Zuckerberg: Musk is an ‘Irresponsible Naysayer’ Over AI Claim

It's not going to happen anytime soon, but to say that we can't bridge the gap from a narrow intelligence to general is essentially arguing that general intelligence cannot exist outside the biological realm. It's just a stupid bet to make.
Artificial narrow intelligence is the equivalent to an ant, and certainly exists.

Also, an apt analogy

No, he's like those fucking religious idiots that destroyed mechanical equipment in the 1800s because they were too fucking backwards to understand anything.

We have fearmongering like this all the time.
2000 is gonna ruin all our computers!!!
2012 the apocalypse is gonna happen!!!
AI is gonna overtake the world and we're all gonna die!!!

Musk understands it fine, it's you and other morons that don't understand artificial general intelligence.
He's not talking about your silly little neural nets, which is probably what pompous redditors like you are using to try and dismiss his argument. He's talking about TRUE AI. Not ants, he's talking about real, general intelligence that can improve upon itself.

This is how I know you're a troll.
I had to do work with researchers on this AI shit.
If you knew the state of how things really were instead of living in your anime, you'd be a lot more pessimistic about it.

When people talk about AI, what they really mean is things like the "AI" in a $700 phone that detects speech directed at it and uploads it to a server farm for recognition and looking up responses in a big hashtable so it can deliver condescending text-to-speech replies in a sultry female voice in realtime, or 3-ton asphalt roombas that have to navigate from point A to point B without splattering the people/cargo inside, or this wacky zany image generator google made that makes fractal dog JPEGs that scare small children and those with the mind of one, or making Room 641A more efficient at detecting key phrases in everything you type to rape and murder the liberty the founding fathers bestowed upon you.

Actual AI that makes you stop and ask "what is a man?" is not going to happen this century. You can't profit by creating sentience; the objective so far is to strip it from the cattle buying these products so they become dependent on them in the first place.

This is probably a very interesting topic, but I can't be bothered to read something that is so poorly formatted.

It's autogenerated blogspam formatted for reddit, just like the other thread directing people to the same site with the same template thumbnail.

Can add OP to the list of worthless automated bullshit in I guess

Zuckerberg is an irresponsible yessayer.

I think its likely that the feds have a couple of engineers on their payroll who would point out how dangerous and unfeasible the whole idea is.

Speaking of a gap, how feasible is it to network a vast swarm of ANIs into forming a collective AGI? The idea would be that the ANIs are tasked with learning how to route data among their peers, as well as its own specifically assigned functions.