early signs of capital controls in Europe and Japan where interest rates are already negative.

European depositors suffer bank withdrawal restrictions, plus there’s strong momentum to ban physical cash (the natural remedy of negative interest rates).

This is just the beginning. And as anyone who has lived under capital controls can attest, they are destructive to your savings and standard of living.

Unfortunately negative interest rates are the most likely course of action.

Because if the Fed actually does start raising interest rates beyond some ceremonial 0.5% to 0.75% range in 2016 or 2017, they risk destabilizing the entre system.

Higher interest rates mean asset prices will fall, including real estate, stocks, and bonds.

That’s a huge problem for the Fed, which owns trillions of dollars worth of bonds and real estate securities.

In addition, the Fed is extremely leveraged, with capital of less than 1% of its total balance sheet.

So if asset prices fall by just 1% after the Fed raises interest rates, they will become insolvent.

It’s hard to even imagine the fallout and consequences of the world’s most important central bank going bust.

Higher rates also risk bankrupting the federal government, which is already borrowing record amounts of money just to pay interest on what they’ve already borrowed.

Plus, higher rates may slow down the US economy where both productivity and GDP growth have ground to a halt, even now when interest rates are at historic lows.

Talk about a rock and a hard place.

If the Fed raises rates significantly they will create all sorts of financial catastrophes, including engineering its own insolvency and stoking a recession that they’re trying to prevent.

But if they don’t raise rates then they’ll be forced to implement negative interest rates in the next recession.

This isn’t some far-fetched prediction, simply a common sense view of publicly available data and modern financial history.

The alternative is to assume that the Fed possesses some magical fairy dust to fix everything without any consequences…

… or that there will never be a recession ever again until the end of time.

This is absurd thinking.

Look- it’s pretty obvious where things are headed. This isn’t a political problem. It’s an arithmetic problem. And the math doesn’t add up.

Other urls found in this thread:

cdfund.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/SDR-Special-aug2016-DEF.pdf
zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-11/us-tax-receipts-have-never-done-without-recession
pdf.wri.org/wri_climate_finance_meeting_special_drawing_rights_feb_2010.pdf
alt-market.com/articles/2931-brexit-global-trigger-event-fake-out-or-something-else
alt-market.com/articles/2982-2016-will-end-with-economic-instability-and-a-trump-presidency
archive.is/iFQ64
archive.is/oH4H6
archive.is/5X4CZ
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

i cant read your formatting

What's with the sage bombs? Bump for interest, no pun intended.

when you refer to the interest rates is this the rates on loans taken out of the reserve or something else? I thought the whole point of usury was to have high interest rates.

Interest rates in this context specifically mean the "Federal Funds Rate". This is the interest rate that banks charge when loaning each other money overnight (they often need to loan each other money overnight to remain solvent).

Firstly, nice dubs.
Secondly, when the US economy is being fucked with in vastly different ways by succeeding governments, democrats wanting mo money fo dem programs, republicans wanting muh free market, it is no real surprise that this happens so often.
Thirdly, and perhaps most important, this is Obama's recession and just like BO did with Bush's recession, Trump is going to have to deal with it. They're holding things together just to dump it on him. He can handle it, but it's an attack vector for them, they'll blame it on his policies or rhetoric or whatever they can.
Fourthly fuck your formatting you retard CIA nigger.

oh so it causes banks to cannibalize each other's assets with only the biggest most Jewish fish in the pond left after the fact?

grudging

bump

for

shitty

formatting

yes it matterssome links would be nice too

What is with the sudden surge of “anons” incapable of formatting their posts properly?

It means that banks can borrow at essentially no cost. But that means Banks make riskier loans to non-banks since they can't make much loaning to each other.

That formatting is fucking terrible to read through. Incredibly annoying jumps between every other sentence, to the point it looks like bait at first glance.

What

the

fuck

are

paragraphs

for

?

Here's an idea of the position the Federal Government is in.

I'll take the numbers to understandable levels but the ratios should be correct.

Imagine you make $60k/yr.

Unfortunately you're spending $90k per year.

You have $1,000,000 in debt, but only pay 1% interest, so you're only paying out $10k in interest per year. The other $80k is expenses (of course you're throwing much of it away by giving it to kikes and niggers).

The smart thing to do would be to cut your spending in half you could slowly start paying off your debt. We know this will never happen, certainly not while politicians are in charge.

If interest rates go up to 6% you'll never be able to pay off your debt even if your expenses go to 0.

Realistically even a rise of 2-3% in interest rates will cause things to spiral out of control and lead to an eventual default. So long as they stay around 1% you can pretend things are fine for years because tacking $30k/yr on to $1 mil is a drop in the bucket.

If Trump's plans work out perfectly and we have some years of 5-10% inflation we could theoretically not have a collapse. However with more of Obama style incompetence we're going to have a default, it's just a matter of when.

a classic

excellent material, but holy shit that formatting is burning my eyes OP

Oh my god that is painful to watch
DOTR

Raise interest rates by 14.88%

watch it all burn

There are so many people that need to be erased

war with Russia seems to be (((their))) way out

Educational and theoretical purposes only.

We shall monitor news sources and look for trending in normie
reporting to determine if we are about to be attacked or even full on invaded. (later highly unlikely)

-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-
Primary threat condition: EMP burst attack.
-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-
EMP burst attack.
EMP burst attack.
EMP burst att….

-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-
Secondary concerns
-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-@-

$$ xfer systems (multiple platforms)

Energy generation (all forms)

Energy DELIVERY (all forms)

Comms and authentication (all forms)

Virus thought injected into US OSINT programs

Virus thought injected into Racial demographics

Political figure character manipulation.

They can go negative.
Please do not put every sentence on a new line.

What if there was another way that would still further their agenda?

cdfund.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/SDR-Special-aug2016-DEF.pdf

Because
>>>/reddit/
isn't a meme for no reason

He did an interview before he was even the nominee saying that "they are going to dump the next recession on the next president"

So he set himself up nicely.

It's obviously going to end with a war to stabilize everything just like what happened with WWII on europe and other parts of the world when US fixed their infrastructures. Just see the tensions we have right now.

Another theory of mine is an overhaul of the financial/economic system due to an ayylmao shit that the government had been hiding for far too long. We are not alone shit and humanity should unite or some shit like that.

tl;dr, what's the gist of this?

super cringe

we told you about capitalism dog

we told you

t.Holla Forums

Negative interest rates don't work and often have the opposite effect. E.g. banks don't want to pass negative rates to depositors in fear they go elsewhere, instead they pass cost of negative rates to people taking out loans, cost of loans goes up instead of down.

...

Didn't read shit but:

are you fucking kidding me? It's practically the same with the FED only the printing house is different. Fiat money all the same.

...

guess again faggot.

the """""""""free""""""""" market would solve this

just remember we told you about it

Reddit formatting should be a ban

This shit has been planned for decades.

Great video, just goes to show how idiots will not hesitate to strongly state their opinion on any topic at all, even the topics they know literally nothing about.

NDB formerly BRICS Development Bank competing with the IMF is likely one of the reasons for WW3.


Or you could just let the banks fail and establish a national bank that issues 1 unit of currency for a defined unit of work.


If it's agitating you this much you might want to get checked for dyslexia.

Hey OP, the US is already in a technical recession, the Fed isn't announcing it yet (they usually wait for 2 quarters of data).

zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-11/us-tax-receipts-have-never-done-without-recession

The recession is already here, and the Fed has both hands tied behind their backs because they're afraid of throwing the election to Trump. After the election it's going to be financial chaos, regardless of who wins.

If Trump gets in and things go to shit, at least Trump will use it as an excuse to eliminate the Fed and rebuild. But it's going to be a shitstorm for at least a year or two for the average person. Niggers will be rioting, Jews will be scheming, Trump is going to have a major challenge keeping things together without some Judeo-Marxist coup taking place.

If Hillary gets in, everyone is going to the fucking gulag, you better get ready to resist your enslavement.

Surely it couldn't just be an eye rape format, surely? It must be me experiencing dyslexia

even leftypol isnt this stupid

...

Maybe they're super redpilled. There should be more of these videos for 2016

well… it's a good thing it's only a monetary union and not a political union like the EU… oh

The crisis was caused by central management propping up the market instead of letting it collapse. It's the death of neo-liberal Keynesian economics, not of capitalism.

Unfortunately, you leftards are too stupid to realize this and will just shout your leftist slogans "huurrr, crapitalism is bad, join the communist revolution or else".

I'm still trying to figure their game here, and whether or not Trump is the real deal.

It seems Hillary is almost to lame to be legit. Would the NWO really stake their entire empire on some dying bitch????

If Trump is for real, that means he has real backing in the Government or else where. All these leaks would be from NSA or CIA types.

...

You niggers ready for WW3 because this is the kind of shit that leads to it. We are basically going to say, "Come get your money, nerds".

We were fine with Glass-Steagal for how long? Trump's republican platform includes reinstating Glass-Steagal.

...

I'm sure they'd never do anything like that.

pdf.wri.org/wri_climate_finance_meeting_special_drawing_rights_feb_2010.pdf

tempted me to post this.

fixed

In the modern history of the US economy over the past seven decades, the longest period of time the country has gone without a recession was 10 years. Since the end of World War II there have been 11 recessions in the United States of America, so the average time in between recessions is 6 years and 5 months. The average length of recession was 336 days; the longest recession in modern history was 18 months in 2008-2009, and the shortest was 6 months in 1980. And whenever a recession hits, the all-knowing, all-powerful Federal Reserve attempts to stimulate the economy by cutting interest rates, typically multiple times.

The smallest interest rate cut was 2.03% during the 1990-1991 recession.
The largest interest rate cut during a recession was 9.84% during the 1981-1982 recession.
The average interest rate cut during a recession is 4.03% based on sixty years of Federal Reserve data.

In fact in every single recession in modern US history, interest rates were always MUCH lower at the end of the recession than they were at the beginning. So if historical averages are any indicator, the next recession should begin some time between now and mid-2019, with an interest rate cut of 2% to 4%, presuming it’s just a mild to average recession. This isn’t some wild fantasy. Even the government’s own Congressional Budget Office recently revised its projections, stating that America’s prodigious (and rapidly growing) $19.5 trillion national debt “blunts” the prospect for meaningful economic growth. Now, here’s the problem– Interest rates right now are at historic lows. The effective Federal Funds Rate as of the first of this month was just 0.29%. So unless the Fed raises rates by a LOT, and does so VERY quickly, the United States is virtually guaranteed negative interest rates in the next recession. Negative rates, of course, are almost invariably accompanied by capital controls– legal restrictions to trap savings in a failed financial system. We’re already seeing early signs of capital controls in Europe and Japan where interest rates are already negative. European depositors suffer bank withdrawal restrictions, plus there’s strong momentum to ban physical cash (the natural remedy of negative interest rates).

This is just the beginning. And as anyone who has lived under capital controls can attest, they are destructive to your savings and standard of living. Unfortunately negative interest rates are the most likely course of action. Because if the Fed actually does start raising interest rates beyond some ceremonial 0.5% to 0.75% range in 2016 or 2017, they risk destabilizing the entre system. Higher interest rates mean asset prices will fall, including real estate, stocks, and bonds. That’s a huge problem for the Fed, which owns trillions of dollars worth of bonds and real estate securities. In addition, the Fed is extremely leveraged, with capital of less than 1% of its total balance sheet. So if asset prices fall by just 1% after the Fed raises interest rates, they will become insolvent. It’s hard to even imagine the fallout and consequences of the world’s most important central bank going bust. Higher rates also risk bankrupting the federal government, which is already borrowing record amounts of money just to pay interest on what they’ve already borrowed. Plus, higher rates may slow down the US economy where both productivity and GDP growth have ground to a halt, even now when interest rates are at historic lows.

Talk about a rock and a hard place. If the Fed raises rates significantly they will create all sorts of financial catastrophes, including engineering its own insolvency and stoking a recession that they’re trying to prevent. But if they don’t raise rates then they’ll be forced to implement negative interest rates in the next recession. This isn’t some far-fetched prediction, simply a common sense view of publicly available data and modern financial history. The alternative is to assume that the Fed possesses some magical fairy dust to fix everything without any consequences… or that there will never be a recession ever again until the end of time. This is absurd thinking.

Look- it’s pretty obvious where things are headed. This isn’t a political problem. It’s an arithmetic problem. And the math doesn’t add up.

You do understand that the GlassSteagal policy is far from the "free market" memes right? its keynesiansim

This guy predicted a Brexit vote win and Trump presidency for exactly these reasons.

alt-market.com/articles/2931-brexit-global-trigger-event-fake-out-or-something-else
alt-market.com/articles/2982-2016-will-end-with-economic-instability-and-a-trump-presidency

When did I imply I bought into free market memes?

I don't really look at IDs 2bh

Oh you're a moron, got it.

So, when does it all come down?
When does the "bubble" pop
when should I send a flash drive full of bitcoin to a swiss PO box I may or may not have

This post is about critically important shit. If he was shilling I would be inclined to agree with you, but a potential economic collapse is more important than OP being a potential Redditor.

Nope, its centralized interest with currency. A central bank takes a cut off the top for loans current reserve, give an indefinite amount of time where all money cycles through, eventually, the bank will either hold all of the cash, or the cash will become more worthless to maintain the currency level currently in circulation.

We could do the same thing with "I'm entitled to one meal" IOUs and end up with the same result. Don't believe me? Let the center allow someone to be lent a ration book minus a ration a week they don't give a complete ration book back before then. Eventually, you'll have people come and get a loan of 30 ration books, which they pay back in 120 weeks, essentially paying back the debt with 40 ration books. The catch is, the food supply doesn't change to compensate, its made to match the amount of mouths in our socialist utopia, 'equality ya know.' Each ration, is therefore cut.

Maybe next time, this African Communist utopia could expel the food-jews and let the natives do better. Never mind, the food-jews were expelled last year and the natives are barely getting by on capitalist corn surplus.

As I recall a Russian think-tank predicted mid 2017.
That's looking fairly accurate the way things are going.

implying they will be worth anything after the EMPs ruin the blockchains and the war does massive damage to the interwebs infrastructure.

Do you have the predict? I only have these.

This. Trump won't magically fix things in 4 or 8 years, but he will set America up with the ability to fix it within 20 if he kicks the kikes out and disbands the whole fed, giving us a new currency based on precious metals and productivity.


MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

2 problems with this. 1. Trump winning doesn't benefit them at all, infact it would destroy all of their plans because then he could undue everything they ever did and bring the military to bear against them if they resist and 2. He has already named the Jew user, In an Arizona rally I heard him name Soros infront of thousands of people, he is the real deal and that's why things have accelerated to point that they have, even if they take Syria and crash our economy it won't stop him because he knows they are responsible.

I want you to imagine him addressing the entire nation on the day of the collapse we've all been talking about for decades red pilling the whole country on the Jews. Because that's how it will happen.

So here is what I don't understand about this "problem". Aren't fed interest rates just Jews jewing? Aren't the recessions caused by them creeping their parasitic central bank interest rates up, causing every dollar in existence to be paid back plus some? Wouldn't it be in the interest of the people to have interest free currency? A currency in which debts could actually be paid back? Why not keep the fed rate at 0% forever come what may? Why should the central banks charge interest in the first place? Why should (((they))) be allowed to manipulate our currency's value by fluctuating interest rates? Why should (((they))) be able to cause booms and subsequent busts in which they can buy assets for pennies on the dollar? No negative interest rates. No positive ones either. Fees for services.

MAKE USURY HISTORY

Because free money plus fractional reserve lending causes hyper inflation

That's a fantasy, but realisitcally he could at least get us to a break even point in 4 years and climbing out of the hole in 8.

I highly doubt he'd even try to disband the fed or act against the kikes.

Bailing out failed banks with taxpayer money is 100% socialist policy. From each according to his ability (the middle class), to each according to his needs (failing banks). This is exactly what you want.

Trust me on this, I have meaningful sources:

People will start shooting in 2 years.

Full war in 3.

If that is true, why are in inflation rates relatively low right now? If it is being hidden, how?

What, idiot? Is everyone from Holla Forums as stupid as you are?

Not if wages don't rise with an increase of the money supply. The money is just sitting with the banks. Wages aren't going up at all.

...

Banks don't have needs, they aren't volk.

Capitalism and communism are equally trash, any system defined in materialist terms is doomed to failure.

economists at work

the inflation is contained in the stocks, productivity, wages, jobs, manufacturing, etc is all down but stocks are high. That is definition inflation, rising prices with less product.

You just don't get it.

This is the formatting of the future.

The internet has evolved past you, Mr. FourChan.

Ok. So then we still have the problem of wall st. parasitism. So how do we shift that "free money" into something productive, rather than letting it fall into the casino banking system? Reinstating glass steagal would be a step in the right direction. What about public sector non profit banks giving loans that benefit people and production? The Fed shouldn't charge interest but bankers shouldn't be allowed to abuse the money supply. Is there some sort of final solution that could be offered to this equation?

Nationalism may have been an issue they saw coming years back.

Remember, they have Google algorithms that let them predict mass movements, they may need to crush the Nationalism idea once and for all before full NWO.

Our only play is full on Nationalism at all cost, if that is the case. No ideological prisoners.

I've seen Trump doing the 666 hands a lot, and he is up the ass with Jews, but I don't see how anything he is doing is "for the Jews" unless he is a legit plant. But I don't see that in his background at all.

There is really no way to tell, all we can do is go thru it.

IT'S FORMATTING FOR MOBILE DEVICES.

FUCK you whiney cuck s are stupid as shot if you couldn't figure that out.

Let me word this abortion better.
Fractional reserve lending is of course just a type of loan, free money + free loans makes hyper inflation only in certain fields that take advantage of low interest rates. The free money is used by the government and in the stock market primarily, this spikes stock prices as more investment is occurring. The spike is independent of actual production, its merely people juggling whatever looks the best in a pile of shit. The increase of stock prices has happened despite no real economic recovery which means it just inflation, the same product at a higher price. The government uses the loans to… pay off earlier loans and fund social programs like student loans and welfare as well as defense. The free money (or cheap low interest money) pumped into student loans caused hyper inflation in the university market. Hyper inflation is not occurring in goods and wages because companies are aware we are in a time of no (or negative even)growth and are not expanding their operations and as such aren't taking out loans to buy equipment and so on.

I would sure hate to think that anyone here is saying that we need the fed to charge interest on our currency.

the final solution is to let it all burn

That's still yesterday's format, grandpa. Proper formatting is similar to that, but more lines should be joined into mini-paragraphs in proportion to the overall size of the post. This creates a vertical spread symmetry which aligns the post properly with the flow of the digital dragon lines.

Secondary to this is the cascade effect in which the number of lines in a block becomes smaller as the post goes on.

Wait until those kikes think up adding interest on interest so the longer people take to pay will increase their interest.

Why are you browsing an autism convention on a borderline 90's style website using a smartphone?

Personally, I am taking advantage of 0% credit cards by only using them for investment in the creation of goods that easily net 200%+ profits before being charged interest. I would never speculate on borrowed money. There should be laws against it. I know plebs are using the same cards to make purchases they cannot afford and banks are using it for speculation. It has been great for me and I'd like to see a sustainable banking system where people like myself don't have to pay for productive capital.

not just any autism convention, a burman cloth weaving autism convention.

obviously for short term capital it would great to move to a fixed cost loan system, the real problem with getting rid of interest is things like 25year mortgages that are impossible to calculate a fair but profitable fixed cost on due to the volatility of such a thing (of course the answer would be to return to a society where people could just pay for things with their own cash). Credit cards shouldn't be available to non business entities.

Though i do admit my student debt is shit. I took on school loans made available shortly after Obama took office. College loans wouldn't be so bad if college was reasonably priced and the education received was not being dragged down to the lowest common denominator.

But would there be volatility in housing and long term debt without fluctuating fed rates and speculative bubbles? I feel like fee based banking would solve that. I'm lucky enough to have got a flat rate non compounded home loan through my in laws. That way I pay them back just to inherit it anyhow. I'm hoping I can pass that along to my son and keep my family free from interest slavery for generations to come.

Fuck off with the plebbit formatting.


THANK YOU user

Hope y'all got your gold, silver and lead.

volatility exists in any market for the simple reason that human reasoning is flawed and we will make mistakes. Sometimes enough people make the same mistake and big problems arise. To an extent we can eliminate big fluctuations by removing jew/bank/government fuckery but it can only ever be as good as the decisions we humans make it. Sorry if thats a little vague, but the point is that the average mortgage is over such a long period of time, even with the best system of economics we could come up with we'd still have to account for 2-4 recessions in the period of the loan.


The problem here is that college loans make college unreasonably priced. There are only so many seats in a class and when you multiply the prospective number of students by 1000 shits going to be whack. Student loans enable more students to get schooling which means less supply to go around. One measure to help ward against this is to cut funding for all but the most deserving and necessary (no loans for any social science and such), requiring down payments (to ensure someone is capable of working and generating income before you give them a truckload of cash) and defunding schools that churn out worthless sacks of shit.

The most I could find off hand were the news articles from 2013 referencing the draft bill to ban the USD in Russia.
archive.is/iFQ64

From the bill:

The BRICS initiative was never about destroying the USD even though it put pressure on the USD. It's primary goal is to replace the IMF. This idea appears to have originated with and was heavily shilled by the LarouchePAC group

Much of what people have been trying to prevent (censorship etc.) would be rolled out during the war. You can't say no, it's wartime. So long as Trump is perfectly legitimate and manages to get in without an issue this will likely be avoided. Of course martial law could just as easily be called if they riot in the wake of Trumps victory. That would mean Obama staying in power and everything it entails.

Internationally USA will ultimately survive but if war erupts it's gonna take a heavy beating a curb stomping almost. In the event of major war, Russian tactical nuke doctrine treats them like high yield conventional weapons. All those forces and equipment stockpiles being moved right near Russia won't be happy.
Missile defense shields are primarily geared toward long range ICBM style missiles and are generally useless against the low flying missiles used to carry tactical nukes. For those the best chance you have are CIWS but with a nuclear payload getting in range of a CIWS unit would likely be close enough to the target to achieve an effective kill. Combine it with an EMP first strike or Russia's demonstrated electronic warfare capabilities and you have to wonder what was the point in deploying those systems in the first place. Hopefully you've got something tricky up your sleeve.

Then there's China's EMP first strike policy.
archive.is/oH4H6
And Russia's EMP/electronic warfare capabilities.
archive.is/5X4CZ

In an EMP first strike situation ICBMs will be sitting ducks in their silos and subs won't have any orders to launch being sent to them.
But how does an EMP missile get in undetected? Space is neutral, just like Cambodia was neutral.
Hopefully this all misdirected autism.

The good news is that the momentum for political correctness is in the toilet worldwide.

Pretty sure this is part of stagflation.


No. Housing would be relatively flat at 3x the average annual wage (what it was before all this shit began decades ago) thanks to no speculation in the housing market. Long term debt would be virtually non-existent as it is created as a direct result of price inflation due to speculative activity and excessive issuance of loans (including student loans).
i.e. housing price bubbles creating ballooning prices up to and over 10x the average annual income for a standard suburban home. This creates massive debt and places an unnecessary strain on the economy by tying up all that currency in the banking sector.

Another issue with colleges is the fact they accept students from all over the world, students that are generally paying with cash. A large number of them come from China as it's considered highly prestigious to have an American degree. The vast majority of those students are paying cold hard cash, and they pay more to the colleges because they're foreign residents. That means colleges, a lot of which are struggling to pay the bills, decide to accept a ton of foreign students because they pay more, and that has a big impact on class sizes. It creates an over demand for the utility, and as you said, that means less supply to go around.

In addition, banks are making money on both sides of the deal with respect to colleges. When a college wants to expand, they take out a loan to fund the expansion and pay it back over many years. So the bank collects interest from the college directly there. Then, the banks also fund student loans, and those loans go to the college, and the money is used to pay off the college's loans. Although they're not necessarily the same banks on both sides, the point is that you're extracting interest from the students twice in reality because they are ultimately the ones paying all the bills.

Its been apparent since the 08/09 slump that they would have to come up with something new to "solve" the problem. We have a similar problem in bongland. We tripled national debt to support the banks and now we are in so much debt, you cant even pretend itll be paid back.

As for what they actually will do, i cant see how they can avoid letting some banks fail. The facade is crumbling and one more hit from another recession will smash it.

Great. Couple this with King Nigger debt machine and things have never been more ripe for a mass culling.

Don't worry, goyim. More QE will fix this.

MOTHER

FUCKING

REDDIT

NIGGERS

RUIN

EVERY

POST

KYS

U

POS

D Y S L E X I A

...

...

I'm gonna comment before I read this.
& just say…

I don't believe a Central Bank can become "insolvent", unless the borrowing institution - In this case, The US Government - defaults on their payments.

In other words. The Fed can literally print currency. It literally has been printing trillions.
The Fed will never go bankrupt as long as it can print money.

After Reading it.

The Fed is not going to go bust.
The Fed is not going to raise rates above 1.25%.

But yes…
In the event of another panic / crash, the Government WILL institute CAPITAL CONTROLS, which effectively steals your money and traps it in the Stock-Ponzi-Jew

mfw

let me try to fix this shit

In the modern history of the US economy over the past seven decades, the longest period of time the country has gone without a recession was 10 years.

Since the end of World War II there have been 11 recessions in the United States of America, so the average time in between recessions is 6 years and 5 months.
The average length of recession was 336 days; the longest recession in modern history was 18 months in 2008-2009, and the shortest was 6 months in 1980.
And whenever a recession hits, the all-knowing, all-powerful Federal Reserve attempts to stimulate the economy by cutting interest rates, typically multiple times.

The smallest interest rate cut was 2.03% during the 1990-1991 recession.
The largest interest rate cut during a recession was 9.84% during the 1981-1982 recession.
The average interest rate cut during a recession is 4.03% based on sixty years of Federal Reserve data.

In fact in every single recession in modern US history, interest rates were always MUCH lower at the end of the recession than they were at the beginning.
So if historical averages are any indicator, the next recession should begin some time between now and mid-2019, with an interest rate cut of 2% to 4%, presuming it’s just a mild to average recession.

This isn’t some wild fantasy.

Even the government’s own Congressional Budget Office recently revised its projections, stating that America’s prodigious (and rapidly growing) $19.5 trillion national debt “blunts” the prospect for meaningful economic growth.

Now, here’s the problem–
Interest rates right now are at historic lows. The effective Federal Funds Rate as of the first of this month was just 0.29%.
So unless the Fed raises rates by a LOT, and does so VERY quickly, the United States is virtually guaranteed negative interest rates in the next recession.
Negative rates, of course, are almost invariably accompanied by capital controls– legal restrictions to trap savings in a failed financial system.
We’re already seeing early signs of capital controls in Europe and Japan where interest rates are already negative.

European depositors suffer bank withdrawal restrictions, plus there’s strong momentum to ban physical cash (the natural remedy of negative interest rates).
This is just the beginning. And as anyone who has lived under capital controls can attest, they are destructive to your savings and standard of living.
Unfortunately negative interest rates are the most likely course of action.
Because if the Fed actually does start raising interest rates beyond some ceremonial 0.5% to 0.75% range in 2016 or 2017, they risk destabilizing the entre system.
Higher interest rates mean asset prices will fall, including real estate, stocks, and bonds.

That’s a huge problem for the Fed, which owns trillions of dollars worth of bonds and real estate securities.
In addition, the Fed is extremely leveraged, with capital of less than 1% of its total balance sheet.
So if asset prices fall by just 1% after the Fed raises interest rates, they will become insolvent.

It’s hard to even imagine the fallout and consequences of the world’s most important central bank going bust.
Higher rates also risk bankrupting the federal government, which is already borrowing record amounts of money just to pay interest on what they’ve already borrowed.
Plus, higher rates may slow down the US economy where both productivity and GDP growth have ground to a halt, even now when interest rates are at historic lows.
Talk about a rock and a hard place.

If the Fed raises rates significantly they will create all sorts of financial catastrophes, including engineering its own insolvency and stoking a recession that they’re trying to prevent.
But if they don’t raise rates then they’ll be forced to implement negative interest rates in the next recession.

This isn’t some far-fetched prediction, simply a common sense view of publicly available data and modern financial history.
The alternative is to assume that the Fed possesses some magical fairy dust to fix everything without any consequences…
… or that there will never be a recession ever again until the end of time.
This is absurd thinking.

tl;dr Look- it’s pretty obvious where things are headed. This isn’t a political problem. It’s an arithmetic problem. And the math doesn’t add up.

Pretty good work fam

This strikes me as a bunch of hubris. Liberals are too chickenshit most of the time to even face reality, how the fuck can you code algorithms to predict it when you spend a sizeable portion of your life denying it. I expect their prediction models are heavily slanted towards pie-in-the-sky wishful thinking horseshit than in no way accurately reflects reality.

I mean, look at how blindsided all of them were/are about Trump.

If they really want a glimpse at the future, they should hire a bunch of coders from Holla Forums.

Nigger, they've been trying to kill it since at least ww2, probably before. There has not been a day in the past 70 years where nationalism hasn't been attacked by any possible angle.

However, in the words of mister filtershillter, we are breaking the conditioning.

Learn to fucking type, nigger.

I'm torn between saging and derailing this thread with gore because of that painfully obvious double spacing and cute reddit sarcasm and bumping because the topic is good.

Why are you doing this to me OP? All you had to do was lurk more.

To stay on topic I'll add pic related. Spoiler because usually these stats throw anons in a tizzy and we don't need a flame war about how fucking debt work right now.

That wall of text very clearly wasn't written on a mobile device.

He also double spaces after

every

single

fucking

sentence

even

if

it

only

consists

of

only

four

words