What do you goys think of my beliefs

So Social Democracy with alt-right approved spooks?

Sounds like pic related.

People can think, you can't criminalize thought you utter retards but you can limit propagation of their ideals with force

Alt-righters are too decadent in themselves and will accept any counter-signaling from otherwise abhorrent people. The movement is a joke

How can you ensure that the bureaucrats administering these businesses do so in the name of the public good, rather than go Stalinmode? Direct elections for top leadership? Elections within your legislative body? What mechanism would there be for accountability? What say would the workers in these businesses have?

Free enterprise meaning the right to voluntary discretionary use of one's own labor, and collaboration with others? Wage labor itself is theft and it's existence would attest to coercive material conditions.

You fucking what, mate? This is a slur I've only ever heard come out of people who have no clue what they're talking about.

M8. Morality policing isn't your prerogative. BLM and SJWism aren't destructive because they have morals beyond simple survival values, but because they undertake to impose these values on society at large violently and without regard to the human, material and cultural cost.

I don't know even how "democratic" my state would be if the electoral college was outlawed altogether in favor of Monarchist rule

Tankies might be pleased, but I'd rather keep government smaller.

"Free enterprise" would look entirely different without capitalists exploiting surplus labor, so it's hard to tell if there'd even be a point.

Banning opinions you don't like is itself criminal.

Oxymoron.

Basing society off of a piece of paper is as idealist as it gets.

Besides the socialist elements would remain intact

exchange economy will always be flawed and manifest crisis
workers will always get paid less than what is produced overall
debt or trade surplus will always be needed to maintain capital accumulation

Technically it has validity: it means to apply the scientific method in a way that does not make any sense out of belief that it is the only way to derive any sort of useful knowledge. The kind of thing you hear from a 17 year old that follows Dawkins on Twitter.

You heard me, faggot. It's heresy. I'm a Christian

you cannot get rid of/criminalize movements and at the same time keep constitutional liberties and keep things like free speech in tact

you have to pick one and stick with it for better or for worse

Rolled 64, 16, 53, 82, 48, 23, 65, 49, 88, 68, 46, 14, 68, 81 = 765 (14d88)Noice.

He said non imperialist with worker control faggot

...

No thanks.

Businesses wouldn't even bother and would move overseas if at the drop of a hat their entire industry can be taken.

That would be touch, a hybrid model would be needed, workers really can't run the entire system, there needs to be a management class that is regulated.

Bad idea, the best idea is to ensure children are protected from harmful social agendas like Critical Theory, Moral Relativism and other monstrosities.

A military is only needed when there is a potential threat, it is all dependent on where you are on the map. A powerful military creates a powerful civilian military complex which easily influences government. Traditionally militaries were kept small except in times of crises, as governments understood the problems of having a bunch of guys with swords sitting around bored, and the powerful businessmen whose wealth relys on making more swords.

Good luck with that. Thats why you make a constitution, because if you don't write it down the legal system will re-interpret words and noble goals into nothingess.

...

It wouldn't be social democracy because there would be a dissolution of obligatory referendums. The leader would only be able to make the decisions

hi ahmed

Fuck off kike

You hit the memes way too hard, bud.
Do you actually think faggots want to go around, knock on doors, and spread Xyr's Gospel? No, because they'd rather be left alone than have some condescending authority figure tell them what they can and can't do with their bodies.

You are either
A: a polyp using shit tier bait
B: a retard who has no fucking clue what leftism is

You guys sure have assrash

1. nationalized? No thanks
2. wait, do workers or the state own means of production?
3. I really see no problem with tolerance of LGBTWTFBBQ people, women and ethnic minorities
What is this?
4. standing armies are a means of oppression, foreign or domestic. I'd rather have a small, highly trained self defense force backed by a reserve/militia
5. but which would be disregarded?

How would a gift or command economy be better or even achievable?

"I see no problem tolerating x" it's not intolerance of women, blacks or homosexuality. It's the intolerance against globalist capitalist exploitation by (((them)))

...

Thanks for the (You) and the useless greentext I guess.

Let's face it, the majority are too dumb to make their own decisions, and when you bring race and gender into the equation it just makes things worse. Let's just cut off all the corners and ban voting nationwide

You'd be the first I'd gulag. Consider it an honor

4. standing armies are a means of oppression, foreign or domestic. I'd rather have a small, highly trained self defense force backed by a reserve/militia

This is something I'd actually take into consideration. At least one good thing came out of this thread

I already work so your gulaging would be redundant.

Nice lack of argument, though.

Ok.

eer .. NO?
So, you want to give them power by making them matter.. Ye.. Go to gulag for a couple of years…

WHY HAVE "powerful military" IF IT'S NOT IMPERIALISTIC???

Oh, hello 'Murica.

1

2

3

4

5

sounds like you're reactionary

You almost had everything right until here, despite the shitposting flag.
It can be argued, and often is by our local anarkids but context is important here, like when we look at events like the American and French Revolution such that a militia or vanguard would be necessary and contingent.

I was referring to the constitutional fetishism

:^)

go away strawmanning tankie autist

Not everything is a fetish. "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar."

...

"Sometimes a cigar is just a big brown dick" - George Carlin

"go away strawmanning tankie autist"

Carlin the cuck :v)

Sounds like reactionary nationalist bullshit with some token "left" policies.

In the Marxist context, "fetishization" means imbuing objects or concepts with social power. It's a comparison to shamanistic religions that used "fetishes", objects that supposedly contained spiritual or divine powers, in their practices and rituals. Marx had fun comparing the worship of objects in shamanistic cultures and capitalist ideology.

...