Blameshifting: Obama tells DiCaprio climate change ‘contributed’ to the Syrian civil war
archive.is
Al Gore to campaign for Clinton, hoping to galvanize young voters on climate change
archive.is
ON THE MOVE AGAIN. BEWARE
Blake Nelson
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
archive.is
consortiumnews.com
semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com
palestinechronicle.com
xaameriki.wordpress.com
haaretz.com
haaretz.com
timesofisrael.com
israeltoday.co.il
foreignpolicy.com
i24news.tv
jpost.com
english.al-akhbar.com
news.antiwar.com
thenational.ae
ibtimes.com
businessinsider.com
presstv.ir
telegraph.co.uk
belfasttelegraph.co.uk
theguardian.com
dw.de
breitbart.com
rt.com
guardianlv.com
businessinsider.com
reuters.com
youtube.com
archive.is
archive.is
youtu.be
geocraft.com
twitter.com
William Rogers
Al Gore was an out of touch foggy twenty years ago, his attempts to connect with todays youfs will hopefully get him shot.
Jeremiah Rivera
Reminder that AGW doesn’t exist.
Yes, climate changes. But there is absolutely no evidence that humans are having any impact on the climate whatsoever. In order to establish an actual human impact in a statistically significant way, you must show a modern trend that deviates from a baseline of appropriate duration. Because geologic processes spanning millions of years are responsible for tremendous amounts of variation in global temperatures, an appropriate baseline must necessarily include millions of years of data to account for this variation. Not only are we not in a period of “record high temperatures,” we are in one of the coldest periods in the past 65 million years.
1
There is absolutely no evidence that current temperatures are outside the trend of totally natural variation, and all attempts to make it appear that way are misleading you by truncating the data to a sample of statistically insignificant size. And then they apply their misleading, exponential curve-fits and smoothing effects for dramatic purposes.
The earth had had ice caps for maybe about half of the time over the past 500 million years. The picture shows rapid periods of melting and re-glaciation over periods of a few thousand years. There is nothing abnormal about current melting rates.
2
The sea level has been rising at a very steady and predictable rate over the past 8-10,000 years since the emergence from the last major glacial period with no deviation at all from this trend even as humans began industrializing. When environmentalists show you graphs going back 50-100 years of rising sea level data, they omit the fact that this is both on-trend and completely expected.
3
We have no actual data that indicates that climate is in any way behaving abnormally, much less due to human impact. The only thing we have is a hypothesis that CO2 affects climate in a meaningful way, which is what climatologists attempt to model. But those models make terrible predictions.
4
If your hypothesis consistently churns out inaccurate predictions–no matter how many times you tweak the knobs and change little fudge-factors here and there–then your hypothesis is shit and must be discarded. Morons who believe in this garbage have no understanding of basic epistemology, let alone science–and that goes for the so-called “scientists” peddling this mystical bullshit.
CO2 is only hypothesized to have the impact on global climate that the alarmists claim. But this has failed to be demonstrated in two major (but related) ways. First, carbon dioxide levels are currently being measured at several hundred ppm higher than measured from ice core samples. Now, it must also be cautioned that you can’t necessarily compare these two sets of data because they represent two different methods of measurement, and have other potential biases. However, even assuming that its true that CO2 levels are much higher–and that they’re caused by human activity–current temperatures are not deviating from the normal historical trends in line with CO2.
A doubling of preindustrial CO2, absent any feedbacks, would result in a maximum forcing of +1.2 ºC. Everyone agrees on this point because it’s a simple computation given the physical characteristics of CO2 which is well mixed in the atmosphere.
Actual warming, again absent feedbacks, would likely be much less due to bandwidth overlap between CO2 and H2O, something that we understand but find difficult to model (H2O levels vary dramatically day to day and even hour to hour with regional weather).
Ayden Martin
5
The General Circulation Models, and the IPCC, predict 2-8 ºC of warming because AGW theory assumes a positive H2O feedback. They assume that if CO2 causes a little warming, the atmosphere will hold more water vapor which will lead to a lot of warming until a new equilibrium point is reached.
The warming predictions cover such a large range because everyone assumes a different average feedback rate. Again, modeling H2O in the atmosphere is extremely difficult because it varies so much with weather.
Every GCM based on this assumption has failed to model temperatures for the past 15 years. They are all trending too high. In the late 1990s, the modelers themselves stated that if they missed their predictions for more then a decade that would falsify AGW theory.
There is no data to suggest a positive H2O feedback either now or in Earth’s past. Indeed, we cannot model some periods in Earth’s history with an assumed positive H2O feedback. It would appear that Earth’s atmosphere is remarkably adept at dampening forcings from either direction and does not amplify them.
If there is no positive H2O feedback, we literally have nothing to worry about. The average climate change believer knows none of this. Politicians, citizens, activists, and surprisingly even a lot of scientists are literally ignorant of the theory and the math. In their mind, it’s simply “CO2 = bad” and “experts say we’re warming faster then ever.” The more you know.
6
Not only are current temperatures not outside the normal trend, we are in one of the coldest periods in the past 65 million years. Also, current temperatures (at the peak of the current 100ky cycle) are actually lower than past 100ky cycles, meaning that we are expected to either warm further just by way of natural variation or we are in an unusually cold peak period.
Second, climate models that use CO2 as a major driver for global temperatures are not producing accurate predictions for global temperatures. This is at least good initial evidence that the alarmist stance on the CO2/climate hypothesis is false. Notice that current temperatures are in no way deviating from normal trends. and that the two “scary red dots” are not observed data, but “predictions.” But, as we already know, the observed data is wildly lower than the predictions. These people are completely full of shit.
Owen Flores
How many hundreds of people does Hilldog have running her campaign again?
They couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery.
Gore is a fucking embarrassment.
David Sanders
Here is a good video on where it came from by the lifetime meteorologist who founded the weather network:
youtube.com
Highlight is where Revel, who linked carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas; and then everyone else ran with it; gives speech at Bohemian grove about how he disagrees with global warming and dies of a (((heart attack))).
Leo Gutierrez
Yea, but you try to explain that shit to a normie and they just scream and yell and call you an anti-intellectual.
Christian James
Didn't someone say a few months ago that climate change causes/caused terrorism?
Jaxon Johnson
They are also trying to change the meaning again, to be talking about warming over 100k years. Fucking lunacy.
Levi Murphy
Sanders said it in one of the debates and it's been festering meme for a while, but hasn't caught on, for mysterious reasons.
Asher Price
==Listen up Goys Zionists and Killary dindu nuffin==.
When backed to the corner distract people with a Red Herring.
You could imagine what kind of a shitshow would be if a redpilled Celeb spreads something like DNC leaks or Open Society leaks.
Obongo is revving up the bullshit engines.
Jayden Hall
It’s funny how meteorologists (people with an actual job) are almost universally against the AGW scam while it’s climatologists (who live on grant money) who are for it…
Jeremiah Hall
So lack of rain did, but our abandoning Iraq and funding of Al Nusra didn't. Got it.
Connor Davis
Reminder that climate change was responsible for Hitler, goyim.
Lucas Ramirez
Now this g-y gets it.
Easton Wilson
kek
Al Gore is about the only politician more out of touch with the youth than Hillary Clinton.
As said he was a woody, boring douche bag twenty years ago.
BTW this is the same Al Gore who has been accused by multiple masseuses of sexual aggression and harassment. I think he got sued by one of them IIRC. Not that makes adifference with Slick Willies past not seeming to matter with the SJW's
Owen Myers
No, Africa is just full of niggers.
Leo Hughes
jude:
TOP KEK
Kevin Harris
...
Isaac Smith
So that's who trained, armed, and financed those islamic militants and send them over the border into Syria.
Drought.
I never knew exceptionally dry weather could be so competent.
Jaxon Martinez
Yeah, must've been the weather.
National Cyber Security Center Employee Suspended After ‘Revealing’ that “ISIS Is A Zionist Plot”archive.is
The Silence of the Israelis on ISIS
consortiumnews.com
Israel and the Origins of the Islamic State
semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com
Fighting ‘Islamic State’ is Not the Israeli Priority
palestinechronicle.com
Why Does ISIS only Fight Israel's Enemies? And why do they have so much in Common?
xaameriki.wordpress.com
———————————————————————————————————–
haaretz.com
UN reveals Israeli Links with Syrian Rebels
haaretz.com
UN reports Israeli Support for Syria Rebels
www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2014/1207/UN-reports-Israeli-support-for-Syria-rebels
IDF Medics seen Treating Syrian Rebels in New Video
timesofisrael.com
Syrian Rebels thank Netanyahu for Israel's Compassion
israeltoday.co.il
Exclusive: Israel is Tending to Wounded Syrian Rebels
foreignpolicy.com
Moderate Syrian Rebels say they Protect Israeli Border
i24news.tv
New UN Report reveals Collaboration between Israel and Syrian Rebels
jpost.com
Israeli Analyst confirms Link between Israel, “Moderate” Syrian Rebels
english.al-akhbar.com
Israeli DM: We’re aiding Syrian Rebels to keep Al-Qaeda away from Border
news.antiwar.com
Revealed: How Syrian Rebels seek Medical help from an Unlikely Source in Israel
thenational.ae
Syrian General accuses Israel of Collaborating with ISIS, Al Qaeda-Linked Rebels
ibtimes.com
Israel is Cautiously Arming Syria's Rebels — and has a Fragile Unspoken Truce with an Al Qaeda Affiliate
businessinsider.com
presstv.ir
telegraph.co.uk
belfasttelegraph.co.uk
theguardian.com
dw.de
breitbart.com
rt.com
guardianlv.com
businessinsider.com
Proof of US training ISIS - reuters.com
jpost.com
haaretz.com
youtube.com
No other explanation.
Brody Wright
...
Brandon Peterson
This is all very useful information, thank you for your well thought out post. Move to the bottom of this comment for my question, since I kind of blab on in the middle of it
I am beginning to get into the climate red-pill. I appreciate science, and because of this appreciation, I always assumed that whatever the scientists that were put on TV said was correct.
Thankfully, I've changed from this, but I do have a question to ask, not out of doubt or skepticism that the entire "man-made climate change" thing is a myth of politicized science, but out of complete lack of understanding and sheer curiosity:
I understand the temperature thing, but what about Ocean acidification? Does anyone have any information that disproves, or, at the very least, provides logical skepticism/goes against the grain of the Al Gore-esque narrative of man made destruction?
With my limited understanding on the subject right now, I know the theory goes: rising CO2 in the atmosphere leads to the lowering PH, or acidification, of the oceans waters, which is, according to this theory, destroying coral, which would have disastrous implications.
Is this where the man-made destruction of the environment has its strongest point? Or is this another form of politicized science and "correlation does not equal causation." If so…what is causing coral to die right now/ocean acidification to increase?
Of course, I will begin to do my own research on this, but I'm only asking because you seem to have already acquired a pretty extensive knowledge on this, and I also just wanted to open this up to other people who want to research as well.
Joseph Murphy
What the fuck is this reddit copypasta cancer in my thread?
Also bump for newfags learning about the climate change lie.
Leo Kelly
FUCKING GLOBAL WARMING I KNEW IT
Ian Nelson
Carbon dioxide, when dissolved in water, creates carbonic acid. This is why your soda tastes acidic. It's literally the same principle.
Whether CO2 causes significant warming or not, the fact that it lowers the pH of water is an unarguable fact. It's a simple chemical reaction that you can literally test in your kitchen with a glass of water, a straw, and a pH strip.
Adam Watson
GLOBAL WARMING CAUSES PORN HUB TO LOAD SLOWER GOYIM!!!! VOTE HILLARY
Robert Anderson
Al Gore is 100% correct about anthropocentric climate change and the far-reaching effects of it.
He's a stooge if he thinks a bought-and-paid-for candidate like Clinton will do anything to upset her oil tycoon benefactors.
Sometimes the prevailing narrative on Holla Forums is dead wrong, and this is one of those times. Go ahead, call me a "goy" or a "shill" but you're just digging your own graves if you can't accept learning new things.
John Anderson
It doesn't cause it, but making a place like the middle east even more dry and inhospitable than it currently is leads to people getting desperate when there's no food or water, which makes them susceptible to radicals promising comfort in exchange for unquestioning loyalty.
Jackson Thompson
I looked up reporting on the studies cited by Obama. Basically they say that the drought caused Syrian farmers to move to Syrian cities, which led to social tensions that eventually led to war.
This is what leftists actually believe.
Sources:
archive.is
Owen Reed
Hang yourself.
David Ortiz
if you're not a shill you're potato
go look through climategate emails and tell me it isn't a bunch of SJW true-believer manipulation
Bentley Taylor
What kills me is this: completely unrelated to whether or not climate change is real, liberals ACTUALLY BELIEVE Hillary will do jack fucking shit about it.
Eli Wright
Reported.
Reported. You have no argument.
Jeremiah Kelly
Riiiiiiiiiiiiigght. You keep funding and arming ISIS, Obama baby.
The Jewish sell out who tax dodged just to sell his shitty network for shekels and whored out his daughter to some gook because he had shekeled?
Al Gore is nothing more than another political opportunist trying to make a quick buck.
Jayden Howard
if you're not a shill you're potato
go look through climategate emails and tell me it isn't a bunch of SJW true-believer manipulation
Gavin Perry
This is a debate where science gets drowned out by opinion. If you try to make a definitive claim, besides "not enough data" you're part of the problem. Humans definitely changed co2 levels, that's all that's known for sure.
Julian Bailey
Al Gore was wrong about NAFTA too.
Parker Parker
There's lots of them. Great link. I didn't know Al Gore got a D in his global warming course and that the polar bears are doing ok.
Jonathan Clark
Is there some reason to believe H2O in the atmosphere has a different emissivity or radiation exposure than water in the ocean?
Also why couldn't we model latitudinal sections of earth with a p-v/t-v diagram? With the mixture of ocean and partial pressure vapor, wouldn't that mean the heat would go into Gibbs free energy, which would mean the temp should stay the same?
Bentley Walker
For what? Bringing unwelcome viewpoints into your "safe space"?
Logan Martin
It gets drowned out by opinion because accepting mankind's role in climate change steps on the toes of the oil & coal lobby, who spend millions on propaganda in order to sow confusion in the public realm, stopping any meaningful improvement from happening,
But I'm sure George Soros and Al gore are the real rich villains, not like the benevolent BP, right?
Jose Jones
For bringing shit quality posting.
Ian Reed
First they claimed man-made-warming since that proved to be false they lowered and widened it to “climate-change”. Well, climate change all the times, like weather, even when there was no human life form on earth.
The only thing constantly drowned at us is “climate change, the world is going under, if you don't give me your shekel”, and Gore took your shekel away with his company selling “climate indulgences”.
Angel Murphy
The droughts in Syria are probably due to it being run by mudshits who let their girlfriends consume all the fauna and destroy the ecosystem. Everywhere muds exist, they turn shit into a desert with their short term r-selected thinking.
Elijah Murphy
I haven't been pilled regarding climate change. What is the other to say?
Evan Green
Okay, so nothing. You are not allowed to speak if you do not protect God's green Earth. You're here to protect it along with your fellow man.
Adrian Jenkins
Yeah it was totally climate change and not the Obama administration arming and funding a bunch of mercenaries and jihadists to disrupt a pipeline under construction and oust the Assad regime in furtherance of the Yinon plan.
Charles Hernandez
Climate - and local climate change, obviously - is only a catalyst of stupidity.
Breaking dams and nations is of no use. AT ALL. Also obvious.
Adam Miller
In the beginning of 1990, Turkey began to fill the reservoir behind the giant Ataturk dam in the southeastern part of the country. The dam sits on the Euphrates river that also supplies Syria and Iraq with a large part of its water supply.
“This is the first time in history that in less than 30 years, the Middle East doubled its population. It was between 1950 and 1980,” said Arnon Soffer, a demographer and the head of research at the University of Haifa and Israel’s National Defense College.
“If that’s not tragic enough, from 1980 to 2010 – another 30 years – this crazy area doubled itself again,” Soffer added.
Christopher Brooks
MUH CLIMATE CHANGE
HUMANS ARE CHANGING CLIMATE, TOTALLY UNLIKE EVERY OTHER LIFEFORM ON THE PLANET WHICH HAS ZERO EFFECT ON CLIMATE
IF NOT FOR HUMANS CLIMATE WOULD BE IN A STATE OF UNCHANGING PERFECT EQUILIBRIUM
Luis Nelson
For the first image, it’s extremely important to have the error bars.
geocraft.com
Michael Collins
Reported. You have no argument. You have no facts. You have no truth. You’re a paid shill. There is no AGW.
Sebastian Price
Wade 'GET machine' Davis has just cucked you out of your GET
Not even Trump can save you now wew
Nicholas Perez
lol